Search

In present study, I proposed the science discipline, network criminology. Network criminology roots in criminology and network science, which focuses on network analysis of criminal networks. It uses the theory and methodology of network science to analyze, predict and control criminal patterns and behavior. The criminal network refers to a criminal group, a terrorism network, etc. Network criminology aims to understand topological structure, organization, function, identification, and control, etc., of criminal networks. Meanwhile, I defined the aims, scope, theory and methodology of network criminology.

"The relationship between Digital Humanities and individual humanities disciplines is difficult to define given the uncertainties surrounding the definition of Digital Humanities itself. An examination of coverage within Digital Humanities journals narrows the range but at the same time emphasizes that, while the focus of Digital Humanities might be textual, not all textually-oriented disciplines are equally represented. Trending terms also seem to suggest that Digital Humanities is more of a label of convenience, even for those disciplines most closely associated with Digital Humanities. From an archaeological perspective, a relationship between Digital Archaeology and Digital Humanities is largely absent and the evidence suggests that each is peripheral with respect to the other. Reasons for this situation are discussed, and the spatial expertise of Digital Archaeology is reviewed in relation to Digital Humanities concerns regarding the use of GIS. The conclusion is that a closer relationship is possible, and indeed desirable, but that a direct conversation between Digital Humanities, Digital Archaeology and humanities geographers needs to be established." (author's abstract)