Search

Substance abuse and obesity are health disparities that may afflict Native Americans more than some other ethnic groups. One theoretical assumption concerning Native people is that the long history of dependence on foraging and subsistence agriculture may have led to selective enrichment of traits that improve genetic fitness, so called 'thrifty' or 'fat sparing' genes. We have speculated that this same selective pressure may have enriched for genetic variants that increase the risk for consumption of alcohol and drugs of abuse. Here, we report the results of a genome scan that compared findings for two consumption phenotypes: 'any drug dependence and/or regular tobacco use' and body mass index (BMI) in southwest California (SWC) Indian families. Variance component analyses from SOLAR were used to generate log of the odds ratio (LOD) scores. Evidence for linkage was found on chromosome 6 for both the 'any drug' (LOD score = 3.3) and BMI (LOD score = 2.3) phenotypes. Bivariate analyses of the two phenotypes revealed a combined LOD score of 4.1 at that location. Additional loci on chromosomes 6, 15, 16 and 21 were found for the 'any drug' phenotype, and on chromosomes 8, 16 and 18 for BMI (LOD scores ranged between 1.2 and 2.3). These results provide suggestive evidence for linkage for substance abuse and BMI in this Mission Indian population and, furthermore, provide preliminary data suggesting that 'consumption phenotypes' may share some genetic determinants.

Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a neurodegenerative disease with early symptoms of personality change and/or language disorder. Approximately 40% of individuals with FTD have a family history of dementia; however, in our experience, less than 10% have clear autosomal dominant inheritance. Mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene have been reported in up to 50% of hereditary cases, but are unusual except in families with more than 3 individuals with FTD. The genetics of FTD is complicated by clinical heterogeneity, variable expression, phenocopies, misdiagnoses, and lost family histories. The objective of this paper is to enable physicians to recognize hereditary patterns and genetic concerns of FTD families and to understand genetic counseling strategies., Review Summary: The complexity of FTD genetics and genetic counseling are illustrated using 4 case histories. Case 1 demonstrates the difficulty obtaining a reliable FTD family history. Case 2 illustrates how psychiatric phenocopies can make family linkage studies difficult. The lack of genotype and phenotype correlation and issues of predictive genetic testing within FTD families are the subject of case 3, and case 4 shows how normal aging language difficulties and cognitive changes can be misinterpreted when a family history of dementia is present., Conclusions: Physicians seeing patients with possible FTD should be aware of the risk of a genetic etiology. A 3-generation family history should be obtained with attention to neurologic, psychiatric, and behavioral symptoms. Variable expression and phenocopies are confounding factors when assessing a possible genetic etiology. Referral of the patient and family for genetic counseling is recommended.

Background: Frontotemporal dementia (FTD) is a clinically heterogeneous condition that can be associated with clinical manifestations of an extrapyramidal disorder or motor neuron disease. A range of histologic patterns has been described in patients with FTD. The most common familial form of this condition is caused by mutations in the microtubule-associated protein tau gene (MAP tau) and is associated with neuronal or glial tau inclusions., Objectives: To determine the clinical, anatomic, and pathological features of San Francisco family A and to map the mutation responsible for disease in this family., Design: A systematic clinical, neuropsychologic, neuroimaging, and chromosome segregation analysis of San Francisco family A was performed. A pathological and biochemical assessment of a family member was made., Setting: Family study., Patients: San Francisco family A, with FTD, variable extrapyramidal symptoms, and prominent motor neuron disease. Afflicted family members do not have a MAP tau coding or splice regulatory sequence mutation, and the MAP tau is genetically excluded., Main Outcome Measures: Comparison of clinical, neuropsychologic, neuroimaging, and linkage findings of San Francisco family A with other familial forms of FTD and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS)., Results: The most probable location for the mutation responsible for this condition is on chromosome arm 17q, distal to the MAP tau. All previously identified susceptibility loci for FTD and ALS are excluded. Autopsy findings from an afflicted family member show distinctive tau and alpha-synuclein inclusions. Another unique feature is that the insoluble tau protein consists predominantly of the 4R/0N isoform., Conclusion: The condition affecting members of San Francisco family A is clinically, pathologically, and genetically distinct from previous familial forms of FTD and ALS.

This article describes the ongoing collaborative effort of six research teams to operationalize and execute an integrative approach to the study of gene x environment interactions in the development of tobacco dependence. At the core of the project is a longitudinal investigation of social and behavioral risk factors for tobacco use in individuals who were, on average, 13 years of age at intake and for whom smoking outcomes extending from early adolescence to young adulthood have been characterized previously (current average age of the cohort is 29 years). The conceptual framework for the integrative approach and the longitudinal investigation on which the study is based is presented. A description is also provided of the methods used to: (a) recruit participants and families to provide DNA samples and information on tobacco use; (b) assess participants for relevant tobacco-related phenotypes including smoking history, current use of tobacco, and nicotine metabolism; (c) assess the quality of the DNA samples collected from participants for genome-wide scanning and candidate gene analysis; (d) examine several research questions concerning the role of genetic and environmental factors in the onset and maintenance of tobacco use; and (e) ensure adherence to local and federal guidelines for ethical and legal investigations of genotypic associations with tobacco-related phenotypes in families. This investigation is unique among ongoing studies of the genetics of tobacco dependence in the extent to which equal importance has been assigned to both phenotypic and genotypic measurements.

Background: A subset of familial cases (FTDP-17) of frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are caused by mutations in the tau gene. The role of tau gene mutations and haplotypes in sporadic FTD and the functional consequences of tau polymorphisms are unknown., Objectives: To investigate (1) the frequency of known FTDP-17 mutations in familial and sporadic FTD and compare these results with previous studies; (2) whether the tau H1 haplotype is associated with FTD; and (3) the functional effect of intronic tau sequence variations., Patients and Methods: Patients with familial and sporadic FTD were screened for mutations in the microtubule-binding region of tau. The frequencies of tau haplotypes and genotypes were compared between patients with FTD and control subjects. We analyzed the splicing effect of novel intronic polymorphisms associated with FTD., Results: The P301L mutation was detected in 11% of familial FTD cases. The H1 haplotype was not overrepresented in patients with FTD, but the P301L mutation appeared on the background of the H2 tau haplotype. We identified 4 novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in intron 9 and a 9-base pair deletion in intron 4A. A C-to-T transition 177 base pairs upstream from exon 10 was significantly increased in patients with FTD compared with controls. Direct analysis of brain tissue from a patient with this variant showed an increase in exon 10-containing tau transcripts., Conclusions: Sequence variations in intronic or regulatory regions of tau may have previously unrecognized consequences leading to tau dysfunction and neurodegeneration.