Search

The salIR and salM genes of Streptomyces albus G specify the SalGI (SalI) restriction enzyme and its cognate methyltransferase, respectively. These enzymes are responsible for restriction and modification of bacteriophages. Some phages carry genes that interfere with SalI-specific modification. The sal genes have been cloned in a Streptomyces host-vector system. Use of the cloned DNA as a hybridization probe reveals that sal mutants frequently arise from transposition of a DNA segment of approx. 1 kb into the sal genes. Some, but not all, other bacteria that produce SalGI isoschizomers contain nucleotide sequences that hybridize with sal DNA.

DNA methylation in Escherichia coli plays a role in many key cellular processes, including DNA replication, repair, restriction, and transcription. However, several mutant bacterial strains exist which are deficient in DNA methylase activities. Thus, it has been suggested that methylation produced by the dam (DNA adenine methylase) gene is required for the viability of E. coli and that dam- strains still produce low levels of methylation. Current experimental methods are not sensitive enough to detect a few potentially essential methylated sites per genome. Here we describe a method for the detection of N6-methyladenine at specific sites with a sensitivity of one site in more than 10 megabases. We show that methylation produced by both the dam and hsd (EcoK) genes is not required for the growth of E. coli and identify the site of EcoK modification. Minor adaptations of the technique should enable the identification of other rare DNA modifications.

The sequences coding for DNA[cytosine-N4]methyltransferases MvaI (from Micrococcus varians RFL19) and Cfr9I (from Citrobacter freundii RFL9) have been determined. The predicted methylases are proteins of 454 and 300 amino acids, respectively. Primary structure comparison of M.Cfr9I and another m4C-forming methylase, M.Pvu II, revealed extended regions of homology. The sequence comparison of the three DNA[cytosine-N4]-methylases using originally developed software revealed two conserved patterns, DPF-GSGT and TSPPY, which were found similar also to those of adenine and DNA[cytosine-C5]-methylases. These data provided a basis for global alignment and classification of DNA-methylase sequences. Structural considerations led us to suggest that the first region could be the binding site of AdoMet, while the second is thought to be directly involved in the modification of the exocyclic amino group.

Bacteriophage T2 codes for a DNA-(adenine-N6)methyltransferase (Dam), which is able to methylate both cytosine- and hydroxymethylcytosine-containing DNAs to a greater extent than the corresponding methyltransferase encoded by bacteriophage T4. We have cloned and sequenced the T2 dam gene and compared it with the T4 dam gene. In the Dam coding region, there are 22 nucleotide differences, 4 of which result in three coding differences (2 are in the same codon). Two of the amino acid alterations are located in a region of homology that is shared by T2 and T4 Dam, Escherichia coli Dam, and the modification enzyme of Streptococcus pneumoniae, all of which methylate the sequence 5' GATC 3'. The T2 dam and T4 dam promoters are not identical and appear to have slightly different efficiencies; when fused to the E. coli lacZ gene, the T4 promoter produces about twofold more beta-galactosidase activity than does the T2 promoter. In our first attempt to isolate T2 dam, a truncated gene was cloned on a 1.67-kilobase XbaI fragment. This construct produces a chimeric protein composed of the first 163 amino acids of T2 Dam followed by 83 amino acids coded by the pUC18 vector. Surprisingly, the chimera has Dam activity, but only on cytosine-containing DNA. Genetic and physical analyses place the T2 dam gene at the same respective map location as the T4 dam gene. However, relative to T4, T2 contains an insertion of 536 base pairs 5' to the dam gene. Southern blot hybridization and computer analysis failed to reveal any homology between this insert and either T4 or E. coli DNA.

A functional bacteriophage T4 dam+ gene, which specifies a DNA [adenine-N6]methyltransferase (Dam), was cloned on a 1.8-kb HindIII fragment [Schlagman and Hattman, Gene 22 (1983) 139-156]. Sequence analysis [Macdonald and Mosig, EMBO J. 3 (1984) 2863-2871] revealed two overlapping in-phase open reading frames (ORFs). The 5' proximal ORF initiates translation at an AUG and encodes a 30-kDa polypeptide, whereas the downstream ORF initiates translation at a GUG and encodes a 26-kDa polypeptide. Analysis of BAL 31 deletions in our original dam+ clone has verified that at least one of these overlapping ORFs, in fact, encodes T4 Dam. To investigate where T4 Dam translation is initiated, we have constructed plasmids in which a tac or lambda PL promoter is placed 5' to either the longer ORF or just the shorter ORF. Only clones which contain a promoter in front of the longer ORF produce active T4 Dam. This indicates that the 26-kDa polypeptide alone cannot be T4 Dam. Additional experiments suggest that only the 30-kDa polypeptide is required for enzyme activity and that the shorter ORF is not translated in plasmid-carrying cells. We also present evidence that T4 Dam is capable of methylating 5'-GATC-3', GATm5C, and GAThmC sequences; non-canonical sites (e.g., GACC) are also methylated, but much less efficiently.

Methyltransferase genes from the FnuDI, NaeI, NcoI, and XbaI restriction-modification systems have been isolated in Escherichia coli by 'shot-gun' cloning bacterial DNA fragments into plasmid vectors and selecting for protectively modified molecules that resist digestion by the corresponding restriction endonuclease.

RsrI DNA methyltransferase (M-RsrI) from Rhodobacter sphaeroides has been purified to homogeneity, and its gene cloned and sequenced. This enzyme catalyzes methylation of the same central adenine residue in the duplex recognition sequence d(GAATTC) as does M-EcoRI. The reduced and denatured molecular weight of the RsrI methyltransferase (MTase) is 33,600 Da. A fragment of R. sphaeroides chromosomal DNA exhibited M.RsrI activity in E. coli and was used to sequence the rsrIM gene. The deduced amino acid sequence of M.RsrI shows partial homology to those of the type II adenine MTases HinfI and DpnA and N4-cytosine MTases BamHI and PvuII, and to the type III adenine MTases EcoP1 and EcoP15. In contrast to their corresponding isoschizomeric endonucleases, the deduced amino acid sequences of the RsrI and EcoRI MTases show very little homology. Either the EcoRI and RsrI restriction-modification systems assembled independently from closely related endonuclease and more distantly related MTase genes, or the MTase genes diverged more than their partner endonuclease genes. The rsrIM gene sequence has also been determined by Stephenson and Greene (Nucl. Acids Res. (1989) 17, this issue).

We describe the isolation of a strain of Escherichia coli bearing a deletion/insertion (i.e., a substitution mutation) in the dam gene (dam-16). The mutagenesis protocol used should be applicable to any cloned non-essential gene of E. coli. The substitution mutation confers resistance to kanamycin and can easily be transferred to other strains by standard genetic techniques. The amount of Dam methyltransferase (MTase) in dam-16 strains as determined either in vitro or in vivo is below the level of detection. We conclude that the Dam MTase is not required for viability of E. coli.

We have dissected the cloned PstI M and R genes to make DNA hybridization probes spanning most of the sequence. These subclones, and also the intact sequence, were used to search for nucleic acid homology by Southern blot in the DNA from twelve organisms which produce PstI isoschizomers. One of these probes, a 206-bp fragment from the N-terminal domain of the endonuclease, showed significant hybridisation in four strains (Escherichia coli strains RFL48, RFL49 and RFL83, and Streptomyces albus P). No significant hybridisation was detected with other parts of the PstI sequences. We have used computer similarity searches to look for homology between the PstI proteins and the known sequences of other type-II systems that recognise different sites. We postulate a possible recognition domain within the M.PstI methyltransferase based on similarity to the M.PaeR7 and M.TaqI methyltransferases.