Search

Since the introduction of linac radiosurgery in October 1994, we have treated 27 patients with 36 lesions. We treated nine AVM, 12 metastatic brain tumors, two malignant lymphomas, one anaplastic astrocytoma, two meningiomas, and one brain tumor of unknown pathology. In the follow-up examinations at least five months after treatment, the local control rate was 83% for the metastatic tumors, and two malignant lymphomas disappeared completely. In addition, satisfactory results have been obtained with AVM and other brain tumors without any side effects. In comparison with gamma-knife radiosurgery, linac radiosurgery has some disadvantages such as longer treatment time and cumbersome accuracy control, but if accuracy control is performed periodically, accuracies of 1 mm or less can be obtained. There is some strengths of linac radiosurgery as follow. 1) The acquisition cost is relatively low. 2) Dose distribution are equivalent to gamma-knife. 3) There is no field size limitation. 4) There is great flexibility in beam delivery and linac systems. Radiosurgery using linear accelerators seems to become widely accepted in the future.

Purpose: To develop a method of measuring locations of the center of dose in stereotactic radiotherapy relative to the center of the target, and thereby obtain a test of the accuracy of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT)., Methods and Materials: An insert was mounted in an SRT collimator on a 6 MV linear accelerator to provide a photon beam approximately 1 mm in diameter at isocenter, and a method of measuring radiation center coordinates of arced SRT beams. To simulate a small intracranial target, two halves of a Barium paste column were embedded in two adjacent slabs of a humanoid phantom. A film was placed between the slabs to image the radiation relative to the target center. A surgical head ring and computerized tomography (CT) localizer were attached to the phantom and CT scans were obtained. The scans were entered in a three-dimensional computerized treatment-planning system and radiation isocenter coordinates determined by iteratively moving the 90% isodose surface center of arced beam dose distributions to coincide with the target center. The phantom was bolted to an SRT floorstand with isocenter coordinates obtained from the treatment plan, and then irradiated in two sets of experiments. The first set applied five 1 mm noncoplanar arced beams with and without offsets of the planned coordinates in the transverse plane. The second set applied one large transverse arc coplanar to the film with and without offsets in the craniocaudal direction. Irradiations with coordinate offsets tested the sensitivity of the method. Films were developed and digitized with a high resolution film scanner to measure the location of the radiation relative to the target center., Results and Conclusion: The radiation center was found from 0.0 to 0.3 mm of the target center, within requirements of our clinical quality assurance program. The measurement and evaluation of coincidence of radiation and target centers are, thus, proposed as elements of radiosurgery facility acceptance and annual quality assurance.

An alternative technology for performing interstitial intracranial radiosurgery is presented. Treatments are performed intraoperatively using a stereotactically mounted, miniature X-ray device. A concentrated, spherical pattern of X-rays is generated about the tip of a needle-like probe, which is inserted into the site of the lesion allowing the absorbed dose to healthy tissue to be minimized. A description of the device is given and results of investigations into the operating characteristics discussed.

Quality assurance methods used in association with radiosurgery must include all aspects of the radiosurgery process: visualization and localization of the target, treatment and dose planning and dose delivery. Presented here is a quality assurance method that utilizes an anthromorphic head phantom and a micro-ionization chamber to demonstrate precise target localization and accurate dose delivery. This micro-ionization chamber method offers an immediate readout which is both accurate and reproducible. Additionally, this method allows unlimited repetition of the dose measurement process without repeated radiographic localization studies as is necessary with the conventional methods of TLD, film, and Fricke gels. The method and techniques presented can be used in the acceptance testing and routine quality assurance of both linac-based and Gamma Knife radiosurgery units.

A miniature, battery operated 40 kV x-ray device has been developed for the interstitial treatment of small tumors ( < 3 cm diam) in humans. X rays are emitted from the tip of a 10 cm long, 3 mm diameter probe that is stereotactically inserted into the tumor. The beam, characterized by half-value layer (HVL), spectrum analysis, and isodose contours, behaves essentially as a point isotropic source with an effective energy of 20 keV at a depth of 10 mm in water. The absolute output from the device was measured using a parallel plate ionization chamber, modified with a platinum aperture. The dose rate in water determined from these chamber measurements was found to be nominally 150 cGy/min at a distance of 10 mm for a beam current of 40 microA and voltage of 40 kV. The dose in water falls off approximately as the third power of the distance. To date, 14 patients have been treated with this device in a phase I clinical trial.

Background: The system SRS 200 for the stereotactic convergent beam irradiation described in this paper has a stereotactic floor stand, which allows the high precision rotation of a secondary collimator around an isocenter. This system is used since 1991 at the University Hospital of Tübingen for the treatment of patients with solitary brain metastases, acoustic neurinomas and arteriovenous malformations., Patients and Methods: The attainable accuracy of the mechanics and dosimetry was studied within the scope of extensive quality assurance measures during its installation and before each patients' irradiation. The individual treatment steps from radiotherapy planning to irradiation were evaluated by means of a specially developed head phantom. Since the installation of the SRS 200 a total of 50 patients (21 solitary brain metastases, 12 acoustic neurinomas, 17 arteriovenous malformations) has been treated with the system., Results: With 0.3 mm +/- 0.2 mm an excellent accuracy of the target point transfer and isocenter stability during irradiation was attained. The difference between calculated dose and dosimetric control measurements was smaller than 3%. The physical accuracy, however, is limited by the imaging resolution (CT and digital subtraction angiography). Of the patients 15% with solitary brain metastases developed complete remission, 20% partial remission and with 50% no further neurological deterioration was observed. Imaging revealed for 88% of the patients a reduced uptake of contrast medium or a regression of the tumor size. Six patients with acoustic neurinoma had anacusis already before radiotherapy. Regarding the other patients in the follow-up, hearing improved in 1 patient, 1 patient showed hearing deterioration, and all other patients hearing remained constant. MR and CT imaging revealed in 10 patients with acoustic neurinoma a reduced uptake of contrast medium and in 1 patient a tumor diminution. From the patients with arteriovenous malformation only 4 have been followed for more than 2 years after treatment. Therefore, statements about the rate of obliteration are not possible yet. Concerning pretherapeutic symptoms (headache 22%, convulsion 28%, neurological deficits 11%) 8/17 (47%) of the arteriovenous malformation patients showed an improvement, in 8 patients clinical findings were unchanged and 1 patient showed neurological deterioration., Conclusion: The stereotactic system SRS 200 allows an excellent mechanical accuracy in the radiosurgery with linear accelerators.

We distributed a questionnaire on radiosurgery patterns of practice to members of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS). Responses were obtained from physicians at 52 facilities, who had treated more than 13,000 patients. Most respondents were found to work within a multidisciplinary team, and averaged 17.3 specialist-hours devoted per patient on the day of radiosurgery. These results will enable radiosurgeons to determine if their practice differs from the norm and to adjust their practice standards, if appropriate.

A spherical acrylic phantom was designed for quality assurance measurements of dynamic radiosurgery. The phantom consists of two mating hemispheres mounted on a base plate. The interhemispheric plane may be oriented at any angle to the base, the angle being identified by visible marks on the base plate of the phantom. The phantom has a set of replaceable, radiologically identifiable markers, suitable for Computed Tomography (CT), Magnetic Resonance (MR), and Digital Subtraction Angiography (DSA) imaging. The frame coordinates of each marker are calculated from its known positions with respect to the center of the sphere. The measured errors of these positions using CT and MR images, were within the voxel size of the displayed image, while for DSA images the error was greater than 2.5 mm at the periphery of the image. The calculated depths from the planning software, for various beam intersection points to the isocenter, agreed within 0.6 mm with the known depths. A variation of 3.6 +/- 2.6 mm in the calculated depths was observed between using MR and CT image data. This difference results in a 1% variation in Tissue Maximum ratio (TMR) calculations. Comparisons of measured and known volumes resulted in differences of 8%-10%.

Purpose: This quality assurance program is designed for stereotactic radiosurgical units, gamma knife, to check and maintain the unit to preclude accidents and comply with current regulations., Materials and Methods: Over 58 stereotactic radiosurgical units using 201 focused 60Co beams have been installed in the last 7 years and are in use at hospitals throughout the world, with at least 11 additional units being prepared to come on-line in the next year. This system has been in use at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) for 7 years. A comprehensive quality assurance program has been developed. It includes the physics and dosimetry parameters and safety checks required by regulatory agencies. The program, based on over 7 years of experience in measurements, and used during the treatment of over 1500 patients, is separated into three aspects, namely physics, dosimetry, and safety. The UPMC program hopefully will indicate out-of-tolerance problems. Some quality assurance items are checked on a daily basis prior to patient treatment, while other aspects are checked on a weekly, monthly, and/or annual basis. A complete list of items with their respective time tables and tolerances is provided., Results: Although experience shows very small margins of error, larger values were chosen to account for variations in equipment and techniques., Conclusions: Items included in this quality assurance program should indicate and/or preclude problems encountered in the use of this unit.

Purpose: To provide the manufacture's specification for the base phantom of a commercially available stereotactic radiosurgery system so that its accuracy can be confirmed, and to describe a calibration device that allows the accuracy of the base phantom to be verified quickly and on a routine basis. Modifications to the target pointer system that make matching the pointer tips easier and less likely to damage the pointer tips are also described., Methods and Materials: In stereotactic radiosurgery, spatial accuracy is the key factor for successful dose delivery. With some commercially available systems, this accuracy depends on the accuracy of the base phantom coordinate system, how closely the tip of the target pointer can be matched to the tip of the base phantom pointer, and how accurately the coordinates set on the isocentric subsystem match those set on the base phantom. Two major problems, usually overlooked when evaluating system accuracy are, first, the base phantom, which establishes the stereotactic coordinate system, is assumed to be completely accurate. This is a dangerous assumption because the base phantom is used frequently for routine patient treatments and for standard quality assurance tests. To exacerbate the problem, no independent device is provided with stereotactic systems to check the accuracy of the base phantom. Second, the accuracy of the isocenter coordinates set on the head support stand depends upon how closely the target pointer and the base phantom pointer can be aligned. The hardware provided with the system is difficult to use and easily leads to damage of the pointer tips., Results: In this work, we provide the manufacturer's specifications for a popular stereotactic system, describe a device that can be used to check quickly and easily the accuracy of the base phantom, and describe a modification to the transfer pointer system that allows the pointer tips to be more easily aligned with reduced possibility of damage to the pointer tips., Conclusion: The methods and apparatus described in this paper should be useful to anyone using a base phantom for testing radiosurgery accuracy.

The stereotactic radiosurgery system used at the Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology is patterned after that developed at the Joint Center for Radiation Therapy (Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA) and uses the Brown-Roberts-Wells computed tomography (CT) stereotactic system. The patient's head is attached to a stand that rotates with the treatment couch. The irradiation is conducted using a set of converging arcs of irradiation. Because of mechanical limitations, no accelerator or treatment couch is capable of placing the center of the radiation beam at precisely the same point for all gantry and couch angles and a compromise must be made when locating the nominal isocenter. The stand settings are checked by placing a radiopaque QA sphere at the desired target location. The QA sphere is imaged using a series of eight films exposed at a set of couch and gantry angles that encompass the treatment angles. The distances between the QA sphere image and the center of the radiation field indicate if the correct coordinates were set on the stand and if the radiation beam converges to a sufficiently small region (< 0.1-cm diameter) for treatment. A mathematical procedure has been developed to use the film-measured position errors to determine a stand offset that will minimize the distance between the accelerator isocenter and the target. The technique is capable of reducing the average placement error, as measured by imaging the QA sphere, to 0.035 cm with a maximum deviation of 0.07 cm.

Artifacts in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may lead to anatomical distortion and inaccurate stereotactic coordinates. A special phantom for MRI and computed tomography (CT) was built to test the quality and precision of the two neuroradiological procedures. The phantom is fixed with the Leksell frame, and it has 15 orthogonal markers visible by CT and MRI techniques. The coordinates of the markers were calculated first on the CT scans and then on MR images. Two groups of different distortions were analysed: artifacts depending on the frame and its components and artifacts depending on the MR unit and image characteristics. A good target-coordinate correlation was found between CT and MRI in the axial plane, while in the coronal plane there was always a small error. This error is not constant, but changes from test to test, consequently it is hard to reform the image.

Precise beam targeting is crucial to stereotactic radiosurgery. A monitoring system is described consisting of a fluorescent screen, video camera, and computer interface. Approximately ten frames are analyzed each second, verifying the beam intensity, uniformity, position, and diameter. When mounted on the gantry, the system can indicate the dynamic isocenter position using the "ball test" technique. The fluorescent screen video indicates that the 6-MV beam used for radiosurgery at our facility is acceptably stable; moreover, the small isocenter shift versus gantry and couch angles is reasonably reproducible. At our facility, quality assurance tests with this apparatus are performed every month.

Purpose: Stereotactic radiosurgery is generally a single, high-dose radiation treatment for the brain requiring targeting accuracy on the order of a millimeter. From the initial implementation of radiosurgery, therefore, quality assurance is an ongoing process of paramount importance. In this paper, we outline the basic elements of a quality assurance program for our linear accelerator that has been in use at Washington University Medical Center over the past 2 years., Methods and Materials: Various devices and procedures have been developed to verify the accuracy and safety of the stereotactic radiosurgery regimen. Specifically, we present methods for assessing the attainment of spatially correct patient images, the reliability of the computerized treatment planning system, achieving physical safety for the patient, as well as the proper operation of the radiation treatment device., Results: Our procedures have allowed us to assure quality patient treatments and, additionally, has permitted monitoring our performance for continual improvement. For example, a plot of targeting accuracy with the number of patients shows an asymptotic approach to a value within 0.6 mm of that ideally expected., Conclusion: To maintain high-quality patient care, one must review critical aspects of the treatment regimen on a periodic basis. Providing for the appropriate level of staff training, periodic reviews of procedures and maintenance of forms are also very important.

The recent development of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT), which utilises the relocatable Gill-Thomas-Cosman frame (GTC 'repeat localiser'), requires comprehensive quality assurance (QA). This paper focuses on those QA procedures particularly relevant to fractionated SRT treatments, and which have been derived from the technique used at the Royal Marsden Hospital. They primarily relate to the following: (i) GTC frame fitting, initially in the mould room, and then at each imaging session and treatment fraction; (ii) checking of the linear accelerator beam geometry and alignment lasers; and (iii) setting up of the patient for each fraction of treatment. The precision of the fractionated technique therefore depends on monitoring the GTC frame relocation at each fitting, checking the accuracy of the radiation isocentre of the treatment unit, its coincidence with the patient alignment lasers and the adjustments required to set the patient up accurately. The results of our quality control checks show that setting up to a mean radiation isocentre using precisely set-up alignment lasers can be achievable to within 1 mm accuracy. When this is combined with a mean GTC frame relocatability of 1 mm on the patient, a 2-mm allowance between the prescribed isodose surface and the defined target volume is a realistic safety margin for this technique.

A multidisciplinary Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) task force has developed quality assurance guidelines for radiosurgery. The purpose of the guidelines are fourfold: (1) To ensure that participating institutions have the proper equipment and appropriate technique(s) to administer radiosurgery; (2) to outline a standard data set for each treated patient to assess protocol compliance; (3) to define minor and major deviations in protocol treatment; and (4) to set forth clinical data necessary to determine treatment efficacy, including failure patterns, and treatment toxicity. These guidelines are being implemented into active and developing radiosurgery protocols.

Purpose: The error frequency in setting stereotactic coordinates for gamma knife radiosurgery was investigated to determine what quality assurance safeguards are necessary., Methods and Materials: A prospective study of 200 consecutive isocenter settings for gamma knife radiosurgery was analyzed to identify the frequency of spontaneous errors in setting and checking stereotactic coordinates (corrected prior to treatment). An additional 25 coordinate errors were introduced at random among the next 200 consecutive isocenter settings to provide additional data on identification of errors., Results: Stereotactic coordinates required resetting in 12% (24/200) of the isocenters treated due to errors of 0.25-0.50 mm (8%) and 1-20 mm (4%). This comprised 2.2% (26/1200) of the individual coordinate settings. The frequency of these errors was significantly related to the specific directional coordinate set (p = 0.0004) and experience (p = 0.016). Errors were identified by 83.5% (91/109) of the observers checking the settings (60.0% of 0.25 mm errors, 94.6% of errors > or = 0.5 mm, p = 0.0000). Verification of stereotactic coordinates by two observers reduces the probability of an undetected error > or = 0.25 mm to 1/1,392 and to 1/154,712 for errors > or = 1 mm., Conclusion: Errors in setting stereotactic coordinates are common (12% prior to checking) but are corrected with a high degree of confidence by a quality assurance policy requiring coordinate verification by a minimum of two observers.

The aim of this paper is to analyse the dosimetric parameters of a linear accelerator used in radiosurgery treatments. The influence of these parameters on the resulting dose distribution are basic for delivering the predefined dose to the vascular or oncological target volume. Several dosimetric methods have been used to define the output factors for small fields. The thimble and the Markus chambers, TLD and film dosimetry are investigated; all these dosimetric systems give reliable and almost similar results if used in the correct way. In the determination of tissue maximum ratio (TMR) the response curves obtained by ionometric and film dosimetry were investigated. For TMR determination the use of the Markus chamber and the correction factors to be applied as a result of the small dimension of the field were also investigated.

Stereotactic radiosurgery has become established as an effective treatment modality for certain non-malignant brain diseases such as arteriovenous malformations. This paper describes an extension of our linear accelerator-based radiosurgical technique to fractionated treatment of intracranial disease. The fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy technique expands the use of the modality by sparing normal cells within the treatment volume thus improving the therapeutic ratio. The first treatment is given using a stereotactic frame both for target localization and patient immobilization. The frame is then removed and subsequent treatments use a standard neurosurgical halo-ring for patient immobilization. The halo-ring is left in place on the skull for the duration of the course of treatment. Thus the physical requirements for fractionation pertain firstly to the patient immobilization and target localization using the halo-ring and secondly to the stringent quality assurance procedures required to maintain spatial accuracy under these new conditions. We describe a sensitive and effective technique for checking the rotational beam parameters and collimator alignment which we use immediately prior to treatment to ensure adequate accuracy of dose delivery to the target volume.

Purpose: Five Varian linear accelerators were studied to determine whether their mechanical isocentric accuracies were sufficient for radiosurgery and, if not, if the observed errors were sufficiently consistent and predictable to be correctable by some form of secondary collimator steering device to maintain isocentric alignment., Methods and Materials: A 0.3 mW 670 nm diode laser was mounted in the secondary collimator insert of a radiosurgery extended collimator assembly. A cylindrical lens was used to create a laser fan beam that passed through isocenter and could be oriented parallel or perpendicular to the plane of rotation. A position sensitive photo-diode having an electrical output that varied with the portion of its surface illuminated was mounted at isocenter in a rotational mount. This mount tracked the accelerator gantry such that the surface of the photo-diode remained perpendicular to the laser beam during gantry rotation. An X/Y recorder was connected to the gantry-angle potentiometer of the accelerator and to the photo-diode and plotted the positional variation from isocenter with gantry rotation., Results: The root-mean-square error for the five machines was +/- 0.06 to +/- 0.08 mm in the plane of rotation and +/- 0.17 to +/- 0.35 mm out of (perpendicular to) the plane of rotation. The in-plane-of-rotation errors tended to be maximal near the diagonal gantry angles and the out-of-plane-of-rotation errors were maximal in the over and under vertical positions., Conclusions: Both types of errors were predictable but only the out-of-plane-of-rotation errors were considered large enough to warrant consideration of correction (although the need is debatable). On all the tested machines, the out-of-plane-of-rotation error curve was a relatively smooth bell-shaped function that would be readily amenable to correction. The diode laser/photo-detector system used should prove useful in accurately defining isocenter and facilitating the precise adjustment of the laser isocenter lights.

A Leksell Gamma Unit was commissioned and a Lars Leksell Center for Radiosurgery was established at the University of Virginia Health Sciences Center in March 1989. At that time a formal quality assurance program designed for the Leksell Gamma Unit was put into effect. This paper will review the components of suggested daily, monthly, semiannual and annual quality assurance reviews of United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulatory as well as nonregulatory items for Leksell Gamma Units. The acceptance criterion for each quality assurance test has been established based on federal requirements and the recommendations of national scientific organizations as well as the practical experience gained from this quality assurance program.