Search

Background & Aims: The addition of boceprevir to therapy with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin results in significantly higher rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) in previously treated patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-1 infection, compared with peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin alone. We assessed SVR with boceprevir plus peginterferon alfa-2a–ribavirin (PEG2a/R) in patients with identical study entry criteria. Methods: In a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 201 patients with HCV genotype-1 who had relapsed or not responded to previous therapy were assigned to groups (1:2) and given a 4-week lead-in phase of PEG2a/R, followed by placebo plus PEG2a/R for 44 weeks (PEG2a/R) or boceprevir plus PEG2a/R for 44 weeks (BOC/PEG2a/R). The primary end point was SVR 24 weeks after therapy ended. Results: The addition of boceprevir after 4 weeks of lead-in therapy with PEG2a/R significantly increased the rate of SVR from 21% in the PEG2a/R group to 64% in the BOC/PEG2a/R group (P < .0001). Among patients with poor response to interferon therapy (<1-log10 decline in HCV RNA at week 4), 39% in the BOC/PEG2a/R group had SVRs, compared with none of the patients in the PEG2a/R group. Among patients with good response to interferon (≥1-log10 decline), 71% in the BOC/PEG2a/R group had SVRs, compared with 25% in the PEG2a/R group. A ≥1-log10 decline in HCV RNA at treatment week 4 was the strongest independent predictor of SVR, exceeding that of IL-28B genotype. Among 8 patients who began the study with HCV amino acid variants associated with boceprevir resistance, 3 (38%) achieved SVRs. Fifty percent of patients in the BOC/PEG2a/R group developed anemia (hemoglobin <10.0 g/dL), compared with 27% in the PEG2a/R group; 43% vs 21%, respectively, developed neutropenia (neutrophil count <750/mm3). Conclusions: The addition of boceprevir after 4 weeks of lead-in therapy with PEG2a/R caused significantly higher rates of SVR in previously treated patients with chronic HCV genotype-1 infection, compared with patients given only PEG2a/R. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00845065. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after treatment with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) are limited. This study evaluated the persistence of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs for up to 5 years after the end of treatment (EOT). We included samples from 678 individuals with an HCV genotype (GT) 1 or 3 infection and virologic DAA treatment failure collected in the European Resistance Database. NS3, NS5A, and NS5B were sequenced, and clinical parameters were evaluated. A total of 242 individuals with HCV GT1a (36%), 237 with GT1b (35%), and 199 (29%) with GT3 and a DAA failure were included. After protease inhibitor failure, the frequencies of NS3 RASs were 40–90% after the EOT. NS3 RASs disappeared rapidly in GT1b and GT3 after follow-up month 3 but were stable (≥60%) in GT1a owing to Q80K. The SOF-resistant NS5B RAS S282T was only found in individuals with GT3a. Non-nucleoside NS5B RASs were frequent in GT1 (56–80%) and decreased to 30% in GT1a but persisted in GT1b. NS5A RASs were very common in all GTs after NS5A inhibitor failure (88–95%), and even after follow-up month 24, their frequency was 65% and higher. However, RASs in GT1b had a stable course, whereas RASs in GT1a and GT3 declined slightly after follow-up month 24 (GT1a, 68%; GT1b, 95%; and GT3, 65%), mainly because of the slow decline of high-level resistant Y93H. We found that low-to medium-level RASs persisted, whereas high-level resistant RASs disappeared over time. Different patterns of RAS persistence according to HCV subtype could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. There are little data on the long-term persistence of HCV resistance-associated substitutions (RASs) after DAA treatment failure, and RASs could have an impact on the efficacy of a rescue treatment. Especially in countries with limited availability of VOX/VEL/SOF or G/P/SOF, different patterns of RAS persistence could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. The different patterns of RAS persistence identified in this study can be used to derive general rules regarding the persistence of RASs after DAA failure that could be applied by physicians in less developed countries to plan individualized HCV retreatment. [Display omitted] • Real-world study of the long-term persistence of NS3, NS5A, and NS5B RASs in 678 individuals with GT1 or GT3 infection after DAA failure. • Sequencing showed a rapid decrease of NS3 RASs after FU month 3 and almost no SOF-resistant RASs. • NS5A RASs persisted for more than 2 years, with a tendency to decrease in GT1a and GT3 owing to the loss of Y93H. • Patterns of RAS persistence could have implications for retreatment with first-generation DAAs and for global HCV elimination goals. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite the availability of highly effective and well-tolerated direct-acting antivirals, not all patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection receive treatment. This retrospective, multi-centre, noninterventional, case-control study identified patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection initiating (control) or not initiating (case) treatment at 43 sites in Germany from September 2017 to June 2018. It aimed to compare characteristics of the two patient populations and to identify factors involved in patient/physician decision to initiate/not initiate chronic hepatitis C virus treatment, with a particular focus on historical barriers. Overall, 793 patients were identified: 573 (72%) who received treatment and 220 (28%) who did not. In 42% of patients, the reason for not initiating treatment was patient wish, particularly due to fear of treatment (17%) or adverse events (13%). Other frequently observed reasons for not initiating treatment were in accordance with known historical barriers for physicians to initiate therapy, including perceived or expected lack of compliance (14.5%), high patient age (10.9%), comorbidities (15.0%), alcohol abuse (9.1%), hard drug use (7.7%), and opioid substitution therapy (4.5%). Patient wish against therapy was also a frequently reported reason for not initiating treatment in the postponed (35.2%) and not planned (47.0%) subgroups; of note, known historical factors were also common reasons for postponing treatment. Real-world and clinical trial evidence is accumulating, which suggests that such historical barriers do not negatively impact treatment effectiveness. Improved education is key to facilitate progress towards the World Health Organization target of eliminating viral hepatitis as a major public health threat by 2030. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data on the prevalence of resistance‐associated substitutions (RASs) and their implications for treatment with direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) are sparse in European patients with HCV genotype 4. This study investigated RASs before and after DAA failure in different genotype 4 subtypes and evaluated retreatment efficacies. Samples of 195 genotype 4‐infected patients were collected in the European Resistance Database and investigated for NS3, NS5A and NS5B RASs. Retreatment efficacies in DAA failure patients were analysed retrospectively. After NS5A inhibitor (NS5Ai) failure, subtype 4r was frequent (30%) compared to DAA‐naïve patients (5%) and the number of NS5A RASs was significantly higher in subtype 4r compared to 4a or 4d (median three RASs vs no or one RAS, respectively, P <.0001). RASsL28V, L30R and M31L pre‐existed in subtype 4r and were maintained after NS5Ai failure. Typical subtype 4r RASs were located in subdomain 1a of NS5A, close to membrane interaction and protein‐protein interaction sites that are responsible for multimerization and hence viral replication. Retreatment of 37 DAA failure patients was highly effective with 100% SVR in prior SOF/RBV, PI/SOF and PI/NS5Ai failures. Secondary virologic failures were rare (n = 2; subtype 4d and 4r) and only observed in prior NS5Ai/SOF failures (SVR 90%). In conclusion, subtype 4r harboured considerably more RASs compared to other subtypes. A resistance‐tailored retreatment using first‐ and second‐generation DAAs was highly effective with SVR rates ≥90% across all subtypes and first‐line treatment regimens. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The current outbreak of the novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), causing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has become a worldwide pandemic with high morbidity and mortality in individuals with chronic disorders.1 The pandemic introduced many unanticipated challenges for patients with chronic and rare diseases, such as Gaucher disease (GD).2 GD is the most common inborn error of metabolism, caused by biallelic glucosylceramidase beta ( I GBA i ) variants and affecting the recycling of cellular glycolipids; GD manifests as hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and bone disease.3 We performed a cross-sectional study using an online survey regarding attitudes of GD experts towards COVID-19 vaccination for patients with GD, and the impact of the pandemic on their patients. Overall, our present findings can assist in reassuring patients with GD worldwide of the expected mild nature of COVID-19, in supporting of COVID-19 vaccination and informing of their conduct during the pandemic. Gaucher disease (GD) expert views on COVID-19 vaccination for patients with GD. [Extracted from the article]

Background and Aims Hepatitis C virus ( HCV) infections with genotype 2 ( GT2) are generally considered as easy to treat. The current standard therapy is 12 weeks of sofosbuvir and ribavirin. However, sustained virological response ( SVR) rates varied substantially in distinct subgroups. Therefore, re-assessing the efficacy of interferon-free therapy in cohorts with larger patient numbers is warranted. Methods The German Hepatitis C registry is a national multicenter cohort. Patients are treated at the discretion of the physician. Data are collected by a web-based data system and confirmed by plausibility checks and on-site monitoring. Results A total of 265 (4.3%) of 6034 patients enrolled in the registry were infected with GT2, and 236 had initiated treatment (60% males, 98% Caucasian, median age 54 years). Treatment with sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks achieved SVR at week 12 post-treatment ( SVR12) in 136/164 (83%) patients. SVR12 rates for this regimen were 80% (35/44) in treatment-experienced patients, 74% (20/27) in cirrhotics and 75% (21/28) in patients with HCV- RNA ≥6 million IU/mL. The overall SVR rate in patients treated with sofosbuvir/ribavirin 12 weeks per protocol ( PP), excluding therapy discontinuation or lost to follow-up, was 135/151 (89%). PP SVR12 rates were 91% for treatment naïve, 83% for cirrhotic and 80% for treatment-experienced patients respectively. Conclusions In this large GT2 cohort, sofosbuvir and ribavirin for 12 weeks achieved lower SVR rates compared to treatment outcomes expected from phase 3 trials. These findings highlight the need for establishing alternative treatment strategies for GT2 patients, especially in patients with unfavourable outcome factors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose In Gaucher disease, diminished activity of the lysosomal enzyme, acid β-glucosidase, leads to accumulation of glucosylceramides and related substrates, primarily in the spleen, liver, and bone marrow. Eliglustat is an oral substrate reduction therapy approved in the European Union and the United States as a first-line treatment for adults with type 1 Gaucher disease who have compatible CYP2D6 metabolism phenotypes. A European Advisory Council of experts in Gaucher disease describes the characteristics of eliglustat that are distinct from enzyme augmentation therapy (the standard of care) and miglustat (the other approved substrate reduction therapy) and recommends investigations and monitoring for patients on eliglustat therapy within the context of current recommendations for Gaucher disease management. Results Eliglustat is a selective, potent inhibitor of glucosylceramide synthase, the enzyme responsible for biosynthesis of glucosylceramides which accumulate in Gaucher disease. Extensive metabolism of eliglustat by CYP2D6, and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A of the cytochrome P450 pathway, necessitates careful consideration of the patient's CYP2D6 metaboliser status and use of concomitant medications which share metabolism by these pathways. Guidance on specific assessments and monitoring required for eliglustat therapy, including an algorithm to determine eligibility for eliglustat, are provided. Conclusions As a first-line therapy for type 1 Gaucher disease, eliglustat offers eligible patients a daily oral therapy alternative to biweekly infusions of enzyme therapy. Physicians will need to carefully assess individual Gaucher patients to determine their appropriateness for eliglustat therapy. The therapeutic response to eliglustat and use of concomitant medications will require long-term monitoring. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1) is known for phenotypic heterogeneity and varied natural history. Registrational clinical trials enrolled narrowly defined phenotypes, but greater diversity is encountered in clinical practice. We report real-world outcomes with long-term eliglustat treatment in adults with GD1 in the International Collaborative Gaucher Group Gaucher Registry. Among 5985 GD1 patients in the Registry as of January 6, 2023, 872 started eliglustat at ≥18 years old; of these, 469 met inclusion criteria. We compared clinical parameters at eliglustat initiation (i.e., baseline) and follow-up in treatment-naïve patients and used linear mixed models to estimate annual change from baseline in parameters among patients who switched to eliglustat after ≥1 year on enzyme replacement therapy. Over 4 years of follow-up in non-splenectomized treatment-naïve patients, hemoglobin and platelet count increased, liver and spleen volume decreased, and total lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) Z-score decreased slightly. Among non-splenectomized switch patients, on average, hemoglobin decreased -0.030 (95% CI: -0.053, -0.008) g/dL (N = 272) and platelet count increased 2.229 (95% CI: 0.751, 3.706) × 10 3 /mm 3 (N = 262) annually up to 10 years; liver volume decreased (-0.009 [95% CI: -0.015, -0.003] MN) (N = 102) and spleen volume remained stable (-0.070 [95% CI: -0.150, 0.010] MN) (N = 106) annually up to 7 years; and total lumbar spine BMD Z-score increased 0.041 (95% CI: 0.015, 0.066) (N = 183) annually up to 8 years. Among splenectomized switch patients, clinical parameters were stable over time. These long-term, real-world outcomes are consistent with the eliglustat clinical trials and emerging real-world experience across the GD phenotypic spectrum., (© 2024 The Authors. American Journal of Hematology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Continuation of standard management of Gaucher disease (GD) has been challenging during the COVID-19 pandemic, resulting in infrequent/missed infusions and follow-up appointments. Little data are available on the consequences of these changes and on the SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in German GD patients., Methods: A survey with 22 questions about GD management during the pandemic was sent to 19 German Gaucher centres. It was answered by 11/19 centres caring for 257 GD patients (almost ¾ of the German GD population); 245 patients had type 1 and 12 had type 3 GD; 240 were ≥ 18 years old., Results: Monitoring intervals were prolonged in 8/11 centres from a median of 9 to 12 months. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) was changed to home ERT in 4 patients and substituted by oral substrate reduction therapy (SRT) in 6 patients. From March 2020 to October 2021, no serious complications of GD were documented. Only 4 SARS-CoV-2 infections were reported (1.6%). Two infections were asymptomatic and two mild; all occurred in adult type 1, non-splenectomized patients on ERT. Vaccination rate in adult GD was 79.5% (95.3% mRNA vaccines). Serious vaccination complications were not reported., Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic has lowered the threshold for switching from practice- or hospital-based ERT to home therapy or to SRT. No major GD complication was documented during the pandemic. Infection rate with SARS-CoV-2 in GD may rather be lower than expected, and its severity is mild. Vaccination rates are high in GD patients and vaccination was well tolerated., Competing Interests: CM has received honoraria for scientific talks and advice from Sanofi-Genzyme, Takeda-Shire, Alexion, MDS, Abbvie, and Falk. HMF has received Honorarium for scientific talk from Sanofi-Genzyme. MM has received research grants, lecture honoraria, travel recompensations from Sanofi, Amgen, Lilly, MSD, Berlin-Chemie, Astra, Novartis, Akcea, Biomarin, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead and Novo. CL has received honoraria, speakers fee and travel support from BioMarin, Takeda, Sanofi, Amicus, Chiesi, Regenxbio, Alexion. EM has received research grants, consultation honoraria and speakerʼs fee from Sanofi, Takeda, Amicus, Idorsia, Prevail, Orphazyme, Cyclo Therapeutics and Sio Therapeutics. JPK has received travel recompensations from Biomarin SVD has received research grants, lecture honoraria, travel recompensations from and worked in advisory boards and steering committees for Pfizer, Sanofi-Genzyme, Shire-Takeda, Actelion, Vitaflo, Nutricia, Dr. Schaer, BioMarin and Recordati. CS, CR, AZ, CB, NM and AG declare that they have no conflict of interest., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) are the two preferred treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min. Both therapies have been separately analyzed in different real-life cohorts; however, a direct comparison has not been performed so far. We, therefore, analyzed safety and effectiveness of both regimens in a concerted real-life population., Methods: The Germany Hepatitis C-Registry is a prospective national real-world registry. The analysis is based on 2773 patients with documented GFR at baseline treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 1041), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 53) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 1679)., Results: A total of 93 patients with GFR <30 mL/min were treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 56), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 4), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 33). They suffered significantly more frequent from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease than individuals with GFR >30 mL/min and showed the following baseline characteristics: 20.4, 55.9, 3.2, 12.9, and 5.3% were infected with HCV-genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4; 12.9% suffered from liver cirrhosis; 80.1% were treatment-naïve. Baseline characteristics except distribution of HCV-genotype 1b (n = 43/52 treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir) and sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) did not differ significantly between glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (SVR12: 100%) and grazoprevir/elbasvir (SVR12: 97.9%).Fatigue, headache, abdominal discomfort, and arthralgia were the most frequently reported adverse events without a statistical difference between grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir., Conclusion: In patients with chronic hepatitis C and a baseline GFR ≤30 mL/min grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir show an equally favorable safety profile and antiviral efficacy and can both be recommended for real-life use., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background:  Healthcare services were faced with unprecedented challenges due to the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdown regulations. In order to analyse the influence of the pandemic on the healthcare of patients with chronic hepatitis C in Germany, we carried out a structured questionnaire among all centres participating in the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)., Methods:  320 centres of the DHC-R were invited to participate in an online survey. Of these, 74 centres had included ≥ 5 patients in the last 12 months., Findings:  A fully answered questionnaire was sent back by 64 centres. Due to the lockdown regulations, 11 % of the centres had stopped their regular consultation between March and May 2020; 58 % had reduced the consultations and 32 % did not change the consultations. More than 50 % of the appointment cancellations were done by the patients. 52 % of the centres offered a new or additional telephone consultation and 17 % offered a new video consultation. Between March and May 2020, the number of patients newly treated with antivirals was markedly lower when compared with the same period in 2019. All centres had returned to their usual consultation procedures in July 2020. Almost 80 % indicated that there were no significant limitations in patient's healthcare. However, 22 % of the centres stated that liver decompensation was diagnosed late and 9.4 % stated that diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma was delayed. An adequate amount of personal protective equipment (including disinfectants) was available in 56 % of the centres. Official information by public healthcare authorities was considered sufficient by 63 % of the centres., Summary:  Diagnosis, therapy and monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C were impaired during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nevertheless, the majority of the centres did not see healthcare problems for these patients in the medium and long term. However, the fact that the diagnosis of liver decompensations with potential lethal consequences was delayed in a considerable number of patients causes major concern., Competing Interests: Dr. Dietrich Hüppe hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: AbbVie GmbH & Co. KG, Falk Pharma, Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH. Prof. Dr. Claus Niederau hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: Abbvie, Alexion, Biogen, BMS, Falk, Gilead, Janssen, MSD, Sanofi-Genzyme und Shire-Takeda. Dr. Yvonne Serfert hat keine Interessenkonflikte. Prof. Dr. Heinz Hartmann hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (Vortragshonorare) erhalten von: Falk Foundation. Prof. Dr. Heiner Wedemeyer hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: Abbott, AbbVie, Altimmune, Biotest, BMS, BTG, Dicerna, Gilead, Janssen, Merck/MSD, MYR GmbH, Novartis, Roche, Siemens, Transgene., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background:  More than 250 000 patients suffer from chronic hepatitis C in Germany. Several potent, direct-acting antiviral drugs have been approved since 2014. The aim of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R) is to describe the epidemiology and patient care of hepatitis C and to investigate the efficacy and safety of new treatment options in real-world settings., Methods:  The DHC-R is a prospective multicenter non-interventional registry study that includes 327 centers throughout Germany. All approved treatment options have been documented. The current analysis differentiated 4 phases: 2/2014 - 12/2014, 1/2015 - 12/2015, 1/2016 - 7/2017 and 8/2017 - 7/2018., Findings:  Between February 2014 and July 2018, 12 170 patients were included in the registry (61.3 % male), and antiviral treatment was initiated in 11 268. The mean age declined from 52.3 years (phase 1) to 49.3 years (phase 4), while the proportion of patients with previous or ongoing drug abuse increased (26.3 % to 43.1 %). In 2014, 35.1 % of treated patients had liver cirrhosis, which declined to 16.5 % in phase 4. The HCV genotype distribution showed marked fluctuations, with most recent increases in HCV genotype 3 (30 % in phase 4). Per-protocol sustained virological response rates increased from 92.8 % in 2014 to 94.4 % in 2017/18 with excellent tolerability., Summary:  The DHC-R mirrors patient care of chronic hepatitis in the real-world setting in Germany and provides insights into epidemiology developments. It also confirms the high efficacy and safety of novel treatment options., Competing Interests: Dr. Dietrich Hüppe hat in den letzten 3 Jahren Zuwendungen (z. B. Vortragshonorare, Forschungsgelder oder Beraterhonorare) erhalten von: MSD Sharp&Dohme GmbH, Janssen Cilag GmbH, Roche Pharma AG, Bristol-Myers Squibb GmbH&Co. KGaA, Falk Pharma, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Novartis Pharma Germany GmbH, Norgine GmbH, AbbVie GmbH & Co. KG, Gilead Sciences GmbH, Ferring Arzneimittel GmbH, (© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.)

Background: The absence of neurological symptoms and signs is traditionally considered mandatory for a diagnosis of type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1), but in recent years many reports have emerged on neurological manifestations in GD1 patients. Nevertheless, it has been unclear whether cognitive deficits are part of the disease as well., Methods: Cognitive function was assessed in a large cohort of GD1 patients with the use of the CDR system, a set of computerised cognitive tests. Testing was performed at baseline and every 6 months thereafter during a two-year study period., Results: Our patient cohort (84 patients, median age 40 years, median time from diagnosis 15 years) showed mild deficits relative to healthy age-matched subjects on the composite scores: power of attention (Z-score (mean ± SD) -0.9 ± 1.37) and speed of memory (Z-score (mean ± SD) -1.39 ± 1.49). No decline in cognitive function was seen during the two-year period. Age correlated with the composite scores variability of attention and quality of working memory. Moreover, severely affected patients (Zimran severity score (SSI) ≥ 15) scored more poorly compared to mildly affected patients (SSI ≤ 5) on the composite measure power of attention, reflecting the ability to concentrate., Conclusions: GD1 patients exhibit mild deficits in power of attention and speed of memory, reflecting a decreased ability to focus attention and process information, together with a slowing in the speed of retrieval of items from memory. The clinical relevance of these findings is uncertain.

Genetic hemochromatosis is classified into four subtypes of which only type 1 is of clinical importance in Caucasians. Type 1 is due to an autosomal recessive inborn error of metabolism; the homozygous C282Y mutation of the HFE gene on chromosome 6 accounts for more than 90% of the clinical phenotype in populations of Celtic origin. The mutation leads to an inadequately high intestinal iron absorption which may finally cause iron overload in and damage to various organs. Type 2 is the juvenile form of iron overload which leads to a severe phenotype prior to age 30 with cardiomyopathy and hypogonadism. The corresponding mutations are located in the hemojuveline and hepcidin genes. Typ 3 has mainly been described in Italian families and refers to mutations in transferrin receptor 2 gene. Histopathologic and clinical consequences of type 3 hemochromatosis are similar to those seen in type 1. Types 2 and 3 are autosomal recessive traits. Type 4 hemochromatosis follows an autosomal dominant trait; the corresponding mutation affects the basolateral iron carrier ferroportin 1. Diagnosis of hemochromatosis is based on determinations of serum ferritin and transferrin saturation with the latter being more sensitive and specific. In case of a homozygous C282Y gene test, liver biopsy is not required for diagnosis. Liver biopsy is, however, recommended in C282Y homozygotes at ferritin values > 1,000 ng/ml because of an increased risk for liver fibrosis. Phlebotomy treatment is the standard care to remove iron in genetic hemochromatosis. Patients treated in the early noncirrhotic stage have a normal life expectancy. Thus, future efforts should aim at early diagnosis. Iron removal also improves the outcome in cirrhotic patients. Liver carcinoma may develop in cirrhotic patients despite iron depletion. Liver cancers without cirrhosis are so rare that screening is only recommended in cirrhotic patients.

The new German and American guidelines on hepatitis B show similarities but also some discrepancies. In general, indication for therapy depends more on hepatitis B virus-(HBV-)DNA than alanine aminotransferase (ALT) values. Antivirals are recommended by German guidelines when HBV-DNA exceeds 10,000 copies/ml and ALT is increased more than twice the upper normal limit or when liver biopsy shows significant inflammation and fibrosis. By contrast, American guidelines recommend therapy only when HBV-DNA exceeds 100,000 copies/ml. American guidelines do not recommend lamivudine or telbivudine as initial monotherapy because of risk for resistance, but adefovir or entecavir. By contrast, according to German guidelines monotherapy with lamivudine, telbivudine, adefovir or entecavir may be initiated, if HBV-DNA is < 1 million copies/ml and cirrhosis is absent. Both guidelines recommend to monitor HBV-DNA even in the absence of therapy. Under antiviral therapy HBV-DNA should be measured more often than previously recommended to early identify lack of response and upcoming resistance. When resistance occurs, combination therapy is indicated. Risk for resistance is low as long as viral suppression is effective. In both guidelines liver biopsy should be considered when there are doubts on indication of therapy or selection of antiviral substances. In the presence of severe fibrosis and high HBV-DNA, antiviral substances should have high potency and low risk for resistance.

Background and Purpose: Little is known about the epidemiology of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Germany. The present study analyzes demographic, socioeconomic and virologic data of a cohort of German HBV-infected patients., Patients and Methods: As a project of the Hepatitis Competence Network, 250 outpatients with chronic HBV infection were included during the last 5 years., Results: Mean age was 40.5+/-14.6 years; 63.2% were men. HBV-DNA was negative by polymerase chain reaction in 12.8%; alanine aminotransferase ALT) was normal in 56.3%; even at DNA levels>1 million copies/ml ALT was normal in 38% ("immunotolerance"). About one third of patients were born in Germany, Turkey or one of 34 other countries. The unemployment rate in migrants from Turkey and other countries was more than three times the rate of subjects born in Germany; this difference, however, is the same in non-HBV-infected subjects. In the total cohort HBeAg-negative subjects were more frequent than HBeAg-positive subjects (66.4% vs. 33.6%). About 40% of patients with a liver biopsy had significant fibrosis (F2-4). Multivariate regression showed that significant fibrosis was associated only with age and ALT, but not with HBV-DNA or other variables. 38.4% of subjects had antiviral therapy; the rate of therapy increased with increasing DNA and ALT. The majority of treated patients received lamivudine (58%), adefovir (31%), or both (5%). Only 3% each received interferon or other antivirals., Conclusion: The present cohort study shows that about two thirds of HBV-infected subjects who live in the Ruhrgebiet originate from migrants many of whom have significant economic problems. Special programs should be designed for migrants in order to detect HBV infection and to inform infected subjects about their individual and infectious risks.

Background and Purpose: Little is known about the epidemiology of hepatitis C in Germany and in particular about the route of infection. The current study prospectively analyzed epidemiologic and clinical data of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection., Methods: A structured questionnaire was sent to primary care physicians in Germany. Of 13,287 questionnaires, 5,837 were sent back for analysis., Results: Although the number of questionnaires sent out was proportional to the number of subjects living in the new and old states of Germany, only 9% were sent back from the new states; thus, the prevalence of hepatitis C is probably considerably lower in the new states compared with the old ones. The HCV-infected subjects originated from 92 different countries throughout the world: 63% were born in Germany, but 21% were from one of the former states of the USSR. Intravenous drug abuse was the most prevalent risk noted; there was a strong bias whereby physicians who cared for a large number of HCV-infected patients had a much higher proportion of subjects with i.v. drug abuse when compared to those who only cared for a few hepatitis C patients. In the latter group a history of infusion of blood products was approximately as frequent as a history of drug abuse. There was a high proportion of patients who had no risk factor for hepatitis C (25-42%). Fatigue was the most frequent symptom (nearly 60%), followed by loss of concentration and abdominal pain. The number of symptoms increased with a higher aspartate aminotransferase/alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT) ratio and thus presumably with the stage of liver fibrosis., Conclusion: Hepatitis C should be excluded in all patients with elevated liver enzymes. In risk groups with a high prevalence of hepatitis C, the infection should be looked for even when liver enzymes are normal.