251. Urinary Metabolomic Profile of Preterm Infants Receiving Human Milk with Either Bovine or Donkey Milk-Based Fortifiers.
- Author
-
Giribaldi M, Peila C, Coscia A, Cavallarin L, Antoniazzi S, Corbu S, Maiocco G, Sottemano S, Cresi F, Moro GE, Bertino E, Fanos V, and Cesare Marincola F
- Subjects
- Animals, Carnitine urine, Cattle, Choline urine, Equidae, Female, Galactose urine, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Leucine urine, Lysine urine, Male, Metabolome, Milk, Human chemistry, Enteral Nutrition methods, Food, Fortified, Infant, Premature urine, Milk, Human metabolism, Nutritional Status
- Abstract
Fortification of human milk (HM) for preterm and very low-birth weight (VLBW) infants is a standard practice in most neonatal intensive care units. The optimal fortification strategy and the most suitable protein source for achieving better tolerance and growth rates for fortified infants are still being investigated. In a previous clinical trial, preterm and VLBW infants receiving supplementation of HM with experimental donkey milk-based fortifiers (D-HMF) showed decreased signs of feeding intolerance, including feeding interruptions, bilious gastric residuals and vomiting, with respect to infants receiving bovine milk-based fortifiers (B-HMF). In the present ancillary study, the urinary metabolome of infants fed B-HMF ( n = 27) and D-HMF ( n = 27) for 21 days was analyzed by
1 H NMR spectroscopy at the beginning (T0) and at the end (T1) of the observation period. Results showed that most temporal changes in the metabolic responses were common in the two groups, providing indications of postnatal adaptation. The significantly higher excretion of galactose in D-HMF and of carnitine, choline, lysine and leucine in B-HMF at T1 were likely due to different formulations. In conclusion, isocaloric and isoproteic HM fortification may result in different metabolic patterns, as a consequence of the different quality of the nutrients provided by the fortifiers.- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF