Search

Background: Bedside transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) performed by emergency physicians (EPs) is valuable in the rapid assessment and treatment of critically ill patients. We sought to determine the preferred cardiac window for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) estimation by EP sonographers in a critically ill patient population., Methods: Prospective investigator-blinded study of focused bedside TTE in a convenience sample of surgical intensive care patients. Investigators were faculty, fellows, or residents from an academic emergency medicine department. Five standard cardiac views were performed: parasternal long axis (PSLA), parasternal short axis (PSSA), subxiphoid 4-chamber, subxiphoid short axis, and apical 4-chamber (AFC). LVEF was determined using at least 1 cardiac view. Investigators rated their preference for each cardiac view on a 5-point Likert scale., Results: A total of 70 studies were performed on 70 patients during a 6-month period. Users rated the PSLA as the most useful view for estimation of LVEF (mean 4.23; 95% confidence interval, 3.95-4.51). Pairwise comparisons of cardiac ultrasound views revealed PSLA was preferred over all other views (P < .05) except PSSA (P = .23). Complete 5 view examinations were not achieved in all patients (PSLA in 98%, PSSA in 96%, apical 4-chamber in 74%, subxiphoid 4-chamber in 35%, and subxiphoid short axis in 18%). Interobserver correlation of LVEF estimation was good (r = 0.86, r2 = 0.74, P < .0001)., Conclusion: Parasternal long axis and PSSA are the preferred echocardiographic windows for EP estimation of LVEF using focused bedside TTE in critical care patients. This may be an important consideration in patients who often have physical barriers to optimal echocardiographic evaluation, are relatively immobile, and have unstable conditions requiring rapid assessment and intervention.

Background: Estimation of volume status in the high-acuity surgical population can be challenging. The use of intensivist bedside ultrasound (INBU) to rapidly assess volume status in the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) was hypothesized to be feasible and as accurate as invasive measures., Methods: Clinician sonographers (CSs) were trained to perform basic cardiac ultrasound and sonographic assessment of the inferior vena cava (IVC). A convenience sample of general surgery and trauma patients was enrolled in the SICU. The CS interpreted IVC and cardiac parameters and then categorized the subject as hypovolemic or not hypovolemic. Intensivists caring for the patients were blinded to the INBU findings and made a real-time expert clinical judgment (ECJ) of the patient's volume status (hypovolemic vs. not hypovolemic) using all available traditional data., Results: A total of nine CSs performed 70 studies; three of the CSs performed the majority of the studies (86%). Adequate ultrasound (US) views for cardiac and IVC assessment were obtained in 96% and 89% of studies, respectively. The ECJ was considered to be the standard to which comparisons were made. The concordance rate between ECJ and central venous pressure was 62%. ECJ concordance with sonographic measures were similar (cardiac US = 75%, IVC US = 67%, and IVC collapse index = 65%). All pairwise comparisons against the ECJ/CVP agreement were not significantly different., Conclusions: INBU is feasible in the SICU and is equivalent to central venous pressure in assessing volume status. Noninvasive methods to assess volume status may decrease the need for invasive procedures.

Background: Pneumonia occurs commonly in intubated patients and is morbid and occasionally mortal. Pneumonia prevention strategies have been successful in the intensive care unit and are favorably regarded, cost effective, and efficacious. Trauma patients are often intubated emergently in the prehospital or emergency department (ED) setting. Nationwide, hospital crowding has resulted in prolonged ED length of stay (LOS). We sought to study the association between prolonged ED LOS and rates of pneumonia., Methods: This was a 2-year retrospective case-control study of pneumonia risk among blunt trauma patients presenting to an urban Level I trauma center who were emergently intubated. The trauma registry was queried for demographic and clinical information. All patients who were intubated prehospital or in the ED and developed pneumonia were identified as cases. A group of matched controls with equivalent age, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score (AIS) chest, and AIS head who did not develop pneumonia were identified. A comparison of ED LOS between the two groups was assessed using conditional logistic regression., Results: We identified 509 emergently intubated blunt trauma patients. Of these, 33 developed pneumonia and could be matched with comparable controls. The case subjects had a mean age of 44.6 (+/-24.3), a mean injury severity score of 32.7 (+/- 9.4), a mean chest AIS of 1.5 (+/-1.6), and a mean head AIS of 4.4 (+/-1.2). The ED LOS for the cases was significantly longer than that for the controls (281.3 minutes vs. 214.0 minutes, p < 0.05). Each hour increased the risk of developing pneumonia by approximately 20%., Conclusions: In blunt trauma patients who are emergently intubated, increased ED LOS is an independent risk factor for pneumonia. Ventilator associated pneumonia interventions, successful in the intensive care unit, should be implemented early in the hospital course, and efforts should be made to minimize hospital crowding and ED LOS.

Background: Time to definitive care is a major determinant of trauma patient outcomes yet little is empirically known about prehospital times at the national level. We sought to determine national averages for prehospital times based on a systematic review of published literature., Methods: We performed a systematic literature search for all articles reporting prehospital times for trauma patients transported by helicopter and ground ambulance over a 30-year period. Forty-nine articles were included in a final meta-analysis. Activation time, response time, on-scene time, and transport time were abstracted from these articles. Prehospital times were also divided into urban, suburban, rural, and air transports. Statistical tests were computed using weighted arithmetic means and standard deviations., Results: The data were drawn from 20 states in all four U.S. Census Regions and represent the prehospital experience of 155,179 patients. Average duration in minutes for urban, suburban, and rural ground ambulances for the total prehospital interval were 30.96, 30.97, and 43.17; for the response interval were 5.25, 5.21, and 7.72; for the on-scene interval were 13.40, 13.39, and 14.59; and for the transport interval were 10.77, 10.86, and 17.28. Average helicopter ambulance times were response 23.25, on-scene 20.43, and transport 29.80 minutes., Conclusions: Despite the emphasis on time in the prehospital and trauma literature there has been no national effort to empirically define average prehospital time intervals for trauma patients. We provide points of reference for prehospital intervals so that policymakers can compare individual emergency medical systems to national norms.