201. Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease using plasma biomarkers adjusted to clinical probability.
- Author
-
Therriault J, Janelidze S, Benedet AL, Ashton NJ, Arranz Martínez J, Gonzalez-Escalante A, Bellaver B, Alcolea D, Vrillon A, Karim H, Mielke MM, Hyung Hong C, Roh HW, Contador J, Puig Pijoan A, Algeciras-Schimnich A, Vemuri P, Graff-Radford J, Lowe VJ, Karikari TK, Jonaitis E, Brum W, Tissot C, Servaes S, Rahmouni N, Macedo AC, Stevenson J, Fernandez-Arias J, Wang YT, Woo MS, Friese MA, Jia WL, Dumurgier J, Hourregue C, Cognat E, Ferreira PL, Vitali P, Johnson S, Pascoal TA, Gauthier S, Lleó A, Paquet C, Petersen RC, Salmon D, Mattsson-Carlgren N, Palmqvist S, Stomrud E, Galasko D, Son SJ, Zetterberg H, Fortea J, Suárez-Calvet M, Jack CR Jr, Blennow K, Hansson O, and Rosa-Neto P
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Female, Male, Cognitive Dysfunction blood, Cognitive Dysfunction diagnosis, Cognitive Dysfunction cerebrospinal fluid, Middle Aged, Cohort Studies, Positron-Emission Tomography, Predictive Value of Tests, Aged, 80 and over, Probability, Alzheimer Disease blood, Alzheimer Disease diagnosis, Alzheimer Disease cerebrospinal fluid, Biomarkers blood, Biomarkers cerebrospinal fluid, tau Proteins blood, tau Proteins cerebrospinal fluid, Amyloid beta-Peptides blood, Amyloid beta-Peptides cerebrospinal fluid
- Abstract
Recently approved anti-amyloid immunotherapies for Alzheimer's disease (AD) require evidence of amyloid-β pathology from positron emission tomography (PET) or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) before initiating treatment. Blood-based biomarkers promise to reduce the need for PET or CSF testing; however, their interpretation at the individual level and the circumstances requiring confirmatory testing are poorly understood. Individual-level interpretation of diagnostic test results requires knowledge of disease prevalence in relation to clinical presentation (clinical pretest probability). Here, in a study of 6,896 individuals evaluated from 11 cohort studies from six countries, we determined the positive and negative predictive value of five plasma biomarkers for amyloid-β pathology in cognitively impaired individuals in relation to clinical pretest probability. We observed that p-tau217 could rule in amyloid-β pathology in individuals with probable AD dementia (positive predictive value above 95%). In mild cognitive impairment, p-tau217 interpretation depended on patient age. Negative p-tau217 results could rule out amyloid-β pathology in individuals with non-AD dementia syndromes (negative predictive value between 90% and 99%). Our findings provide a framework for the individual-level interpretation of plasma biomarkers, suggesting that p-tau217 combined with clinical phenotyping can identify patients where amyloid-β pathology can be ruled in or out without the need for PET or CSF confirmatory testing., Competing Interests: Competing interests J.T. has served as a consultant for the Neurotorium educational platform, outside of the scope of the submitted work. H.Z. has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Abbvie, Acumen, Alector, Alzinova, ALZPath, Annexon, Apellis, Artery Therapeutics, AZTherapies, Cognito Therapeutics, CogRx, Denali, Eisai, Nervgen, Novo Nordisk, Optoceutics, Passage Bio, Pinteon Therapeutics, Prothena, Red Abbey Labs, reMYND, Roche, Samumed, Siemens Healthineers, Triplet Therapeutics and Wave; has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Cellectricon, Fujirebio, Alzecure, Biogen and Roche; and is a co-founder of Brain Biomarker Solutions in Gothenburg AB, which is a part of the GU Ventures Incubator Program (outside submitted work). O.H. has acquired research support (for the institution) from ADx, AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, Biogen, Eli Lilly, Eisai, Fujirebio, GE Healthcare, Pfizer and Roche. In the past 2 years, he has received consultancy/speaker fees from AC Immune, Amylyx, Alzpath, BioArctic, Biogen, Cerveau, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Fujirebio, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Roche, Sanofi and Siemens. R.C.P. has consulted for Roche, Genentech, Eli Lilly, Eisai and Nestle, all outside the scope of the current work. M.S.-C. has served as a consultant and at advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics International Ltd and Grifols S.L.; has given lectures in symposia sponsored by Roche Diagnostics, S.L.U and Roche Farma, S.A.; and was granted with a project funded by Roche Diagnostics International Ltd; payments were made to the institution (BBRC). A.P.P. has served at advisory boards for Schwabe Farma Iberica. D.A. participated in advisory boards from Fujirebio-Europe, Roche Diagnostics, Grifols S.A. and Lilly, and received speaker honoraria from Fujirebio-Europe, Roche Diagnostics, Nutricia, Krka Farmacéutica S.L., Zambon S.A.U. and Esteve Pharmaceuticals S.A. D.A. declares a filed patent application (WO2019175379 A1 Markers of synaptopathy in neurodegenerative disease). S. Johnson has served at scientific advisory boards or as a consultant for ALZpath, Prothena, Roche Diagnostics, and Enigma. M.M.M. has served as a consultant and at advisory boards for Biogen, Eisai, Lilly, Merck, Roche, and Siemens Healthineers. P.R.-N. has served at scientific advisory boards and/or as a consultant for Roche, Novo Nordisk, Eisai, and Cerveau radiopharmaceuticals. A.A.-S. has participated in advisory boards for Roche Diagnostics, Fujirebio Diagnostics and Siemens Healthineers. The remaining authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF