Search

Rasmus Rivinius,1 Matthias Helmschrott,1 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Bastian Schmack,2 Fabrice F Darche,1 Dierk Thomas,1 Tom Bruckner,3 Hugo A Katus,1 Philipp Ehlermann,1,* Andreas O Doesch1,4,* 1Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany; 3Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 4Department of Pneumology and Oncology, Asklepios Hospital, Bad Salzungen, Germany *These authors contributed equally to this work Objectives: COPD is associated with reduced physical activity, an increased risk for pulmonary infections, and impaired survival in nontransplant patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of COPD in patients after heart transplantation (HTX). Methods: We performed an observational retrospective single-center study of 259 patients receiving HTX at Heidelberg University Hospital between 2003 and 2012. Patients were stratified by the Tiffeneau index (forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC])

Rasmus Rivinius,1 Matthias Helmschrott,1 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Bastian Schmack,2 Christian Erbel,1 Christian A Gleissner,1 Mohammadreza Akhavanpoor,1 Lutz Frankenstein,1 Fabrice F Darche,1 Patrick A Schweizer,1 Dierk Thomas,1 Philipp Ehlermann,1 Tom Bruckner,3 Hugo A Katus,1 Andreas O Doesch1 1Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 3Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Background: Amiodarone is a frequently used antiarrhythmic drug in patients with end-stage heart failure. Given its long half-life, pre-transplant use of amiodarone has been controversially discussed, with divergent results regarding morbidity and mortality after heart transplantation (HTX).Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of long-term use of amiodarone before HTX on early post-transplant atrial fibrillation (AF) and mortality after HTX.Methods: Five hundred and thirty patients (age ≥18 years) receiving HTX between June 1989 and December 2012 were included in this retrospective single-center study. Patients with long-term use of amiodarone before HTX (≥1 year) were compared to those without long-term use (none or

Matthias Helmschrott,1 Rasmus Rivinius,1 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Bastian Schmack,2 Christian Erbel,1 Christian A Gleissner,1 Mohammadreza Akhavanpoor,1 Lutz Frankenstein,1 Philipp Ehlermann,1 Tom Bruckner,3 Hugo A Katus,1 Andreas O Doesch1 1Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, 3Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Background: Nephrotoxicity is a serious adverse effect of calcineurin inhibitor therapy in patients after heart transplantation (HTX).Aim: In this retrospective registry study, renal function within the first 2 years after HTX in patients receiving de novo calcineurin inhibitor treatment, that is, cyclosporine A (CSA) or tacrolimus (TAC), was analyzed. In a consecutive subgroup analysis, renal function in patients receiving conventional tacrolimus (CTAC) was compared with that of patients receiving extended-release tacrolimus (ETAC).Methods: Data from 150 HTX patients at Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were continuously receiving the primarily applied calcineurin inhibitor during the first 2 years after HTX and received follow-up care according to center practice.Results: Within the first 2 years after HTX, serum creatinine increased significantly in patients receiving CSA (P

Rasmus Rivinius,1 Matthias Helmschrott,1 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Bastian Schmack,2 Berthold Klein,2 Christian Erbel,1 Christian A Gleissner,1 Mohammadreza Akhavanpoor,1 Lutz Frankenstein,1 Fabrice F Darche,1 Dierk Thomas,1 Philipp Ehlermann,1 Tom Bruckner,3 Hugo A Katus,1 Andreas O Doesch11Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Pneumology, 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, 3Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, GermanyObjective: The aim of this study was to analyze the distribution of malignancies in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) and to evaluate the risk factors including immunosuppressive therapy with regard to the development of malignancies and survival. Special emphasis was placed on the effects of a mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) containing immunosuppressive regimen.Methods: A total of 381 patients (age ≥18 years) receiving HTX were included in the present analysis. All patients were followed-up at the University of Heidelberg Heart Center, Heidelberg, Germany. Data were retrieved from the Heidelberg Registry for Heart Transplantation being collected between 1989 and 2014. According to center standard, all patients received induction therapy with anti-thymocyte globulin guided by T-cell monitoring since 1994. The initial immunosuppressive regimen consisting of cyclosporine A (CsA) and azathioprine (AZA) was replaced by CsA and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 2001 and by tacrolimus (TAC) and MMF in 2006. Additionally, mTOR inhibitors (everolimus/sirolimus) were applied since 2003.Results: Mean recipient age at HTX was 51.2±10.5 years and the mean follow-up period after HTX was 9.7±5.9 years. During follow-up, 130 patients developed a neoplasm (34.1% of total). Subgroup analysis revealed 58 patients with cutaneous malignancy only (15.2%), 56 patients with noncutaneous malignancy only (14.7%), and 16 patients with both cutaneous and noncutaneous malignancy (4.2%). Statistically significant risk factors associated with an increased risk of malignancy after HTX were older age (P1 treated rejection episode (TRE) in the first year after HTX (P=0.0091). Administration of CsA (P=0.0195), AZA (P=0.0008), or steroids (P=0.0018) for >1 year after HTX was associated with increased development of malignancy, whereas administration of MMF (P

Matthias Helmschrott,1 Jan Beckendorf,1 Ceylan Akyol,1 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Bastian Schmack,2 Christian Erbel,1 Christian A Gleissner,1 Mohammadreza Akhavanpoor,1 Philipp Ehlermann,1 Tom Bruckner,3 Hugo A Katus,1 Andreas O Doesch1 1Department of Cardiology, Angiology, Pneumology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; 3Institute for Medical Biometry and Informatics, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Background: The use of tacrolimus (TAC) in patients after heart transplantation (HTX) has increased over the last few years. Aim: In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effects of a TAC (conventional and extended-release TAC)-based immunosuppressive therapy regarding rejection profile in comparison to a cyclosporine A (CSA)-based regimen in patients after HTX.Methods: The data of 233 patients who underwent HTX at the Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center from May 1998 until November 2010 were retrospectively analyzed. Primary immunosuppressive therapy was changed from a CSA (n=114) to a TAC (n=119)-based regimen in February 2006 according to center routine. Follow-up period was 2 years post-HTX. Primary endpoint was time to first biopsy-proven rejection requiring therapy. In all patients, routine follow-up at the Heidelberg Heart Transplantation Center was mandatory. Results: Multivariate risk factor analysis regarding time to first rejection episode showed no statistically significant differences regarding recipient age, donor age, recipient sex, donor sex, sex mismatch, ischemic time, and diagnosis leading to HTX between the two groups (all P= not statistically significant). Time to first biopsy-proven rejection was significantly longer in the TAC group (intention-to-treat analysis, n=233, log-rank test P

Maximilian Kraeuter,1 Matthias Helmschrott,1 Christian Erbel,1 Christian A Gleissner,1 Lutz Frankenstein,1 Bastian Schmack,2 Arjang Ruhparwar,2 Philipp Ehlermann,1 Hugo A Katus,1 Andreas O Doesch1 1Department of Cardiology, 2Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany Background: Cyclosporine A (CSA) is a narrow therapeutic index drug. Available CSA products differ in the constitution of their emulsion. To compare intra-individual differences after a conversion to a generic CSA, a retrospective single-center study was initiated. Methods: Twenty adult stable chronic (>24 months post heart transplant) recipients were included in the present retrospective study. These patients were previously switched from Sandimmune Neoral® to the generic CSA (Equoral®) according to the patients’ preference during the clinical routine. Dose-normalized trough levels (DNL) and trough levels (C0) at 8 months, 4 months, and 2 weeks before the switch were retrospectively compared with the corresponding values at 2 weeks, 4 months, and 8 months after the switch to the generic CSA. Additionally, changes in the routine laboratory parameters, the number of treated rejection episodes, and the adherence to the CSA target levels were compared. Results: The mean DNL (adapted to the daily CSA dose in mg) was 0.71±0.26 (ng/mL)/mg on Neoral therapy; on Equoral it was 0.68±0.23 (ng/mL)/mg, (P=0.38). In comparison to the CSA daily dose prior to the conversion, at postconversion, no significant changes of CSA daily dose were observed (Neoral 140.67±39.81 mg versus Equoral 134.58±41.61 mg; P=0.13). No rejection episodes requiring therapy occurred prior to or postconversion (P=0.99). Additionally, no statistically significant changes of routine laboratory parameters regarding the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease or hematological parameters were seen (all P=not significant). No adverse events after the conversion were observed. Conclusion: This study in chronic and stable HTx patients demonstrated no statistically significant differences in the CSA DNL after a conversion to generic CSA (Equoral). The generic CSA was generally well-tolerated. We concluded that a conversion from Neoral to Equoral is safe and clinically feasible in this distinct patient population. However, multiple switches between different generic immunosuppressants must especially be avoided in the interest of patient safety, and close follow-up examinations must be warranted. Keywords: heart transplantation, immunosuppression, generic cyclosporine A

OBJECTIVES Bridging from a temporary microaxial left ventricular assist device (tLVAD) to a durable left ventricular assist device (dLVAD) is playing an increasing role in the treatment of terminally ill patients with heart failure. Scant data exist about the best implant strategy. The goal of this study was to analyse differences in the dLVAD implant technique and effects on patient outcomes. METHODS Data from 341 patients (19 European centres) who underwent a bridge-to-bridge implant from tLVAD to dLVAD between January 2017 and October 2022 were retrospectively analysed. The outcomes of the different implant techniques with the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass, extracorporeal life support or tLVAD were compared. RESULTS A durable LVAD implant was performed employing cardiopulmonary bypass in 70% of cases (n  = 238, group 1), extracorporeal life support in 11% (n  = 38, group 2) and tLVAD in 19% (n  = 65, group 3). Baseline characteristics showed no significant differences in age (P  = 0.140), body mass index (P  = 0.388), creatinine level (P  = 0.659), the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score (P  = 0.190) and rate of dialysis (P  = 0.110). Group 3 had significantly fewer patients with preoperatively invasive ventilation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation before the tLVAD was implanted (P  = 0.009 and P  < 0.001 respectively). Concomitant procedures were performed more often in groups 1 and 2 compared to group 3 (24%, 37% and 5%, respectively, P  < 0.001). The 30-day mortality data showed significantly better survival after an inverse probability of treatment weighting in group 3, but the 1-year mortality showed no significant differences among the groups (P  = 0.012 and 0.581, respectively). Postoperative complications like the rate of right ventricular assist device (RVAD) implants or re-thoracotomy due to bleeding, postoperative respiratory failure and renal replacement therapy showed no significant differences among the groups. Freedom from the first adverse event like stroke, driveline infection or pump thrombosis during follow-up was not significantly different among the groups. Postoperative blood transfusions within 24 h were significantly higher in groups 1 and 2 compared to surgery on tLVAD support (P  < 0.001 and P  = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS In our analysis, the transition from tLVAD to dLVAD without further circulatory support did not show a difference in postoperative long-term survival, but a better 30-day survival was reported. The implant using only tLVAD showed a reduction in postoperative transfusion rates, without increasing the risk of postoperative stroke or pump thrombosis. In this small cohort study, our data support the hypothesis that a dLVAD implant on a tLVAD is a safe and feasible technique in selected patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the outcomes associated with different types of micro-axial flow pumps (mAFPs) used in patients with acute decompensated heart failure who require left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support. The study analyzes data from a multicenter registry and stratifies patients into three groups based on the flow provided by each mAFP variant. The results show that the use of higher-flow mAFPs is associated with improved outcomes, including a reduction in inotropic scores and a decreased incidence of postoperative complications. The study suggests that higher-flow mAFPs may enhance patient recovery and facilitate myocardial unloading. However, there was no statistically significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups. [Extracted from the article]