M. Zupancic, Johannes Rusch, Florian Leese, S. Zlatkovic, A. Stovicek, Romana K. Salis, Jens Boenigk, Jeremy J. Piggott, Tina Elersek, Peeter Nõges, Larissa Frühe, Thorsten Stoeck, Karel Šimek, Sandi Orlić, Adam Petrusek, Agnès Bouchez, David A. Strand, Tadeusz Fleituch, M. Gajdosova, Kristina Cermakova, Jan Pawlowski, Tristan Cordier, Jan Kopecky, Marlen I. Vasquez, Nadine Graupner, Teofana Chonova, Trude Vrålstad, Arne Haegerbaeumer, Kristel Panksep, Ursula Eisendle, Stefano Fazi, A. M. Kelly, Janina Schenk, Marketa Sagova-Mareckova, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZU), Universität Duisburg-Essen [Essen], Centre Alpin de Recherche sur les Réseaux Trophiques et Ecosystèmes Limniques (CARRTEL), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (USMB [Université de Savoie] [Université de Chambéry])-Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), ID-Gene ecodiagnostics [Geneva], University of Geneva [Switzerland], Universität Salzburg, National Institute of Biology [Ljubljana] (NIB), Natl Res Council CNR, Inst Ecosyst Study ISE, Res Unit Pisa, Pisa, Italy, Polish Academy of Sciences (PAN), Technische Universität Kaiserslautern (TU Kaiserslautern), Charles University [Prague] (CU), Universität Bielefeld = Bielefeld University, University of Dublin, Oil Crops Research Institute (OCRI), Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), Estonian University of Life Sciences (EMU), Institut Ruđer Bošković (IRB), Norwegian Veterinary Institute [Oslo], University of Oslo (UiO), Lund University [Lund], Biology Centre of the Czech Academy of Sciences (BIOLOGY CENTRE CAS), Czech Academy of Sciences [Prague] (CAS), and Cyprus University of Technology
International audience; Bioindication has become an indispensable part of water quality monitoring in most countries of the world, with the presence and abundance of bioindicator taxa, mostly multicellular eukaryotes, used for biotic indices. In contrast, microbes (bacteria, archaea and protists) are seldom used as bioindicators in routine assessments, although they have been recognized for their importance in environmental processes. Recently, the use of molecular methods has revealed unexpected diversity within known functional groups and novel metabolic pathways that are particularly important in energy and nutrient cycling. In various habitats, microbial communities respond to eutrophication, metals, and natural or anthropogenic organic pollutants through changes in diversity and function. In this review, we evaluated the common trends in these changes, documenting that they have value as bioindicators and can be used not only for monitoring but also for improving our understanding of the major processes in lotic and lentic environments. Current knowledge provides a solid foundation for exploiting microbial taxa, community structures and diversity, as well as functional genes, in novel monitoring programs. These microbial community measures can also be combined into biotic indices, improving the resolution of individual bioindicators. Here, we assess particular molecular approaches complemented by advanced bioinformatic analysis, as these are the most promising with respect to detailed bioindication value. We conclude that microbial community dynamics are a missing link important for our understanding of rapid changes in the structure and function of aquatic ecosystems, and should be addressed in the future environmental monitoring of freshwater ecosystems.