Search

Introduction: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) has always been part of breast cancer (BC) treatment. However, during the past 25 years, the surgical management of the axilla has shifted towards a more conservative approach. Until now, ALND has remained the standard surgical technique when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is macrometastatic. However, ALND may now be considered overtreatment for early-stage BC. The SINODAR-ONE trial is a prospective non-inferiority multicenter randomized study aimed at assessing the role of ALND in patients undergoing either breast-conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy for T1-2 BC presenting 1-2 macrometastatic SLNs. Objectives: The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) only was associated with clinically relevant worsening of the prognosis compared with ALND in terms of overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate whether there was increased regional (lymph node recurrence) or distant recurrence in terms of recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with macrometastatic SLN who did not undergo ALND. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to either removal of ≥10 axillary level I/II non-SLNs followed by adjuvant therapy (standard arm) or no further axillary treatment (experimental arm). Results: The trial started in April 2015 and ceased in April 2020, involving 889 patients. The majority of the patients (75.2%) underwent BCS; 328 of 439 patients (74.7%) in the standard treatment arm, and 333 of 440 patients (75.7%) in the experimental treatment arm. 218 patients (24.8%) underwent mastectomy. SLN status at randomization was comparable between the two groups of treatment, with a median number of two SLNs removed and a median number of one positive SLN in both arms. The median number of non-SLNs identified at definitive histopathological evaluation was 16 (interquartile range [IQR] 12–21) in the ALND group. Overall, 193 of 439 patients (44.0%) in the standard treatment arm had additional macrometastases in the removed axillary lymph nodes. However, the median number of positive non SLNs was 0 (IQR 0–1) in the ALND group. Median follow-up was 34.0 months. There were eight deaths (ALND, 4; SNLB only, 4), with a 5-year cumulative mortality of 5.8% and 2.1% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.984). There were 26 recurrences (ALND 11; SNLB only, 15), with a 5-year cumulative incidence of recurrence of 6.9% and 3.3% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively (p = 0.444). Only one axillary lymph node recurrence was observed in each arm. The 5-year OS rates were 98.9% and 98.8%, in the ALND and SNLB only arm, respectively (p = 0.936). Conclusion: The 3-year survival and relapse rates of T1-2 BC patients with 1-2 macrometastatic SLNs treated with SLNB only, and adjuvant therapy, were not inferior to those of patients treated with ALND. These results do not support the use of routine ALND in patients undergoing BCS. However, given the low number of patients treated with mastectomy, there is no certainty that ALND omission can be extended also to this sub-group. In order to collect further evidence regarding the safety of the experimental treatment in patients candidates for mastectomy, the reopening of the enrollment of these patients as part of a single-arm experimental study started in June 2022. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Andrea Sagona, Erika Barbieri, Alberto Testori, Valentina Errico, Alberto Bottini, Simone Di Maria Grimaldi, Giulia Caraceni, Luca Boni, Paolo Bruzzi, Bethania Fernandes, Davide Franceschini, Ruggero Spoto, Rosalba Torrisi, Marta Scorsetti, Armando Santoro, Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes in breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: The current status and future perspectives of the multicenter randomized clinical trial SINODAR-ONE [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-06-01.

Background A small proportion of patients with primary breast cancer who receive breast conserving surgery (BCS) will develop an ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence (IBCR). In these patients, mastectomy is still considered the treatment of first choice, even if a second conservative surgical approach is technically feasible. The aims of our study are to analyze the characteristics of patients with IBCR after BCS, evaluate and compare the different treatment modalities (repeat BCS vs. mastectomy) in terms of patients and tumor characteristics, disease-free interval (DFI), disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS).MethodsOur prospectively maintained institutional database was queried, and 309 patients with IBCR after BCS who underwent either repeat BCS or mastectomy, between January 2008 and December 2018, were identified. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence was defined as a local tumor reappearance in the same breast or in the surgical scar. Exclusion criteria were: age Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Andrea Sagona, Chiara Annunziata Pasqualina Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Emilia Marrazzo, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Giuseppe Canavese, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Corrado Tinterri. Ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence: Treatment and long-term oncological results at a high volume center [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS1-16.

Introduction: Neuroendocrine neoplasm of the breast (bNENs) are considered a rare disease, even if in WHO data they represent about 2-5 % of all breast cancer. The last WHO classification includes: welldifferentiated neuroendocrine tumor (bNET), neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and invasive carcinoma with neuroendocrine differentiation. The current knowledge on clinical management of bNENs is poor and patients are usually treated according to non-endocrine tumor components guidelines. Materials and Methods: We presented our experience of six cases of bNENs. Moreover, we conducted a systematic review of published data on diagnosis, treatment and outcome of this kind of tumors. Results: bNENS usually presented as palpable breast masses, classically appearing as irregular hypoechoic lesions at US examination and as hyperdense masses at mammography. Usually pre-operative tumor biopsy is not able to recognize the neuroendocrine components and the final diagnosis is performed only on definitive histopathological assessment. The most frequent subtype seems to be neuroendocrine carcinoma and synaptophysin is positive in most specimens. Treatment strategies, including surgical treatment, radiotherapy and medical treatment are nowadays based on current non-endocrine breast cancer guidelines, independently from neuroendocrine components, even if some studies have proposed the use of somatostatin analogues for bNET and cisplatin-etoposide for NEC. Prognosis of all bNENs, especially of poorly differentiated neoplasia, seems worse compared to non-neuroendocrine breast cancer and stage and morphology seem the best predictor of tumor outcome. Conclusions: We provide an algorithm for clinical management of bNETs, basing on available data. More studies are necessary for confirming the best treatment strategy for these patients, in order to improve clinical outcome

Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a rare breast cancer characterized by the presence of large extracellular mucin amount. Two main subtypes can be distinguished: pure (PMC) and mixed (MMC). We conducted a retrospective MC analysis in our prospective maintained database, calculating disease-free survival (DFS) and 5-year overall survival (OS). We found a global 92.1% OS (higher in MMC group and statistically significative) and a DFS of 95.3% (higher in MMC group but not statistically significative)., Highlights • Mucinous carcinoma (MC) is a rare breast cancer characterized by the presence of large extracellular mucin amount. • We conducted a literature review and conducted a retrospective analysis in our database, finding 157 cases of MC. • Our findings are consistent with those published in literature, showing fundamental differences between PMC and MMC management and outcomes., We reviewed literature and our data to find out mucinous breast cancer's overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and if there are differences between pure mucinous breast cancer and mixed mucinous breast cancer in terms of OS and DFS.

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. The SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in ≥60% of cases. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (Z0011) comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+ demonstrated no significant statistical difference in relapse and overall survival (OS) rates among the two different groups. However, this study had some limitations: small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%). Given these considerations, the SINODAR-ONE study started in April 2015. Objectives: The aims are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse. Thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Primary endpoint is OS. Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and loco-regional recurrence. Methods: Patients received either mastectomy or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy. They all underwent SLNB and were randomly divided into two arms of treatment: standard (SLNB plus ALND) or experimental treatment (only SLNB). According to multidisciplinary evaluation, patients could undergo additional adjuvant radiotherapy, chemo- and/or hormonal therapy, or no further therapy. Eligibility criteria: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes cN0; no more than 2 macro-metastatic SLNs; no distant MTS; no neo-adjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC. Exclusion criteria: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; micro-metastatic SLNs; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. All analyses were performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Statistical analysis: OS and DFS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Estimator and differences between arms were assessed with the log-rank test. Results: The enrollment of patients ended in April 2020 with a total of 889 cases (443: standard arm; 446: experimental arm). In April 2021, we conducted a preliminary analysis on 889 patients. We found the two groups homogeneous for epidemiologic characteristics (age and menopausal status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, pTNM, immunohistochemistry, histology, grading, vascular and lymphatic invasion), and adjuvant therapies. The majority of patients (77.2%) received breast conserving surgery, while 22.8% of patients underwent mastectomy. A median of 2 SLNs were removed in both arms. Overall, only 3 micro-metastatic SNLs were found (1 in the standard arm and 2 in the experimental arm). Conclusion: In sum, OS rate is 99.1% and 99.3% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively; DFS rate is 96.8% and 95.9% in the standard and experimental arm, respectively. After a median follow-up of 36 months, there has been only one axillary recurrence in the experimental arm. Additionally, we found seven distant relapses in both arms; four and three deaths in the standard and experimental arm, respectively. Citation Format: Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Marta Scorsetti, Giuseppe Canavese, Corrado Tinterri. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes. A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS4-05.

Background Whether the extent of residual disease in the sentinel lymph node (SLN) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) influences the prognosis in clinically node-positive breast cancer (BC) patients remains to be ascertained. Methods One hundred and thirty-four consecutive cN+/BC-patients received NAC followed by SLN biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection. Cumulative incidence of overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival, BC-related recurrences and death from BC were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method both in the whole patient population and according to the SLN status. The log rank test was used for comparisons between groups. Results The SLN was identified in 123/134 (91.8%) patients and was positive in 98/123 (79.7%) patients. Sixty-five of them (66.3%) had other axillary nodes involved. SLN sensitivity and false-negative rate were 88.0% and 2.0%, Median follow-up was 10.2 years. Ten-year cumulative incidence of axillary, breast and distant recurrences, and death from BC were 6.5%, 11.9%, 33.4% and 31.3%, respectively. Ten-year OS and DFS were 67.3% and 55.9%. When stratified by SLN status, 10-year cumulative incidence of BC-related and loco-regional events, and death from BC were similar between disease-free SLN and micrometastatic SLN subgroups (28.9% vs 30.2%, p = 0.954; 21.6% vs 13.4%, p = 0.840; 12.9 vs 24.5%, p=0.494). Likewise, 10-year OS and DFS were comparable (80.0% vs 75.5%, p=0.975 and 68.0% vs 69.8, p=0.836). Both OS and DFS were lower in patients presenting a macrometastatic SLN (60.2% and 47.5%). Conclusion Outcome of patients with micrometastatic SLN was similar to that of patients with disease-free SLN, which was more favorable as compared to that of patients with macrometastatic SLN.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone, without complete axillary lymph node dissection, is the standard treatment of the axilla nodal chain in early-stage breast cancer patients presenting a negative sentinel lymph node. The updated results of the IBCSG 23-01 randomized trial recently provided evidence that this approach could be extended to early-stage breast cancer patients presenting only micrometastasis in the sentinel lymph node.On the other hand, patients with large operable or locally advanced breast cancer and clinically positive lymph nodes currently receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy, which is then followed by complete axillary node dissection if the sentinel lymph node till contains tumor residue, regardless of the extent of nodal disease. Assuming that patients presenting only a micrometastatic sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy are clinically equivalent to the IBCSG 23-01 early-breast cancer patients with only micrometastatic sentinel node, then complete axillary dissection would be unneeded also in these subset of patients in the neoadjuvant setting. The multicenter uncontrolled non-inferiority trial NEONOD 2 we here present was designed to assess this hypothesis, i.e. whether or not omission of complete axillary nodal clearance worsens prognosis in patients with sentinel node resulting only micrometastatic after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Keywords: Infiltrating breast cancer, Clinically positive axilla, Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, Sentinel lymph node biopsy, Axillary lymph node dissection, Outcome

Nipple Sparing Mastectomy (NSM) requires the entire breast tissue to be removed, maintaining the nipple-areola complex, and represents nowadays the gold standard of the demolitive breast surgery. Although it represents the evolution of conservative breast surgery, NSM presents some limitations in the selection of women candidates for treatment, and still there are no real guidelines regarding its indications, but simply objective data to address the choice. How the breast surgery approach to demolitive and conservative surgery has changed over time? We evaluated throughout the years (from 2009 up to 2018) the time trend of NSM at our institution and analysed the main differences between patients undergone NSM and other mastectomies and/or breast conserving surgery in terms of cancer size, multicentricity and biological profile. We found 781 NSMs, 1261 other mastectomies and 5621 breast conservative surgeries. Among NSMs, 39.6% were reconstructed with tissue expander and 58.1% with definitive prosthesis. From 2009 to 2018 we found a general increase of NSM rate (from 21.3% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 67.3% in 2018) and a decrease of total mastectomies (from 78.7% of all mastectomies in 2009 to 32.7% in 2018). In line with the literature data, our data confirm that in the recent years NSM represents the gold standard for radical breast surgery. Undisputed in prophylaxis, NSM is continuously acquiring more support in being used as first line treatment for locally advanced disease.

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients. The SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in ≤60% of cases. Recently, a randomized controlled trial (Z0011) comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+ demonstrated no significant statistical difference in relapse and overall survival rates among the two different groups. However, this study had some limitations: small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%). Given these considerations, the SINODAR-ONE study started in April 2015.Objectives: The aims are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse. Thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and loco-regional recurrence. Methods: Patients receive either mastectomy or conservative surgery plus radiotherapy. They all undergo SLNB and are randomly divided into two arms of treatment: standard (SLNB plus ALND) or experimental treatment (only SLNB). According to multidisciplinary evaluation, patients may undergo additional adjuvant radiotherapy, chemo- and/or hormonal therapy , or no further therapy. Eligibility criteria: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 macro-metastatic SLNs; no distant MTS; no neo-adjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC; signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; micro-metastic SLNs; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Statistical analysis: OS and DFS are calculated using the Kaplan-Meier Product Limit Estimator and differences between arms are assessed with the log-rank test. Results: The enrollment of patients ended in April 2020 with a total of 889 cases (443: standard arm; 446: experimental arm). In June 2020, we conducted an ad interim analysis on 889 patients. We found the two groups homogeneous for epidemiologic characteristics (age and menopausal status), tumor characteristics (tumor size, pTNM, immunohistochemistry, histology, grading, vascular and lymphatic invasion), adjuvant therapies and surgery on T. In particular we have performed a 23,1% of mastectomies in the standard arm and 20,1% in the experimental arm. We found a median of 2 sentinel lymph nodes removed in both arms and 1 non-sentinel positive lymph node in the experimental arm, and only 3 micro-metastases (1 in the standard arm and 2 in the experimental arm). Conclusion: In sum, with a median follow-up of 30 months, there have been no axillary recurrence in both arms. In the standard arm we found 8 total events (2 deaths and 6 distant relapses) and in in the experimental arm 6 events (1 death and 5 distant relapses), with a projected 5-years cumulative incidence of 6,5% in standard arm and 4,85% in the experimental arm. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Chiara Anghelone, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Arianna Rubino, Damiano Gentile, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes : A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD4-01.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone is the current surgical axillary treatment for early-stage breast cancer patients with a negative sentinel lymph node (SLN). The possibility to omit axillary dissection also in presence of positive SLNs has been promoted by the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group (ASOCOG) Z0011 randomized trial. Several limitations and evidences of potential selection bias made this trial fairly controversial. Stronger evidence than currently available is needed on the safety of foregoing axillary dissection in well-defined populations of patients with positive SLNs. The Italian multicentre SINODAR ONE randomized trial here presented was designed with this aim.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) allows for staging of the axillary node status in early-stage breast cancer (BC) patients and avoiding complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) when the sentinel lymph node (SLN) is proven to be free of disease. In a previous randomized trial we compared SLNB followed by ALND (ALND arm) with SLNB followed by ALND only if the SLN presented metastasis (SLNB arm). At a mid-term of ≈ 6 years median follow-up, the two strategies appeared to ensure similar survival and locoregional control. We have revised these previous findings and update the results following a 15-year observation period. Patients were randomly assigned to either the ALND or SLNB arm. The main endpoints were event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and axillary disease recurrence. EFS and OS were assessed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and the log-rank test. The ALND and SLNB arms included 115 and 110 patients, respectively. At 14.3 years median follow-up, 39 primary BC-related recurrences occurred, 22 (19 %) of which occurred in the ALND arm and 17 (16 %) occurred in the SLNB arm (p = 0.519). No axillary relapse developed in the SLNB arm, while two were observed in the ALND arm. OS (82.0 vs. 78.8 %) and EFS (72.8 vs. 72.9 %) were not statistically different between the ALND and SLNB arms (p = 0.502 and 0.953, respectively). SLNB is a safe and efficacious component of the surgical treatment of early-stage BC patients. In the long-term, SLNB is equivalent to ALND in terms of locoregional nodal disease control and survival in this subset of patients.

Introduction Sentinel lymph node (SLN) staging is currently used to avoid complete axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in breast cancer (BC) patients with negative SLNs without jeopardizing survival or regional control. International guidelines keep recommending ALND in the presence of positive (+) SLNs. However SLN is the only site of axillary metastasis (MTS) in many cases (60%). Retrospective studies have also shown a low risk of locoregional relapse in patients with SLNs+ not receiving ALND.This latter finding was recently confirmed in a randomized trial comparing SLN biopsy (SLNB) alone with SLNB followed by ALND in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. However the observation of both similar relapse rate and survival in the 2 arms and the conclusion of a non-inferiority of SLNB compared to ALND require cautiousness because of some study limitations: premature enrollment cessation due to death rate lower than expected, short follow-up (6 years), small tumor size (≤2cm in 70% of cases), frequent presence of only microMTS in SLN (40%), prevalent use of “whole breast” adjuvant radiotherapy (>90%) which irradiates the breast but also the I° axillary level, thereby contributing to the low rate of regional relapse in the SLNB arm due to lymph node sterilization. Consequently further randomized trials with more precise selection criteria based on homogeneous clinico-pathological features and with longer follow-up are needed to confirm that performing only SLNB does not affect survival or relapse risk in patients with 1-2 SLNs+. Materials and Methods Primary and secondary aims of the present 2-arm randomized trial are to assess whether ALND omission in BC patients with 1-2 SLNs+ is associated with worse survival and/or increased rate of regional/distant relapse, respectively, thus evaluating whether SLNB is or is not inferior to ALND. Patients receive either conservative surgery or mastectomy and radiotherapy. They all undergo intraoperative SLNB and SLN evaluation, and are randomly assigned to either further dissection of level I-II axillary lymph nodes (standard ALND arm) or absence of any axillary surgery (experimental SLNB arm). According to International Guidelines post-surgery treatments. Eligibility criteria are: age 40-75 years; primary invasive T1-T2 tumor; axillary nodes clinically N0; no more than 2 SLNs presenting macroMTS at intraoperative or definitive histological evaluation; no distant MTS; no neoadjuvant therapy; no previous invasive BC, signed informed consent. Exclusion criteria are: in situ, inflammatory, contralateral BC; presence of only microMTS in the SLN+; pregnancy or breast feeding; comorbidity impeding adjuvant therapy. Follow-up controls foresee: clinical examination every 6 months for 5 years and yearly thereafter; annual mammography and breast echography; annual axillary echography for patients in the SLNB arm; additional laboratory and instrumental surveys in case of suspected onset of distant MTS. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS) referring to distant MTS and to locoregional (ipsilateral breast or axillary, internal mammary or sopraclaveolar lymph nodes) disease recurrence. All analyses are performed both on all patients according to the Intention-To-Treat principle and excluding those patients who did not receive the axillary treatment randomly assigned. Citation Format: Corrado Tinterri, Emilia Marrazzo, Federico Frusone, Wolfgang Gatzemeier, Erika Barbieri, Andrea Sagona, Alberto Bottini, Valentina Errico, Alberto Testori, Giuseppe Canavese. Preservation of axillary lymph nodes compared to complete dissection in T1-T2 breast cancer patients presenting 1-2 metastatic sentinel lymph nodes: A multicenter randomized clinical trial. Sinodar One Study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-01-02.

Background Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in early-breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node (SLN+) may not always be necessary. Aims To predict the finding of ≥1 metastatic axillary node in addition to SLN+(s); to discriminate between patients who would or not benefit from ALND. Methods Records of 397 consecutive patients with 1-2 SLN+s receiving ALND were reviewed. Clinico-pathological features were used in univariate and multivariate analyses to develop a logistic regression model predictive of the risk of ≥1 additional axillary node involved. The discrimination power of the model was quantified by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and validated using an independent set of 83 patients. Results In univariate analyses, the risk of ≥1 additional node involved was correlated with tumor size, grade, HER-2 and Ki-67 over-expression, number of SLN+s. All factors, but Ki-67, retained in multivariate regressions were used to generate a predictive model with good discriminating power on both the training and the validation sets (AUC 0.73 and 0.75, respectively). Three patient groups were defined based on their risk to present additional axillary burden. Conclusions The model identifies SLN+-patients at low risk (≤15%) who could reasonably be spared ALND and those at high risk (>75%) who should receive ALND. For patients at intermediate risk, ALND appropriateness could be individually evaluated based on other clinico-pathological parameters.

Background The role of temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure (POF) is still controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of GnRHa, given before and during chemotherapy, in the prevention of POF in premenopausal cancer patients. Methods Studies were retrieved by searching PubMed, Web of Knowledge database and the proceedings of major conferences. We calculated Odds Ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for POF from each trial and obtained pooled estimates through the random effects model as suggested by DerSimonian and Laird. Results Nine studies were included in the meta-analysis with 225 events of POF occurring in 765 analyzed patients. The pooled OR estimate indicates a highly significant reduction in the risk of POF (OR=0.43; 95% CI: 0.22–0.84; p =0.013) in patients receiving GnRHa. There was statistically significant heterogeneity among studies ( I 2 =55.8%; p =0.012). There was no evidence of publication bias. Subgroups analyses showed that the protective effect of GnRHa against POF was similar in subgroups of patients defined by age and timing of POF assessment, while it was present in breast cancer but unclear in ovarian cancer and lymphoma patients. Conclusions Our pooled analysis of randomized studies shows that the temporary ovarian suppression induced by GnRHa significantly reduces the risk of chemotherapy-induced POF in young cancer patients.

Infection is a severe potential complication of breast implant positioning in women with cancer. There still is some degree of uncertainty regarding optimal antibiotic prophylaxis regimens, infecting pathogens, and risk factors associated with infection during long-term followup of these patients.We performed a systematic clinical review to assess infecting microorganisms and risk factors among patients undergoing reconstructive procedures for breast cancer between January 2005 and February 2007. A randomly selected group of infection-free patients treated over the same time span was considered as a control.Among 240 women undergoing implant procedures performed and followed up as outpatients, 16 patients with prosthetic infections were observed (infection rate 6.7%). Infection was recorded within six months from surgery in 94% of the cases, with an overall mean time to infection of 95 days. The time interval between surgery and infection did not support a diagnosis of hospital-acquired infection in most cases. Gram-negative microorganisms were identified in seven cases. A higher proportion of patients with implant infection underwent radiotherapy or chemotherapy after surgery for advanced tumors compared with the control patients without infection.Extended post-operative surveillance is indicated, at least for the first six months after breast implant placement, particularly for women who need radiotherapy or chemotherapy after implant surgery. Gram-negative bacilli may be involved more often in late infections than otherwise expected. This finding may influence initial empiric antibiotic treatment.

Several studies have shown that the majority of in-breast recurrences following lumpectomy are at or near the original tumor site while ipsilateral breast recurrences further afield occur rarely. This suggests that the radiation dose could be delivered exclusively to the tumor bed, allowing larger fractions to be used without increasing toxicity and shortening the total treatment time. We investigated the use of the MammoSite irradiation system with a view to analyzing complications, cosmesis and patient comfort. Between 2004 and 2007 intracavity brachytherapy was given to 30 patients using the MammoSite device. The reference isodose was prescribed to the lumpectomy cavity with a 1 cm margin. Geometric parameters and anatomic position of the applicator after implantation were checked via CT, x-ray and ultrasound. Analysis was done for patient quality of life, cosmesis, early and late complications. Forty-nine patients received a proposal for MammoSite brachytherapy. Nine declined, 40 enrolled while 10 were excluded for various reasons (Table 5). A total of 30 patients were actually treated to 34 Gy (2 × 3.4 Gy) in 5 days. We observed 3 cases (10%) of infection within 3 months of implantation. Symptomatic seroma was seen in five patients (16.6%) at 6 months, in three (10%) at 12 months, and in just one patient (3.3%) at 18 months. Good to excellent cosmetic results were achieved in 75% by patient and physician ratings. Accelerated partial breast irradiation using the MammoSite catheter produces favorable short-term outcomes, limited toxic effects on skin, and optimal cosmetic results. Patient tolerance for the treatment is very high. Critical issues may regard the importance of good cavity conformance and adequate balloon-skin distance in avoiding possible dose excesses to the skin. For a selected patient group, this could be a valid alternative to conventional whole breast irradiation. Table 5. Causes of Exclusion from the Protocol Causes No. pts EIC 1 Tumor size 2 Lobular carcinoma 3 Rupture 1 N+ 3

Background and Objectives Literature review suggests that the sentinel lymph node (sN) represents a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients; however, some important issues, such as the optimisation of the technique for the intraoperative identification of the sN, the role of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sN, and the clinical implications of sN metastasis as regards the surgical management of the axilla, still require further confirmation. The authors aimed (1) to assess the feasibility of sN identification with a combined approach (vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery, RGS) and the specific contribution of either techniques to the detection of the sN, (2) to determine the accuracy and usefulness of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sN in order to perform a one-stage surgical procedure, and (3) to define how the sN might modulate the therapeutic planning in different stages of disease. Materials and Methods From October 1997 to June 2001, 334 patients with early-stage (T1–2 N0 M0) invasive mammary carcinoma underwent sN biopsy; the average age of patients was 61.5 years (range, 39–75 years). In a subset of 153 patients, both vital blue dye (Patent Blue-V) lymphatic mapping and RGS were used to identify the sN, and the relative contribution of each of the two techniques was assessed. Results In the whole group, the sN was identified in 326 of 334 patients (97.6%), and 105 of 326 patients (37.3%) had positive axillary lymph nodes (pN+). In 9 of 105 pN+ patients, the definitive histologic examination of the sN did not show metastases but these were detected in non-sN, thus giving an 8.6% false-negative rate, a negative predictive value of 94.5% (156/165), and an accuracy of 96.5% (252/261). As regards the specific contribution of the two different techniques used in the identification of the sN, the detection rate was 73.8% (113/153) with Patent Blue-V alone, 94.1% (144/153) with RGS alone, and 98.7% (151/153) with Patent Blue-V combined with RGS (P

Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine with considerable activity and minimal myelosuppression and alopecia. This phase I study evaluated the addition of capecitabine to epirubicin/docetaxel combination therapy as first-line treatment for advanced breast cancer.Twenty-three female patients with advanced breast cancer received capecitabine (765-1060 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 3-week treatment cycle) in combination with epirubicin and docetaxel (75 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1).The maximum tolerated dose of capecitabine was 985 mg/m2 and the principal dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia. No grade 3/4 anemia or thrombocytopenia occurred. There were no grade 4 non-hematological events and grade 3 events other than alopecia were rare. Alopecia occurred in all patients and treatment cycles, and asthenia occurred in all patients and in 84% of treatment cycles. Other frequent adverse events included nausea, vomiting, fever, paresthesia and elevated transaminase levels. An objective response to treatment was observed in 91% (95% confidence interval 72% to 99%) of patients.The addition of capecitabine to docetaxel/epirubicin combination therapy provides a well-tolerated and active first-line chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced breast cancer, and merits phase II/III evaluation.

Background and Objectives Recent studies have demonstrated that the sentinel lymph node (sN) can be considered a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients. However, some important issues, such as optimization of the technique for the intraoperative identification of the sN, and the clinical implications of sN metastasis as regards the surgical management of the axilla still require further elucidation. The objectives of this study was to assess (1) the feasibility of sN identification with a combined approach (vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery, RGS) and the specific contribution of either techniques to the detection of the sN, and (2) the correlation between the size of sN metastasis (micrometastasis ≤ 2 mm; macrometastasis > 2), primary tumour size, and the status of nonsentinel nodes (nsN) in the axilla. Methods Between October of 1997 and December of 1999, 212 patients with breast cancer (average age: 61 years; range, 40–79 years) underwent sN biopsy before performing standard axillary dissection. In a subset of 153 patients, both vital blue dye (Patent Blue-V) lymphatic mapping and RGS were used to identify the sN, and the relative contribution of each of the two techniques was assessed. Results Overall, the sN was identified in 206 of 212 patients (97.1%); at histologic examination of all dissected nodes, 77 of 206 patients had positive nodes (37.3%). The false-negative rate was 6.5% (5/77), the negative predictive value was 96.3% (129/134), and accuracy was 97.6% (201/206). Among 72 patients with positive sN, micrometastases were detected in 21 cases and macrometastases in 51. When micrometastases only were observed, the sN was the exclusive site of nodal metastasis in 17 of 21 cases (80.9%); in the remaining 4 cases (19.1%), nsN metastases were detected in 3 of 14 pT1c patients (21.5%), and 1 of 5 pT2 patients (20%). Macrometastases were detected in patients with tumors classified as pT1b or larger: the sN was the exclusive site of metastasis in 3 of 4 pT1b patients (75%), in 14 of 29 pT1c patients (48.2%), and in 3 of 18 pT2 patients (16.6%). The specific contribution of the two different techniques used in the identification of the sN was evaluated; the detection rate was 73.8% (113 of 153) with Patent Blue-V alone, 94.1% (144 of 153) with RGS alone, and 98.7% (151 of 153) with Patent Blue-V combined with RGS (P

Twenty-one patients with histologically proven locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) were treated with a combined modality approach based on primary chemotherapy and radical modified mastectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Surgery was performed by using radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) technique with the preoperative injection of Iodine-125 labeled monoclonal antibodies (MoAbs) B72.3 anti-TAG (11 patients, Group A) and FO23C5 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; 10 patients, Group B). The role of RIGS was defined at surgery by using an intraoperative hand-held gamma-detecting probe (GDP) to locate the primary tumor, possible clinically occult multicentric foci and ipsilateral lymph node metastases. In Group A, RIGS correctly defined the primary tumor in seven out of 11 patients (63.3%) and was able to find multicentric tumors in two out of four patients (50%). Positive lymph nodes were identified by RIGS in three out of eight patients (37.5%). In Group B, patients RIGS correctly located the primary in 4/10 cases (40%); in two RIGS-positive cases, the tumor was clinically not evident after primary chemotherapy (yT0). RIGS correctly identified multicentric foci of tumor in one out of two cases (50%). Correct lymph nodal RIGS assessment was observed in three out of nine patients (33.3%). No RIGS false-positive findings occurred in the 21 patients included in the study. RIGS appears to be a reliable technique for the intraoperative diagnosis and staging of breast cancer with a potential role especially when conservative surgery is planned after primary chemotherapy in LABC.

PURPOSE The purpose of our study was to test dynamic helical CT (hCT) in the evaluation of breast tumors. METHOD Thirty-six patients with 39 suspected lesions underwent breast hCT before and 1, 3, and 8 min after intravenous contrast medium administration. A marked enhancement (> or = 100%) at 1 or 3 min without increase at 8 minutes was considered as the primary indicator for malignancy. Twenty carcinomas, one metastatic non-Hodgkin lymphoma, six fibroadenomas, and six other benign findings were histologically assessed. Six cases had negative fine needle aspiration cytology and at least a 2 year negative follow-up. RESULTS hCT showed a 100% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity. Considering carcinomas and fibroadenomas, significant differences were found for the percent enhancement at 1 min (p = 0.002) as well as for the density increase or decrease at 3 versus 1 min (p = 0.0035), at 8 versus 1 min (p = 0.0027), and at 8 versus 3 min (p = 0.0180). CONCLUSION hCT proved to have a high diagnostic efficacy in evaluating breast tumors. Even though it involves some exposure to radiation, it should be considered in patients in whom MR is contraindicated.

AIMS Clinical records of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were reviewed in order to evaluate the prognostic role of lymph-node level involvement. METHODS From 1982 to 1991, 1143 patients had radical mastectomy or conservative surgery with total axillary dissection: 461 patients of mean age 57.1 years (range: 25-89 years) were lymph-node positive (pN1); 369 patients (80%) had radical mastectomy; and 92 patients (20%) had conservative treatment plus post-operative radiotherapy, with the same mean number (n = 16) of lymph nodes collected in the surgical specimen. Data were analysed for the number of positive lymph nodes and level of involvement. RESULTS Level I, Levels I + II and Levels I + II + III were involved in 44.9, 18 and 21.4% of patients, respectively; 'skip metastases' occurred in 72 of 461 pN1 patients (15.5%). A univariate analysis showed that prognosis was directly related to the number of levels involved (P < 0.001), and skip metastases had the same prognostic role as Level I involvement. The numbers of involved lymph-node levels and metastatic lymph nodes were well correlated; multivariate analysis showed that involvement of Levels I and III was independently correlated with prognosis. After adjustment for age and number of positive lymph nodes, the number of involved lymph-node levels was an independent prognostic factor, with highest predictability when all three lymph-node levels were positive (P = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS The prognostic value of lymph-node status should be defined not only by the number of metastatic lymph nodes, but also by the number of levels of involvement.

To evaluate ultrasonographic (US)-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of intraductal masses performed immediately after galactography and to compare cytologic findings from US-guided FNA with those from nipple discharge.In 36 patients with nipple discharge from a single duct in one breast and intraductal masses diagnosed at galactography, US was performed to detect intraductal lesions and perform FNA before removal of the galactographic catheter. Cytologic analysis of nipple discharge, excisional biopsy, and histopathologic evaluation were performed in all patients.Cytologic analysis revealed 23 nonpapillary benignancies, seven papillomas, five indeterminate cases, and one carcinoma. US-guided FNA cytologic analysis revealed 16 papillomas, 10 nonpapillary benignancies, five indeterminate cases, and three carcinomas. The two carcinomas misdiagnosed as papillomas at US-guided FNA cytologic analysis were papillary in situ carcinomas, while the three carcinomas correctly identified were invasive (only one was detected with cytologic analysis of nipple discharge). With cytologic analysis of nipple discharge, nine (25%) of 36 diagnoses were correct, and with US-guided FNA, 18 (50%) were correct (P = .0352).Compared with cytologic analysis of nipple discharge, US-guided FNA cytologic analysis seems to add useful information for tailored surgical planning.

Background This study aimed to establish if women with a diagnosis of flat epithelial atypia (FEA) without residual microcalcifications at stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VABB) could be managed with mammographic follow-up (FU) instead of surgery and to compare 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices. Patients and Methods From October 2003 to January 2011, 2382 VABB procedures were performed (1373 with 11-gauge and 1009 with 9-gauge). We found 121 cases of pure FEA that were surgically treated: 57 with a 9-gauge device (group 1) and 64 with an 11-gauge device (group 2). The underestimation rate (UR) of malignancy for patients without and those with residual microcalcifications for each VABB device was calculated. Differences between groups were analyzed with the Fischer exact test. Results The overall UR of FEA was 4% (2 of 57) with the 9-gauge device and 8% (5 of 64) with the 11-gauge device. With a 9-gauge device, the UR for patients without residual microcalcifications was 0% (0 of 46), and the UR for patients with residual microcalcifications was 18% (2 of 11). With an 11-gauge device, the UR for patients without residual microcalcifications was 0% (0 of 39), the UR for patients with residual microcalcifications at post-biopsy mammograms was 16% (5 of 25). With a 9-gauge device, 80% (46 of 57) of patients did not have residual microcalcifications after VABB. With an 11-gauge device, 60% (39 of 64) of patients had no residual microcalcifications after VABB. Differences between the 9-gauge and 11-gauge devices were statistically significant ( P Conclusion Women with FEA without residual microcalcifications after VABB can be managed conservatively. Nine-gauge VABB is associated with a lower percentage of residual microcalcifications compared with an 11-gauge device, but it is safe to follow patients with FEA if all calcifications are removed with the core biopsy.

11562Background: Mammography is the standard for breast cancer (BC) screening and diagnosis. However, its limited accuracy and false-positive results necessitate the identification of novel complem...

on 21 early breast cancer patients. All patients gavewritten informed consent approved by the Ethic Committee.After the breast tumor was removed, a tumor sample wasstored by pathologist and sent to Agendia for MammaPrint test.Nine patients had a MammaPrint result which is not use-ful for clinical decision about adjuvant chemotherapy because3 were ductal carcinoma in situ, 4 (22%) had quality of sam-ples not sufficient to perform the MammaPrint assay and 2had both oestrogen- and progesterone-receptors negative andthen patients were candidates for chemotherapy regardlessthe MammaPrint results.In the remaining 12 cases (67%) both clinical risk (definedby clinical-pathological parameters) and MammaPrint riskwere considered for decision-making about adjuvant treat-ment. All cases were discussed in the Breast Disease Manage-ment Team with the presence of medical oncologists, sur-geons and pathologists. Characteristics of the 12 patients areshowed in Table 1.In five (42%) cases (2, 4, 5, 6, 11) clinical risk was dis-cordant with the risk estimated by MammaPrint. In thesecases decision about chemotherapy was based on clinical-pathological factors and disagreed with MammaPrint risk. Infact, in our Institute we recommend chemotherapy in endo-crine-responsive patients with node-positive (2 and 5) or T2tumor or G3 or age 35 years. Conversely, we do not recom-mend usually chemotherapy in endocrine-responsive patientswith age 70 years (4 and 6). Patient 11 had a lobular inva-sive carcinoma and, although she had a T2, we did not rec-ommend chemotherapy because lobular invasive carcinomaappeared to be less responsive to chemotherapy.

The clinical use of breast magnetic resonance (MR) imaging is increasing, especially for applications requiring paramagnetic contrast-agent injection. This document presents a synthetic list of acceptable indications with potential advantages for women according to evidence from the literature and the expert opinion of the panel that developed this statement. We generally recommend that breast MR imaging be performed in centres with experience in conventional breast imaging [mammography and ultrasonography (US)] and needle-biopsy procedures (under stereotactic or US guidance) as well as in breast MR imaging and second-look US for findings not revealed by conventional imaging performed before MR imaging. In our opinion, there is no evidence in favour of breast MR imaging as a diagnostic tool to characterise equivocal findings at conventional imaging when needle-biopsy procedures can be performed, nor for the study of asymptomatic, non-high-risk women with negative conventional imaging. After a description of technical and methodological requirements, we define the indications and limitations of breast MR imaging for surveillance of high-risk women, local staging before surgery, evaluation of the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, breast previously treated for carcinoma, carcinoma of unknown primary syndrome, nipple discharge and breast implants.

We undertook this phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of epidoxorubicin and ifosfamide in the treatment of locally advanced and/or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas. We used escalating doses of epidoxorubicin (from 60 to 75 mg/m2) on day 1 and 1.2 g/m2 ifosfamide on days 1-5. Chemotherapy courses were repeated every 3-4 weeks. A total of 16 patients--13 who had not previously been treated and 3 who had undergone prior therapy with anthracyclines--entered the study. In all, 15 patients were evaluable for response and 16, for toxicity. At least two courses of chemotherapy were given. A complete remission (CR) was seen in 1 patient, a partial remission (PR) in 5, and a minor response (MR) in 1, for an objective response rate (CR + PR) of 40% (6/15); this value reached 50% in non-pretreated patients (6/12). Stable disease (SD) was observed in 40% (6/15) of patients. The relative dose intensity of epidoxorubicin ranged from 10 to 23.3 mg/m2 (median, 16.6 mg/m2). The time to objective response ranged from 4 to 12 weeks (median, 8.5 weeks). The duration of response was 4 months for the single CR, and that for the five PRs was 6+ months (range, 4-18 months). Toxicity was evaluated according to WHO criteria in 16 patients; it was mild and consisted mainly of alopecia, nausea and vomiting, and leucopenia. In only three patients did we observe grade 3 leucopenia. In one case an ifosfamide-associated encephalopathy occurred, but it regressed after 24 h. Neither chronic nor acute cardiac toxicity was reported. In this preliminary analysis, the response rate obtained with the combination of epidoxorubicin and ifosfamide was encouraging and the toxicity was acceptable.

Background: To determine whether a dose-dense regimen improves outcome in early breast cancer patients, we compared outcomes with the same fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapeutic regimen administered every 3 weeks (FEC 21 ) or administered every 2 weeks (FEC 14 including support with filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in a multicenter phase III randomized trial. Methods: A total of 1214 patients with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of FEC 14 (604 patients) or of FEC 21 (610 patients). Study endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival. Associations were assessed by multivariable analysis with adjustment for age; tumor size; grade; proliferative rate; and menopausal, lymph node, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Patients in the FEC 14 arm had fewer dose reductions or treatment delays or discontinuation (26%) than those in the FEC 21 arm (33%) (difference = 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2% to 12%; P = .008). FEC 14 therapy, compared with FEC 21 therapy, was associated with more asthenia (36% versus 29%, difference = 7%, 95% CI = 2% to 12%; P = .01), bone pain (33% versus 4%, difference = 29%, 95% CI = 25% to 33%; P

Previous in vitro and in vivo studies showed a synergistic effect of concomitant doxorubicin and radiotherapy in a variety of solid tumors. From 1988 to 2000, we have investigated in a pilot study and then in a phase II study the efficacy of a concomitant doxorubicin radiotherapy treatment in patients with advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas (STS). We enrolled and treated a group of 115 patients with advanced STS, with metastases (61%), frequently pretreated (59%), predominantly G2/G3 (84%). Doxorubicin was administered by continuous infusion at a dose of 12 mg/m(2)/day over 5 consecutive days concomitantly with radiotherapy; treatment was given on ambulatory basis at 2-week intervals with support of granulocytes colony stimulating factors (GCSF). In the whole group of 115 patients a clinical objective response (ORs) rate of 67% was obtained, with 11% complete and 56% partial responses. No patient progressed while on therapy, except one who progressed in non-irradiated metastatic tumor. Treatment (median 3 cycles) was well tolerated with no WHO grade 3 toxicity (apart from alopecia) and no acute or chronic cardiotoxicity. Thirty-nine responder patients underwent surgery (24 primary tumors, 10 relapses, 5 relapses plus isolated lung metastases). The median survival time(s) was 29 months in the whole series and over 50 months in responder patients. A multivariate analysis showed a positive association between survival and sex (HR=1.8; CI 95%, 1.0-3.4), performance status (HR=2.1; CI 95%, 1.1-4.0), ORs (HR=7.9; CI 95%, 3.5-18.1) and surgery (HR=8.8; CI 95%, 2.1-35.9). Low toxicity, high OR rate and positive survival time trend make the concomitant chemo-radiotherapy an efficacious approach for advanced STS.

In addition to suppressing breast cancer cell growth, retinoids potentiate growth inhibition in human breast cancer when tested in vitro and in vivo with tamoxifen and/or interferon. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the biologic effects of all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA) administered alone and with tamoxifen +/- interferon and to identify the relationship between ATRA plasma concentrations and optimal biological dose (the lowest dose that produces a biological response). Three consecutive groups of 15 patients with locally advanced operable breast cancer were treated, in accordance with good clinical practice (GCP) requirements, with ATRA at 3 dose levels alone or with tamoxifen +/- alpha-interferon 2a at flat doses. After 3 weeks, the tumors were surgically removed. Biological parameters measured at the beginning (in biopsy tissue) and end (in surgical tissue) of the study were compared. The optimal biological dose for ATRA was 15 mg/m2/day. Treatments influenced tumor grade but not cell cycle kinetics (G0-G1 phase) or proliferation (Ki67 levels). ATRA induced progesterone receptors independent of dose level and co-administered drugs, but did not induce estrogen receptors when administered alone. Retinoic acid receptor (RAR)-alpha was not affected by treatment and RAR-alpha was moderately influenced whereas RAR-beta (concomitantly with transforming growth factor-beta) was induced in 33% of patients by ATRA alone. ATRA pharmacokinetics were dose- and time-dependent. Neither the ATRA + tamoxifen nor the ATRA + tamoxifen + interferon combinations potentiated the ATRA-induced biological changes. Future studies evaluating the role of RAR-beta as a biological marker of retinoid activity are warranted.

Several studies have been published describing the techniques of identification of the “sentinel lymph node'’ (SN). There are marked differences in the techniques used by different investigators. Although agreement exists about the tracer particle size and the volume of injection, it is unknown what is the best site where to inject the tracer or the vital dye. The aim of the present study was to define the influence of different sites of injection on imaging of the lymphatic ducts and their SNs. We performed a pilot study in 30 consecutive patients with breast cancer who underwent SN biopsy by means of radioguided surgery and vital blue dye mapping. The patients were divided into six groups of five patients each; each patient was given a subdermal (ID) or peritumoral (IP) injection of radiotracer (300 μCi in 150 mL of 99mTc-HSA microcolloids; Albures, Amersham Sorin) above the tumor site in order to localize the SN. After the identification of the SN, a second injection of radiotracer was performed, which was different in each patient subset. In some cases more than one lymph node appeared on the lymphoscintigraphic scans after the second injection of radiotracer. When the peritumoral route was used it took longer to visualize the lymphatic pathways. For the ID route, injection at the exact skin projection over the tumor is optimal. Internal mammary lymph nodes were identified by both IP (2) and ID (1) injection, irrespective of the quadrant in which the tracer was injected. Our findings support the hypothesis of a precise topographic correspondence between the primary tumor and its specific SN. The subdermal route is more accurate than the intraparenchymal route, as it allows faster identification of the lymphatic vessels and SN. We believe these observations should be taken into account for the proper selection of the injection site of either vital dye or radiopharmaceuticals.

Axillary lymph node status represents the most important prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. A severe limitation of this technique is the relatively high rate of false negative sentinel lymph nodes (>5%). We studied 284 patients suffering from breast cancer; 264 had T1 tumors (16 T1a, 37 T1b and 211 T1c), while 20 had T2 tumors. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy 18-h before surgery. At surgery, 0.5 mL of patent blue violet was injected subdermally, and the sentinel lymph node (SN) was searched by gamma probe and by the dye method. The surgically isolated SN was processed for intraoperative and delayed examinations. The SN was successfully identified by the combined radioisotopic procedure and patent blue dye technique in 278/284 cases (97.9%). Analysis of the predictive value of the SN in relation to the status of the axillary lymph nodes was limited to 191 patients undergoing standard axillary dissection irrespective of the SN status. Overall, 63/191 (33%) identified SNs were metastatic, the SN alone being involved in 37/63 (58.7%) patients; a positive axillary status with negative SN was found in 10/73 (13.7%) patients with metastatic involvement. In T1a-T1b patients the SN turned out to be metastatic in 9/53 patients (17.0%). In 7/9 patients the SN was the only site of metastasis, while in 2/9 patients other axillary lymph nodes were found to be metastatic in addition to the SN. None of the 44 patients in whom the SN proved to be non-metastatic showed any metastatic involvement of other axillary lymph nodes. Our results demonstrate a good predictive value of SN biopsy in patients with breast cancer; the predictive value was excellent in those subjects with nodules smaller than 1 cm.

The purpose of the present work was two-fold: 1) to evaluate the predictive value of the sentinel lymph node (sLN) versus the axillary-node status in patients with T1-T2 breast cancer, and 2) to form an experimental basis for a randomized trial in which one group of patients with non-metastatic sLN will not have axillary dissection. Of a group of 284 patients considered for this analysis, 264 had a T1 cancer (16 T1a, 37 T1b and 211 T1c), while 20 had a T2 cancer; 243 patients were in clinical stage N0 and 41 were N1. All patients underwent lymphoscintigraphy 18 hr before surgery: 10 MBq in 0.15 mL of 99mTc-human albumin nanocolloids (particle size between 50-80 nm) was injected subdermally at the cutaneous projection of the tumor. Static gamma-camera images were acquired every 10-15 minutes until scintigraphic identification of the sLN. At surgery, 1-2 mL of Patent-Blue Violet was injected subdermally, and the sLN was searched by gamma-probe and by the dye method. The surgically isolated sLN was processed for intraoperative HematoxylinEosin (HE) histology, then for delayed histological and immunohistochemical examinations. The sLN was successfully identified by the combined radioisotopic procedure and Patent-Blue dye technique in 278/284 cases (97.9%). The Patent-Blue dye technique alone identified fewer sLNs than the radioisotopic procedure alone (56.3% versus 97.2%). Analysis of the predictive value of the sLN as to the status of axillary lymph nodes was limited to 197 patients undergoing standard axillary dissection irrespective of the sLN status. Overall, 63/191 (33%) identified sLNs were metastatic, the sLN alone being involved in 37/63 (58.7%) patients; a positive axilla status with negative sLN was found in 10/73 patients with metastatic involvement (13.7% false-negative rate). In conclusion, subdermal lymphoscintigraphy was confirmed to be an effective technique for sLN mapping; the addition of Patent-Blue dye minimally improved intra-surgical identification of the sLN. There was a high, but not absolute, correlation between a negative sLN and a negative axilla.

Background and Objective: We performed a pilot study on 30 consecutive patients undergoing sentinel node (sN) biopsy by radioguided surgery and vital blue dye mapping to determine whether there is a single sN for each breast independent of tumor site or an sN specifically related to the site of the breast neoplasm. Methods: There were 6 groups of 5 patients; each patient had a subdermal injection of radiotracer on the tumor site plus a second injection of radiotracer that was changed in every subset of patients to test whether modifying the site or the route of injection could have impaired the proper detection of the sN. Results: False sN were detected only in patients who had a second injection of radiotracer away from the tumor site; this occurred in 2 of 5 patients (40%) in group I, in 3 of 5 patients (60%) in group II, in all patients in group III, and in 3 of 5 patients (60%) in group IV. The different route of injection (peritumoral or subdermal) always on the tumor site that was tested in groups V and VI did not impair the proper detection of the sN. Conclusions: Our findings support the hypothesis of a precise topographic correspondence between the primary tumor and its specific sN more than the existence of a first sN in the axillary basin, which indiscriminately drains all quadrants of the breast, like a neck of a bottle. This should be considered for the proper selection of the injection site of either vital blue dye or radiopharmaceuticals.

Background and Objectives: Axillary lymph node status is the most important prognostic factor in patients with operable breast cancer. Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (sN) as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in both cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer. Sentinel lymph node identification proved feasible by either peritumoral dye injection (Patent Blue-V) or radiodetection, with identification rates of 65-97% and 92-98%, respectively. However, some important issues need further definition, namely (a) optimization of the technique for intraoperative detection of the sN, (b) predictive value of the sN with regard to axillary lymph node status, and (c) reliability of intraoperative histology of the sN. We reviewed our experience in sN detection in patients with stage I-II breast cancer to assess the feasibility and accuracy of lymphatic mapping, by vital blue dye or radioguided surgery, and sN histology as a predictor of axillary lymph node status. Methods: Two groups of patients (55 and 48) were recruited between May 1996 and May 1997 and between October 1997 and February 1998; the patients of the first series underwent vital blue dye lymphatic mapping only, whereas those of the second series had a combined approach with both vital blue dye mapping and radioguided detection of the sN. Results: In the first set of patients, the sN was identified in 36/55 patients (65.4%); sN histology predicted axillary lymph node status with a 77% sensitivity (10/13), a 100% specificity (23/23), an 88.5% negative predictive value (23/26), and an overall 91.5% accuracy (33/36). The sN was the quasi-elective site of lymph node metastases because in clinically NO patients nodal involvement was 20-fold more likely at histology in sN than in non-sN (30% and 1.5%, respectively). In the second set of patients, 49 lymphadenectomies were performed because 1 patient had bilateral breast cancer; the sN was identified in 45/49 lymphadenectomies (92%). The sN was intraoperatively negative at frozen-section examination in 33 cases, and final histology confirmed the absence of metastases in 31/33 cases (94%), whereas in 2 cases (6%) micrometastases only were detected. Final histology of the sN predicted axillary lymph node status with an 87.5% sensitivity (14/16), a 100% specificity (29/29), a 93.5% negative predictive value (29/31), and an overall 95.5% accuracy (43/45). Conclusions: Sentinel lymphadenectomy can be better accomplished when both mapping techniques (vital blue dye and radioguided surgery) are used. In this group of patients, agreement of intraoperative histology of the sN with the final diagnosis was 94%, and sN histology accurately predicted axillary lymph node status in 43/45 lymphadenectomy specimens (95.5%) in which an sN was identified.

Recent studies have demonstrated the possibility of identifying the sentinel lymph node (sN) as a reliable predictor of axillary lymph node status in both cutaneous melanoma and breast cancer. However, some important issues need further definition: (1) optimization of the technique for intraoperative detection of the sN; (2) predictive value of the sN as regards axillary lymph node status, and (3) reliability of intraoperative histology of the sN. We report our experience in sN mapping in patients with Stage I-II breast cancer, with the aim of assessing: (1) the feasibility of lymphatic mapping with a combined approach (vital blue dye lymphatic mapping and radioguided surgery); (2) the agreement of the intraoperative histologic examination of the sN, by means of hematoxylin and eosin staining with final histology, and (3) the accuracy of sN histology as a predictor of axillary lymph node status.

From May 1985 to June 1992, 375 patients were enrolled in a prospective controlled randomized clinical trial of peri-operative adjuvant chemotherapy (PAC) associated with long-term adjuvant chemo-endocrinotherapy in order to test the effectiveness of reducing the time interval between surgery and chemotherapy. The short-term surgical complications related to PAC are reported in order to verify whether such treatment might negatively affect the results of breast cancer surgery. One hundred and eighty-nine patients were randomly assigned to the peri-operative treatment, and 186 to the control group. Patients undergoing PAC received one course of cyclophosphamide (600 mg/sqm), epidoxorubicin (60 mg/ sqm), and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/sqm) (CEF) within 48-72 h following surgery. Pathologically node-positive (N+) patients, who were given peri-operative CEF, had five further cycles of CEF alternated with six cycles of CMF (cyclophosphamide 600 mg/sqm, methotrexate 40 mg/sqm, and 5-fluorouracil 600 mg/sqm). All the other N+ patients received six cycles of CEF alternated with six cycles of CMF, starting within 30 days of surgery. No significant difference in post-operative morbidity was observed as regards median hospital stay (8 days), number of outpatient dressings (3.5 vs 3), seroma (51 (26.9%) vs 45 (24.2%)), lymphatic drainage (400 ml vs 409 ml), and post-operative infections, both local (10 vs 9) and in extraoperative foci (6 vs 7), in the study and control group, respectively. The toxicity of the peri-operative CEF was mainly gastrointestinal (nausea and vomiting, 55%; stomatitis, 3%), with only a small percentage (9%) reaching grades III-IV. Hair loss was the other main side effect (55%) with baldness in only 3%. Post-operative complications following radical breast cancer surgery seem to be primarily related to operative details (type of incision, accurate nerve-sparing technique, bleeding control, closure of subcutaneous and skin, drainage, aseptic technique) rather than to the one course of PAC.

PURPOSE To assess the role of radioimmunoguided surgery (RIGS) using a handheld intraoperative gamma-detecting probe (GDP) to identify neoplastic disease after primary chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) patients injected with iodine 125-labeled monoclonal antibodies (MAbs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Twenty-one patients with histologically documented LABC were treated with a combined modality approach. After three courses of primary chemotherapy and before modified radical mastectomy, the 125I-radiolabeled MAbs B72.3 (anti-TAG72) and FO23C5 (anti-carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA]) were administered to 11 patients (group A) and 10 patients (group B), respectively. At surgery, a GDP was used to locate the primary tumor and to assess possible tumor multicentricity and the presence of ipsilateral axillary metastases. Routine pathologic examination was performed in neoplastic and normal tissue specimens of all 21 patients. In addition, immunohistochemical assay for TAG72 and CEA expression was performed. RESULTS In group A patients, RIGS identified primary tumor in seven of 11 patients (63.3%) and unpalpable multicentric tumor lesions were located in two of four (50%). Positive axillary lymph nodes were histologically documented in eight of 11 patients (72.7%) and RIGS identified three of eight (37.5%). In group B, RIGS located the primary tumor lesion in four of 10 patients (40%); in two cases, the tumor was not clinically evident. Multicentricity was observed in one of two patients and lymph node involvement in three of nine (33.3%). No false-positive results were observed in either group A or B. CONCLUSION RIGS appears to be a safe and reliable technique. However, the MAbs used in this study are not sufficiently specific. RIGS represents a technique for which the full potential for intraoperative assessment of breast cancer lesions can be reached when more specific antibodies become readily available.

The use of preoperative localization procedures for non-palpable breast lesions (NPBL) is becoming more and more widespread, increasing the detection of early breast cancers. From October 1987 to July 1992, at our Institution, 253 patients (pts) with clinically non-palpable lesions underwent surgical treatment. Of the 253 pts, the lesions have been localized in 95 cases by a needle system, and in the other 158 cases by a dye injection of a 3% sterile charcoal suspension using stereotactic method (118 cases) or sonography (40 cases). The patients' mean age was 53 years (range 30–75). Mammography revealed regular opacities in 133 cases, clustered microcalcification in 75, diffuse microcalcification in 24, opacities with irregular borders in nine and opacities with internal microcalcifications in 12. The histological findings showed benign breast disease in 175 cases (69.2%), borderline breast disease in 23 (9.1%) and malignancy in 55 (21.7%). The benign/malignant/borderline lesions ratio was 3.2: 1. The majority (70%) of these malignant lesions were small cancers (less than 1 cm in diameter) and without lymph-node involvement. The biopsy cost (benign/malignant/borderline ratio, patients discomfort and cosmetic result) has been acceptable.

125 stage III breast cancer patients, including 51 cases of inflammatory carcinoma, were treated with the following combined modality approach: three courses of primary 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) chemotherapy followed by locoregional treatment and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy consisting of three courses of FAC alternating with three courses of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF). Clinical response to primary FAC was 65% (complete 10%). Residual tumour mass in the mastectomy specimen was > 1 and ≤ 1 cm in 82 and 18% of cases, respectively. Complete pathological response following primary chemotherapy was achieved in only 3.5% of cases. After primary FAC and local treatment, 97% of patients were disease-free. Overall survival (S) and progression-free survival (PFS) at 5 years were 56 and 34%, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that age, receptor status and clinical and pathological response to primary chemotherapy did not appear to influence treatment outcome significantly, whereas stage, presence of inflammatory disease and number of involved nodes had a significant impact on both S and PFS.

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) in adults (age 16 years or more) are a heterogeneous group of malignant tumours showing great variations in histological type and grade, clinical presentation, site and biological behaviour. These tumours are relatively uncommon, and the number of patients treated at an individual institution is usually limited. Furthermore, treatment strategies vary, thus adequate experience with these tumours is restricted to relatively few centres.

It is well known that the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is in most cases merely palliative, remaining overall survival very poor [1]. As in other advanced tumors, several clinicalbiologic parameters have been tested as possible prognostic factors in the outcome of disease [2, 3, 4, 5]. At today, it is not yet known if the type of clinical response to chemotherapy could modify prognosis in these patients, but is general opinion that the achievement of an objective response (expecially complete response) may be, also in advanced and/or metastatic stage, an important factor for survival. With regard to soft tissue sarcomas, a dose-response relationship is suggested for Doxorubicin [6, 7] or his analogue Epidoxorubicin [8, 9], although with an increased cardiotoxicity. Similarly, in a review performed on the efficacy of Ifosfamide (a new effective drug more recently introduced in the management of sarcoma patients) combined with anthracyclines, the highest percentage of responses were reported in studies using the higher doses of Doxorubicin or Epidoxorubicin [10]. On the other hand, an increase of the administered dose of chemotherapy has been demonstrated effective in enhance the response in different tumours, also in advanced or metastatic stage [11]. However, in all reported experiences, the major limiting factor for dose escalation is the increasing in overall toxicity, both cardiac and haematologic.