Search

Rationale: Cough is a key symptom in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: This study evaluated the prevalence, longitudinal change, associations, and prognostic significance of cough severity in patients with fibrotic ILD. Methods: We included consecutive patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and non-IPF fibrotic ILD who completed the 100-mm Cough Severity Visual Analog Scale from the prospective multicenter Canadian Registry for Pulmonary Fibrosis. Baseline cough severity and associations with patient demographics and clinical factors were determined. Relationships between baseline cough severity and health outcomes were evaluated. Measurements and Main Results: Patients with IPF (n = 1,061) had higher median baseline cough severity than those with non-IPF fibrotic ILD (n = 2,825) (24 vs. 20 mm; P < 0.001), with worse cough associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease for both cohorts. Worse cough severity was independently associated with worse health-related quality of life at baseline, larger annualized decline in DlCO, development of disease progression, and reduced transplant-free survival in both IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohorts. The IPF cohort (2.2 mm; 95% confidence interval, 1.6–2.9 mm) had larger annualized increments in cough severity than the non-IPF fibrotic ILD cohort (1.1 mm; 95% confidence interval, 0.8–1.4 mm; P = 0.004). There was no difference in worsening cough over time comparing those receiving and not receiving ILD-targeted therapy or with and without lung function decline. Conclusions: Cough is common in patients with IPF and non-IPF fibrotic ILD, with increasing cough severity over time irrespective of ILD-targeted therapy. Patient-reported cough severity has prognostic implications on health-related quality of life, disease progression, and survival in fibrotic ILD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives Interstitial lung disease (ILD) in CTDs has highly variable morphology. We aimed to identify imaging features and their impact on ILD progression, mortality, and immunosuppression response. Methods Patients with CTD-ILD had high-resolution chest CT (HRCT) reviewed by expert radiologists blinded to clinical data for overall imaging pattern [usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP); non-specific interstitial pneumonia (NSIP); organizing pneumonia (OP); fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP); and other]. Transplant-free survival and change in percent-predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) were compared using Cox and linear mixed-effects models adjusted for age, sex, smoking, and baseline FVC. FVC decline after immunosuppression was compared with pre-treatment. Results Among 645 CTD-ILD patients, the most frequent CTDs were SSc (n  = 215), RA (n  = 127), and inflammatory myopathies (n  = 100). NSIP was the most common pattern (54%), followed by UIP (20%), fHP (9%), and OP (5%). Compared with the case for patients with UIP, FVC decline was slower in patients with NSIP (by 1.1%/year, 95% CI 0.2, 1.9) or OP (by 3.5%/year, 95% CI 2.0, 4.9), and mortality was lower in patients with NSIP [hazard ratio (HR) 0.65, 95% CI 0.45, 0.93] or OP (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05, 0.57), but higher in fHP (HR 1.58, 95% CI 1.01, 2.40). The extent of fibrosis also predicted FVC decline and mortality. After immunosuppression, FVC decline was slower compared with pre-treatment in NSIP (by 2.1%/year, 95% CI 1.4, 2.8), with no change for UIP or fHP. Conclusion Multiple radiologic patterns are possible in CTD-ILD, including a fHP pattern. NSIP and OP were associated with better outcomes and response to immunosuppression, while fHP had worse survival compared with UIP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objective Despite the high mortality of acute exacerbations of interstitial lung disease (AE-ILD), there is minimal evidence to guide management decisions. We aimed to assess the feasibility and outcomes of a standardized management protocol for AE-ILD. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with AE-ILD admitted to hospital between January 2015 and August 2019. Patients were managed with a standardized protocol including chest computed tomography (CT) at diagnosis, pulse corticosteroid treatment, and a follow-up CT 7 days after corticosteroid pulse. The association between idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) versus non-IPF diagnosis and transplant-free survival within 1-year of AE-ILD was assessed using adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression survival analysis. Associations with CT chest improvement 7 days after corticosteroid pulse were secondarily assessed. Results 89 patients with AE-ILD were identified. 1-year transplant-free and overall survival were 20.2 and 51.7%, respectively. Protocol adherence to pulse corticosteroids was high (95.5%). A diagnosis of IPF was associated with higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year versus a non-IPF diagnosis [hazard ratio (HR) 2.23, 95% CI 1.19-4.17, p = 0.012]. There were no significant associations with 7-day CT improvement; however, CT improvement was associated with higher transplant-free survival (p = 0.02) and a lower risk of in-hospital mortality ([chi].sup.2 = 7.06, p = 0.01) on unadjusted analysis. Conclusions IPF is associated with a higher risk of death or transplant at 1-year as compared to a non-IPF diagnosis in patients with AE-ILD managed using a standardized protocol. Improvement on CT chest 7 days after corticosteroid pulse is associated with better survival., Author(s): Colin J. Adams [sup.1], Karan Chohan [sup.2], Dmitry Rozenberg [sup.1] [sup.3], John Kavanagh [sup.4], Gerhard Greyling [sup.4], Shane Shapera [sup.1], Jolene H. Fisher [sup.1] [sup.5] Author Affiliations: (1) grid.17063.33, [...]

Rationale: A visual analog scale (VAS) is a simple and easily administered tool for measuring the impact of disease; however, little is known about the use of a dyspnea VAS in interstitial lung disease (ILD). Objectives: To validate the use of a dyspnea VAS in a large and heterogeneous cohort of patients with fibrotic ILD, including its minimal clinically important difference (MCID), responsiveness to change, and prognostic significance. Methods: Patients with fibrotic ILD were identified from a large prospective registry. The validity of a 100-mm dyspnea VAS was assessed by testing its correlation in change score with other measures of ILD severity, including the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain, the European Quality of Life VAS, forced vital capacity, and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide. The responsiveness of the dyspnea VAS was qualitatively confirmed on the basis of there being an observable difference in the change in dyspnea VAS across tertiles of change in anchor variables. The MCID in dyspnea VAS was calculated using both anchor (linear regression) and distribution (one-half standard deviation) approaches, with anchors including the above variables that had a correlation with dyspnea VAS (|r| ≥ 0.30). The association of dyspnea VAS with time to death or transplant was determined. Results: The cohort included 826 patients with fibrotic ILD, including 127 patients with follow-up measurements at 6 months. The mean baseline dyspnea VAS was 53 ± 24 mm. Dyspnea VAS change scores were moderately correlated with the University of California San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire (|r| = 0.55) and the King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease quality of life questionnaire Breathlessness and Activities Domain (|r| = 0.44) and weakly correlated with the European Quality of Life VAS (|r| = 0.19), forced vital capacity percent predicted (|r| = 0.21), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide percent predicted (|r| = 0.05). The MCID was 2.7 to 4.5 using the more reliable anchor-based methods and 12.0 based on distribution-based methods. Dyspnea VAS was associated with time to death or transplant in unadjusted models and after adjustment for age and sex (hazard ratios, 1.16 and 1.15, respectively; P < 0.05 for both). Conclusions: This study provides support for the use of the dyspnea VAS in patients with fibrotic ILD, with an estimated anchor-based MCID of 5 mm. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose International guidelines recommend screening for connective tissue disease (CTD) with autoantibodies when evaluating patients with idiopathic interstitial lung disease (ILD). Idiopathic inflammatory myositis comprises of a subgroup of CTD diagnosed with myositis antibodies (MA), often presenting with ILD. Our aim was to evaluate the utility of MA screening in patients with idiopathic ILD. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred with idiopathic ILD to a tertiary centre ILD clinic who were screened for MA. Patients with known or suspected CTD were excluded. Descriptive statistics, univariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression were used to detect associations between MA and patient characteristics. Results Of 360 patients, 165 met inclusion criteria and 44 (26.7%) were identified to have MA. Fourteen patients (8.5%) had a change in diagnosis as a result of MA screening. Multivariable logistic regression identified the presence of MA to be associated with current smoking [OR 6.87 (1.65-28.64), p = 0.008] and a diffusing capacity of < 70% predicted [OR 2.55 (1.09-5.97), p = 0.03]. In patients with a change in diagnosis due to MA screening, 3 (1.8%) underwent a surgical lung biopsy and 2 (1.2%) were previously treated with antifibrotic therapy. Conclusions Screening for MA in patients with idiopathic ILD can contribute to a change in patient diagnosis, and may prevent invasive testing and unproven use of antifibrotic therapy. These results support the addition of MA to CTD screening panels during the initial evaluation of idiopathic ILD., Author(s): Lee Fidler [sup.1] , Irena Doubelt [sup.2] , Sonja Kandel [sup.3] , Jolene H. Fisher [sup.1] , Shikha Mittoo [sup.4] , Shane Shapera [sup.1] Author Affiliations: (Aff1) 0000 0001 [...]

he article focuses on the association between organic exposures and specific radiologic features in patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP). It investigates whether certain HRCT patterns of fHP, such as mosaic attenuation, gas trapping, and the three-density sign, are linked to identified organic exposures, validating current diagnostic guidelines for fHP.