Search

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE: To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical manage

Background: Testicular cancer survivors (TCS) are at risk of Leydig cell insufficiency, which is a condition characterized by elevated luteinising hormone (LH) in combination with low levels of testosterone. It has been suggested that this condition is associated with impaired metabolic profile and low bone mineral density (BMD). The primary aim of the randomized double-blind trial NCT02991209 was to evaluate metabolic profile after 12-months testosterone replacement therapy (TRT) in TCS with mild Leydig cell insufficiency. Here we present the secondary outcomes of changes in BMD and markers of bone turnover. Methodology: In total, 69 TCS with mild Leydig cell insufficiency were randomized 1:1 to 12 months TRT (n = 35) (Tostran, gel, 2%, applied transdermally, with a maximum daily dose of 40 mg) or placebo (n = 34). BMD and markers of bone turnover were evaluated at baseline, after 6- and 12-months TRT, and 3-months post-treatment. Linear mixed effects models were used to analyse changes in BMD, N-terminal propeptide of type 1 procollagen (P1NP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX). Results: After 12 months treatment, TRT was not associated with a statistically significant difference in BMD compared to placebo; total body BMD: 0.01 g/cm2 (95% confidence interval (CI): −0.01 − 0.02), BMD of the lumbar spine: 0.01 g/cm2, (95% CI: −0.01–0.03), BMD of the left femoral neck: 0.00, (95% CI: −0.01–0.02). TRT was associated with a small but statistically significant increase in P1NP: 11.65 µg/L (95% CI: 3.96, 19.35), while there was no difference in CTX. Conclusion: 12 months of TRT did not change BMD, while there was as small and clinically irrelevant increase in P1NP compared to placebo in TCS with mild Leydig cell insufficiency. The findings need validation in a larger cohort.

PURPOSE: To report on the clinical characteristics, outcome, and frequency of peritoneal carcinosis (PC) in patients with advanced germ cell tumors (GCT), a multicenter registry analysis was carried out. METHODS: A multicenter registry analysis was conducted by the German Testicular Cancer Study Group (GTCSG) with international collaborators. Data was collected and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were eligible for inclusion if PC was diagnosed either by radiologic or histopathologic finding during the course of disease. Descriptive and explorative statistical analysis was carried out with cancer-specific survival (CSS) as primary study endpoint. RESULTS: Collaborators from ten GCT expert centers identified 28 GCT (0.77%) patients with PC after screening approximately 3767 GCT patient files and one case was contributed from a cancer registry request. Patients were diagnosed from 1997 to 2019 at a median age of 37 years (interquartile range, 13). Two patients (7%) presented with stage I and 27 patients (93%) with synchronous metastatic disease at first diagnosis. The primary histology was seminoma in seven (27%) and non-seminoma in 21 patients (72%). PC was detected after a median of 15.3 months from primary diagnosis (range 0-177) and two consecutive treatment lines (range 0-5), respectively. The median CSS from the time of detection of PC was 10.5 months (95%Confidence Interval 0.47-1.30) associated with an overall 2-year CSS rate of 30%. CONCLUSION: PC represents a rare tumor manifestation in GCT patients and was primarily associated with the occurrence of advanced cisplatin-refractory disease conferring to a dismal prognosis.

PURPOSE: The classification of the International Germ-Cell Cancer Collaborative Group (IGCCCG) has been a major advance in the management of germ-cell tumors, but relies on data of only 660 patients with seminoma treated between 1975 and 1990. We re-evaluated this classification in a database from a large international consortium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on 2,451 men with metastatic seminoma treated with cisplatin- and etoposide-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2013 were collected from 30 institutions or collaborative groups in Australia, Europe, and North America. Clinical trial and registry data were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) calculated from day 1 of treatment. Variables at initial presentation were evaluated for their prognostic impact. Results were validated in an independent validation set of 764 additional patients. RESULTS: Compared with the initial IGCCCG classification, in our modern series, 5-year PFS improved from 82% to 89% (95% CI, 87 to 90) and 5-year OS from 86% to 95% (95% CI, 94 to 96) in good prognosis, and from 67% to 79% (95% CI, 70 to 85) and 72% to 88% (95% CI, 80 to 93) in intermediate prognosis patients. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) proved to be an additional adverse prognostic factor. Good prognosis patients with LDH above 2.5× upper limit of normal had a 3-year PFS of 80% (95% CI, 75 to 84) and a 3-year OS of 92% (95% CI, 88 to 95) versus 92% (95% CI, 90 to 94) and 97% (95% CI, 96 to 98) in the group with lower LDH. CONCLUSION: PFS and OS in metastatic seminoma significantly improved in our modern series compared with the original data. The original IGCCCG classification retains its relevance, but can be further refined by adding LDH at a cutoff of 2.5× upper limit of normal as an additional adverse prognostic factor.

PURPOSE: The prognostic significance of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in patients with metastatic seminoma is not defined. We investigated the prognostic impact of LDH levels prior to first-line systemic treatment and other clinical characteristics in this subset of patients. METHODS: Files from two registry studies and one single-institution database were analyzed retrospectively. Uni- and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify patient characteristics associated with recurrence free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS), and complete response rate (CRR). RESULTS: The dataset included 351 metastatic seminoma patients with a median follow-up of 5.36 years. Five-year RFS, OS and CRR were 82%, 89% and 52%, respectively. Explorative analysis revealed a cut-off LDH level of < 2.5 upper limit of normal (ULN) (n = 228) vs. ≥ 2.5 ULN (n = 123) to be associated with a significant difference concerning OS associated with 5-years OS rates of 93% vs. 83% (p = 0.001) which was confirmed in multivariate analysis (HR 2.87; p = 0.004). Furthermore, the cut-off LDH < 2.5 ULN vs. ≥ 2.5 ULN correlated with RFS and CRR associated with a 5-years RFS rate and CRR of 76% vs. 86% (p = 0.012) and 32% vs. 59% (p ≤ 0.001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: LDH levels correlate with treatment response and survival in metastatic seminoma patients and should be considered for their prognostic stratification.

STUDY QUESTION: Is anogenital distance (AGD) shorter in testicular cancer (TC) survivors than in men from the general population, and is AGD affected by testosterone replacement therapy in adulthood? SUMMARY ANSWER: AGD, measured as distance from anus to scrotum (AGDas), is shorter in TC survivors and does not change as a result of testosterone replacement therapy. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Animal studies have shown that AGD is a postnatal 'read-out' of foetal androgen action, and short AGD in male offspring is considered a sign of feminization caused by in utero disruption of the reproductive system. Likewise, measurement of AGD in human studies has suggested AGD to be part of the testicular dysgenesis syndrome hypothesis, which proposes that male reproductive disorders, such as hypospadias, cryptorchidism, some cases of impaired semen quality and TC, all share a common foetal origin. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The aim was to assess AGD in men with a history of TC and controls, and furthermore to examine AGD during testosterone replacement therapy in adulthood. Study participants were TC survivors with a mild Leydig cell insufficiency who participated in a randomized double-blind study of testosterone replacement therapy versus placebo for 52 weeks (N = 69). Men from the general population were prospectively included from a study on testicular function as controls (N = 67). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: We measured two variants of AGD; as our primary outcome the anoscrotal distance (AGDas) measured from the centre of the anus to the posterior base of the scrotum, and secondarily the anopenile distance (AGDap) measured from the anus to the cephalad insertion of the penis. Using multiple regression analysis, the mean difference in AGD between TC survivors and men from the general population was assessed, adjusted for height, BMI and examiner. Next, AGD was measured before and after 52 weeks of treatment with testosterone or placebo, and with covariance an