Search

Using the Kariba dam project as a case study, this article examines some of the biases and interdependencies of development planning in 1950s Northern Rhodesia in order to consider Zambia's trajectory into independence. The Kariba dam, a highly controversial hydro-electricity scheme in the short-lived Central African Federation, crystallises the ambivalent practices of building nations – materially, politically and ideologically. Colonial imbalances of development planning, most notably its ‘urban bias’, were bound to have a profound effect on the postcolonial period. I illustrate this, first with regard to Kariba's materiality. Given that infrastructures remain long after the planners and decision-makers leave, one must explore their potential for pre-structuring social change, including some types of change and excluding others. Secondly, Kariba is a prime example of the priorities in development politics that characterised both the colonial and postcolonial eras, particularly the neglect of rural populations in remote areas. At a more ideological level, the final section discusses how the dam project was contested by nationalist leaders and the resettled Gwembe Tonga peasants, drawing out the intricacies and ambiguities involved in ‘resisting’ a large-scale development project that promised to bring ‘light and power for a nation’.1 [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

The article discusses the different ways in which Hezekiah Habanyama, a member of the Gwembe Valley administrative council, and nationalist Harry Nkumbula, leader of the Northern Rhodesian African National Congress, reacted to the construction of the Kariba Dam in modern-day Zambia and Zimbabwe. The dam was built in order to help industrialize and modernize the Central African Federation, at the time part of the British Empire. The displacement of the area's Gwembe Tonga population as a result of the construction is detailed. The ways in which the dam reinforced preexisting racial power imbalances in the region are also explained.