Search

Objective: To assess the impact of low‐dose aspirin (LDA) starting in early pregnancy on delaying preterm hypertensive disorders of pregnancy. Design: Non‐prespecified secondary analysis of a randomised masked trial of LDA. Setting: The study was conducted among women in the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health's Maternal and Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) clusters, a prospective, population‐based study in Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Pakistan, India (two sites‐Belagavi and Nagpur) and Guatemala. Population: Nulliparous singleton pregnancies between 6+0 weeks and 13+6 weeks in six low‐middle income countries (Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India, Kenya, Pakistan, Zambia) enrolled in the ASPIRIN Trial. Methods: We compared the incidence of HDP at delivery at three gestational age periods (<28, <34 and <37 weeks) between women who were randomised to aspirin or placebo. Women were included if they were randomised and had an outcome at or beyond 20 weeks (Modified Intent to Treat). Main Outcome Measures: Our primary outcome was pregnancies with HDP associated with preterm delivery (HDP@delivery) before <28, <34 and <37 weeks. Secondary outcomes included small for gestational age (SGA) <10th percentile, <5th percentile, and perinatal mortality. Results: Among the 11 976 pregnancies, LDA did not significantly lower HDP@delivery <28 weeks (relative risk [RR] 0.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02–1.52); however, it did lower HDP@delivery <34 weeks (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.17–0.81) and HDP@delivery <37 weeks (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.49–0.90). The overall rate of HDP did not differ between the two groups (RR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94–1.25). Among those pregnancies who had HDP, SGA <10th percentile was reduced (RR 0.81, 95% CI 0.67–0.99), though SGA <5th percentile was not (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.64–1.09). Similarly, perinatal mortality among pregnancies with HDP occurred less frequently (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.33–0.92) in those receiving LDA. Pregnancies randomised to LDA delivered later with HDP compared with those receiving placebo (median gestational age 38.5 weeks vs. 37.9 weeks; p = 0.022). Conclusions: In this secondary analysis of a study of low‐risk nulliparous singleton pregnancies, early administration of LDA resulted in lower rates of preterm HDP and delivery before 34 and 37 weeks but not in the overall rate of HDP. These results suggest that LDA works in part by delaying HDP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine COVID‐19 antibody positivity rates over time and relationships to pregnancy outcomes in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). Design: With COVID‐19 antibody positivity at delivery as the exposure, we performed a prospective, observational cohort study in seven LMICs during the early COVID‐19 pandemic. Setting: The study was conducted among women in the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health's Maternal and Newborn Health Registry (MNHR), a prospective, population‐based study in Kenya, Zambia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), and Guatemala. Population: Pregnant women enrolled in an ongoing pregnancy registry at study sites. Methods: From October 2020 to October 2021, standardised COVID‐19 antibody testing was performed at delivery among women enrolled in MNHR. Trained staff masked to COVID‐19 status obtained pregnancy outcomes, which were then compared with COVID‐19 antibody results. Main Outcome Measures: Antibody status, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, maternal mortality and morbidity. Results: At delivery, 26.0% of women were COVID‐19 antibody positive. Positivity increased over the four time periods across all sites: 13.8%, 15.4%, 21.0% and 40.9%. In the final period, positivity rates were: DRC 27.0%, Kenya 33.1%, Pakistan 32.8%, Guatemala 37.0%, Zambia 37.8%, Bangladesh 47.2%, Nagpur, India 57.4% and Belagavi, India 62.4%. Adjusting for site and maternal characteristics, stillbirth, neonatal mortality, low birthweight and preterm birth were not significantly associated with COVID‐19. The adjusted relative risk (aRR) for stillbirth was 1.27 (95% CI 0.95–1.69). Postpartum haemorrhage was associated with antibody positivity (aRR 1.44; 95% CI 1.01–2.07). Conclusions: In pregnant populations in LMICs, COVID‐19 antibody positivity has increased. However, most adverse pregnancy outcomes were not significantly associated with antibody positivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Maternal mortality is a public health problem that disproportionately affects low and lower-middle income countries (LMICs). Appropriate data sources are lacking to effectively track maternal mortality and monitor changes in this health indicator over time. Methods: We analyzed data from women enrolled in the NICHD Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR) from 2010 through 2018. Women delivering within research sites in the Democratic Republic of Congo, Guatemala, India (Nagpur and Belagavi), Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia are included. We evaluated maternal and delivery characteristics using log-binomial models and multivariable models to obtain relative risk estimates for mortality. We used running averages to track maternal mortality ratio (MMR, maternal deaths per 100,000 live births) over time. Results: We evaluated 571,321 pregnancies and 842 maternal deaths. We observed an MMR of 157 / 100,000 live births (95% CI 147, 167) across all sites, with a range of MMRs from 97 (76, 118) in the Guatemala site to 327 (293, 361) in the Pakistan site. When adjusted for maternal risk factors, risks of maternal mortality were higher with maternal age > 35 (RR 1.43 (1.06, 1.92)), no maternal education (RR 3.40 (2.08, 5.55)), lower education (RR 2.46 (1.54, 3.94)), nulliparity (RR 1.24 (1.01, 1.52)) and parity > 2 (RR 1.48 (1.15, 1.89)). Increased risk of maternal mortality was also associated with occurrence of obstructed labor (RR 1.58 (1.14, 2.19)), severe antepartum hemorrhage (RR 2.59 (1.83, 3.66)) and hypertensive disorders (RR 6.87 (5.05, 9.34)). Before and after adjusting for other characteristics, physician attendance at delivery, delivery in hospital and Caesarean delivery were associated with increased risk. We observed variable changes over time in the MMR within sites. Conclusions: The MNHR is a useful tool for tracking MMRs in these LMICs. We identified maternal and delivery characteristics associated with increased risk of death, some might be confounded by indication. Despite declines in MMR in some sites, all sites had an MMR higher than the Sustainable Development Goals target of below 70 per 100,000 live births by 2030. Trial registration: The MNHR is registered at NCT01073475. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Few studies have shown how the move toward institutional delivery in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) impacts stillbirth and newborn mortality. Objectives: The study evaluated trends in institutional delivery in research sites in Belagavi and Nagpur India, Guatemala, Kenya, Pakistan, and Zambia from 2010 to 2018 and compared them to changes in the rates of neonatal mortality and stillbirth. Methods: We analyzed data from a nine-year interval captured in the Global Network (GN) Maternal Newborn Health Registry (MNHR). Mortality rates were estimated from generalized estimating equations controlling for within-cluster correlation. Cluster-level analyses were performed to assess the association between institutional delivery and mortality rates. Results: From 2010 to 2018, a total of 413,377 deliveries in 80 clusters across 6 sites in 5 countries were included in these analyses. An increase in the proportion of institutional deliveries occurred in all sites, with a range in 2018 from 57.7 to 99.8%. In 2010, the stillbirth rates ranged from 19.3 per 1000 births in the Kenyan site to 46.2 per 1000 births in the Pakistani site and by 2018, ranged from 9.7 per 1000 births in the Belagavi, India site to 40.8 per 1000 births in the Pakistani site. The 2010 neonatal mortality rates ranged from 19.0 per 1000 live births in the Kenyan site to 51.3 per 1000 live births in the Pakistani site with the 2018 neonatal mortality rates ranging from 9.2 per 1000 live births in the Zambian site to 50.2 per 1000 live births in the Pakistani site. In multivariate modeling, in some but not all sites, the reductions in stillbirth and neonatal death were significantly associated with an increase in the institutional deliveries. Conclusions: There was an increase in institutional delivery rates in all sites and a reduction in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates in some of the GN sites over the past decade. The relationship between institutional delivery and a decrease in mortality was significant in some but not all sites. However, the stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates remain at high levels. Understanding the relationship between institutional delivery and stillbirth and neonatal deaths in resource-limited environments will enable development of targeted interventions for reducing the mortality burden. Trial registration: The study is registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ClinicalTrial.gov Trial Registration: NCT01073475. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To describe the intrapartum and postpartum use of non-study antibiotics in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) during the double-blinded NICHD Global Network Azithromycin in Labor (A-PLUS) trial., Design: The antibiotic use sub-study was a planned prospective, observational sub-study of the A-PLUS trial., Settings: The study was carried out in hospitals or health centres affiliated with eight sites of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research (Global Network) in seven countries: Bangladesh, Pakistan, India (two sites), Kenya, Zambia, The Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) and Guatemala., Population: Totally, 29 278 pregnant women enrolled in the A-PLUS trial., Methods: We collected data on 29 278 pregnant women admitted to a facility for delivery related to non-study antibiotic use overall and during three time periods: (1) in the facility prior to delivery, (2) after delivery until facility discharge and (3) after discharge to 42 days post-partum., Main Outcome Measures: Non-study antibiotic use overall and for treatment or prophylaxis by the site during the three time periods., Results: Of the 29 278 women in the study, 5020 (17.1%; 95% CI 16.7%-17.6%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility prior to delivery, 11 956 (40.8%; 95% CI 40.3%-41.4%) received non-study antibiotics in the facility after delivery, and 13 390 (47.6%; 95% CI 47.0%-48.2%) women received non-study antibiotics after delivery and after facility discharge. Antibiotics were prescribed more often among women in the Asian and Guatemalan sites than in the African sites. In the three time-periods, among those receiving antibiotics, prophylaxis was the indication in 82.3%, 97.7% and 90.7% of the cases, respectively. The type of antibiotics used varied substantially by time-period and site, but generally, penicillin-type drugs, cephalosporin-type drugs and metronidazole were used more frequently than other types., Conclusions: Across the eight sites of the Global Network, in the facility before delivery, and in the post-partum periods before and after facility discharge, antibiotics were used frequently, but use was highly variable by site and time-period., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)