Search

Aim: Our objective was to assess clinical and pathological factors associated with a final diagnosis of endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia with a particular emphasis on the grading of atypia. Materials and methods: A retrospective review over five years on patients (N = 97) who underwent hysterectomy for a diagnosis of atypical endometrial hyperplasia at a statewide public tertiary gynaecologic oncology centre. Clinical and pathological characteristics were obtained. Results: The rate of concurrent endometrial carcinoma was 34% (n = 33) with most being stage 1A endometrioid. A significant group difference was reported for age at diagnosis (t = −2.20 P = 0.031 d = 0.43) with carcinoma patients on average older (Mage = 60.2 (8.9) years) than patients without carcinoma (Mage = 55.5 (12.3) years). No significant group differences were found for body mass index, endometrial thickness or time between diagnosis and treatment. Significantly higher rates of carcinoma were reported in patients with moderate atypical hyperplasia (27.6%) and severe atypical hyperplasia (66.7%), compared to mild atypical hyperplasia (7.1%). Only severe atypical hyperplasia (odds ratio (OR) = 21.5, 95% CI 2.8–163.1, P = 0.003) and postmenopausal status (OR = 13.2, 95% CI 1.3–139.0, P = 0.032) significantly increased the risk of carcinoma in a multivariate model. Conclusion: Severe atypical hyperplasia and postmenopausal status were significant predictors of concurrent endometrial carcinoma in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia. The grading of atypical hyperplasia may be utilised by gynaecologic oncologists in the triage and referral process of managing these patients; however, the grading system requires external validation in larger prospective studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Conservative treatments including cold knife cone biopsy (CKC) or loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) are fertility-preserving alternatives to hysterectomy. The risks of persistent cervical neoplasia in women with negative surgical margins following conservative treatment of adenocarcinoma-in-situ (AIS) are uncertain. This study aims to investigate the risk of persistent or recurrent cervical neoplasia [AIS, adenocarcinoma and/or high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN)] and compliance with follow-up recommendations in conservatively treated women with AIS and negative histopathological margins.Material and Methods: A retrospective, population-based study of Western Australian women treated by CKC or LEEP for AIS between 2001 and 2012. Histopathology reports were reviewed for demographic information, treatment procedures and clinicopathological factors. Primary outcomes were the diagnosis of cervical neoplasia during follow-up (defined as <12 months) and surveillance (≥12 months) periods.Results: The cohort comprised 360 women, with 175 (48.6%) initially treated by CKC and 185 (51.4%) treated by LEEP. The median patient age at time of excisional treatment was 30.0 years (range 18-64 years) and the median follow-up time was 3.9 years (range six months to 12.2 years). During the follow-up and surveillance periods, seven (1.9%) women were diagnosed with CIN 2/3, 10 (2.8%) with AIS, and one (0.3%) with cervical adenocarcinoma, despite their initial excision specimens having negative histological margins.Conclusion: In this study, there was a low but significant risk of persistent or recurrent cervical neoplasia in women who had initial conservative management of AIS with negative histopathological margins. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: CIN2 has a high rate of spontaneous regression in young women and may be managed conservatively in appropriately selected patients. This study aimed to investigate health outcomes in women aged 18-24 years with biopsy-confirmed CIN2.Material and Methods: A retrospective cohort study of Western Australian women aged 18-24 years diagnosed with CIN2 on cervical biopsy from 1 January 2001 to 31 December 2010. Women who had not received treatment at ≥4 months following CIN2 diagnosis were classified as managed 'conservatively'. Subsequent cervical cytology and/or biopsy test results were used to report lesion regression (absence of dysplasia or an epithelial lesion of lower grade than CIN2) and disease persistence (CIN2, CIN3 or ACIS).Results: Follow-up data were available for 2417 women of whom 924 (38.2%) were 'conservatively' managed. In all, 152 (16.4%) conservatively managed women had a lesion more severe than CIN2 detected within 24 months of initial diagnosis, of which 144 were CIN3 and eight were ACIS. There was no statistically significant association between rates of regression and patient age, Socio-economic Indexes for Areas or Accessibility/Remoteness Index of Australia indices. The 2-year regression rate for CIN2 was estimated to be 59.5% (95%CI 0.5-0.6) in this cohort of women.Conclusion: In conservatively managed young women with CIN2 there was a high rate of spontaneous disease regression. Thus, excisional or ablative treatments may be avoided in selected patients who receive appropriate counseling and who are able to comply with more intensive and prolonged follow-up requirements. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In 2016 universal screening with mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry in all newly diagnosed endometrial carcinomas was introduced in Western Australia., Objective: To compare the prevalence of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas between 2016 and 2019 with a historical control (2015). Additionally, to compare the number of cases appropriately referred for genetic assessment., Methods: A cross-sectional study of cases presented at the Western Australia gynecologic oncology tumor board was carried out. The primary outcome was the prevalence of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas. A secondary outcome was the number of cases appropriately referred for genetic assessment. The following variables were extracted: date of birth; age at diagnosis; vital status; tumor mismatch repair protein expression status (retained or lost) and if lost, the specific mismatch repair protein deficiency; patients who were referred to a genetic clinic; and family history, if recorded. Data were collected from the clinical databases of the Familial Cancer Program at Genetic Services of Western Australia and WOMEN Center, to determine whether patients were appropriately referred for genetic evaluation and to ascertain the results of genetic testing., Results: Between 2016 and 2019, there were 1040 new endometrial carcinomas. Tumors of 883 (85%) patients underwent mismatch repair protein immunohistochemistry compared with 117 of 199 patients (59%) in 2015 (χ 2 73.14, p<0.001). Of 883 tumors tested, 242 (27%) showed loss of mismatch repair protein expression. In 2015, 30 (26%) tumors of 117 tested showed loss of mismatch repair protein expression. During the 4 years of universal screening, 13 (1.5%) of 883 patients screened were diagnosed with Lynch syndrome compared with 2 (1.7%) of 117 in 2015 (Fisher's exact test 0.04, p=0.69). In 2015, 11 (37%) of 30 patients with loss of mismatch repair protein expression were not referred for genetic assessment compared with 36 (17%) of 209 patients in the universal screening group (χ 2 6.28, p=0.02). No cases of Lynch syndrome were diagnosed in patients aged over 70 years., Conclusions: Universal immunohistochemical screening did not increase the proportion of Lynch syndrome associated endometrial carcinomas identified, although the study was underpowered to detect small differences. There was an improvement in appropriate referrals for genetic assessment., Competing Interests: Competing interests: PAC declares honoraria from Astra Zeneca and Seqirus unrelated to the submitted work. SGS declares advisory roles with Johnson and Johnson, and Baxter, and a teaching appointment with Medtronic., (© IGCS and ESGO 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: In 2006, Australia adopted a revised cervical cytology terminology system, known as the Australian Modified Bethesda System (AMBS). One substantial change in the AMBS was the introduction of the diagnostic category of atypical endocervical cells (AEC) of undetermined significance., Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of histologically confirmed high-grade cervical dysplasia (cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) grades 2 and 3 and adenocarcinoma in situ (ACIS)), cervical carcinoma and endometrial carcinoma in women presenting with AEC on cervical cytology., Methods: A seven-year retrospective study examining clinical outcomes of women with AEC on a screening cervical smear. Cytology and histology results were extracted from the Western Australia Cervical Screening Registry, and time-to-event analysis was used to predict the odds of having or developing in situ and invasive neoplasia., Results: AEC was reported in index smears from 0.093% (584/622754) women during the study period. No follow-up was available in 35 AEC cases. Sixty-five of the remaining 549 women (11.8%) had, or developed, high-grade cervical dysplasia within five years of their index AEC diagnosis. Endometrial cancer was diagnosed in 21 women and cervical cancer in four women during the follow-up period., Conclusion: Cytologic demonstration of AEC requires careful gynaecologic evaluation, particularly in younger women who may be found to have either high-grade squamous (CIN) or glandular (ACIS) lesions, while in older women, the possibility of endometrial neoplasia needs to be considered., (© 2015 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Introduction: Whilst the prime role of a gynaecologic oncologist is the comprehensive management of women with a gynaecologic cancer, their surgical skills are increasingly utilised for general gynaecological and obstetric surgery. Within tertiary centres, there is increasing provision of support by gynaecologic oncologists for both emergency and complex elective cases., Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate and define the expanding role of the gynaecologic oncologist within obstetrics and gynaecology., Method: A retrospective analysis of all nongynaecological oncology unit cases from 2006 to 2012 which required the presence of a gynaecologic oncologist in the operating theatre., Results: A wide variety of cases that required the involvement of a gynaecologic oncologist were identified. These ranged from complications such as bowel injuries and haemorrhage to gynaecological surgeries in complicated patients, and obstetric patients with placenta accreta and intra-operative diagnosis of unexpected malignancy., Conclusion: The role of the gynaecologic oncologist within a tertiary centre is expanding to include the provision of support to general gynaecologists and obstetricians. There is increasing utilisation of the gynaecologic oncologist whereby their attendance is often pre-arranged prior to the surgery. However, emergency cases requiring their assistance are not uncommon., (© 2013 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Objectives: To investigate the trends in incidence and mortality and estimate survival for women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in Western Australia. CASE SELECTION AND METHODS: There were 1,336 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 1982-98. Age-standardised rates were calculated by the direct method. Age-period and age-cohort models were analysed by Poisson regression. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival and Cox proportional hazards regression evaluated the relative risk of dying., Results: Trends in age-adjusted incidence and mortality rates showed little changed over the three time periods of diagnosis. A significant birth cohort effect showed a peak in the risk in the 1924 (mid-year) cohort followed by a general decrease in both incidence and mortality risk. Survival at five years was 34% (95% CI 31.3-36.5) overall, but was only 27% (95% CI 17.4-36.7) among women with stage III and IV disease. Aboriginal women showed a risk of dying twice that of non-Aboriginal women., Conclusions: The birth cohort analysis of ovarian cancer proved better at explaining disease trends than was time period of diagnosis. Survival continues to be poor, but Aboriginal women and those with serous and unspecified adenocarcinoma tumours fair much worse., Implications: As the leading cause of death from a gynaecological malignancy, ovarian cancer is of public health importance. Historical trends in birth rates and the use of oral contraceptives help to explain at least some of the observed birth cohort trends in this study. In the long term, an effective diagnostic technique needs to be developed or this disease will continue to be diagnosed at an advanced stage when treatment options for cure are limited.