Search

In order to combat the COVID-19 pandemic, policymakers around the globe have increasingly invested in digital health technologies to support the 'test, track and trace' approach of containing the spread of the novel coronavirus. These technologies include mobile 'contact tracing' applications (apps), which can trace individuals likely to have come into contact with those who have reported symptoms or tested positive for the virus and request that they self-isolate. This paper takes a critical public health perspective that advocates for 'genuine participation' in public health interventions and emphasises the need to take citizen's knowledge into account during public health decision-making. In doing so, it presents and discusses the findings of a UK interview study that explored public views on the possibility of using a COVID-19 contact-tracing app public health intervention at the time the United Kingdom (UK) Government announced their decision to develop such a technology. Findings illustrated interviewees' range and degree of understandings, misconceptions, and concerns about the possibility of using an app. In particular, concerns about privacy and surveillance predominated. Interviewees associated these concerns much more broadly than health by identifying with pre-existent British national narratives associated with individual liberty and autonomy. In extending and contributing to ongoing sociological research with public health, we argue that understanding and responding to these matters is vital, and that our findings demonstrate the need for a forward-looking, anticipatory strategy for public engagement as part of the responsible innovation of the COVID-19 contact-tracing app in the UK. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Occupational vaccination of health care workers is strongly recommended to prevent health care associated transmission but coverage in general remains suboptimal. The aim of this survey was to: 1. Estimate levels vaccination coverage for annual flu and MMR vaccines among hospital-based health care workers; 2. Explore the reasons behind low vaccination rates; and 3. Identify potential practical and policy solutions. Study design: A cross-sectional study. Methods; An opportunistic survey was used to estimate MMR and flu vaccination coverage, and review attitudes and explore solutions. Staff from eight randomly selected wards, stratified by ward-level patient susceptibility, were invited to participate. Results: In total 133 staff responded, an approximate response rate of 68%. Seventy one percent had ever received an MMR and 42% had received the most recent flu vaccination. Actively declining vaccination was more common for flu than MMR (29% and 7% respectively). Side-effects, insufficient knowledge and vaccine ineffectiveness were popular justifications for declining flu vaccination but not MMR. Not seeing vaccination as a professional responsibility was associated with declining flu vaccination (P < 0.001). Improving vaccination coverage with booster vaccines for new staff and immunity testing received strong support from staff working with vulnerable groups (82% and 74% respectively); 70% of this staff group also supported compulsory vaccination. Conclusions: Improving staff education may increase coverage. Clarification of the benefits of vaccination in specific staff groups may also improve uptake. Routine booster vaccinations and immunity testing were generally acceptable and compulsory vaccination of certain staff groups warrants further investigation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Historically, it has been difficult to obtain population based data on the uptake of influenza immunisation in people aged under 65 years who are at risk of serious illness or death from influenza and its complications. Data obtained electronically from 96% of all practices in Wales demonstrated that uptake in this group is low, with only a quarter of eligible patients immunised. Uptake varies considerably between patient groups and between geographical areas. This suggests an opportunity for significant health gain from targeted interventions to improve uptake.

The prevalence of salmonella contamination in hens' eggs remains high. A case control study of sporadic cases of Salmonella enteritidis infection in Wales in 1997 confirmed the association of infection with consumption of raw or lightly cooked eggs.