1. Improving radiologist's ability in identifying particular abnormal lesions on mammograms through training test set with immediate feedback.
- Author
-
Trieu PDY, Lewis SJ, Li T, Ho K, Wong DJ, Tran OTM, Puslednik L, Black D, and Brennan PC
- Subjects
- Adult, Breast pathology, Breast Density, Breast Neoplasms pathology, Clinical Competence statistics & numerical data, Female, Humans, Observer Variation, Program Evaluation, Quality Improvement, ROC Curve, Radiologists statistics & numerical data, Radiology organization & administration, Vietnam, Breast diagnostic imaging, Breast Neoplasms diagnosis, Education, Medical, Continuing organization & administration, Mammography statistics & numerical data, Radiologists education
- Abstract
It has been shown that there are differences in diagnostic accuracy of cancer detection on mammograms, from below 50% in developing countries to over 80% in developed world. One previous study reported that radiologists from a population in Asia displayed a low mammographic cancer detection of 48% compared with over 80% in developed countries, and more importantly, that most lesions missed by these radiologists were spiculated masses or stellate lesions. The aim of this study was to explore the performance of radiologists after undertaking a training test set which had been designed to improve the capability in detecting a specific type of cancers on mammograms. Twenty-five radiologists read two sets of 60 mammograms in a standardized mammogram reading room. The first test set focused on stellate or spiculated masses. When radiologists completed the first set, the system displayed immediate feedback to the readers comparing their performances in each case with the truth of cancer cases and cancer types so that the readers could identify individual-based errors. Later radiologists were asked to read the second set of mammograms which contained different types of cancers including stellate/spiculated masses, asymmetric density, calcification, discrete mass and architectural distortion. Case sensitivity, lesion sensitivity, specificity, receiver operating characteristics (ROC) and Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristics (JAFROC) were calculated for each participant and their diagnostic accuracy was compared between two sessions. Results showed significant improvement among radiologists in case sensitivity (+ 11.4%; P < 0.05), lesion sensitivity (+ 18.7%; P < 0.01) and JAFROC (+ 11%; P < 0.01) in the second set compared with the first set. The increase in diagnostic accuracy was also recorded in the detection of stellate/spiculated mass (+ 20.6%; P < 0.05). This indicated that the performance of radiologists in detecting malignant lesions on mammograms can be improved if an appropriate training intervention is applied after the readers' weakness and strength are identified.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF