Search

Background: Continuity of care by a primary midwife during the antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum periods has been recommended in Australia and many hospitals have introduced a caseload midwifery model of care. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the effect of caseload midwifery on women's satisfaction with care across the maternity continuum., Methods: Pregnant women at low risk of complications, booking for care at a tertiary hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were recruited to a randomised controlled trial between September 2007 and June 2010. Women were randomised to caseload midwifery or standard care. The caseload model included antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care from a primary midwife with back-up provided by another known midwife when necessary. Women allocated to standard care received midwife-led care with varying levels of continuity, junior obstetric care, or community-based general practitioner care. Data for this paper were collected by background questionnaire prior to randomisation and a follow-up questionnaire sent at two months postpartum. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. A secondary analysis explored the effect of intrapartum continuity of carer on overall satisfaction rating., Results: Two thousand, three hundred fourteen women were randomised: 1,156 to caseload care and 1,158 to standard care. The response rate to the two month survey was 88% in the caseload group and 74% in the standard care group. Compared with standard care, caseload care was associated with higher overall ratings of satisfaction with antenatal care (OR 3.35; 95% CI 2.79, 4.03), intrapartum care (OR 2.14; 95% CI 1.78, 2.57), hospital postpartum care (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.32, 1.85) and home-based postpartum care (OR 3.19; 95% CI 2.64, 3.85)., Conclusion: For women at low risk of medical complications, caseload midwifery increases women's satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum and postpartum care., Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN012607000073404 (registration complete 23rd January 2007).

Objective: women have consistently rated postnatal care less favourably than other episodes of maternity care. Midwives have also reported concerns with postnatal care, with challenges related to workloads, busy environments and lack of staff. Given these concerns, a regional hospital in Victoria, Australia redesigned its postnatal care provision. The changes included cessation of routine postnatal observations and the use of clinical pathways for women who gave birth vaginally; promotion of rest through minimal disturbances before 9 am; discouraging the use of the call bell system except in emergency situations; introduction of 'one-to-one' time with women; and promotion of normalcy and independence. This paper examines midwives' views of the changes and their impressions of the effects of the changes on women and their infants., Design: cross-sectional surveys of midwives were conducted six months after the changes to postnatal care were introduced then again, two years later. Midwives' views and experiences of the changes; the impact of the changes on confidence and autonomy of practice; views regarding the effect on women's satisfaction with care; and the perceived safety of the changes were explored., Setting: a regional hospital in Victoria, Australia where approximately 2,000 births occur each year., Participants: permanent part-time and full-time midwives., Findings: response rates were 64% (50/78) at baseline and 60% (50/84) two years later. Overall, midwives were supportive of, and complied with, the changes to postnatal care. They agreed that change was needed and believed that the new way of providing care would be better for women and increase individualised care. Midwives also agreed that the changes would facilitate rest for women, believed that removal of routine observations for women after a vaginal birth was safe and that it would allow more time with women. Over time, midwives were more likely to feel autonomous when providing postnatal care. However, some concerns were raised, mostly in relation to the challenges around postnatal documentation, care provision without the guidance of a care/clinical pathway, and about limiting the use of the call bell to only emergency situations. Midwives were not confident that the changes would necessarily translate to a measurable increase in women's satisfaction with care, and were not confident that the changes translated into more time to spend listening and providing support to women., Key Conclusions and Implications for Practice: overall, midwives were supportive of the changes and agreed that change to postnatal care was needed. Challenges remain around the most effective method of communication and documentation of postnatal care. It is important that when major changes to care provision are implemented that care providers' views and experiences are explored given their crucial role in the introduction and maintenance of changes and the potential impact on them as care providers., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To establish the prevalence of perineal pain, the effects of pain on postnatal recovery, analgesia used to relieve pain and the perceived effectiveness of such analgesia at the Royal Women's Hospital, Victoria, Australia., Design, Setting and Participants: We conducted structured interviews of 215 women in the postnatal ward of a tertiary hospital, within 72 hours of a vaginal birth., Findings: The structured interviews revealed that 90% of women reported some perineal pain, with 37% reporting moderate or severe pain. The degree of perineal trauma predicted women's ratings of perineal pain on a visual analogue scale, with more severe trauma related to higher pain scores. Over a third of women experienced moderate or severe perineal pain, particularly when walking (33%) or sitting (39%), while 45% noted that pain interfered with their ability to sleep. Women reported moderate or severe perineal pain when they undertook activities involving feeding their infant (12%) or caring for their infant (12%). Women used a range of analgesia, including a combination of ice packs (69%), oral analgesia (75%), narcotic analgesia (4%) and anti-inflammatory suppositories (25%). The majority of women rated these forms of analgesia as effective and identified very few side effects., Key Conclusions: Following vaginal birth, women commonly reported pain from perineal trauma. This pain affected women's ability to mobilise and was relieved by a variety of agents. Side effects from analgesia were rare., Implications for Practice: The prevalence of perineal pain and the associated impact on women's recovery from childbirth warrants midwives' proactive care in offering a range of effective pain relief options to women., (Crown Copyright © 2010. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objective: women experience a range of psychosocial issues during pregnancy, childbirth and the postnatal period. A review of hospital postnatal care in Australia found that many midwives who provide postnatal care find dealing with psychosocial issues a challenge, further complicated by heavy workloads that reduce the opportunity for quality interactions between midwives and women. This study aimed to evaluate an advanced communication skills education package for midwives caring for women during the postnatal period., Design: a before-and-after survey design was used. Midwives attended seven sessions over a six-month period in 2006 and completed a survey before and after the sessions to evaluate the programme. Surveys included items about communication skills, willingness to change, learning style, and knowledge of and attitudes towards psychosocial issues., Setting: the programme was implemented at two sites in Victoria, Australia: a tertiary metropolitan referral hospital and a regional hospital., Participants: 25 midwives participated in the study., Findings: 21 of the 25 participating midwives (84%) completed both the pre and post survey. Following the educational intervention, participants were more likely to feel competent at identifying women in an abusive relationship (p = 0.002); encouraging women to talk about any psychosocial issues (p = 0.02); actively encouraging women to talk about things on their mind (p = 0.01); and encouraging women to talk about how they are really feeling (p = 0.02). Participants also felt more confident in their knowledge of psychosocial issues (p=0.01) and in supporting women experiencing psychosocial issues in the early postnatal period (p = 0.02). Participants were very positive about the programme., Key Conclusions and Implications for Practice: the advanced communication programme, implemented for the first time in the postnatal setting, increased the self-reported comfort and competency of midwives to identify and care for women with psychosocial issues during the postnatal period. The effect of this approach should now be evaluated in terms of women's outcomes., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Despite limited evidence evaluating early postnatal discharge, length of hospital stay has declined dramatically in Australia since the 1980s. The recent rising birth rate in Victoria, Australia has increased pressure on hospital beds, and many services have responded by discharging women earlier than planned, often with little preparation during pregnancy. We aimed to explore the views of women and their partners regarding a number of theoretical postnatal care 'packages' that could provide an alternative approach to early postnatal care., Methods: Eight focus groups and four interviews were held in rural and metropolitan Victoria in 2006 with participants who had experienced a mix of public and private maternity care. These included 8 pregnant women, 42 recent mothers and 2 male partners. All were fluent in English. Focus groups explored participants' experiences and/or expectations of early postnatal care in hospital and at home and their views of alternative packages of postnatal care where location of care shifted from hospital to home and/or hotel. This paper describes the packages and explores and describes what 'value' women placed on the various components of care., Findings: Overall, women expressed a preference for what they had experienced or expected, which may be explained by the 'what is must be best' phenomenon where women place value on the status quo. They generally did not respond favourably towards the alternative postnatal care packages, with concerns about any shorter length of hospital stay, especially for first time mothers. Women were concerned about the safety and wellbeing of their new baby and reported that they lacked confidence in their ability to care for their baby. The physical presence and availability of professional support was seen to alleviate these concerns, especially for first time mothers. Participants did not believe that increased domiciliary visits compensated for forgoing the perceived security and value of staying in hospital. Women generally valued staying in hospital for the length of time they felt they needed above all other factors., Key Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Women were concerned about shortened postnatal length of hospital stay and these concerns must be considered when changes are planned in maternity service provision. Any moves towards shorter postnatal length of stay must be comprehensively evaluated with consideration given to exploring consumer views and satisfaction. There is also a need for flexibility in postnatal care that acknowledges women's individual needs.

Background: four hospitals comprising a health network in Melbourne, Australia, implemented a range of initiatives aimed at enhancing women's experiences of postnatal maternity care., Objective: to compare women's views and experiences of early postnatal care before and after implementation of maternity enhancement initiatives., Design: 'before and after' study design incorporating two postal surveys of recent mothers (baseline and post-implementation)., Setting: four hospitals in Melbourne, Australia. Analysis of postnatal outcomes was confined to three hospitals where the initiatives were fully operational., Participants: 1256 women participated in the baseline survey in 1999 (before implementing the initiative) and 1050 women responded to the post-implementation survey in 2001., Findings: the response to the 1999 baseline survey was 65.3% (1256/1922) and to the 2001 post-implementation survey 57.4% (1050/1829). Comparative analysis revealed a statistically significant improvement in overall ratings of hospital postnatal care; the level of advice and support received in relation to discharge and going home; the sensitivity of caregivers; and the proportion of women receiving domiciliary care after discharge. There was little change in the time women spent in hospital after birth between the two survey time-points. Over 90% of women reported one or more health problems in the first 3 months postpartum. The proportion of women reporting physical or emotional health problems between the two surveys did not change., Key Conclusion: mainstream maternity care can be restructured to improve women's experiences of early postnatal care., Implications for Practice: maternity service providers should consider a multi-faceted approach to reorienting postnatal services and improving women's experiences of care. Approaches worthy of consideration include attempts to ensure consistency and continuity of care through staffing arrangements, guidelines and protocols; an emphasis on planning for postnatal care during pregnancy; the use of evidence to inform both consumer information and advice and in the practice of caring; and skill-enhancement opportunities for care providers in managing postnatal issues and in effective communication.

Background: There is growing evidence from Australia and overseas that the care provided in hospital in the early postnatal period is less than ideal for both women and care providers. Many health services face increasing pressure on hospital beds and have limited physical space available to care for mothers and their babies. We aimed to gain a more in-depth understanding of women's views, expectations and experiences of early postnatal care., Methods: We conducted focus groups in rural and metropolitan Victoria, Australia in 2006. Fifty-two people participated in eight focus groups and four interviews. Participants included eight pregnant women, of whom seven were pregnant with their first baby; 42 women who were in the postpartum period (some up to twelve months after the birth of their baby); and two partners. All participants were fluent in English. Focus group guides were developed specifically for the study and explored participants' experiences and/or expectations of early postnatal care in hospital and at home, with an emphasis on length of hospital stay, professional and social support, continuity of care, and rest. Discussions were audio-taped and transcribed verbatim. A thematic network was constructed to describe and connect categories with emerging basic, organizing, and global themes., Results: Global themes that emerged were: anxiety and/or fear; and the transition to motherhood and parenting. The needs of first time mothers were considered to be different to the needs of women who had already experienced motherhood. The women in this study were generally concerned about the safety of their new baby, and lacked confidence in themselves as new mothers regarding their ability to care for their baby. There was a consistent view that the physical presence and availability of professional support helped alleviate these concerns, and this was especially the case for women having a first baby., Conclusion: Women have anxieties and fears around early parenting and their changing role, and may consider that the physical availability of professional care providers will help during this time. Care providers should be cognisant of these potential issues. It is crucial that women's concerns and needs be considered when service delivery changes are planned. If anxiety around new parenting is a predominant view then care providers need to recognise this and ensure care is individualised to address each woman's/families particular concerns.

Objective: to describe how women's maternal health, particularly at a psychosocial level, is assessed and promoted during the postnatal hospital stay., Design: postal survey of public hospitals providing postnatal care and interviews with care providers., Setting: all publicly funded maternity units and selected health professionals in Victoria, Australia., Participants: hospital postal survey: sixty six hospital respondents; interviews: 38 maternity unit managers, clinical midwives and medical practitioners., Findings: there was little consistency across the State in relation to routine observations of the mother. Physical checks were much more common than enquiring about how women felt physically. Practice in psychosocial assessment was also diverse, with care plans/maps (clinical pathways) being the main tool to guide assessment. Most participants reported that psychosocial assessment was undertaken during pregnancy. Follow-up after birth also varied. Hospital respondents reported that emotional well-being is assessed postnatally by observation and conversation with women. Participants who were interviewed reported that midwives had mixed skills in assessing and dealing with complex psychosocial issues. Three hospitals administer the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale to women in the days after birth, and three hospitals provide routine sessions of structured debriefing. Survey participants reported that the busy and, at times, chaotic nature of postnatal wards affected the provision of care and the level of psychosocial support offered to women., Key Conclusions: although one of the stated aims of early postnatal care is the promotion of maternal well-being, the diversity of practices and the routine nature of many of these practices suggest that care is often not individualised or woman-centred. The reliance of detecting and managing women with particular psychosocial issues during pregnancy results in this aspect of care being given less priority postnatally than may be ideal., Implications for Practice: strategies are required to provide health professionals with guidelines and skills to enhance the detection of women who have, or have the potential to develop, health problems after birth. This requires a reorganisation of the way early postnatal care is provided in relation to the use of routine practices; the ability of caregivers to spend time with women in an environment that offers privacy and confidentiality; the structuring of care around individual needs; and opportunities for women to be cared for by caregiver/s with whom they have met before.

Objective: To capture the missing voices of mothers who are suffering postnatal depression., Design: Qualitative methodology using in-depth interviews., Setting: Melbourne, Victoria, Australia., Participants: 10 women who had been clinically diagnosed and admitted to a large hospital mother and baby unit in Australia., Findings: Stigma is frequently attached to women who are unhappy after the birth of their child, because they are not coping with the demands of motherhood or do not instantly bond with, and love, their baby. As a result, postnatal depression can be a terrifying and isolating experience for women. It is also a complex illness with varying degrees, reasons for onset and medical treatments., Implications for Practice: In this study, we have captured the emotions and feelings of women first hand, allowing us and health-care practitioners who are treating women to truly understand this debilitating illness. It is hoped that, in making the wider community aware of depression after childbirth, fewer women will suffer in silence.

Background: In the 1980s there was substantial interest in early pregnancy and pre-pregnancy interventions to increase birth weight and reduce preterm birth. We developed an inter-pregnancy intervention, implemented in a randomised controlled trial, to be provided by midwives at home soon after women's first birth., Methods: MCH nurses invited women to take part during their home visit to new mothers. Women's contact details, with their permission, were passed to the study midwife. She had a randomisation schedule to which women's names were added before she met the women or their partners. All women recruited had a home visit from the study midwife with a discussion of their first pregnancy, labour and birth and the postpartum experience. Women in the intervention arm received in addition a pre-pregnancy intervention with discussion of social, health or lifestyle problems, preparation and timing for pregnancy, family history, rubella immunisation, referrals for health problems, and a reminder card. The primary outcome was defined as a birth weight difference in the second birth of 100 g (one-sided) in favour of the intervention. Additional data collected were gestational age, perinatal deaths and birth defects. Analyses used EPI-INFO and STATA., Results: Intervention and comparison groups were comparable on socioeconomic factors, prior reproductive history and first birth outcomes. Infant birth weight in the second birth was lower (-97.4 g,)) among infants in the intervention arm. There were no significant differences between intervention and comparison arms in the proportion of women having a preterm birth, an infant with low birthweight, or an infant with a birth weight <10th percentile. There were more adverse outcomes in the intervention arm: ten births <32 weeks), compared with one in standard care, and more infants with a birth weight <2000 g, 16 compared with two in standard care, Conclusion: As the primary outcome was envisaged to be either improved birth weight or no effect, the study was not designed to identify the alternative outcome with confidence. Despite widespread support for pre-pregnancy interventions to improve maternal and perinatal health, this first randomised controlled trial of a multi-component intervention provided at home, did not have a beneficial outcome.

Length of postnatal hospital stay has declined dramatically since the 1970s, with ongoing controversy about potential harmful effects. Three population-based surveys of recent mothers conducted in the State of Victoria, Australia have been analysed to assess the impact of shorter length of stay on breast feeding and women's psychological well-being. Women giving birth in Victoria, Australia in 1 week in 1989, 2 weeks in 1993 and 2 weeks in 1999, excluding those who had a stillbirth or neonatal death, were mailed surveys 5-8 months postpartum. Adjusted response fractions were: 71.4% in 1989 (n = 790), 62.5% in 1994 (n = 1313), and 67% in 2000 (n = 1616). Participants were representative in terms of method of birth, parity and infant birthweight. Younger women, single women and women of non-English-speaking background (born outside Australia) were under-represented. The primary outcome measures were infant feeding at 6 weeks postpartum and maternal depression at 5-8 months postpartum (Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale > or = 13). There was no significant association between length of stay (1-2 days vs. > or = 5 days, 3-4 days vs. > or = 5 days) and primary outcome measures in univariable analyses of the 1989 Survey, or multivariable analyses of the 1994 and 2000 Surveys adjusting for relevant social and obstetric factors. For stays of 3-4 days, the adjusted odds ratio for formula feeding at 6 weeks was 1.35 [95% CI 0.9, 1.9] in 1994 and 1.22 [95% CI 0.9, 1.7] in 2000. The confidence intervals are compatible with a very small reduction or a large increase in formula feeding, neither reaching statistical significance. For depressive symptoms at 5-7 months postpartum (EPDS score > or = 13), the adjusted odds ratio for women staying 3-4 days was 0.96 [95% CI 0.7, 1.4] in 1994 and 0.90 [95% CI 0.6, 1.3] in 2000. These confidence intervals are compatible with a 30-40% reduction or a 30-40% increase in odds of depressive symptoms. Based on these findings shorter length of stay does not appear to have an adverse impact on breast feeding or women's emotional well-being. Testing early discharge policies in well-designed randomised trials remains a priority for developing stronger evidence to inform practice.

Postnatal care in hospital continues to include routine recording of observations of temperature, pulse, blood pressure, fundal height, lochia and perineal injury on clinical pathways that allow little if any leeway for individualizing care. This paper discusses the issues of designing a new clinical pathway that encompasses best practice, is woman friendly and allows for individualized care rather than routine rituals.

Background: Although policymakers have suggested that improving continuity of midwifery can increase women's satisfaction with care in childbirth, evidence based on randomized controlled trials is lacking. New models of care, such as birth centers and team midwife care, try to increase the continuity of care and caregiver. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new team midwife care program in the standard clinic and hospital environment on satisfaction with antenatal, intrapartum, and postpartum care in low-risk women in early pregnancy., Methods: Women at Royal Women's Hospital in Melbourne, Australia, were randomly allocated to team midwife care (n = 495) or standard care (n = 505) at booking in early pregnancy. Doctors attended most women in standard care, and continuity of the caregiver was lacking. Satisfaction was measured by means of a postal questionnaire 2 months after the birth., Results: Team midwife care was associated with increased satisfaction, and the differences between the groups were most noticeable for antenatal care, less noticeable for intrapartum care, and least noticeable for postpartum care. The study found no differences between team midwife care and standard care in medical interventions or in women's emotional well-being 2 months after the birth., Conclusion: Conclusions about which components of team midwife care were most important to increased satisfaction with antenatal care were difficult to draw, but data suggest that satisfaction with intrapartum care was related to continuity of the caregiver.

Background: Despite the practice of routine postnatal check-ups, many women experience problems in the months after childbirth. General practitioners (GPs) are involved in routine postnatal care, yet little research has been undertaken to explore this role., Aim: To report the views of Australian GPs as to what physical examination and discussion should take place at the routine six week postnatal check-up and to determine the influence of gender on the approach to the check-up., Method: Postal survey of 1104 Australian GPs, yielding an eligible sample of 1022., Results: A total of 715/1022 (70%) usable surveys returned. Over 65% of GPs recommend routine examination of the abdomen, blood pressure, perineum, vagina, pelvic floor, and breasts at the six week check-up. Fewer than a half the sample believed that physical problems (urine and bowel symptoms, back problems), sexual issues, relationship and parenting issues should be routinely discussed. After controlling for age, practice location, obstetric practice, and qualifications, the sex of the GP remains an important factor influencing the GP's approach to postnatal care. Female GPs are three times more likely to believe that maternal feelings should be discussed routinely and about twice as likely to believe that infant sleeping/behaviour, maternal sleeping/diet/tiredness, coping with other children, relationship with partner, and household work should form part of the routine discussion with all recent mothers., Conclusions: Sex of practitioner and older age (60 years or more) are the two most important influences on a GP's approach to postnatal care. This study indicates a need for GPs to shift their focus from routine examination to indicated examination to allow more time to discuss common postnatal problems.