Search

The purpose of this research is to determine the impact of working during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic on the well-being of staff at one 600-bed acute hospital in metropolitan Melbourne, Australia. This exploratory study is part of a larger mixed methods survey project, reporting the qualitative data from an on-line survey of clinical staff working at one acute hospital between April 16th and May 13th, 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Responses to five free-text questions were analysed using inductive content analysis. 321 medical, nursing, allied health and non-clinical staff responded to the survey. Respondents reported anxiety, fear and uncertainty related to the pandemic, from the perspectives of work, home, family and community. They reported feeling confused by inconsistent messages received from government, hospital executive, managers and media. Seven themes were identified: (i) worrying about patient care, (ii) changed working conditions, (iii) working in the changed hospital environment, (iv) impact of the pandemic, (v) personal isolation and uncertainty, (vi) leadership and management and (vii) additional support needed for staff. Despite the pandemic being comparatively well-controlled in Australia, all disciplines reported a high degree of anticipatory anxiety. Staff working in healthcare require both managerial and psychological support to minimise anxiety and promote well-being and resilience in order to deal with the health crisis. Regular unambiguous communication directing the way forward is crucial., (© 2020 Australian College of Mental Health Nurses Inc.)

Background: A high prevalence of self-inflicted burn injury is noted in severe burn injury. It remains unclear as to whether gender and past psychiatric history impact upon whether injury is self-inflicted and the outcomes., Aims: Review the psychiatric history of patients treated in a statewide burn service following severe burn injury and determine whether psychiatric history, extent of burn and mortality are impacted by gender and whether the injury was self-inflicted., Method: A data linkage study was performed with psychiatric history and mental health service contact data matched to patients' data collected via a previous retrospective file audit. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression modelling measured interactions between gender and self-inflicted burn status, and other study outcomes., Results: In total, 298 patients (47 with a self-inflicted burn) were admitted following a severe burn. Patients with self-inflicted burns were significantly more likely to have total body surface area burn of at least 50% (OR=9.3; 95%CI: 4.7-18.5) and die within 24h of admission (OR=10.5; 95%CI:4.7-23.2). They were significantly more likely to have a past psychiatric diagnosis and public mental health service contact in the month pre-injury (OR=18.9; 95%CI: 7.5-47.2). Male patients had significantly lower rates of a psychiatric diagnosis and recent mental health service contact. Males with self-inflicted injury are far more likely to die than males with a non-self-inflicted injury., Conclusions: Psychiatric clinicians should assertively screen the psychiatric history of patients with severe burn injury, and participate in the acute and longer-term management of persons admitted with a self-inflicted burn., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)

Introduction and Aims: The pathophysiology and time-course of coagulopathy post major burns are inadequately understood. The aims of this study were to review the incidence of acute coagulopathy post major burns, potential contributing factors associated with this coagulopathy and outcome of patients who developed early coagulopathy., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients with major burns (≥20% total body surface area (TBSA)) presenting to a tertiary burns referral centre was conducted. Data on demographic, injury characteristics and fluid resuscitation practices were recorded and tested for association with coagulopathy (INR>1.5 or aPTT>60 s) at hospital presentation and within 24 h of burns injury. Mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation and blood and blood product usage were primary endpoints., Results: There were 99 patients who met the inclusion criteria with 36 (16) %TBSA burns. Coagulopathy was present in only three patients on presentation, but 37 (37%) patients developed early onset (within 24 h of injury) coagulopathy. Early onset coagulopathy was independently associated with %TBSA burnt (p<0.001) and volume of fluid administered (p=0.005). Early onset coagulopathy was associated with higher volumes of blood and blood product administration, ICU admission and prolonged mechanical ventilation., Conclusions: Post major burns, a very low proportion of patients presented with coagulopathy, but a substantial proportion of patients developed coagulopathy within 24 h. This and the association of coagulopathy with the volume of fluid resuscitation suggest dilution as a major cause of the early coagulopathy of major burns., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: The Alfred pre-hospital fluid isotonic crystalloid resuscitation formula for major burns (body weight (kg)×%TBSA burnt=mls in the first 2 h) was adopted by Ambulance Victoria in 2007 for the early and consistent correction of fluid deficit in major burns patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the associated change in pre-hospital fluid administration., Methods: A retrospective explicit chart review of patient records was conducted of all patients with major burns presenting to The Alfred Emergency & Trauma Centre over a 10 year period. Patient demographics, fluid resuscitation and outcomes in the period before the introduction of the new formula were compared to those in the post-introduction period., Results: There were 126 patients with major burns (≥20% total body surface area burnt) included in the study. The median fluid volume administration pre-hospital after introduction of The Alfred formula was 0.35 (0.22-0.44) mL/kg/%TBSA burnt, which was significantly higher than 0.14 (0.04-0.26) mL/kg/%TBSA administered in the prior period (p=0.013). There was no significant change in physiological endpoints associated with the increased volume. At 24 h, the volume of fluid administered in patients when The Alfred formula was used was 4.9±1.6 mL/kg/%TBSA, which was not significantly higher than the volume administered before 2007 of 4.8±2.2 mL/%TBSA/kg (p=0.802)., Discussion: The Alfred pre-hospital fluid formula has resulted in patients receiving significantly more fluids early, although still below volumes suggested by the Parkland formula. There were no adverse effects of this increased volume detected over the study period. The Alfred pre-hospital fluid formula appears to be safe and more effective in delivering fluid volumes predicted by the current 'gold standard'., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ltd and ISBI. All rights reserved.)