Search

Objective: Polymorphisms in the CYP2C9 gene may be associated with adverse vascular events following endovascular procedures independent of antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to investigate the impact of CYP2C9 loss-of-function polymorphisms on adverse vascular events following neurointervention., Patients and Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing neurointervention were prospectively recruited between 2010 and 2016. Patients were genotyped for the CYP2C9*2 and *3 loss-of-function polymorphisms. On the basis of possible genetic influence on antiplatelet response, ex vivo clopidogrel response was measured using the VerifyNow® P2Y 12 Assay. The primary endpoint was the 90-day incidence of adverse vascular events including ischemic stroke., Results: A total of 229 patients were included. The median age was 57 years (IQR: 49-64), and 158 (69.00%) were female. Eighty-one (35.37%) patients carried at least one CYP2C9 loss-of-function (LOF) allele. After adjustment for stroke risk factors, the 90-day incidence of ischemic stroke was significantly lower in the LOF group compared to the wild type group (1.23% vs 10.14%; OR adj  = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.03-0.91; p = 0.04)., Conclusions: Our results suggest protection against ischemic stroke in carriers of CYP2C9*2 or *3 polymorphisms undergoing neurointervention. Our findings warrant further studies to investigate the mechanisms by which CYP2C9 may influence the risk of ischemic stroke., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose- Mobile stroke units (MSUs) are increasingly used worldwide to provide prehospital triage and treatment. The benefits of MSUs in giving earlier thrombolysis have been well established, but the impacts of MSUs on endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) and effect on disability avoidance are largely unknown. We aimed to determine the clinical impact and disability reduction for reperfusion therapies in the first operational year of the Melbourne MSU. Methods- Treatment time metrics for MSU patients receiving reperfusion therapy were compared with control patients presenting to metropolitan Melbourne stroke units via standard ambulance within MSU operating hours. The primary outcome was median time difference in first ambulance dispatch to treatment modeled using quantile regression analysis. Time savings were subsequently converted to disability-adjusted life years avoided using published estimates. Results- In the first 365-day operation of the Melbourne MSU, prehospital thrombolysis was administered to 100 patients (mean age, 73.8 years; 62% men). The median time savings per MSU patient, compared with the control cohort, was 26 minutes ( P <0.001) for dispatch to hospital arrival and 15 minutes ( P <0.001) for hospital arrival to thrombolysis. The calculated overall time saving from dispatch to thrombolysis was 42.5 minutes (95% CI, 36.0-49.0). In the same period, 41 MSU patients received EVT (mean age, 76 years; 61% men) with median dispatch-to-treatment time saving of 51 minutes ([95% CI, 30.1-71.9], P <0.001). This included a median time saving of 17 minutes ([95% CI, 7.6-26.4], P =0.001) for EVT hospital arrival to arterial puncture for MSU patients. Estimated median disability-adjusted life years saved through earlier provision of reperfusion therapies were 20.9 for thrombolysis and 24.6 for EVT. Conclusions- The Melbourne MSU substantially reduced time to reperfusion therapies, with the greatest estimated disability avoidance driven by the more powerful impact of earlier EVT. These findings highlight the benefits of prehospital notification and direct triage to EVT centers with facilitated workflow on arrival by the MSU.

Background: Endovascular clot retrieval (ECR) improves outcomes for acute ischaemic stroke with large artery occlusion. However, the provision of ECR requires resource-intensive comprehensive stroke centres (CSC), which are impractical to establish in regional hospitals. An alternative is a "hub-and-spoke" model, whereby ischaemic strokes are triaged at the regional primary centres and where eligible, transferred to a CSC. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients directly admitted to a CSC with patients treated in the "hub-and-spoke" model. We hypothesize that there are no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the 2 systems., Methods: We included patients undergoing ECR at a CSC. Patients were categorised into 2 groups; the first group included patients directly admitted to the CSC and the second group included patients in the "hub-and-spoke" model. Good clinical outcome was defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2 and the difference between the 2 groups was tested by logistic regression., Results: Of 178 patients, 50 (28%) presented directly to CSC and 128 (72%) were transferred from a referring hospital. The median age was 70 (interquartile range 58-77) and 61% were male. Thrombolysis in ischaemic cerebral-infarction 2b/3 recanalisation was achieved in 79% of patients. Of the direct group, 63% (95% CI 48-77%) achieved good clinical outcomes compared to 52% (95% CI 43-61%) in the "hub-and-spoke" group (p = 0.233)., Conclusion: This state-wide service model demonstrates comparable clinical outcomes to that described in clinical trials. We found no significant difference in outcome between patients directly admitted to CSC and those with "hub-and-spoke" service delivery., (© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel.)