Search

A total of 3425 influenza B viruses collected from the Asia-Pacific region were tested against the four registered neuraminidase inhibitors (NAIs) (oseltamivir carboxylate, zanamivir, peramivir and laninamivir) as part of the routine surveillance work at the WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Reference on Influenza, Melbourne between 2016 and 2020. Forty-five influenza B viruses with reduced susceptibility to one or more NAIs were identified. While the majority of these had neuraminidase (NA) mutations that were known to confer NAIs resistance, fifteen had NA mutations that had not been confirmed as being responsible for reduced NAIs susceptibility. Eleven of these NA mutations of concern were investigated using reverse genetics (RG) techniques to verify that these mutations were the cause of the reduced NAI susceptibility. All mutations were introduced separately into the NA of B/Brisbane/27/2016 (a B Victoria-lineage virus) or B/Yamanashi/166/98 (a B Yamagata-lineage virus) and the effects of these were analysed by an in vitro NAI assay. The T146K substitution in the NA of B Victoria and Yamagata-lineages resulted in a large increase in the IC 50 for peramivir (>1000-fold increase in the mean IC 50 of sensitive viruses with T146) with smaller increases for zanamivir and oseltamivir. A proline substitution (T146P) had a slightly lower (>700-fold) effect on the peramivir IC 50 and also on the other NAIs. The presence of a second NA mutation at N169S combined with the T146P further increased the IC 50 of peramivir (>7000-fold) and the other NAIs. A synergistic effect was also confirmed for dual NA mutations with G247D + I361V which showed a modest increase in the IC 50 for oseltamivir (6-fold). Only one of two RG-viruses with the mutation G108E could be rescued and it had a high IC 50 against zanamivir (>4000-fold) and laninamivir (>7000-fold), but a lower IC 50 against oseltamivir (>200-fold). NA mutations H101L, A200T, D432G, H439P and H439R were also confirmed to somewhat reduce the in vitro susceptibility of influenza B viruses to the NAIs. Overall, this study identifies the potential impact of selected mutations on the clinical performance of NAIs when used to treat influenza B infection in humans. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundCOVID-19 pandemic mitigation measures, including travel restrictions, limited global circulation of influenza viruses. In Australia, travel bans for non-residents and quarantine requirements for returned travellers were eased in November 2021, providing pathways for influenza viruses to be re-introduced.AimWe aimed to describe the epidemiological and virological characteristics of the re-emergence of influenza in Victoria, Australia to inform public health interventions.MethodsFrom 1 November 2021 to 30 April 2022, we conducted an epidemiological study analysing case notification data from the Victorian Department of Health to describe case demographics, interviewed the first 200 cases to establish probable routes of virus reintroduction and examined phylogenetic and antigenic data to understand virus diversity and susceptibility to current vaccines.ResultsOverall, 1,598 notifications and 1,064 positive specimens were analysed. The majority of cases (61.4%) occurred in the 15-34 years age group. Interviews revealed a higher incidence of international travel exposure during the first month of case detections, and high levels of transmission in university residential colleges were associated with return to campus. Influenza A(H3N2) was the predominant subtype, with a single lineage predominating despite multiple importations.ConclusionEnhanced testing for respiratory viruses during the COVID-19 pandemic provided a more complete picture of influenza virus transmission compared with previous seasons. Returned international travellers were important drivers of influenza reemergence, as were young adults, a group whose role has previously been under-recognised in the establishment of seasonal influenza epidemics. Targeting interventions, including vaccination, to these groups could reduce future influenza transmission.

Background: Influenza circulated at historically low levels during 2020/2021 due to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic travel restrictions. In Australia, international arrivals were required to undergo a 14-day hotel quarantine to limit new introduction of SARS-CoV-2., Methods: We usedtesting data for travelers arriving on repatriation flights to Darwin, Australia, from 3 January 2021 to 11 October 2021 to identify importations of influenza virus into Australia. We used this information to estimate the risk of a case exiting quarantine while still infectious. Influenza-positive samples were sequenced, and cases were followed up to identify transmission clusters. Data on the number of cases and total passengers were used to infer the risk of influenza cases exiting quarantine while infectious., Results: Despite very low circulation of influenza globally, 42 cases were identified among 15 026 returned travelers, of which 30 were A(H3N2), 2 were A(H1N1)pdm09, and 10 were B/Victoria. Virus sequencing data identified potential in-flight transmission, as well as independent infections prior to travel. Under the quarantine strategy in place at the time, the probability that these cases could initiate influenza outbreaks in Australia neared 0. However, this probability rose as quarantine requirements relaxed., Conclusions: Detection of influenza virus infections in repatriated travelers provided a source of influenza viruses otherwise unavailable and enabled development of the A(H3N2) vaccine seed viruses included in the 2022 Southern Hemisphere influenza vaccine. Failure to test quarantined returned travelers for influenza represents a missed opportunity for enhanced surveillance to better inform public health preparedness., Competing Interests: Potential conflicts of interest. B. J. C. reports consulting fees paid to author from AstraZeneca, Fosun Pharma, GSK, Moderna, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi Pasteur. S. G. S. reports OptumLabs research credits through the University of California (no funding received; had access to data for 1 year) to study the influenza infection and vaccination outcomes during pregnancy; participated in advisory boards for influenza vaccines for Seqiris and Sanofi (no remuneration received); from 2017–2021, served as a member of the WHO Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on Immunization Working Group on Influenza (unpaid); since 2011, has been an observer or invited member of the National Influenza Surveillance Committee for the Australian Government (unpaid); WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza [employer] receives funding from the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers & Associations (IFPMA) for the development of influenza vaccines and CSL Seqirus. All remaining authors: No reported conflicts of interest. All authors have submitted the ICMJE Form for Disclosure of Potential Conflicts of Interest. Conflicts that the editors consider relevant to the content of the manuscript have been disclosed., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)