Search

Unlabelled: Over one hundred Regional Health Information Organizations (RHIOs) are under development in the United States. Many of these will fail but many will become a vital part of the Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN)., Methods: Documentation was reviewed and summarized and a core group of Vermont Information Technology Leaders (VITL, Inc.) were interviewed to ascertained lessons learned in the development of Vermont's RHIO., Results: Issues were grouped into five major categories: early planning, organization, education and marketing, technology, and financial sustainability., Conclusion: There are a number of commonalities about all RHIOs but also a number of differences predicated on location. RHIOs must remain dynamic and learn from others in order to survive.

Background: Despite evidence that optimal care for diabetes can result in reduced complications and improved economic outcomes, such care is often not achieved. The Vermont Diabetes Information System (VDIS) is a registry-based decision support and reminder system based on the Chronic Care Model and targeted to primary care physicians and their patients with diabetes., Purpose: To develop and evaluate a regional decision support system for patients with diabetes., Methods: Randomized trial of an information system with clustering at the practice level. Ten percent random subsample of patients selected for a home interview., Subject: and setting includes 10 hospitals, 121 primary care providers, and 7348 patients in 55 Vermont and New York primary care practices., Results: We report on the study design and baseline characteristics of the population. Patients have a mean age of 63 years and a mean glycosolated hemoglobin A1C of 7.1 %. Sixty percent of the population has excellent glycemic control (A1 C < 7%); 45% have excellent lipid control (serum LDL-cholesterol <100 mg /dL and serum triglycerides <400 mg/dL). Twenty-five percent have excellent blood pressure control (<130/80mmHg). These results compare favorably to recent national reports. However, only 8% are in optimal control for all three of hyperglycemia, lipids and blood pressure., Conclusions: Our experience to date indicates that a low cost decision support and information system based on the Chronic Care Model is feasible in primary care practices that lack sophisticated electronic information systems. VDIS is well accepted by patients, providers and laboratory staff. If proven beneficial in a rigorous, randomized, controlled evaluation, the intervention could be widely disseminated to practices across America and the world with a substantial impact on the outcomes and costs of diabetes. It could also be adapted to other chronic conditions. We anticipate the results of the study will be available in 2006.

Background: In 1989, The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation launched a demonstration project to test a consortium approach to quality improvement. As part of this project, four hospital consortia in various parts of the United States are currently sharing quality resources (for example, training) and collaborating on various improvement efforts. The purpose of the project is to demonstrate that hospitals can take on more difficult problems and accomplish more in cooperation with each other than on their own., Case Studies: The Institute for Quality Healthcare (Iowa City, Iowa) has built a comparative database so that 40 member hospitals can make meaningful comparisons on various aspects of performance; The Vermont Program for Quality in Health Care has lowered the postoperative infection rate in Vermont by monitoring compliance with consensus guidelines; Interwest Quality of Care, Inc, which has member organizations in Utah, Wyoming, and Idaho, has adapted and disseminated guidelines for diabetic care; and The Public Hospital Institute, in Berkeley, California, has worked with the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations to develop a written guide to help surveyors understand the unique operational traits of public hospitals., Lessons Learned: Projects such as those with champions in several member organizations and comparative data analysis lend themselves more easily to cooperative work than others. They also provide some strategies for collaboration, such as continually reinforcing the principles of collaboration, obtaining a fully informed commitment, beginning with initiatives that are likely successes, and being serious and vocal about the commitment to confidentiality., Conclusions: Collaborators in quality improvement gain important resources, such as better information, more relevant reference databases, colleagues and support for quality improvement specialists, and economies of scale in education programs, training materials, and interaction with vendors. However, the difficulties in collaboration are great. Hospitals must continually consider not only "What's in this for me," but also "What can we accomplish as a group that is greater than what each of us can do alone?"