Search

Introduction : To evaluate the access to treatments with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and/or mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic stroke patients admitted to stroke units (SUs) of Veneto region (Italy) according to current "hub-and-spoke" model from 2017 to 2021. Patients and methods: We retrospectively analyzed data on treatments with IVT and/or MT for stroke patients admitted to the 23 SUs (6 Hubs and 17 Spokes) of the 6 macro-areas including 9 local sanitary units (LSUs) and 2 hospitals. Results: We reported 6093 treatments with IVT alone, 1114 with IVT plus MT, and 921 with MT alone. Number of stroke unit (SU) beds/100,000 inhabitants ranges from 2.3 to 2.8, and no difference was found among different macro-areas. Number of treatments/100,000 inhabitants/year ranges from 19 to 34 for IVT alone, from 2 to 7 for IVT plus MT, and from 2 to 5 for MT alone. Number of IVT alone/SU bed/year ranges from 9 to 21 in the Hub and from 6 to 12 in the Spokes. Rate of IVT plus MT in patients directly arrived in the same LSU's Hub ranges from 50 to 81%, likewise the one of MT alone ranges from 49 to 84%. Conclusions: Treatment target rates of IVT and MT set by Action Plan for Stroke in Europe 2018–2030 has been globally exceeded in the Veneto region. However, the target rate of MT and access revascularization treatments is heterogeneous among different macro-areas. Further efforts should be made to homogenize the current territorial organization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Efficiency of care chain response and hospital reactivity were and are challenged for stroke acute care management during the pandemic period of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in North-Eastern Italy (Veneto, Friuli-Venezia-Giulia, Trentino-Alto-Adige), counting 7,193,880 inhabitants (ISTAT), with consequences in acute treatment for patients with ischemic stroke. Methods: We conducted a retrospective data collection of patients admitted to stroke units eventually treated with thrombolysis and thrombectomy, ranging from January to May 2020 from the beginning to the end of the main first pandemic period of COVID-19 in Italy. The primary endpoint was the number of patients arriving to these stroke units, and secondary endpoints were the number of thrombolysis and/or thrombectomy. Chi-square analysis was used on all patients; furthermore, patients were divided into two cohorts (pre-lockdown and lockdown periods) and the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to test differences on admission and reperfusive therapies. Results: In total, 2536 patients were included in 22 centers. There was a significant decrease of admissions in April compared to January. Furthermore, we observed a significant decrease of thrombectomy during the lockdown period, while thrombolysis rate was unaffected in the same interval across all centers. Conclusions: Our study confirmed a decrease in admission rate of stroke patients in a large area of northern Italy during the lockdown period, especially during the first dramatic phase. Overall, there was no decrease in thrombolysis rate, confirming an effect of emergency care system for stroke patients. Instead, the significant decrease in thrombectomy rate during lockdown addresses some considerations of local and regional stroke networks during COVID-19 pandemic evolution. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

B Correction to: Neurological Sciences (2023) 44:2033-2039 b https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06662-7 The original article contains an error, a typo in the surname of a co-author. The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-023-06662-7. [Extracted from the article]