Search

A real-time electronic CDS for pneumonia (ePNa) identifies possible pneumonia patients, measures severity and antimicrobial resistance risk, and then recommends disposition, antibiotics, and microbiology studies. Use is voluntary, and clinicians may modify treatment recommendations. ePNa was associated with lower mortality in emergency department (ED) patients versus usual care (Annals EM 66:511). We adapted ePNa for the Cerner EHR, and implemented it across Intermountain Healthcare EDs (Utah, USA) throughout 2018. We introduced ePNa through didactic, interactive presentations to ED clinicians; follow-up visits identified barriers and facilitators to use. Email reminded clinicians and answered questions. Hospital admitting clinicians encouraged ePNa use to smooth care transitions. Audit-and-feedback measured utilization, showing variations from best practice when ePNa and associated electronic order sets were not used. Use was initially low, but gradually increased especially at larger hospitals. A user-friendly interface, frequent reminders, audit-and- feedback, a user survey, a nurse educator, and local physician champions are additive towards implementation success., (©2019 AMIA - All rights reserved.)

Intermountain Healthcare has designed and implemented a publish-subscribe (PubSub) infrastructure to support essential event processing workflows across our organization. A recent implementation of a commercial EMR highlighted the need to provide this capability on top of the EMR to support external applications and services that require access to triggering events within the EMR. A description of the PubSub architecture is presented. Use cases for health information exchange, public health reporting, and pulmonary embolism diagnosis that utilize PubSub are described, along with benefits of using the paradigm. Besides providing support for these external applications, the PubSub infrastructure allows additional event handling functionality not available in the commercial EMR. The open, standards-based nature of the design should allow other organizations to implement the system in their information systems environment.

Study Objective: Despite evidence that guideline adherence improves clinical outcomes, management of pneumonia patients varies in emergency departments (EDs). We study the effect of a real-time, ED, electronic clinical decision support tool that provides clinicians with guideline-recommended decision support for diagnosis, severity assessment, disposition, and antibiotic selection., Methods: This was a prospective, controlled, quasi-experimental trial in 7 Intermountain Healthcare hospital EDs in Utah's urban corridor. We studied adults with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes and radiographic evidence for pneumonia during 2 periods: baseline (December 2009 through November 2010) and post-tool deployment (December 2011 through November 2012). The tool was deployed at 4 intervention EDs in May 2011, leaving 3 as usual care controls. We compared 30-day, all-cause mortality adjusted for illness severity, using a mixed-effect, logistic regression model., Results: The study population comprised 4,758 ED pneumonia patients; 14% had health care-associated pneumonia. Median age was 58 years, 53% were female patients, and 59% were admitted to the hospital. Physicians applied the tool for 62.6% of intervention ED study patients. There was no difference overall in severity-adjusted mortality between intervention and usual care EDs post-tool deployment (odds ratio [OR]=0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41 to 1.16). Post hoc analysis showed that patients with community-acquired pneumonia experienced significantly lower mortality (OR=0.53; 95% CI 0.28 to 0.99), whereas mortality was unchanged among patients with health care-associated pneumonia (OR=1.12; 95% CI 0.45 to 2.8). Patient disposition from the ED postdeployment adhered more to tool recommendations., Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility and potential benefit of real-time electronic clinical decision support for ED pneumonia patients., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Emergency Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To understand how the source of information affects different adverse event (AE) surveillance methods., Design: Retrospective analysis of inpatient adverse drug events (ADEs) and hospital-associated infections (HAIs) detected by either a computerized surveillance system (CSS) or manual chart review (MCR)., Measurement: Descriptive analysis of events detected using the two methods by type of AE, type of information about the AE, and sources of the information., Results: CSS detected more HAIs than MCR (92% vs 34%); however, a similar number of ADEs was detected by both systems (52% vs 51%). The agreement between systems was greater for HAIs than ADEs (26% vs 3%). The CSS missed events that did not have information in coded format or that were described only in physician narratives. The MCR detected events missed by CSS using information in physician narratives. Discharge summaries were more likely to contain information about AEs than any other type of physician narrative, followed by emergency department reports for HAIs and general consult notes for ADEs. Some ADEs found by MCR were detected by CSS but not verified by a clinician., Limitations: Inability to distinguish between CSS false positives and suspected AEs for cases in which the clinician did not document their assessment in the CSS., Conclusion: The effect that information source has on different surveillance methods depends on the type of AE. Integrating information from physician narratives with CSS using natural language processing would improve the detection of ADEs more than HAIs.

Purpose: Using a large, retrospective cohort from the Utah Population Database, we assess how well family history predicts who will acquire colorectal cancer during a 20-year period., Methods: Individuals were selected between ages 35 and 80 with no prior record of colorectal cancer diagnosis, as of the year 1985. Numbers of colorectal cancer-affected relatives and diagnosis ages were collected. Familial relative risk and absolute risk estimates were calculated. Colorectal cancer diagnoses in the cohort were counted between years 1986 and 2005. Cox regression and Harrell's C were used to measure the discriminatory power of resulting models., Results: A total of 431,153 individuals were included with 5,334 colorectal cancer diagnoses. Familial relative risk ranged from 0.83 to 12.39 and 20-year absolute risk from 0.002 to 0.21. With familial relative risk as the only predictor, Harrell's C = 0.53 and with age only, Harrell's C = 0.66. Familial relative risk combined with age produced a Harrell's C = 0.67., Conclusion: Family history by itself is not a strong predictor of exactly who will acquire colorectal cancer within 20 years. However, stratification of risk using absolute risk probabilities may be more helpful in focusing screening on individuals who are more likely to develop the disease.

Background & Aims: Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk estimates based on family history typically include only close relatives. We report familial relative risk (FRR) in probands with various combinations, or constellations, of affected relatives, extending to third-degree., Methods: A population-based resource that includes a computerized genealogy linked to statewide cancer records was used to identify genetic relationships among CRC cases and their first-, second-, and third-degree relatives (FDRs, SDRs, and TDRs). FRRs were estimated by comparing the observed number of affected persons with a particular family history constellation to the expected number, based on cohort-specific CRC rates., Results: A total of 2,327,327 persons included in > or =3 generation family histories were analyzed; 10,556 had a diagnosis of CRC. The FRR for CRC in persons with > or =1 affected FDR = 2.05 (95% CI, 1.96-2.14), consistent with published estimates. In the absence of a positive first-degree family history, considering both affected SDRs and TDRs, only 1 constellation had an FRR estimate that was significantly >1.0 (0 affected FDRs, 1 affected SDR, 2 affected TDRs; FRR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55). The FRR for persons with 1 affected FDR, 1 affected SDR, and 0 affected TDRs was 1.88 (95% CI, 1.59-2.20), increasing to FRR = 3.28 (95% CI, 2.44-4.31) for probands with 1 affected FDR, 1 affected SDR, and > or =3 affected TDRs., Conclusions: Increased numbers of affected FDRs influences risk much more than affected SDRs or TDRs. However, when combined with a positive first-degree family history, a positive second- and third-degree family history can significantly increase risk., (Copyright 2010 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Family history (FH) is an important risk factor for many diseases and its assessment can be a powerful tool for identifying and stratifying patients at risk. As part of an initiative to improve FH collection and decision support at Intermountain Healthcare we conducted a literature review on FH data collection and reviewed a number of current Web-based tools. An ideal list of features was produced to help implement goals of the initiative.

In critically ill patients control of blood sugar levels with IV insulin has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in the intensive care units. We have developed an analytical framework with which to evaluate and compare IV insulin-treatment models and protocols. Performance of the analytical framework is demonstrated using protocols published by others and new protocols under development by our group.

Constantly changing diabetes care standards makes it challenging to deliver care adapted to the unique condition of the individual patient. The availability of large amounts of data from patient's electronic medical records makes it possible to individualize diabetes management. Initial design of a "patient-specific" hybrid system (physiological-causal probabilistic) of adaptive diabetes models and insulin treatment algorithms will be presented. The system is uniquely derived and tested using a diabetes data mart of about 33,000 patients.

Purpose: To improve the completeness and timeliness of an electronic problem list, we have developed a system using Natural Language Processing (NLP) to automatically extract potential medical problems from clinical, free-text documents; these problems are then proposed for inclusion in an electronic problem list management application., Methods: A prospective randomized controlled evaluation of the Automatic Problem List (APL) system in an intensive care unit and in a cardiovascular surgery unit is reported here. A total of 247 patients were enrolled: 76 in an initial control phase and 171 in the randomized controlled trial that followed. During this latter phase, patients were randomly assigned to a control or an intervention group. All patients had their documents analyzed by the system, but the medical problems discovered were only proposed in the problem list for intervention patients. We measured the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios and the timeliness of the problem lists., Results: Our system significantly increased the sensitivity of the problem lists in the intensive care unit, from about 9% to 41%, and even 77% if problems automatically proposed but not acknowledged by users were also considered. Timeliness of addition of problems to the list was greatly improved, with a time between a problem's first mention in a clinical document and its addition to the problem list reduced from about 6 days to less than 2 days. No significant effect was observed in the cardiovascular surgery unit.

The aims of this study were to estimate relative risk for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in relatives of diabetic patients, and to test for excess relatedness among diabetic patients. Additionally, the difference in parental transmission of diabetes was investigated. This study used a unique Utah genealogical resource, linked to electronic medical records of the largest health provider in Utah. We identified 19,640 patients with a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes. Relative Risks (RRs) for type 1 and type 2 diabetes were assessed for first-, second- and third-degree relatives of diabetic patients. The observed average relatedness of diabetic patients was compared to the expected relatedness using the Genealogical Index of Familiality (GIF). We observed significantly elevated RRs for type 1 diabetes in first-degree (RR=8.68; P<0.0001), second-degree (RR=1.93; P<0.0001) and third-degree relatives (RR=1.74; P<0.0001) of type 1 diabetic patients. RRs for type 2 diabetes were significantly increased in first-degree (RR=2.24; P<0.0001), second-degree (RR=1.36; P<0.0001) and third-degree relatives (RR=1.14; P<0.0001) of type 2 diabetic patients. Significantly increased RRs for type 1 diabetes were observed in the relatives of type 2 diabetic patients, and vice versa. The GIF analysis showed significant excess relatedness for type 1 diabetes cases, and independently for type 2 diabetes cases. Offspring of diabetic fathers were at significantly higher risk for type 1 diabetes than offspring of diabetic mothers (RR=9.73; P<0.0001 compared to RR=4.99; P<0.0001). No significant difference in parental transmission was observed for type 2 diabetes. Our results strongly support the existence of a genetic contribution to both type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and additionally suggest a relationship between both types of diabetes. Furthermore, our results suggest a significant difference in parental transmission of type 1 diabetes.

The increasing use of information system has resulted in the accumulation of a large volume of nursing data in electronic medical records. These data have great potential for supporting the various clinical decisions made by physicians, nurses, and managers. However, how to re-use of nursing data remains largely an issue of informatics. The aim of this study was to demonstrate how these nursing data can be used and how much they could contribute to developing a predictive model for an expert system for early detection of acute pancreatitis. We employed a probability-based model consisting of a Bayesian network and trained this model with the patient data retrospectively retrieved from the enterprise data warehouse of a tertiary hospital. The performance of the predictive model was measured based on the error rate and the area under receiver operating characteristics curve, which were 13.89 % and 0.93, respectively. The sensitivity of the acute pancreatitis to the findings from each nursing data was measured using a test of sensitivity. The results showed that the role of nursing data is as important as laboratory data in formulating a model for an expert system.

The goal of this study was to determine the accuracy and the impact of 5 different claims-based pneumonia definitions. Three International Classification of Diseases, Version 9, (ICD-9), and 2 diagnosis-related group (DRG)-based case identification algorithms were compared against an independent, clinical pneumonia reference standard. Among 10748 patients, 272 (2.5%) had pneumonia verified by the reference standard. The sensitivity of claims-based algorithms ranged from 47.8% to 66.2%. The positive predictive values ranged from 72.6% to 80.8%. Patient-related variables were not significantly different from the reference standard among the 3 ICD-9-based algorithms. DRG-based algorithms had significantly lower hospital admission rates (57% and 65% vs 73.2%), lower 30-day mortality (5.0% and 5.8% vs 10.7%), shorter length of stay (3.9 and 4.1 days vs 5.6 days), and lower costs (USD $4543 and USD $5159 vs USD $8585). Claims-based identification algorithms for defining pneumonia in administrative databases are imprecise. ICD-9-based algorithms did not influence patient variables in our population. Identifying pneumonia patients with DRG codes is significantly less precise.

Background: The medical problem list is an important part of the electronic medical record in development in our institution. To serve the functions it is designed for, the problem list has to be as accurate and timely as possible. However, the current problem list is usually incomplete and inaccurate, and is often totally unused. To alleviate this issue, we are building an environment where the problem list can be easily and effectively maintained., Methods: For this project, 80 medical problems were selected for their frequency of use in our future clinical field of evaluation (cardiovascular). We have developed an Automated Problem List system composed of two main components: a background and a foreground application. The background application uses Natural Language Processing (NLP) to harvest potential problem list entries from the list of 80 targeted problems detected in the multiple free-text electronic documents available in our electronic medical record. These proposed medical problems drive the foreground application designed for management of the problem list. Within this application, the extracted problems are proposed to the physicians for addition to the official problem list., Results: The set of 80 targeted medical problems selected for this project covered about 5% of all possible diagnoses coded in ICD-9-CM in our study population (cardiovascular adult inpatients), but about 64% of all instances of these coded diagnoses. The system contains algorithms to detect first document sections, then sentences within these sections, and finally potential problems within the sentences. The initial evaluation of the section and sentence detection algorithms demonstrated a sensitivity and positive predictive value of 100% when detecting sections, and a sensitivity of 89% and a positive predictive value of 94% when detecting sentences., Conclusion: The global aim of our project is to automate the process of creating and maintaining a problem list for hospitalized patients and thereby help to guarantee the timeliness, accuracy and completeness of this information.

Objectives: To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of an interfaced approach to clinical information systems architecture., Methods: After many years of internally building almost all components of a hospital clinical information system (HELP) at Intermountain Health Care, we changed our architectural approach as we chose to encompass ambulatory as well as acute care. We now seek to interface applications from a variety of sources (including some that we build ourselves) to a clinical data repository that contains a longitudinal electronic patient record., Results: We have a total of 820 instances of interfaces to 51 different applications. We process nearly 2 million transactions per day via our interface engine and feel that the reliability of the approach is acceptable. Interface costs constitute about four percent of our total information systems budget. The clinical database currently contains records for 1.45 m patients and the response time for a query is 0.19 sec., Discussion: Based upon our experience with both integrated (monolithic) and interfaced approaches, we conclude that for those with the expertise and resources to do so, the interfaced approach offers an attractive alternative to systems provided by a single vendor. We expect the advantages of this approach to increase as the costs of interfaces are reduced in the future as standards for vocabulary and messaging become increasingly mature and functional.

Objective: This study examined whether clinical data routinely available in a computerized patient record (CPR) can be used to drive a complex guideline that supports physicians in real time and at the point of care in assessing the risk of mortality for patients with community-acquired pneumonia., Setting: Emergency department of a tertiary-care hospital., Design: Retrospective analysis with medical chart review., Patients: All 241 inpatients during a 17-month period (Jun 1995 to Nov 1996) who presented to the emergency department and had a primary discharge diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia. METHODS/MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The 20 guideline variables were extracted from the CPR (HELP System) and the paper chart. The risk score and the risk class of the Pneumonia Severity Index were computed using data from the CPR alone and from a reference standard of all data available in the paper chart and the CPR at the time of the emergency department encounters. Availability and concordance were quantified to determine data quality. The type and cause of errors were analyzed depending on the source and format of the clinical variables., Results: Of the 20 guideline variables, 12 variables were required to be present for every computer-charted emergency department patient, seven variables were required for selected patients only, and one variable was not typically available in the HELP System during a patient's encounter. The risk class was identical for 86.7 percent of the patients. The majority of patients with different risk classes were assigned too low a risk class. The risk scores were identical for 72.1 percent of the patients. The average availability was 0.99 for the data elements that were required to be present and 0.79 for the data elements that were not required to be present. The average concordance was 0.98 when all a patient's variables were taken into account. The cause of error was attributed to the nurse charting in 77 percent of the cases and to the computerized evaluation in 23 percent. The type of error originated from the free-text fields in 64 percent, from coded fields in 21 percent, from vital signs in 14 percent, and from laboratory results in 1 percent., Conclusion: From a clinical perspective, the current level of data quality in the HELP System supports the automation and the prospective evaluation of the Pneumonia Severity Index as a computerized decision support tool.

Hospital information systems designed to support the needs of health care professionals include patient data entered using both freetext and precoded storage schemes. A major disadvantage of freetext storage schemes is that data captured in this format can only be presented as is to the user for review tasks. In the view of many health care scientists, natural language understanding systems capable of identifying, extracting, and encoding information contained in freetext data may provide the necessary tools to overcome this weakness. This paper describes the development and evaluation of a such a system designed to encode freetext admission diagnoses. This system combines both semantic and syntactic linguistic analysis techniques. Evaluation results demonstrate the overall performance of this system to be reasonable, accurately encoding approximately 76% of admission diagnoses. Inefficiencies are primarily due to the inability of this system to generate encodings in roughly 15% of test cases. When encodings are produced, however, accuracy equals that of the current manual coding method. With further modification, this application can partially automate the coding process.

Virtually there. Natural language or textual data in the patient record plays a critical role in medicine. Read about the innovative system LDS Hospital has implemented to integrate textual data into the computerized patient record.

Computerized health information systems can contribute to the care received by patients in a number of ways. Not the least of these is through interactions with health care providers to modify diagnostic and therapeutic decisions. Since its beginning, developers have used the HELP hospital information system to explore computerized interventions into the medical decision making process. By their nature these interventions imply a computer-directed interaction with the physicians, nurses, and therapists involved in delivering care. In this paper we describe four different approaches to this intervention. These include: (1) processes that respond to the appearance of certain types of clinical data by issuing an alert informing caregivers of these data's presence and import, (2) programs that critique new orders and propose changes in those orders when appropriate, (3) programs that suggest new orders and procedures in response to patient data suggesting their need, and (4) applications that function by summarizing patient care data and that attempt to retrospectively assess the average or typical quality of medical decisions and therapeutic interventions made by health care providers. These approaches are illustrated with experience from the HELP system.

NEONATE is a prototype of an expert system for the Newborn Intensive Care Unit developed at the Primary Children's Medical Center in Salt Lake City, Utah. A pilot study was undertaken to see if the addition of radiological frames to the NEONATE software could aid attending Neonatologists to interpret chest X-ray films. A set of radiological frames was created from rules generated by a radiologist. The performance of these radiological frames was compared to the performance of other radiologists using the Kappa statistic to measure agreement. There is a good agreement between the computer's decisions and the radiologists' decisions. The radiological frames were also tested to see if they help physicians who are not trained in radiology. A system that compares the residents' interpretation and the computer's interpretation to a gold standard interpretation was developed. It shows that the computer helps the first and second year residents, but not the third year residents. This article suggests that NEONATE's interpretation of chest X-ray findings are close to the radiologists' interpretations. While NEONATE's radiological frames help novice physicians in reaching better chest X-ray interpretation, the current study suggests that they are not likely to help a Neonatologist.

We designed an automated system for managing large-scale screening and diagnostic mammography. The system collects coded mammographic findings from the radiologist and records a history directly from the patient. This information is stored in an integrated clinical data base to which the results of subsequent examinations or surgery are added. In addition, the system generates letters to the patient and her physician that describe mammographic findings and letters reminding them of routine screening visits. For patients who have positive results on examinations, it checks for records of biopsy or repeat mammography and generates follow-up letters if appropriate intervention is not found. While this system is part of a comprehensive computerized hospital information system, mammography management tools with most of the features described can be designed for relatively inexpensive microcomputers.

To investigate the effect of mobile paramedic units on outcome, we prospectively studied for two years all patients with myocardial infarction admitted to the LDS Hospital emergency department who sought aid prior to cardiac arrest. One hundred thirty-four patients who received prehospital care from a mobile paramedic unit were compared with 101 patients who selected another means of initial care. Mortality, occurrence of life-threatening arrhythmias, and change in Killip class at 24 and 48 hours were the outcome variables. Data analysis by multiple logistic regression revealed that outcome was not improved, but a 29-minute median delay in hospital arrival occurred in paramedic-treated patients. Defibrillation was the only beneficial treatment performed by paramedics that could be identified. Current mobile paramedic unit procedures may need to be streamlined to eliminate the delay in hospital arrival resulting from extensive prehospital care.