Search

Background: The continued escalation of opioid use disorder (OUD) calls for heightened vigilance to implement evidence-based care across the US. Rural care providers and patients have limited resources, and a number of barriers exist that can impede necessary OUD treatment services. This paper reports the design and protocol of an implementation study seeking to advance availability of medication assisted treatment (MAT) for OUD in rural Pennsylvania counties for patients insured by Medicaid in primary care settings. Methods: This project was a hybrid implementation study. Within a chronic care model paradigm, we employed the Framework for Systems Transformation to implement the American Society for Addiction Medicine care model for the use of medications in the treatment of OUD. In partnership with state leadership, Medicaid managed care organizations, local care management professionals, the Universities of Pittsburgh and Utah, primary care providers (PCP), and patients; the project team worked within 23 rural Pennsylvania counties to engage, recruit, train, and collaborate to implement the OUD service model in PCP practices from 2016 to 2019. Formative measures included practice-level metrics to monitor project implementation, and outcome measures involved employing Medicaid claims and encounter data to assess changes in provider/patient-level OUD-related metrics, such as MAT provider supply, prevalence of OUD, and MAT utilization. Descriptive statistics and repeated measures regression analyses were used to assess changes across the study period. Discussion: There is an urgent need in the US to expand access to high quality, evidence-based OUD treatment—particularly in rural areas where capacity is limited for service delivery in order to improve patient health and protect lives. Importantly, this project leverages multiple partners to implement a theory- and practice-driven model of care for OUD. Results of this study will provide needed evidence in the field for appropriate methods for implementing MAT among a large number of rural primary care providers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Drug-induced deaths, defined as intentional or unintentional consumption of illicit substances or diverted medications leading to death, are the leading cause of death for reproductive-age women in the United States. Our objective was to describe pregnancy-associated deaths attributed to drug-induced causes to identify opportunities for intervention.Methods: Using the Utah Perinatal Morality Review Committee database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of all pregnancy-associated deaths-death of a woman during pregnancy or within 1 year from the end of pregnancy-from 2005 to 2014. We performed a detailed descriptive analysis of women with drug-induced deaths. We compared characteristics of women with drug-induced and other pregnancy-associated deaths.Results: From 2005 to 2014, 136 pregnancy-associated deaths were identified. Drug-induced death was the leading cause of pregnancy-associated death (n=35, 26%) and 89% occurred in the postpartum period. More specifically, those with a drug-induced death were more likely to die in the late postpartum period, defined as death occurring within 43 days to 1 year of the end of the pregnancy, (n=28/35, 80%) compared with women whose deaths were from other pregnancy-associated causes (n=34/101, 34%) (P<.001). The majority of drug-induced deaths were attributed to opioids (n=27/35, 77%), prescription opioids (n=21/35, 60%), and polysubstance use (n=29/35, 83%). From 2005 to 2014, the pregnancy-associated mortality ratio increased 76%, from 23.3 in 2005 to 41.0 in 2014. During this same time period, the drug-induced pregnancy-associated mortality ratio increased 200%, from 3.9 in 2005 to 11.7 in 2014.Conclusion: Drug-induced death is the leading cause of pregnancy-associated death in Utah and occurs primarily in the late postpartum period. Interventional studies focused on identifying and treating women at risk of drug-induced death are urgently needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The opioid crisis continues to affect pregnant and postpartum women the United States, with the number of pregnant women diagnosed with opioid use disorder (OUD) quadrupling over the last decade. The associated increase in morbidity and mortality among mother and baby warrants prompt, targeted intervention efforts that improve engagement, linkage of care, and treatment retention. Patient navigation (PN) is a chronic care intervention that can directly address this need by helping women identify medical, behavioral, and psychosocial care goals. Moreover, PN can assist women in preparing for, engaging in, and maintaining patient participation in necessary services. Specifically, PN includes strengths-based case management, 1-1 clinical support, motivational interviewing, and addiction-relapse prevention programming. The objective of this article is to present the study protocol of a pilot multisite randomized clinical trial, entitled: Optimizing Pregnancy and Treatment Interventions for Moms 2.0 (OPTI-Mom 2.0; NCT03833245). In this study, we build upon a proof-of-concept study, employing evidence-informed frameworks for protocol and intervention expansion in order to construct a PN intervention tailored for pregnant women with OUD in central Utah and southwestern Pennsylvania. Our protocol provides an initial framework of a potentially impactful intervention and may guide development of future programs. Importantly, this study further establishes the evidence-base—with potential to ameliorate serious adverse opioid-related outcomes and improve health for women and their children. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A significant risk for overdose among patients prescribed opioid medications is co-use of alcohol. Community pharmacies are underutilized as a resource to prevent and address co-use. The barriers and facilitators that promote or impede the adoption of universal alcohol screening and intervention at point of opioid medication dispensing are unknown. We assessed community pharmacy leaders, pharmacists, and technician's perceptions towards the implementation of a pharmacy-based screening/intervention for the co-use of opioids and alcohol among patients., Methods: We conducted a multi-method study that included one-time key informant interviews combined with a close-ended survey to inform our understanding of pharmacy system/practice-level barriers and facilitators for universal screening and intervention. Participants were recruited from Utah and Tennessee and were required to have active employment as pharmacy leaders, pharmacists, or technicians, be English-speaking, and believe they could provide feedback regarding co-use screening and intervention within community pharmacies. Interviews used the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Organizational Readiness for Implementing Change assessment. Qualitative analysis included both inductive and deductive coding. Themes followed a cycle of open, initial coding whereby codes were derived inductively from the data., Results: Themes from interviews (N = 68) included a) emphasizing a need to overcome the stigma associated with patients who engage in co-use and a mindset shift to treat the challenges and risks associated, b) need for corporate-level support, management buy-in, and c) appropriate technology to support the workflow including system-wide changes to support the integration of medication therapy management services within community pharmacies. However, barriers were offset by pharmacists eager to understand their role in screening patients and reiterated a focus on patient-centered care to achieve this goal. From the ORIC assessment, 75 % (n = 51) of respondents reported that community pharmacy staff wanted to implement the screening and intervention, and 69.1 % (n = 47) reported motivation to implement the screening and intervention. Finally, 67.6 % (n = 46) felt that community pharmacies are committed to implementing the screening and intervention, but only 10.3 % (n = 7) expressed strong support to do "whatever it takes" to implement the screening and intervention., Conclusion: These results provide critical insights into implementation strategies for the adoption of brief intervention by community pharmacists. These data are foundational to developing strategies for a powered trial and possible future system/practice-level implementation of universal alcohol screening and intervention for co-use., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)