Search

The integration of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) modeling and simulations with artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithms is one of the most attractive areas of the pharmacometric research. These hybrid techniques are currently under investigation to perform several tasks, among which precision dosing. In this scenario, this paper presents and evaluates a new framework embedding PK-PD models into a reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm, Q-learning (QL), to personalize pharmacological treatment. Each patient is represented with a set of PK-PD parameters and has a personal QL agent which optimizes the individual treatment. In the training phase, leveraging PK-PD simulations, the QL agent assesses different actions, defined consistently with the clinical knowledge to consider only plausible dose-adjustments, in order to find the optimal rules. The proposed framework was evaluated to optimize the erdafitinib treatment in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. This drug was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with a dose-adaptive protocol based on monitoring the levels of serum phosphate, which represent a biomarker of both treatment efficacy and toxicity. To evaluate the flexibility of the methodology, a heterogeneous virtual population of 141 patients was generated using an erdafitinib population PK (PopPK)-PD literature model. For each patient, treatment response was simulated by using both QL-optimized protocol and the clinical one. QL agents outperform the approved dose-adaptive rules, increasing more than 10% the efficacy and the safety of treatment at each end point. Results confirm the great potentialities of the integration of PopPK-PD models and RL algorithms to optimize precision dosing tasks., (© 2024 The Authors. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics © 2024 American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: Despite fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR ) inhibitors being approved in tumor types with select FGFR rearrangements or gene mutations, amplifications of FGFR represent the most common FGFR alteration across malignancies. Subprotocol K1 (EAY131-K1) of the National Cancer Institute-MATCH platform trial was designed to evaluate the antitumor efficacy of the oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in patients with tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplification., Methods: EAY131-K1 was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study with central confirmation of presence of FGFR1-4 amplification in tumors. Patients with urothelial carcinoma were excluded. Enrolled patients received oral erdafitinib at a starting dose of 8 mg once daily continuously with escalation to 9 mg once daily continuously, on the basis of predefined time point assessments of phosphate levels, until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary end point was centrally assessed objective response rate (ORR), with key secondary end points being 6-month progression-free survival (PFS6), PFS, overall survival (OS), and safety., Results: Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study with 18 included in the prespecified primary efficacy analysis. The median age of the 18 patients was 60 years, and 78% had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy. There were no confirmed responses to erdafitinib; however, five patients experienced stable disease (SD) as best response. One patient with an FGFR1 -amplified breast cancer had a prolonged PFS >168 days (5.5 months). The median PFS was 1.7 months (90% CI, 1.1 to 1.8 months) and the median OS was 4.2 months (90% CI, 2.3 to 9.3 months). The estimated PFS6 rate was 13.8% (90% CI, 3.3 to 31.6). The majority of toxicities were grade 1 to 2 in nature, although there was one grade 5 treatment-related adverse event., Conclusion: Erdafitinib did not meet its primary end point of efficacy as determined by ORR in treatment-refractory solid tumors harboring FGFR1-4 amplifications. Our findings support that rearrangements and gene mutations, but not amplifications, of FGFR remain the established FGFR alterations with approved indications for FGFR inhibition.

Among patients with chronic kidney disease ( CKD) in the United States, HCV infection causes significant morbidity and mortality and results in substantial healthcare costs. A once-daily oral regimen of elbasvir/grazoprevir ( EBR/ GZR) for 12 weeks was found to be a safe and efficacious treatment for HCV in patients with CKD. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of EBR/ GZR in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced CKD patients compared with no treatment (NoTx) and pegylated interferon plus ribavirin (peg- IFN/ RBV) using a computer-based model of the natural history of chronic HCV genotype 1 infection, CKD and liver disease. Data on baseline characteristics of the simulated patients were obtained from NHANES, 2000-2010. Model inputs were estimated from published studies. Cost of treatment with EBR/ GZR and peg- INF/ RBV were based on wholesale acquisition cost. All costs were from a third-party payer perspective and were expressed in 2015 U.S. dollars. We estimated lifetime incidence of liver-related complications, liver transplantation, kidney transplantation, end-stage live disease mortality and end-stage renal disease mortality; lifetime quality-adjusted life years ( QALY); and incremental cost-utility ratios ( ICUR). The model predicted that EBR/ GZR will significantly reduce the incidence of liver-related complications and prolong life in patients with chronic HCV genotype 1 infection and CKD compared with NoTx or use of peg- IFN/ RBV. EBR/ GZR-based regimens resulted in higher average remaining QALYs and higher costs (11.5716, $191 242) compared with NoTx (8.9199, $156 236) or peg- INF/ RBV (10.2857, $186 701). Peg- IFN/ RBV is not cost-effective, and the ICUR of EBR/ GZR compared with NoTx was $13 200/ QALY. Treatment of a patient on haemodialysis with EBR/ GZR resulted in a higher ICUR ($217 000/ QALY). Assuming a threshold of $100 000 per QALY gained for cost-effectiveness, use of elbasvir/grazoprevir to treat an average patient with CKD can be considered cost-effective in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The synthesis of some 2-furano-4(3H)-quinazolinones, diamides (open ring quinazolines), quinoxalines and their biological evaluation as antitumor agents using National Cancer Institute (NCI) disease oriented antitumor screen protocol are investigated. Among the synthesize compounds, seventeen compounds were granted NSC code and screened at National Cancer Institute (NCI), USA for anticancer activity at a single high dose (10−5 M) in full NCI 60 cell panel. Among the selected compounds, 3-(2-chloro benzylideneamine)-2-(furan-2-yl) quinazoline-4(3h)-one 21 was found to be the most active candidate of the series at five dose level screening against Ovarian OVCAR-4 and Non-small cell lung cancer NCI-H522 with GI50 1.82 & 2.14 μM respectively. Rational approach and QSAR techniques enabled the understanding of the pharmacophoric requirement for quinazoline, diamides and quinoxaline derivatives. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Significance: Erdafitinib is the first fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitor approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in April 2019 for the treatment of locally advanced and unresectable or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Central serous chorioretinopathy is a common ocular adverse effect requiring frequent monitoring with ophthalmic examination., Purpose: This study aimed to increase awareness of erdafitinib-induced central serous chorioretinopathy, highlight erdafitinib dose management guidelines, and emphasize the importance of collaborating with oncologists to prevent adverse visual consequences., Case Report: An 80-year-old patient with an advanced urothelial cancer with fibroblast growth factor receptor mutations developed central serous chorioretinopathy when he was treated with daily 8 mg of erdafitinib. The erdafitinib-induced central serous chorioretinopathy resolved completely after the discontinuation of erdafitinib. He was then treated with daily 6 mg of erdafitinib and again developed central serous chorioretinopathy, which resolved completely upon discontinuation of the medication. The patient then decided to stop treatment with erdafitinib., Conclusions: Erdafitinib, a potent tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1 to 4, demonstrates antitumor activity in advanced urothelial carcinoma with fibroblast growth factor receptor mutations with a response rate of approximately 40%. However, central serous chorioretinopathy develops in 25% of patients treated with a daily 8-mg dose of erdafitinib. Although most mild to moderate erdafitinib-induced central serous chorioretinopathies resolve with dose interruption or reduction, occasionally discontinuation of the medication is necessary. Therefore, careful coordination with oncologists is important to assess the impact of erdafitinib on vision, quality of life, and survival prognosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest Disclosure: None of the authors have reported a financial conflict of interest. No identifiable health information was included in this case report. No financial conflict of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 American Academy of Optometry.)

A fixed-dose combination of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) NS5B polymerase inhibitor sofosbuvir, the HCV NS5A inhibitor velpatasvir and the HCV NS3/4A protease inhibitor voxilaprevir (sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir; Vosevi ® ) is approved in the EU for the treatment of chronic HCV genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 infection in adults. In the phase III POLARIS trials, in patients who had HCV genotype 1-6 infection with or without compensated cirrhosis, overall rates of sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR 12 ) with sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir were high after 8 weeks of treatment in direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-naïve patients and 12 weeks of treatment in DAA-experienced patients. However, 8 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir was inferior to 12 weeks of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir in cirrhotic or non-cirrhotic DAA-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1, 2, 4, 5 or 6 infection and non-cirrhotic DAA-naïve patients with HCV genotype 3 infection, mostly due to an insufficient treatment period. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir was generally well tolerated, with most adverse events being of mild or moderate intensity. The most common adverse events included headache, fatigue, nausea and diarrhoea. In conclusion, sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir is an important and effective option for the treatment of HCV genotype 1-6 infection in adults, especially those who have previously failed a DAA therapy with or without an HCV NS5A inhibitor.

On July 18, 2017, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) (Vosevi) fixed-dose combination (FDC), an interferon-free, complete regimen for adult patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection without cirrhosis or with compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A) who have: • genotype 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing a nonstructural protein 5A (NS5A) inhibitor; and • genotype 1a or 3 infection and have previously been treated with an HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Approval was based on an acceptable safety profile and high sustained virological response rates 12 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12) in two phase 3 clinical trials in subjects previously treated with a direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen. In POLARIS-1, 96% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. In POLARIS-4, 98% of SOF/VEL/VOX-treated subjects achieved SVR12. A key and challenging question in evaluating the data was determining the contribution of VOX to SOF/VEL and how this differed depending on the genotype and patient population. In this article, we provide our perspective on the issues considered in making these determinations, especially regarding the POLARIS-4 data in subjects who have previously been treated with a chronic HCV regimen containing sofosbuvir without an NS5A inhibitor. Conclusion: We seek to provide context as to why a broad indication was given for NS5A inhibitor-experienced patients (HCV genotypes 1-6) while the indication for NS5A inhibitor- naïve patients was limited to HCV genotypes 1a and 3 only. (Hepatology 2018;67:482-491)., (Published 2017. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.)