Search

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is one of the most effective therapies for chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is significantly underutilized. There are several patient-related, geographic, societal, and health system-related barriers to PR. People with chronic respiratory disease face a collectively high burden of treatments including health care provider visits, medications, oxygen and other durable medical equipment, and providers' recommendation to undertake PR may be considered an added burden more than a likely benefit. Transportation difficulties, lack of insurance coverage, competing time priorities, low knowledge of PR, lack of perceived likely benefit, comorbidities, and other factors also pose obstacles to participation in PR for patients. Geographic availability of PR is heterogenous; in the United States, out-patient center-based PR programs are often not available within close proximity to patients' residence, posing barriers to patients' access to it. PR programs are lacking altogether in many areas; rural areas are particularly affected. Existing PR programs are often poorly funded and underresourced. Socioeconomic and racial disparities also influence patients' likelihood of receiving PR. Also, health care professionals (HCPs) often do not refer their patients with chronic respiratory disease to PR, owing to a lack of knowledge and awareness of its content and benefits, patient candidacy, or of the referral process. A limited number of multidisciplinary HCPs trained in PR likely also contributes to limited access to PR for patients. Collectively, these multifaceted barriers to PR create unacceptable health care disparities. Strategies to address barriers to PR are urgently needed in order to enable individuals who need to receive it., Competing Interests: Dr Rochester discloses relationships with Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, and AstraZeneca., (Copyright © 2024 by Daedalus Enterprises.)

Rationale: Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) has demonstrated physiological, symptom-reducing, psychosocial, and health economic benefits for patients with chronic respiratory diseases, yet it is underutilized worldwide. Insufficient funding, resources, and reimbursement; lack of healthcare professional, payer, and patient awareness and knowledge; and additional patient-related barriers all contribute to the gap between the knowledge of the science and benefits of PR and the actual delivery of PR services to suitable patients.Objectives: The objectives of this document are to enhance implementation, use, and delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation to suitable individuals worldwide.Methods: Members of the American Thoracic Society (ATS) Pulmonary Rehabilitation Assembly and the European Respiratory Society (ERS) Rehabilitation and Chronic Care Group established a Task Force and writing committee to develop a policy statement on PR. The document was modified based on feedback from expert peer reviewers. After cycles of review and revisions, the statement was reviewed and formally approved by the Board of Directors of the ATS and the Science Council and Executive Committee of the ERS.Main Results: This document articulates policy recommendations for advancing healthcare professional, payer, and patient awareness and knowledge of PR, increasing patient access to PR, and ensuring quality of PR programs. It also recommends areas of future research to establish evidence to support the development of an updated funding and reimbursement policy regarding PR.Conclusions: The ATS and ERS commit to undertake actions that will improve access to and delivery of PR services for suitable patients. They call on their members and other health professional societies, payers, patients, and patient advocacy groups to join in this commitment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rationale: Chronic respiratory diseases, the third leading cause of death worldwide, have been associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and increased economic burden that make a profound impact on individuals and communities. However, limited research has delineated complex relationships between specific sociodemographic disparities and chronic respiratory disease outcomes among U.S. counties. Objectives: To assess the association of county-level sociodemographic vulnerabilities with chronic respiratory disease mortality in the United States. Methods: Chronic respiratory disease mortality data among U.S. counties for 2014-2018 was obtained from the CDC WONDER (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research) database. The social vulnerability index (SVI), including subindices of socioeconomic status, household composition and disability, minority status and language, and housing type and transportation, is a composite, percentile-based measure developed by the CDC to evaluate county-level sociodemographic vulnerabilities to disasters. We examined county-level sociodemographic characteristics from the SVI and classified the percentile rank into quartiles, with a higher quartile indicating greater vulnerability. The associations between chronic respiratory disease mortality and overall SVI, its four subindices, and each county characteristic were analyzed by negative binomial regression. Results: From 2014 to 2018, the age-adjusted mortality per 1,000,000 population attributed to chronic lower respiratory disease was 406.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 405.5-407.3); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), 393.7 (392.8-394.6); asthma, 10.0 (9.9-10.2); interstitial lung disease (ILD), 50.5 (50.1-50.8); idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 37.0 (36.7-37.3); and sarcoidosis, 5.3 (5.2-5.4). Counties in the higher quartile of overall SVI were significantly associated with greater disease mortality (chronic lower respiratory disease, incidence rate ratios: fourth vs. first quartile, 1.43 [95% CI, 1.39-1.48]; COPD, 1.44 [1.39-1.49]; asthma, 2.06 [1.71-2.48]; ILD, 1.07 [1.02-1.13]; IPF, 1.14 [1.06-1.22]; sarcoidosis, 2.01 [1.44-2.81]). In addition, higher mortality was also found in counties in the higher quartile of each subindex and most sociodemographic characteristics. Conclusions: Chronic respiratory disease mortalities were significantly associated with county-level sociodemographic determinants as measured by the SVI in the United States. These findings suggested sociodemographic determinants may add a considerable barrier to establishing health equity. Multidegree public health strategies and clinical interventions addressing inequitable outcomes of chronic respiratory disease should be developed and targeted in areas with greater social vulnerability and disadvantage.