1. The complementary Erlangen active simulator for interventional endoscopy training is superior to solely clinical education in endoscopic hemostasis--the French training project: a prospective trial.
- Author
-
Maiss J, Prat F, Wiesnet J, Proeschel A, Matthes K, Peters A, Hahn EG, Sautereau D, Chaussade S, and Hochberger J
- Subjects
- Animals, Clinical Competence, Educational Measurement, France, Humans, Models, Animal, Prospective Studies, Swine, United States, Computer-Assisted Instruction methods, Education, Medical, Graduate methods, Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal methods, Hemostasis, Endoscopic education
- Abstract
Background: The Erlangen Active Simulator for Interventional Endoscopy (EASIE) using ex-vivo porcine organs was introduced in 1997. The present study should analyze whether repeated EASIE simulator training in endoscopic hemostasis led to superior performance compared with a traditionally educated group. The results were compared with a similar project in New York., Methods: Thirty-five French GI fellows were enrolled. Baseline skills evaluation was performed in four disciplines (manual skills, injection/coagulation, clip application and variceal ligation) using the compactEASIE-simulator equipped with an upper gastrointestinal organ package for bleeding simulation. The same, translated evaluation forms (from the prior New York project) were used. Subsequently, fellows were randomized into group A (n=17, only clinical education) and group B (n=18, additional three simulator trainings). Group B was trained the next day and after 4 and 7 months by experts of the French Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Both groups performed routine and emergency endoscopies at their home hospitals during the study period. Both groups were re-evaluated blindly after 9 months., Results: The learning curve for group B showed a significant improvement in all disciplines (P<0.004) whereas group A improved significantly in only two of four disciplines at blinded final evaluation (manual skills P=0.02, injection/coagulation P=0.013). The direct comparison of groups B and A at blinded final evaluation showed significantly superior ratings for group B in all disciplines (P<0.006) and significantly shorter performance times in two disciplines (P=0.016 each). The comparison with the similar 'New York project' revealed that preexisting differences in skills were adjusted by the training., Conclusion: Complementary trainings (three workshops in 7 months) in endoscopic hemostasis using the compactEASIE improved skills compared with a solely clinical education. The results of the 'New York project' were confirmed and benefits were independent from the medical educational system.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF