Search

Differences in breeding values between dominance and additive models were examined theoretically and with field data. Data included 5.2 million records on stature from 3.0 million US Holsteins. The largest full-sib family had 29 animals, and 7% of all animals had at least one full sib. The dominance model, which accounted for dominance covariances, included the following effects: management, age, stage of lactation, permanent environment, animal additive, and parental dominance (one-quarter of dominance variance) as well as a regression coefficient for inbreeding percentage. Two reduced models were also assumed; in the first, the parental dominance effect was removed, and, in the second, the inbreeding regression coefficient was also removed. The correlations between breeding values in the three models were > 0.999, but breeding values of some animals from full-sib families changed > 5 standard deviations of parental dominance. The largest changes were observed for parents with large numbers of full-sib progeny, with limited information from parents, and without individual performance records. On average, the differences were up to four times larger for cows than for bulls and up to five times larger for dams than for sires. The greatest differences in breeding values between the dominance and the additive models were observed for dams with full-sib progeny, female full sibs, and low reliability bulls with full sibs in the extended family. Animals with large amounts of additive information as progeny-tested bulls were influenced little by the inclusion of dominance. Animals with a large proportion of information coming from animals with dominance relationships, such as cows originating via embryo transfer changed the most.

We used 179,485 Yorkshire reproductive and 239,354 Yorkshire growth records to estimate additive and dominance variances by Method Fraktur R. Estimates were obtained for number born alive (NBA), 21-d litter weight (LWT), days to 104.5 kg (DAYS), and backfat at 104.5 kg (BF). The single-trait models for NBA and LWT included the fixed effects of contemporary group and regression on inbreeding percentage and the random effects mate within contemporary group, animal permanent environment, animal additive, and parental dominance. The single-trait models for DAYS and BF included the fixed effects of contemporary group, sex, and regression on inbreeding percentage and the random effects litter of birth, dam permanent environment, animal additive, and parental dominance. Final estimates were obtained from six samples for each trait. Regression coefficients for 10% inbreeding were found to be -.23 for NBA, -.52 kg for LWT, 2.1 d for DAYS, and 0 mm for BF. Estimates of additive and dominance variances expressed as a percentage of phenotypic variances were, respectively, 8.8 +/- .5 and 2.2 +/- .7 for NBA, 8.1 +/- 1.1 and 6.3 +/- .9 for LWT, 33.2 +/- .4 and 10.3 +/- 1.5 for DAYS, and 43.6 +/- .9 and 4.8 +/- .7 for BF. The ratio of dominance to additive variances ranged from .78 to .11.