Search

Objectives. To evaluate motor vehicle crash fatality rates in the first 2 states with recreational marijuana legalization and compare them with motor vehicle crash fatality rates in similar states without recreational marijuana legalization. Methods. We used the US Fatality Analysis Reporting System to determine the annual numbers of motor vehicle crash fatalities between 2009 and 2015 in Washington, Colorado, and 8 control states. We compared year-over-year changes in motor vehicle crash fatality rates (per billion vehicle miles traveled) before and after recreational marijuana legalization with a difference-in-differences approach that controlled for underlying time trends and state-specific population, economic, and traffic characteristics. Results. Pre-recreational marijuana legalization annual changes in motor vehicle crash fatality rates for Washington and Colorado were similar to those for the control states. Post-recreational marijuana legalization changes in motor vehicle crash fatality rates for Washington and Colorado also did not significantly differ from those for the control states (adjusted difference-in-differences coefficient = +0.2 fatalities/billion vehicle miles traveled; 95% confidence interval = -0.4, +0.9). Conclusions. Three years after recreational marijuana legalization, changes in motor vehicle crash fatality rates for Washington and Colorado were not statistically different from those in similar states without recreational marijuana legalization. Future studies over a longer time remain warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pyloric exclusion (PEX) has traditionally been used in the management of complicated duodenal injuries to temporarily protect the duodenal repair and prevent septic abdominal complications. We used the American College of Surgeons National Trauma Data Bank (v 5.0) to evaluate adult patients with severe duodenal injuries [American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Grade ≥3] undergoing primary repair only or repair with PEX within 24 hours of admission. Propensity scoring was used to adjust for relevant confounding factors during outcomes comparison. Among 147 patients with severe duodenal injuries, 28 (19.0%) underwent PEX [15.9% (11/69) Grade III vs 34.0% (17/50) Grade IV-V]. Despite similar demographics, PEX was associated with a longer mean hospital stay (32.2 vs 22.2 days, P = 0.003) and was not associated with a mortality benefit. There was a trend toward increased development of septic abdominal complications (intra-abdominal abscess, wound infection, or dehiscence) with PEX that was not statistically significant. After multivariable analysis using propensity score, no statistically significant differences in mortality or occurrence of septic abdominal complications was noted between those patients undergoing primary repair only or PEX. The use of PEX in patients with severe duodenal injuries may contribute to longer hospital stay and confers no survival or outcome benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The geriatric population is growing and trauma providers are often tasked with caring for injuries in the elderly. There is limited information regarding injury patterns in geriatric trauma patients stratified by mechanism of injury. This study intends to investigate the comorbidities, mechanisms, injury patterns, and outcomes in geriatric blunt trauma patients. A retrospective study of the 2012 National Trauma Databank was performed. Adult blunt trauma patients were identified; geriatric (>/=65) patients were compared with younger (<65) patients regarding admission demographics and vital signs, mechanism and severity of injury, and comorbidities. The primary outcome was injuries sustained and secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay in the intensive care unit and hospital, and ventilator days. There were 589,830 blunt trauma patients who met the inclusion criteria, including 183,209 (31%) geriatric and 406,621 (69%) nongeriatric patients. Falls were more common in geriatric patients (79 vs 29%, P < 0.0001). Geriatric patients less often had an Injury Severity Score >/=16 (18 vs 20%, P < 0.0001) but more often a head Abbreviated Injury Scale >/=3 (24 vs 18%, P < 0.0001) and lower extremity Abbreviated Injury Scale >/=3 (24% vs 8%, P < 0.0001). After logistic regression older age was an independent risk factor for mortality for the overall population and across all mechanisms. Falls are the most common mechanism for geriatric trauma patients. Geriatric patients overall present with a lower Injury Severity Score, but more often sustain severe injuries to the head and lower extremities. Injury patterns vary significantly between older and younger patients when stratified by mechanism. Mortality is significantly higher for geriatric trauma patients and older age is independently associated with mortality across all mechanisms.

Introduction: The relationship between outcomes following severe trauma and American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma centre designation has been studied. Little is known, however, about the association between ACS level and outcomes associated with ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)., Methods: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB, Version 5.0) was queried to identify adult (age 18)trauma patients who (1) developed VAP and (2) were admitted to either an ACS level I or level II centre.Transfer and burn patients were excluded. Univariate analysis defined differences between patient cohorts. Logistic regression analysis was utilised to identify independent risk factors for mortality., Results: A total of 3465 patients were identified where 65.6% were admitted to a level I facility and 34.4%to a level II centre. Patients admitted to a level I centre were more likely to have an age > 55 (71.5% vs.66.8%, p = 0.004) and to be hypotensive (SBP < 90) on admission (16.2% vs. 13.6%, p = 0.042). They were also more likely to have a longer duration of mechanical ventilation (18.5 days vs. 16.5 days, p = 0.001),longer hospital LOS (34.2 days vs. 29.6 days, p < 0.001) and a higher rate of early (±7 days) tracheostomy(33.1% vs. 29.1%, p = 0.017). Level I admission was, however, associated with lower mortality rates (10.8%vs. 14.7%, p = 0.001) and a higher likelihood of achieving discharge to home (20.2% vs. 16.1%, p < 0.001).Logistic regression analysis identified admission to a level II facility as an independent risk factor for mortality (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.08–1.66; p = 0.008) in patients developing post-traumatic VAP., Conclusion: For adults who develop VAP after trauma, admission to a level I facility is associated with improved survival. Further prospective study is needed., (2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The purpose of this study was to examine the epidemiology and outcomes of posttraumatic upper (UEA) and lower extremity amputations (LEA). The National Trauma Databank version 5 was used to identify all posttraumatic amputations. From 2000 to 2004 there were 8910 amputated patients (1.0% of all trauma patients). Of these, 6855 (76.9%) had digit and 2055 (23.1%) had limb amputation. Of those with limb amputation, 92.7 per cent (1904/2055) had a single limb amputation. LEA were more frequent than UEA among patients in the single limb amputation group (58.9% vs 41.1%). The mechanism of injury was blunt in 83 per cent; most commonly after motor vehicle collisions (51.0%), followed by machinery accidents (19.4%). Motor vehicle collision occupants had more UEA (54.5% vs 45.5%, P < 0.001), whereas motorcyclists (86.2% vs 13.8%, P < 0.001) and pedestrians (91.9% vs 8.1%, P < 0.001) had more LEA. Patients with LEA were more likely to require discharge to a skilled nursing facility; whereas those with UEA were more likely to be discharged home. Traumatic limb amputation is not uncommon after trauma in the civilian population and is associated with significant morbidity. Although single limb amputation did not impact mortality, the need for multiple limb amputation was an independent risk factor for death.

Objective: Because of its rarity and high rate of mortality, traumatic blunt cardiac rupture (BCR) has been poorly studied. The objective of this study was to use the National Trauma Data Bank to review the epidemiology and outcomes associated with traumatic BCR., Methods: After approved by the institutional review board, the National Trauma Data Bank (version 5.0) was queried for all BCR occurring between 2000 and 2005. Demographics, clinical injury data, interventions, and outcomes were abstracted for each patient. Statistical analysis was performed using an unpaired Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test to compare means and chi analysis to compare proportions. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of inhospital mortality., Results: Of 811,531 blunt trauma patients, 366 (0.045%) had a BCR of which 334 were available for analysis, with the mean age of 45 years, 65% were men, and their mean Injury Severity Score was 58 +/- 19. The most common mechanism of injury was motor vehicle collision (73%), followed by pedestrian struck by auto (16%), and falls from height (8%). Twenty-one patients (6%) died on arrival and 140 (42%) died in the emergency room. The overall mortality for patients arriving alive to hospital was 89%. Of the patients surviving to operation, 42% survived >24 hours of which 87% were discharged. Survivors were significantly younger (39 vs. 46 years, p = 0.04), had a lower Injury Severity Score (47 vs. 56, p = 0.02), higher Glasgow Coma Scale (10 vs. 6, p < 0.001), and were more likely to present with an systolic blood pressure >or=90 mm Hg (p = 0.01). Nevertheless, none of these factors was found to be an independent risk factor for mortality., Conclusion: BCR is an exceedingly rare injury, occurring in 1 of 2400 blunt trauma patients. In patients arriving alive to hospital, traumatic BCR is associated with a high mortality rate, however, is not uniformly fatal.

Background: Several authors have examined the relationship between outcomes following severe trauma and American College of Surgeons (ACS) trauma centre designation. Little is known, however, about the association between ACS level and outcomes following complications of trauma., Methods: The National Trauma Databank (NTDB, v. 5.0) was queried to identify adult (age > or =18) trauma patients developing post-traumatic ARDS, who were admitted to either ACS level 1 or level 2 trauma centres from 2000 to 2004. Patients transferred between institutions and injuries following burns were excluded. Univariate analysis was used to assess differences between those patients admitted to ACS level 1 and level 2 facilities. Adjusted mortality was derived using logistic regression analysis., Results: A total of 902 adult trauma patients with ARDS after 48 h of mechanical ventilation were identified from the NTDB. Five hundred and thirty six patients were admitted to a level 1 ACS verified centre and 366 to a level 2 facility. Univariate analysis revealed no statistical differences in clinical and demographic characteristics between the two groups. On univariate comparison, patients admitted to level 1 facilities had longer mean hospital and ICU length of stay and higher hospital related charges than level 2 counterparts. Patients admitted to a level 1 centre were, however, significantly more likely to achieve discharge to home. Using multivariate logistic regression, ACS level designation was shown to have no statistical effect on mortality. Hypotension on admission and age greater than 55 were the only independent predictors of mortality., Conclusion: ACS trauma centre designation level is not an independent predictor of mortality following post-traumatic ARDS.

Objective: The association between hospital volume and outcomes following mechanical ventilation has been previously examined in diverse patient populations. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma has outlined criteria for trauma centre level designations with specific requirements for both specialty capabilities and hospital volume. Our objective is to determine the relationship between ACS centre designation and outcomes for trauma patients undergoing mechanical ventilation., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Trauma Databank (NTDB), identifying 13,933 adult (age>or=18) trauma patients receiving mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h from 2000 to 2004 who were admitted to either an ACS Level I or Level II trauma centre. The primary endpoints examined were mortality, pneumonia and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). Univariate analysis defined differences between those patients admitted to ACS Level I and Level II facilities. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify if ACS level designation was an independent risk factor for the goal outcomes., Results: Patients admitted to a Level I facility and mechanically ventilated for greater than 48 h were more commonly greater than age 55 (71.3% vs. 67.9%, p<0.01), hypotensive (SBP<90) (16.1% vs. 12.8%, p<0.01), and likely to have sustained injury due to penetrating mechanism (11.1% vs. 5.1%, p<0.01). On univariate analysis, mortality and the incidence of pneumonia did not differ between the two groups. Level I admission was, however, less commonly associated with the development of ARDS (5.8% vs. 7.7%, p<0.01) and patients admitted to Level I facilities were significantly more likely to be discharged to home than Level II counterparts (29.7% vs. 22.9%, p<0.01). Logistic regression revealed that, while ACS Level designation was not a predictive factor for mortality or the development of pneumonia, admission to an ACS Level II facility was an independent predictor for the development of ARDS [p<0.01, odds ratio, 95% CI: 1.35 (1.18-1.59)]., Conclusion: For trauma patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >48 h, ACS trauma centre designation had no effect on overall mortality or the incidence of pneumonia. Compared to Level I counterparts, however, patients admitted to an ACS Level II facility were significantly more likely to develop ARDS following trauma. This finding needs further investigation in a large, prospective analysis.

Background: Empyema is a rare, but morbid complication of diaphragmatic injury. The purpose of this study was to use the National Trauma Databank of the American College of Surgeons to determine (1) the incidence of empyema after diaphragmatic injury, (2) risk factors for development of empyema after these injuries, and (3) the effect of empyema on mortality, hospital, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) after diaphragm injury., Methods: The National Trauma Databank (v. 5.0) was used to identify adult patients sustaining diaphragmatic injury and surviving for greater than 48 hours. Demographics, injury characteristics, associated abdominal injuries, thoracic procedures, and outcomes data were abstracted for comparison of patients who did and did not develop empyema after these injuries. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors for the development of empyema. Subsequent adjusted analysis was used to determine the effect of empyema on outcomes (hospital LOS, ICU LOS, mortality)., Results: Among 4,153 patients with diaphragmatic injury who survived more than 48 hours from admission, 57 (1.4%) developed empyema. Demographics did not differ significantly between the two groups. Empyema was associated with longer adjusted mean hospital (35.9 vs. 16.1, p < 0.001) and ICU (18.1 vs. 8.5, p < 0.001) LOS, but was not associated with increased mortality. Patients with empyema more commonly had associated hollow viscus (63.2% vs. 35.6%, p < 0.001), gastric (40.4% vs. 18.8%, p < 0.001), and splenic injuries (49.1% vs. 33.3%, p = 0.01). After multivariable analysis, two independent risk factors for the development of empyema after diaphragmatic injury were identified: gastric injury (adjusted odds ratio = 2.90; 95% confidence interval: 1.69-5.00; p < 0.001) and Injury Severity Score > or = 20 (adjusted odds ratio = 2.99; 95% confidence interval: 1.61-5.59; p = 0.001). Concomitant colonic injury did not significantly increase the risk of empyema in the study population., Conclusions: Empyema is an uncommon sequela of diaphragm injury that contributes to the need for prolonged hospital and ICU LOSs. Associated gastric trauma and Injury Severity Score > or = 20 were independently associated with empyema development after diaphragmatic injury.