Search

Background: The suicide rate for United States military veterans is 1.5× higher than that of non-veterans. To meaningfully advance suicide prevention efforts, research is needed to delineate factors that differentiate veterans with suicide attempt/s, particularly in high-risk groups, e.g., major depressive disorder (MDD), from those with suicidal ideation (no history of attempt/s). The current study aimed to identify clinical, neurocognitive, and neuroimaging variables that differentiate suicide-severity groups in veterans with MDD., Methods: Sixty-eight veterans with a DSM-5 diagnosis of MDD, including those with no ideation or suicide attempt (N = 21; MDD-SI/SA), ideation-only (N = 17; MDD + SI), and one-or-more suicide attempts (N = 30; MDD + SA; aborted, interrupted, actual attempts), participated in this study. Participants underwent a structured diagnostic interview, neurocognitive assessment, and 3 T-structural/diffusion tensor magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI). Multinomial logistic regression models were conducted to identify variables that differentiated groups with respect to the severity of suicidal behavior., Results: Relative to veterans with MDD-SI/SA, those with MDD + SA had significantly higher left cingulum fractional anisotropy, decreased attentional control on emotional-Stroop, and faster response time with intact accuracy on Go/No-Go. Relative to MDD + SI, MDD + SA had higher left cingulum fractional anisotropy and faster response time with intact accuracy on Go/No-Go., Limitations: Findings are based on retrospective, cross-sectional data and cannot identify causal relationships. Also, a healthy control group was not included given the study's focus on differentiating suicide profiles in MDD., Conclusions: This study suggests that MRI and neurocognition differentiate veterans with MDD along the suicide-risk spectrum and could inform suicide-risk stratification and prevention efforts in veterans and other vulnerable populations., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

This study investigated high school students' marijuana usage patterns in relation to their harmfulness ratings of 15 licit and illicit drugs, perceived negative consequences from using marijuana, and types of defense mechanisms employed. Subjects were classified into one of five pattern-of-use groups based on marijuana usage: principled nonusers, nonusers, light users, moderate users, and heavy users. Principled nonusers (individuals who have never used marijuana and would not do so if it was legalized) rated marijuana, hashish, cocaine, and alcohol as significantly more harmful than heavy users. A cluster analysis of the drugs' harmfulness ratings best fit a three cluster solution and were named medicinal drugs, recreational drugs, and hard drugs. In general, principled nonusers rated negative consequences from using marijuana as significantly more likely to occur than other groups. Principled nonusers and heavy users utilized reversal from the Defense Mechanism Inventory, which includes repression and denial, significantly more than nonusers, indicating some trait common to the two extreme pattern-of-use groups.