1. Potential misclassification of diabetes and prediabetes in the U.S.: Mismatched HbA1c and glucose in NHANES 2005-2016.
- Author
-
Staimez LR, Kipling LM, Nina Ham J, Legvold BT, Jackson SL, Wilson PWF, Rhee MK, and Phillips LS
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose metabolism, Child, Glucose, Glycated Hemoglobin analysis, Humans, Middle Aged, Nutrition Surveys, Prevalence, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Diabetes Mellitus diagnosis, Diabetes Mellitus epidemiology, Prediabetic State diagnosis, Prediabetic State epidemiology
- Abstract
Aims: To assess the prevalence and clinical implications of "mismatches" between HbA1c and glucose levels in the United States across the life course., Methods: Participants ages 12-79 years from U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2016 without known diagnosis of diabetes and who had a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test were included. Previously undiagnosed diabetes (DM), prediabetes, and normal glucose metabolism (NGM) were defined using American Diabetes Association cut-points. Mismatches were defined by the hemoglobin glycation index (HGI)., Results: In 10,361 participants, 5% and 41% had diabetes and prediabetes, respectively, by fasting or 2-hour glucose criteria. By HbA1c criteria, the high HGI tertile consisted of mostly abnormal classification (3% DM, 52% prediabetes) and the low HGI tertile contained mostly normal classification (78% NGM). Across all ages, 15% (weighted: 30 million individuals) had clinically significant mismatches of HGI magnitude ≥+0.5% (i.e., high mismatch) or ≤-0.5% (low mismatch). Mismatch was most common in older adults and non-Hispanic Black participants., Conclusions: Mismatches of clinically significant magnitude could lead to HbA1c-related misdiagnosis or inappropriate management in up to 30 million Americans. Older adults, non-Hispanic Black individuals, and others with high mismatches may benefit from complementing HbA1c with additional diagnostic and management strategies., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF