Search

Background: This study sought to investigate health and healthcare disparities in the management of severe mitral regurgitation with transcatheter edge-to-edge repair using MitraClip and how racial differences impact resource utilization and costs., Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) for patients who underwent Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair (TEER) using MitraClip between 2016 and 2018. The patients were stratified into four racial cohorts and study outcomes included high resource utilization (HRU), periprocedural complications, and total procedural costs. High resource utilization (HRU) was defined as length of stay (LOS) ≥7 days or a nonhome disposition at discharge. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to determine independent predictors of HRU., Results: 17,100 weighted TEER patients were segregated by race: Caucasian (n = 13,270), others (n = 1510), African Americans, AA (n = 1245) and Hispanics (n = 1075). More African Americans and Hispanics had TEER at Urban facilities (P < 0.001), which were teaching hospitals as well (P < 0.001) but were less likely to be covered by public insurance options -Medicare or Medicaid (P < 0.001). More AA (52.2 %) and Hispanics (27.6 %) were likely to be in the lowest median annual income quartile versus Caucasians (19.2 %) (P = 0.003). AA and Hispanics had higher resource utilization (HRU), prolonged length of stay, nonhome disposition at discharge, higher procedural costs and periprocedural complications versus Caucasians. The logistic regression model revealed acute kidney injury (AKI) and actual procedural costs as independent predictors of HRU in both African American and Hispanic groups., Conclusion: Significant Health and healthcare disparities do exist among underrepresented, racial minority patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair in the US. These disparities were associated with higher resource utilization and actual costs in patients with mitral regurgitation treated with TEER., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no actual or potential conflicts of interest relevant to the conduct of this research and its subsequent publication., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The MitraClip from Abbott is FDA approved intracardiac implantable device for transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). Despite a few previously published studies, there is limited safety data for its use in clinical practice, hence, we designed this study using data obtained from a safety nationwide database to demonstrate the safety profile of MitraClip., Methods: The first two of the five authors independently queried all reported adverse events from the United State Food and Drug Administration [FDA] Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience [MAUDE] registry from January 2014 to December 2020. The primary end point was trend in reported fatal events obtained from this database. The secondary end points included the causes of reported nonfatal reports from the MAUDE registry. The trend of reported fatal events was assessed using the Cochran Armitage trend test over the period of the study., Results: During the study period, subjects included 3370 patients whose MitraClip-associated adverse events were reported and captured by MAUDE registry. Of these, 211 were fatal and 3159 nonfatal events. Fatal event reports resulted deaths and reported nonfatal events were from injuries and device system malfunction. This study demonstrated an initial upward trend from 2014 to 2015 then a subsequent statistically significant downward trend in reported fatal events from 2015 to 2020 (Cochran-Armitage test P = 0.039). The peak proportion of reported fatal events occurred in 2015, (n = 44; representing 1.25% of reported adverse events) and lowest proportion of reported fatal events took place in 2020 (n = 19; representing 0.56% of reported adverse events). The most reported nonfatal events were from malfunctioning of MitraClip system (n = 1170; representing 37% of reported nonfatal events), new unremarkable repolarization abnormalities on periprocedural EKG (n = 864; representing 27% of reported nonfatal events), leaflet rupture (n = 651; representing 21% of reported nonfatal events), and cardiogenic shock (n = 170; representing 5% of reported nonfatal events)., Conclusions: This analysis of the MAUDE Registry indicated, especially within the confines of this study's limitations and poor data quality of information, an apparent downward trend of reported fatal events over the study period. Even though conclusive attributions cannot be made regarding this important finding, perhaps, this points to early evidence of a potential institutional or operator learning curve with this device. However, in view of the inferior quality of the data accrued from the MAUDE Registry, more high-precision studies are needed to better understand these changes, as the utility of MitraClip, becomes more established in clinical practice., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest This is to state that the Author of this Manuscript titled “Adverse Events Following Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair using MitraClip: Lessons learned from the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) Registry” have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)