1. Standardized Reporting and Management of Suspicious Findings on Chest CT Imaging Is Associated With Improved Lung Cancer Diagnosis in an Observational Study.
- Author
-
Urbania TH, Dusendang JR, Herrinton LJ, Alexeeff S, Corley DA, Ely S, Patel A, Osinski T, and Sakoda LC
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Delayed Diagnosis, Female, Humans, Incidence, Lung Neoplasms epidemiology, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, United States epidemiology, Young Adult, Lung Neoplasms diagnosis, Radiography, Thoracic methods, Tomography, X-Ray Computed methods
- Abstract
Background: Follow-up of chest CT scan findings suspicious for lung cancer may be delayed because of inadequate documentation. Standardized reporting and follow-up may reduce time to diagnosis and care for lung cancer., Study Design and Methods: We implemented a reporting system that standardizes tagging of chest CT scan reports by classifying pulmonary findings. The system also automates referral of patients with findings suspicious for lung cancer to a multidisciplinary care team for rapid review and follow-up. The system was designed to reduce the time to diagnosis, particularly for early-stage lung cancer. We evaluated the effectiveness of this system, using a quasi-experimental stepped wedge cluster design, examining 99,148 patients who underwent diagnostic (nonscreening) chest CT imaging from 2015 to 2017 and who had not received a chest CT scan in the preceding 24 months. We evaluated the association of the intervention with the incidence of diagnosis and surgical treatment of early-stage (I, II) and late-stage (III, IV) lung cancer within 120 days of chest CT imaging., Results: Forty percent of patients received the intervention. Among 2,856 patients (2.9%) who received diagnoses of lung cancer, 28% had early-stage disease. In multivariable analyses, the intervention was associated with 24% greater odds of early-stage diagnosis (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.09-1.41) and no change in the odds of late-stage diagnosis (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14). The intervention was not associated with the rate of surgical treatment within 120 days., Interpretation: In this large quasi-experimental community-based observational study, implementation of a system that combines standardized tagging of chest CT scan reports with clinical navigation was effective for increasing the diagnosis of early-stage lung cancer., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF