Search

Background: Most medical educational programs emphasize clinical observation or clinical skill acquisition, fewer focus upon research. The Danish-American Research Exchange (DARE) program, sponsored by the Lundbeck Foundation, is unique in that the medical student initiates biomedical research collaboration between Danish and US medical institutions. To achieve this, Danish medical students (DARE students) conduct binational mentored research projects while based in the United States for 10 months. In addition, DARE students are introduced to interdisciplinary thinking about how to develop ultra-low-cost healthcare interventions through the '$10 Challenge'. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of DARE alumni over five consecutive years (2015–2020, n = 24). Research metrics included completion of a research project, primary authorship, and co-authorship of publications. The number of publications, prior to and after the DARE program were enumerated. For the first four cohorts, graduation from medical school and acceptance or intention to enter a joint MD-PhD program also were assessed. Two focus groups were conducted using constructivist grounded theory. Discussions were transcribed, redacted, and coded using Dedoose software. Results: DARE Medical students were 31.2 years (range 24–35), the majority were women (67%;16/24). The majority (17/24;71%) completed a first author publication in a peer-reviewed journal with a median of 3.9 per DARE alumnus. DARE alumnus reported increased proficiency in biostatistics, epidemiology, coding and public speaking as well as stronger research qualities in creativity, critical thinking, comfort in approaching scientist in both the US and Denmark (p < 0.001 for all). Qualitative key themes included: increased confidence, a deepening of research inquiry and linkage to a research network. Conclusions: Preliminarily, this study suggests that medical students can initiate binational collaboration in medicine. Benefits include research productivity, intention to pursue academic medical careers, as well as positive impacts on motivation. This medical student-initiated research model lays the groundwork for using this model across other country pairs to promote binational collaboration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Importance: Given the rapidly increasing use of stimulant medications during pregnancy and among women of reproductive age who may become pregnant inadvertently, there is a need to better understand their safety.Objective: To examine the risk of congenital malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to stimulants.Design, Setting, and Participants: Cohort study of the Medicaid-insured population in the United States nested in the 2000-2013 US Medicaid Analytic eXtract, with follow-up of safety signals detected in the Medicaid Analytic eXtract data using the Nordic Health registries (2003-2013) (Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden). A total of 1 813 894 publicly insured pregnancies in the United States and 2 560 069 singleton pregnancies in the 5 Nordic countries ending in live births were included. Relative risks were estimated accounting for underlying psychiatric disorders and other potential confounders. Relative risk estimates for the US and Nordic data were pooled using a fixed-effects meta-analytic approach. The study was conducted from July 1, 2015, to March 31, 2017.Exposures: Methylphenidate and amphetamines dispensed during the first trimester.Main Outcomes and Measures: Major congenital malformations and subgroup of cardiac malformations.Results: In the US data, of the 1 813 894 pregnancies evaluated, 35.0 per 1000 infants not exposed to stimulants were diagnosed as having congenital malformations, compared with 45.9 per 1000 infants for methylphenidate and 45.4 for amphetamines. For cardiac malformations, the risks were 12.7 (95% CI, 12.6-12.9), 18.8 (95% CI, 13.8-25.6), and 15.4 (95% CI, 12.5-19.0) per 1000 infants, respectively. The adjusted relative risks for methylphenidate were 1.11 (95% CI, 0.91-1.35) for any malformation and 1.28 (95% CI, 0.94-1.74) for cardiac malformations. No increased risks were observed for amphetamines: 1.05 (95% CI, 0.93-1.19) for any malformations and 0.96 (95% CI, 0.78-1.19) for cardiac malformations. Findings were confirmed in sensitivity analyses accounting for proxies of unmeasured confounders and increasing the specificity of the exposure and outcome definitions. Replication of the analyses for methylphenidate using the Nordic data including 2 560 069 pregnancies yielded a relative risk of 1.28 (95% CI, 0.83-1.97) for cardiac malformations, resulting in a pooled estimate of 1.28 (95% CI, 1.00-1.64).Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a small increase in the risk of cardiac malformations associated with intrauterine exposure to methylphenidate but not to amphetamines. This information is important when weighing the risks and benefits of alternative treatment strategies for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in women of reproductive age and during early pregnancy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

OBJECTIVES: It is known that liver disease can cause an imbalance in the coagulation system, but available data on liver disease and risk of venous thromboembolism are conflicting. We examined the risk of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized with liver diseases. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide Danish case-control study of incident cases of venous thromboembolism from 1980 to 2005 using population-based data from the National Registry of Patients, and from the Civil Registration System. We used conditional logistic regression to compute the relative risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with liver disease compared to population controls. We then excluded patients with known malignancy (diagnosed either before or up to 3 months after the venous thromboembolism) or fractures, trauma, surgery, or pregnancy within 90 days before the venous thromboembolism to estimate the risk associated with unprovoked venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: A total of 99,444 patients with venous thromboembolism and 496,872 population controls were included in the study. Patients with liver disease had a clearly increased relative risk of venous thromboembolism, varying from 1.74 (95% CI, 1.54-1.95) for liver cirrhosis to 1.87 (95% CI, 1.73-2.03) for non-cirrhotic liver disease. The risks were higher for deep venous thrombosis compared with pulmonary embolism. In the analysis, restricted to 67,519 patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism and 308,614 population controls, we found slightly higher relative risks: 2.06 (95% CI, 1.79-2.38) for liver cirrhosis and 2.10 (95% CI, 1.91-2.31) for non-cirrhotic liver disease. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with liver disease have a substantially increased risk of venous thromboembolism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to assess if information on CAD severity from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) can identify patients that benefit most from treating low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) to American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology (ACC/AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines targets., Background: Current treatment guidelines for secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) disregard severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) for treatment choices. It is unclear whether severity of CAD should be considered in treatment recommendations., Methods: Among 20,241 symptomatic patients undergoing diagnostic CTA from the Western Denmark Heart Registry, we assessed the number needed to treat (NNT) in 6 years to prevent 1 ASCVD event as well as the proportion of all events that could be prevented by treating LDL-C to targets. We assumed a 22% relative reduction of ASCVD events per 1 mmol/l reduction in LDL-C., Results: In multivariable analysis with no CAD as the reference, the subdistribution hazard ratio for ASCVD events was 4.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.3 to 4.9) for 1-vessel disease, 4.6 (3.5 to 6.0) for 2-vessel disease, and 5.6 (4.0 to 8.0) for 3-vessel disease. Consequently, the NNT to prevent 1 ASCVD event in 6 years by treating LDL-C to targets varied greatly from 233 (ESC) and 110 (ACC/AHA) for patients with no CAD to 8-9 for patients with 3-vessel disease (both ACC/AHA and ESC). The estimated percentage of ASCVD events that could be prevented by achieving guideline targets was 30% to 36% for patients with obstructive disease. However, <20% of patients achieved targets., Conclusions: An individualized approach based on CAD severity can identify symptomatic patients that are likely to derive most and least benefit from treating LDL-C to ACC/AHA and ESC treatment targets., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence rates vary by gender, age, time and place. Geographic differences in gender-, age- and time-specific HCC incidence rates may improve the understanding of HCC risk factors. We computed annual standardized HCC incidence rates for the United States (U.S.) 1978-2004 and for Denmark 1978-2003. Among U.S. white men aged 45-59 the HCC incidence rates were comparable to the Danish rates until 1995, but more than tripled over the following 8 years to become over 2.5-fold higher than the Danish rate by 2003, with an additional small increase in 2004. HCC rates in black U.S. men aged 45-59 also increased sharply after 1995. Among women aged 45-59 the U.S. HCC rates were elevated in recent years, but did not show the sharp increase after 1995 observed among men; the Danish rates showed a decreasing trend throughout 1978-2003. U.S. rates in the 60-74 years age groups showed a protracted and gradual increase with no evidence of a sharp increase after 1995. In the 60-74 years age group, rates for Danish men were comparable to those for U.S. white men, but rates for Danish women decreased. The U.S. prevalence rates of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are 2.1 and 1.1% for men and women, respectively, the Danish 0.2%. The disparity in HCV prevalence is the most likely explanation for the differences between Danish and U.S. trends in HCC incidence. Intravenous drug use and blood transfusions are the major sources of HCV, and we suggest that increased HCV infection prevalence among Vietnam era military veterans may contribute to the earlier and steeper HCC incidence increase for U.S. men than for U.S. women.