Search

Introduction: Proximal femur fractures are one of the most common fractures observed in dialysis-dependent patients. Given the large comorbidity burden present in this patient population, more information is needed regarding post-operative outcomes. The goal of this study was to assess morbidity and mortality following operative fixation of femoral neck fractures in the dialysis-dependent elderly.Methods: The full set of medicare data from 2005 to 2014 was retrospectively analyzed. Elderly patients with femoral neck fractures were selected. Patients were stratified based on dialysis dependence. Post-operative morbidity and mortality outcomes were compared between the two populations. Adjusted odds were calculated to determine the effect of dialysis dependence on outcomes.Results: A total of 320,629 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of dialysis-dependent patients, 1504 patients underwent internal fixation and 2662 underwent arthroplasty. For both surgical cohorts, dialysis dependence was found to be associated with at least 1.9 times greater odds of mortality within 1 and 2 years post-operatively. Blood transfusions within 90 days and infections within 2 years were significantly increased in the dialysis-dependent study cohort. Dialysis dependence alone did not contribute to increased mechanical failure or major medical complications.Conclusion: Regardless of the surgery performed, dialysis dependence is a significant risk factor for major post-surgical morbidity and mortality after operative treatment of femoral neck fractures in this population. Increased mechanical failure in the internal fixation group was not observed. The increased risk associated with caring for this population should be understood when considering surgical intervention and counseling patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: With advances in the understanding of adult spinal deformity (ASD), more complex osteotomy and fusion techniques are being implemented with increasing frequency. Patients undergoing ASD corrections infrequently require extended acute care, longer inpatient stays, and are discharged to supervised care. Given the necessity of value-based health care, identification of clinical indicators of adverse discharge disposition in ASD surgeries is paramount.Purpose: Using the nationwide and surgeon-created databases, the present study aimed to identify predictors of adverse discharge disposition after ASD surgeries and view the corresponding differences in charges.Study Design/setting: This is a retrospective analysis of patients on the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database and of cost data from Medicare PearlDiver Database.Patient Sample: Patients undergoing thoracolumbar surgery for correction of ASD were included in the study.Outcome Measures: Primary analysis was performed to compare patients discharged to home with patients who either expired or were discharged to locations other than home. Secondary analysis was performed to determine the cost differences across discharge groups.Methods: Patients on NSQIP undergoing thoracolumbar ASD-corrective surgery with a primary diagnosis of scoliosis (ICD-9 code 737.x) and over the age of 18 were isolated. Predictors (demographic, clinical, and complications) of not-home (NH; rehab or skilled nursing facility) discharge were analyzed using binary logistic regression controlling for levels fused, decompressions, osteotomies, and revisions. Average 30- and 90-day costs of care were reported in home, rehab, and skilled nursing facility discharge groups in patients undergoing 8+ level thoracolumbar fusion.Results: A total of 1,978 patients undergoing lumbar ASD-corrective surgery were included for analysis (average age: 59.3 years, sex: 64% female). Average length of stay was 6.58 days. On multivariate regression analysis, age over 60 years (odds ratio [OR]: 0.28, confidence interval [CI]: 0.22-0.34) and female sex (p=.003) were independent predictors of adverse discharge status. Partially dependent preoperational functional status, defined as reliance on another person to complete some activities of daily living, increased likelihood of adverse discharge disposition (OR: 0.57, CI: 0.35-0.90). Despite controlling for all clinical variables except for the ones specific to each analysis, Smith-Petersen osteotomy (OR: 0.51, CI: 0.40-0.64), interbody device placement (OR: 0.80, CI: 0.64-0.98), and fixation to the iliac (OR: 0.54, CI: 0.41-0.70) increased the likelihood of adverse discharge. Complications most associated with adverse discharge were urinary tract infections (OR: 0.34, CI: 0.21-0.57) and blood transfusions (OR: 0.42, CI: 0.34-0.52). Relative to home discharge, 30-day costs of care were +$21,061 more expensive in rehab discharges, but not different in skilled nursing facility discharges (+$5,791, p=.177). The 90-day costs of care were $23,815 in rehab discharges (p<.001), but again not different from skilled nursing facility discharges (+$6,091, p=.212).Conclusions: Discharge destination to rehabilitation has a significant impact on the cost of thoracolumbar ASD surgeries. Patient selection can predict patients at higher risk of discharges to rehab or skilled nursing facility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective database analysis among Medicare beneficiaries OBJECTIVE.: The aim of this study was to determine the effect of chronic steroid use and chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection on rates of surgical site infection (SSI) and mortality in patients 65 years of age and older who were treated with lumbar spine fusion., Summary of Background Data: Systemic immunosuppression and infection focus elsewhere in the body are considered risk factors for SSI. Chronic steroid use and previous MRSA infection have been associated with an increased risk of SSI in some surgical procedures, but their impact on the risk of infection and mortality after lumbar fusion surgery has not been studied in detail., Methods: The PearlDiver insurance-based database (2005-2012) was queried to identify 360,005 patients over 65 years of age who had undergone lumbar spine fusion. Of these patients, those who had been taking oral glucocorticoids chronically and those with a history of chronic MRSA infection were identified. The rates of SSI and mortality in these two cohorts were compared with an age- and risk-factor matched control cohort and odds ratio (OR) was calculated., Results: Chronic oral steroid use was associated with a significantly increased risk of 1-year mortality [OR = 2.06, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.13-3.78, P = 0.018] and significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 1.74, 95% CI 1.33-1.92, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 1.88, 95% CI 1.41-2.01, P < 0.001). Chronic MRSA infection was associated with a significantly increased risk of SSI at 90 days (OR = 6.99, 95% CI 5.61-9.91, P < 0.001) and 1 year (OR = 24.0, 95%CI 22.20-28.46, P < 0.001) but did not significantly impact mortality., Conclusion: Patients over 65 years of age who are on chronic oral steroids or have a history of chronic MRSA infection are at a significantly increased risk of SSI following lumbar spine fusion., Level of Evidence: 3.

Study Design: Retrospective database review., Objective: To understand medical complication rates, readmission rates, costs, and discharge dispositions in anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIFs) versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions (TLIFs)/posterior lumbar interbody fusions (PLIFs) for lumbar degenerative disease., Summary of Background Data: Indications for ALIFs versus PLIFs can vary, though benefits of anterior approach surgery include full access to the anterior column and ability to place fusion devices., Methods: The PearlDiver Database of Medicare records was utilized for this retrospective database review. A study group consisting solely of ALIF procedure patients was selected for. Similarly, a TLIF/PLIF group was selected for. Both groups were queried for comorbidities, 30 and 90-day complication and readmission rates. Additionally, discharge dispositions, and in-hospital/30-day/90-day Medicare reimbursements were determined., Results: At both 30 and 90 days postoperatively odds of ileus, wound infection, and lower extremity deep venous thrombosis were significantly increased in the ALIF. However, unadjusted rates and adjusted odds of transfusion or dural tear were significantly decreased in the ALIF patients. Odds of 30-day readmission were 4 times higher in ALIF patients. Additionally, 30 and 90-day total costs of care in ALIF patients were significantly increased by approximately $4800 and $5800 respectively, as compared with patients undergoing TLIF/PLIF., Conclusion: Despite higher initial routine discharge rates, readmissions and costs of postoperative care were significantly increased in ALIF procedures. It is necessary to evaluate etiology of degenerative pathology as ALIFs are successful solutions to anterior translational instability and anterior disc slippage, but may not have the best long-term outcomes and may not be cost-effective compared with a TLIF/PLIF. In light of our data, it is important to assess the risks and benefits of the varying approaches, and the necessity to access the anterior column, when deciding on surgical technique to treat lumbar degenerative pathology., Level of Evidence: 4.