Search

Artificial intelligence (AI), including deep learning methods that leverage neural network-based algorithms, hold significant promise for dermatopathology and other areas of diagnostic pathology in research and clinical practice. There has been significant progress over past several years in applying AI to analyzing digital histopathology images for diagnosis. While much work in AI analysis of histopathology data remains investigational, recent regulatory agency approval in Europe and United States of AI-assisted tools for clinical use in histopathologic diagnosis of prostate and breast cancer herald broader movement of AI into the clinical diagnostic realm of anatomic pathology, including dermatopathology. However, significant challenges remain in translating AI from research into clinical practice, including algorithmic real-world performance, robustness to variation in data sets and practice settings, effective integration into clinical workflows, and cost effectiveness. This review introduces core concepts and terminology in AI, and assesses current progress and challenges in applying AI to dermatopathology., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Appropriate use criteria (AUC) provide patient-centered physician guidance in test selection. An initial set of AUC was reported by the American Society of Dermatopathology (ASDP) in 2018. AUC reflect evidence collected at single timepoints and may be affected by evolving evidence and experience. The objective of this study was to update and expand AUC for selected tests., Methods: RAND/UCLA (RAND Corporation [Santa Monica, CA]/University of California Los Angeles) methodology used includes the following: (a) literature review; (b) review of previously rated tests and previously employed clinical scenarios; (c) selection of previously rated tests for new ratings; (d) development of new clinical scenarios; (e) selection of additional tests; (f) three rating rounds with feedback and group discussion after rounds 1 and 2., Results: For 220 clinical scenarios comprising lymphoproliferative (light chain clonality), melanocytic (comparative genomic hybridization, fluorescence in situ hybridization, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter), vascular disorders (MYC), and inflammatory dermatoses (periodic acid-Schiff, Gömöri methenamine silver), consensus by panel raters was reached in 172 of 220 (78%) scenarios, with 103 of 148 (70%) rated "usually appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" and 45 of 148 (30%), "appropriateness uncertain.", Limitations: The study design only measures appropriateness. Cost, availability, test comparison, and additional clinical considerations are not measured. The possibility that the findings of this study may be influenced by the inherent biases of the dermatopathologists involved in the study cannot be excluded., Conclusions: AUC are reported for selected diagnostic tests in clinical scenarios that occur in dermatopathology practice. Adhering to AUC may reduce inappropriate test utilization and improve healthcare delivery., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)