1. Can we use azithromycin eye drops for gonococcal ophthalmia prophylaxis in the United States?
- Author
-
Franco S and Hammerschlag MR
- Subjects
- Humans, United States, Infant, Newborn, Female, Pregnancy, Antibiotic Prophylaxis methods, Neisseria gonorrhoeae drug effects, Azithromycin administration & dosage, Azithromycin pharmacokinetics, Ophthalmic Solutions administration & dosage, Anti-Bacterial Agents administration & dosage, Gonorrhea drug therapy, Gonorrhea prevention & control, Ophthalmia Neonatorum prevention & control, Ophthalmia Neonatorum drug therapy, Erythromycin administration & dosage
- Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal ocular prophylaxis with 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is mandated by law in many U.S. states despite its lack of efficacy in preventing chlamydial ophthalmia and the low incidence of gonococcal ophthalmia today. The current shortage of 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment is bringing into question what alternatives exist for neonatal ocular prophylaxis for the prevention of gonococcal ophthalmia. Providers in states with mandates are concerned with the implications of administering intramuscular ceftriaxone to every newborn. Azithromycin eye drops are being considered as an alternative., Areas Covered: This article discusses 1% azithromycin eye drops as an alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment. Clinical experience, side effects, resistance, logistics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics are considered., Expert Opinion: Azithromycin eye drops are not an appropriate alternative to 0.5% erythromycin ophthalmic ointment for ocular prophylaxis. Prenatal screening and treatment of pregnant women is the most effective way to prevent neonatal ophthalmia. Mandates for universal prophylaxis should be withdrawn to avoid unnecessary medication administration, healthcare costs, and potential harm.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF