Search

Background: Failure to rescue after elective surgery is associated with increased healthcare costs. These costs are poorly understood and have not been reported for colorectal surgery. This study aimed to assess the incremental costs of failure to rescue after elective colorectal surgery., Methods: This was a retrospective study of adult patients identified in the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019 who underwent an elective colectomy or proctectomy. Patients were stratified into 4 groups: uneventful recovery, successfully rescued, failure to rescue, and died without rescue attempts. "Rescue" was defined as admissions with ≥1 procedure code ≥1 day after the initial procedure. The primary outcome was total admission costs., Results: Of 451,490 admissions for elective colorectal resection, 94.6% had an uneventful recovery, 4.8% were successfully rescued, 0.4% were failure to rescue, and 0.3% died without rescue attempts. The median total hospital cost for the uneventful recovery cohort was $16,751 (IQR, $12,611-$23,116), for the successfully rescued cohort was $42,295 (IQR, $27,959-$67,077), for the failure-to-rescue cohort was $53,182 (IQR, $30,852-$95,615), and for the died without attempted rescue cohort was $29,296 (IQR, $19,812-$45,919). When comparing cost quantiles by regression analysis, failure-to-rescue patients had significantly higher costs than the successfully rescued patients for the last 3 quantiles (fifth quantile [90th percentile], $163,963 vs $106,521; P < .001)., Conclusion: Across a nationally representative cohort, the median total hospital costs for patients who failed to be rescued were $10,887 more than for those who were successfully rescued. These findings emphasize the importance of shared decision making and medical futility and highlight opportunities for resource optimization after postoperative complications., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and is anticipated to cause 52,580 deaths in 2022 in the United States. Despite the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening (CRCS), only 74% of adults eligible for CRCS complete the screening. Community pharmacists are well positioned to provide preventive care education and recommendations to the general population., Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate overall participants' knowledge, perceptions, and barriers on CRCS before and after receiving pharmacist-led education in the outpatient, community pharmacy setting and to assess the impact of pharmacist intervention on screening uptake with the stool-based DNA test., Methods: A 16-item prequestionnaire/postquestionnaire was administered by clinical pharmacists in a grocery store pharmacy chain in the Kansas City area. The questionnaire assessed participants' knowledge, perceptions, barriers, CRCS intentions, and demographics. After completing the prequestionnaire, participants received verbal and written education. For those participants interested in the stool-based DNA test, a facsimile transmission was sent to the participant's provider. The postquestionnaire was administered by the pharmacist coach at visit two 6 to 10 weeks later. Participant demographics were assessed using descriptive statistics. Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to assess prechanges/postchanges in perceptions, awareness, and knowledge. We reported the stool-based DNA test completion rate as an overall percentage., Results: Participants' knowledge of CRCS reached statistical significance after pharmacist-led education (score 4.5-6, P = 0.003). There was no change in perception pre/post. The 3 most common reported barriers were cost of screening, not being concerned with colon cancer, and lack of follow-up from a physician. Of 42 participants, 23 (54.8%) were indicated for CRCS and 4 (17%) completed screening during the study., Conclusion: Not all eligible participants completed CRCS, but pharmacists improved participants' knowledge of CRCS., (Copyright © 2022 American Pharmacists Association®. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimated that, during 1999-2008, people born in 1945-1965 (the baby boomer generation) represented approximately 75% of people infected with hepatitis C virus and 73% of hepatitis C virus-associated deaths and are at greatest risk for hepatocellular carcinoma and liver disease. In 2012, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommended one-time hepatitis C virus screening for people born during 1945-1965. In addition, New York State enacted a Hepatitis C Virus Testing Law in 2014. This analysis assesses the impacts of the 2012 recommendation and 2014 New York State Testing Law on hepatitis C virus screening rates among New York City Medicaid-enrolled recipients born during 1945-1965., Methods: The eligible population was determined quarterly as the number of Medicaid recipients continuously enrolled for 12 months with neither a prior hepatitis C virus diagnosis nor antibody test since 2005. Quarterly screening rates during 2010-2017 were examined using interrupted time series analysis. Data were analyzed in 2018-2019., Results: In 2010-2017, the highest screening rate occurred in the quarter immediately after the law (33.64 per 1,000 Medicaid recipients). There was no change in screening rates after the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendation and a significant increase after the New York State Law, which was not sustained., Conclusions: Hepatitis C virus screening rates increased in the quarter after the 2014 New York State Hepatitis C Virus Testing Law became effective. Additional efforts are needed to screen baby boomers and people who were recently infected with hepatitis C virus related to opioid use., (Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

White-nose syndrome (WNS) is an emerging infectious disease devastating hibernating North American bat populations that is caused by the psychrophilic fungus Geomyces destructans. Previous histopathological analysis demonstrated little evidence of inflammatory responses in infected bats, however few studies have compared other aspects of immune function between WNS-affected and unaffected bats. We collected bats from confirmed WNS-affected and unaffected sites during the winter of 2008-2009 and compared estimates of their circulating levels of total leukocytes, total immunoglobulins, cytokines and total antioxidants. Bats from affected and unaffected sites did not differ in their total circulating immunoglobulin levels, but significantly higher leukocyte counts were observed in bats from affected sites and particularly in affected bats with elevated body temperatures (above 20°C). Bats from WNS-affected sites exhibited significantly lower antioxidant activity and levels of interleukin-4 (IL-4), a cytokine that induces T cell differentiation. Within affected sites only, bats exhibiting visible fungal infections had significantly lower antioxidant activity and levels of IL-4 compared to bats without visible fungal infections. Overall, bats hibernating in WNS-affected sites showed immunological changes that may be evident of attempted defense against G. destructans. Observed changes, specifically elevated circulating leukocytes, may also be related to the documented changes in thermoregulatory behaviors of affected bats (i.e. increased frequencies in arousal from torpor). Alterations in immune function may reflect expensive energetic costs associated with these processes and intrinsic qualities of the immunocapability of hibernating bats to clear fungal infections. Additionally, lowered antioxidant activity indicates a possible imbalance in the pro- versus antioxidant system, may reflect oxidative tissue damage, and should be investigated as a contributor to WNS-associated morbidity and mortality.

Purpose: The purpose of this pilot study was to evaluate a culturally tailored intervention for rural African Americans. Social Cognitive Theory provided the framework for the study., Methods: Twenty-two participants were recruited and randomly assigned to either Group or Individual diabetes self-management (DSME). Group DSME included story-telling, hands-on activities, and problem-solving exercises. Individual DSME sessions focused on goal-setting and problem-solving strategies. Sessions were offered in an accessible community center over a 10-week period., Results: Outcomes included glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C), self-care actions, self-efficacy level, goal attainment, and satisfaction with DSME. Participants in both Group and Individual DSME improved slightly over the 3-month period in self-care activities, A1C level, and goal attainment. Although differences were not statistically significant, trends indicate improved scores on dietary actions, foot care, goal attainment, and empowerment for those experiencing Group DSME., Conclusions: The culturally tailored approach was well received by all participants. Improvements among those receiving Individual DSME may indicate that brief sessions usinga culturally tailored approach could enhance self-care and glycemic control. Additional testing among more participants over a longer time period is recommended.

The cross-disciplinary nature of patient care and medical emergency teams allows for identification of systemwide problems that might otherwise be perceived as isolated events.