Search

For individuals living with a chronic illness who require use of long-term medications, adherence is a vital aspect of successful symptom management and outcomes. This study investigated the effect of a smartphone app on adherence, self-efficacy, knowledge, and medication social support in a medically underserved adult population with various chronic illnesses. Participants were randomized to a group who used the app for one month or a control group provided with a printed medication list. Compared to the control group, participants receiving the intervention had significantly greater medication adherence (Cohen's d = -0.52, p =.014) and medication self-efficacy (Cohen's d = 0.43, p =.035). No significant effects were observed related to knowledge or social support. The findings suggest use of the app could positively impact chronic disease management in a medically underserved population in the United States. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Up to 1/2 of outpatients prescribed clozapine may be partially/fully non-adherent, based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Three indices for measuring partial/full non-adherence are proposed a: 1) clozapine concentration/dose (C/D) ratio which drops to half or more of what is expected in the patient; 2) clozapine/norclozapine ratio that becomes inverted; and 3) clozapine concentration that becomes non-detectable. These 3 proposed indices are based on a literature review and 17 cases of possible non-adherence from 3 samples: 1) an inpatient study in a Chinese hospital, 2) an inpatient randomized clinical trial in a United States hospital, and 3) and a Uruguayan outpatient study. The first index of non-adherence is a clozapine C/D ratio which is less than half the ratio corresponding to the patient's specific ancestry group and sex-smoking subgroup. Knowing the minimum therapeutic dose of the patient based on repeated TDM makes it much easier to establish non-adherence. The second index is inverted clozapine/norclozapine ratios in the absence of alternative explanations. The third index is undetectable concentrations. By using half-lives, the chronology of the 3 indices of non-adherence was modeled in two patients: 1) the clozapine C/D ratio dropped to ≥1/2 of what is expected from the patient (around day 2); 2) the clozapine/norclozapine ratio became inverted (around day 3); and 3) the clozapine concentration became undetectable by the laboratory (around days 9–11). Prospective studies should further explore these proposed clozapine indices in average patients, poor metabolizers (3 presented) and ultrarapid metabolizers (2 presented). [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study examined the trends in diabetes medication taking and its association with the incidence of depression in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Method: A retrospective cohort of Medicare enrollees with regular care in 2010 was defined from 100% Texas Medicare claims. The impact of medication taking on incident depression was evaluated from 2010 to 2018. Cox proportional hazards regressions were used to estimate the association between medication taking and depression. Results: A total of 72,461 patients with T2D and with regular care were analyzed. Among 60,216 treated patients, the regular medication taking rate slightly increased from 60.8 to 63.2% during the study period. Patients with regular medication taking at baseline had a 9% lower risk of developing depression (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.91, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89–0.94), and the magnitude of the association increased after adjustment of the model for time-varied medication taking (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.79–0.85). The presence of nephropathy had the greatest mediating effect (23.2%) on the association of medication taking and depression. Conclusion: We demonstrated a steady but modest increase in regular diabetes medication taking over a 9-year period and a significant relationship between medication taking and incident depression in patients with T2D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Suboptimal adherence to oral PrEP medications, particularly among younger sexual minority men (SMM), continues to be a key barrier to achieving more substantial declines in new HIV infections. Although variety of interventions, including web and text-message-based applications, have successfully addressed PrEP adherence, very few have addressed the potential influence of alcohol. This pilot study explored whether the Game Plan for PrEP, a brief, web-based and text messaging intervention, helped promote PrEP persistence and adherence and reduced condomless sex and alcohol use. Seventy-three heavy-drinking SMM on PrEP were recruited online from states with Ending the HIV Epidemic jurisdictions and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either the Game Plan for PrEP intervention or an attention-matched control. We collected online surveys assessing primary outcomes at one, three, and six months post-enrollment. As secondary outcomes, we also collected dried blood spot samples at baseline, three, and six months to analyze for biomarkers of PrEP and alcohol use. Our results showed that the odds of stopping PrEP or experiencing a clinically meaningful lapse in PrEP adherence (≥ 4 consecutive missed doses) were not different across the two conditions. We also did not find evidence of any differences in condomless sex or drinking outcomes across conditions, although participants in both conditions reported drinking less often over time. These findings were consistent across both self-reported outcomes and biomarkers. Overall, we did not find evidence that our brief, web and text messaging intervention encouraged more optimal PrEP coverage or moderate their alcohol use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Behavior change and medication adherence represent potential barriers to optimal prevention of pregnancy complications including preeclampsia. We sought to evaluate baseline sentiments on pregnancy care and medication amenability, and how these measures would be impacted by early predictive testing for preeclampsia. Methods: We developed a digital survey to query participants' baseline sentiments on pregnancy care, knowledge about pregnancy complications, and views on a hypothetical test to predict preeclampsia. The survey was administered online to pregnant and recently-delivered individuals in the United States. Survey data were analyzed using pooled two-sample proportion z-tests with adjustment for multiple comparisons. Results: One thousand and twenty-two people completed the survey. 84% reported they were satisfied with their pregnancy care. Self-assessed knowledge about preeclampsia was high, with 75% of respondents reporting they have a "good understanding" of preeclampsia, but measured knowledge was low, with only 10% able to identify five common signs/symptoms of preeclampsia. Notably, 40% of participants with prior preeclampsia believed they were at average or below-average risk for recurrence. 91% of participants desired early pregnancy predictive testing for preeclampsia. If found to be at high risk for preeclampsia, 88% reported they would be more motivated to follow their provider's medication recommendations and 94% reported they would desire home blood pressure monitoring. Increased motivation to follow clinicians' medication and monitoring recommendations was observed across the full spectrum of medication amenability. Individuals who are more medication-hesitant still reported high rates of motivation to change behavior and adhere to medication recommendations if predictive testing showed a high risk of preeclampsia. Importantly, a high proportion of medication-hesitant individuals reported that if a predictive test demonstrated they were at high risk of preeclampsia, they would feel more motivated to take medications (83.0%) and aspirin (75.9%) if recommended. Conclusion: While satisfaction with care is high, participants desire more information about their pregnancy health, would value predictive testing for preeclampsia, and report they would act on this information. Improved detection of at-risk individuals through objective testing combined with increased adherence to their recommended care plan may be an important step to remedy the growing gap in prevention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This systematic review explores the roles of HIV stigma and disclosure of HIV serostatus in antiretroviral therapy (ART) adherence and retention in care (RIC) among women with HIV (WHIV) in the United States and Canada. We conducted a systematic search of electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Google scholar) to identify peer-reviewed articles published between January 1996 and December 2022. The search yielded 1120 articles after duplicates were removed. Of these, 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. The majority (89%) of the studies were conducted in the United States. The studies included WHIV from diverse racial/ethnic groups, residing in both urban and rural areas. Most of the studies suggested that internalized stigma, perceived community stigma, and fear of disclosure were important barriers to ART adherence and RIC among WHIV. HIV-related stigma experienced within the health care setting was also reported as a factor impacting health care utilization. A few studies identified mental health distress as a potential mechanism accounting for the association and suggested that social support and resilience may buffer the negative effects of stigma and disclosure on ART adherence and RIC among WHIV. Our review indicates that stigma and concerns about disclosure continue to significantly affect HIV health outcomes for WHIV in high-income countries. It underscores the importance of integrated HIV care services and interventions targeting mental health, resilience building, and improved patient–provider relationships for WHIV to enhance ART adherence and RIC. Longitudinal studies and investigations into additional mechanisms are needed to advance understanding and inform women-centered interventions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To compare health-care resource utilization (HCRU) outcomes in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED) and benign prostatic hyperplasia-associated lower urinary tract symptoms (BPH-LUTS) treated with tadalafil or non-phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i), adherence to and persistence with tadalafil by dose in the United States (US).Methods: This was a noninterventional, real-world evidence study of men (aged ≥ 45 years) with ED and BPH-LUTS treated with tadalafil or non-PDE5i. The IQVIA US PharMetrics Plus claims database was used. Outcomes included all-cause and disease-specific HCRU over a 12-month follow-up. Persistence with and adherence to tadalafil were evaluated stratified by dose (10 or 20 mg as needed; 2.5 or 5 mg as once daily [OD]).Results: The final sample comprised 11,351 tadalafil and 48,722 non-PDE5i patients. For all-cause and disease-specific HCRU, including prescription fills, physician office visits, emergency room visits, laboratory tests, radiology examinations, outpatient surgical services, ancillary services, hospitalizations, mean number of utilizations, and proportions of patients with one or more utilizations, were lower for tadalafil compared with non-PDE5i patients. For all-cause HCRU, proportions of patients with one or more emergency room visits (18.6% vs 21.7%, p< 0.0001) and outpatient surgical visits (63.0% vs 68.8%, p< 0.0001) were significantly lower for tadalafil compared with non-PDE5i patients. For disease-specific HCRU, the proportion with one or more disease-specific physician office visits (55.1% vs 91.4%), laboratory tests (34.8% vs 58.2%), outpatient surgery (24.3% vs 38.9%), or outpatient ancillary services (18.0% vs 29.8%) were significantly lower for tadalafil compared with non-PDE5i patients (all comparisons, p< 0.0001). Mean persistence days (179.8 vs 61.2), proportion persistence (35.8% vs 6.5%), and mean adherence (0.5 vs 0.2) were higher for tadalafil OD doses than as-needed tadalafil doses.Conclusion: Patients on tadalafil demonstrated less HCRU and higher persistence and adherence (OD versus as-needed tadalafil) than non-PDE5i patients, which demonstrates its benefit in the management of ED and BPH-LUTS in the US.Plain Language Summary: Erectile dysfunction (ED) and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) conditions are more common in adult men and increase with age. These conditions affect their sexual satisfaction, create mental stress, and impact their interactions with family and associates. This study examined the patterns of health-care resource utilization (HCRU) in 11,351 patients treated with tadalafil versus 48,722 not treated with any PDE5i and compared treatment adherence to and persistence with tadalafil in patients with ED and comorbid BPH-LUTS in the US. All-cause and disease-specific HCRU were lower in patients treated with tadalafil than patients not treated with any PDE5i. The persistence with and adherence to therapy was higher with once-daily dose of tadalafil (2.5 or 5 mg) compared with as-needed dose of tadalafil (10 or 20 mg). Therefore, a lower dose of tadalafil demonstrated benefit in the management of men with ED and BPH-LUTS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Researchers have determined that illness representation, including identifying the illness, understanding the cause, and knowing the risk, may influence asthma symptom management. Purpose: The purpose of study was to determine reliability and factor structure for child's version of illness representation. Methods: A Maximum Likelihood factor analysis was used to examine reliability and factor structure of the child version of illness representation (CIR) scale. The sample included teens ages 12 to 18 from United States (N = 331) with asthma. Results: The reliability was 0.79. Eight factors loaded with the most percentage of variance. Conclusions: The perceptions of teens on the health care provider's prescribing practices may shed light on medication adherence. More research is needed to examine CIR function in a study on medication adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although effective antihypertensive medications have existed for decades, only about half of the hypertensive individuals are considered to have controlled blood pressure. Limited research studies have investigated gender disparity in the utilization and effectiveness of antihypertensive medications treatment. To examine the gender difference in antihypertensive medications' use and the effect of using antihypertensive medication treatment on blood pressure control among the U.S. adult with hypertension. Methods: Analysis of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from (1999-2012) including individuals > 18 years old with hypertension. Study variables included gender, age, race/ethnicity, obesity, smoking, comorbidities, treatment medication type, and continuity of care. We used multivariate logistic regression in STATA V14. The data is presented as adjusted odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Of the 15 719 participants, 52% were female. 49% of the antihypertensive medication users had their blood pressure under control (95% CI). In the adjusted logistic regression analysis, use of antihypertensive medications was found to be 12% greater in females as compared to males (OR = 1.12; CI = 1.02-1.22; P< 0.05). No association between gender and blood pressure control was found. Blood pressure control was less likely achieved among 50 years or younger individuals, Blacks and Hispanics, obese, and those taking calcium channel blocker (CCB). Conclusion: Hypertensive females are more likely than males to use antihypertensive medications. The effectiveness of treatment to control blood pressure is equal across males and females. Our findings have implications for practitioners to account gender-specific approaches when discussing adherence to hypertension medication treatment with their patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Before the COVID-19 pandemic and the disruptions it brought, medication adherence was already a challenging and complex health behavior. The purpose of this study was to describe patients' interactions in clinic, pharmacy, and home contexts and associated medication management and adherence during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients and Methods: A survey questionnaire was developed using the Medication Adherence Context and Outcomes framework and distributed via social media between May and July 2020 targeting adults taking a daily prescribed medication. Survey questions assessed sociodemographics, interactions with healthcare providers, clinics, pharmacies, medication management experiences, habit strength, and life chaos perceptions during the pandemic. Medication adherence was assessed by the self-report BAASIS© scale to measure implementation, discontinuation, and overall nonadherence. Results: A total of 134 adults from the United States, mean age 50.0 (SD 16.1) years were included in this analysis. Respondents took a median of 3.50 (interquartile range 4) daily medications. Delays in seeing a provider were reported by 47 (35.1%). Pharmacy encounters were impacted; 25 (18.7%) indicated their method for obtaining medication changed. Medication nonadherence was reported among 62 (46.3%) and was significantly greater among those who delayed prescription refills (p=0.032), pillbox users (p=0.047), and those who experienced greater life chaos (p=0.040) and lower habit strength (p< 0.001) in the early phase of the pandemic. Conclusion: Although the early phase of the pandemic affected access to care for nearly one-third of the sample, distance-accessible care options and strategies to obtain needed services without being in-person supported respondents medication management. Helpful strategies included provider accessibility, telehealth, home delivery/mail-order, drive-thru's, 90-day supplies, and online/automatic refills. Methods to develop and reestablish habits are critical. Care providers in clinic and pharmacy settings can educate and remind patients about services like distance-accessible technologies and online ordering of medications and establishing routines to support medication adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Consumer cost sharing is widely employed by payers in the United States in an effort to control spending. Most cost-sharing strategies set patient contributions on the basis of costs incurred by payers and often do not consider medical necessity as a coverage criterion. Available evidence suggests that increases in cost sharing worsen health disparities and adversely affect patient-centered outcomes, particularly among economically vulnerable individuals, people of color, and those with chronic conditions. A key question has been how to better engage consumers while balancing appropriate access to essential services with increasing fiscal pressures. Value-based insurance design (VBID) is a promising approach designed to improve desired clinical and financial outcomes, in which out-of-pocket costs are based on the potential for clinical benefit, taking into consideration the patient's clinical condition. For more than two decades, broad multi stakeholder support and multiple federal policy initiatives have led to the implementation of VBID programs that enhance access to vital preventive and chronic disease medications for millions of Americans. A robust evidence base shows that when financial barriers to essential medications are reduced, increased adherence results, leading to improved patient-centered outcomes, reduced health care disparities, and in some (but not most) instances, lower total medical expenditures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Alcohol use disorder (AUD) accounts for millions of acute care encounters annually in the United States. Hospitalization represents a vital opportunity to intervene pharmacologically, but low medication adherence is a significant barrier. Two single-dose, adherence-independent interventions are well suited for pre-discharge administration: intravenous (IV) ketamine and intramuscular (IM) naltrexone. Their feasibility and readmission-reducing efficacy in hospital settings are not well-established. Methods: A 3-arm, open-label randomized trial was conducted at our safety-net medical hospital among high-utilization inpatients with severe AUD. Consented adults (age 18–65) were randomized to (1) IV ketamine (KET) 0.5 mg/kg over 40 min, (2) IM naltrexone (NTX) 380 mg once, or (3) linkage alone (LA). The primary clinical outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission rate. All were provided enhanced linkage to outpatient addiction clinic. Results: We consented and randomized 44 participants (n = 13, 14, 17 for KET, NTX, LA, respectively), with a mean of 3.2 past-year hospitalizations. Compared to the LA arm, both the KET arm (RR 0.37, p = 0.17) and NTX arm (RR 0.52, p = 0.27) had a lower 30-day readmission rate, though the differences were nonsignificant. Immediate acceptability ratings of KET and NTX were 9.50 and 9.17 out of 10, respectively. No serious adverse events or illicit ketamine use was reported. Conclusions: Both interventions are feasible and showed promise in reducing readmissions for high-utilization AUD inpatients. Despite randomization, baseline characteristics may have differed in ways that biased against the control arm. Additional pragmatic studies—with larger sample size, blinding, and robust follow-up data collection—are needed to verify findings and better understand mediating factors. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT04562779. Registered 24 September 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04562779 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) can significantly reduce HIV acquisition especially among communities with high HIV prevalence, including men who have sex with men (MSM). Much research has been finding suboptimal PrEP persistence; however, few studies examine factors that enhance PrEP persistence in real-world settings.Methods: We interviewed 33 patients who identified as MSM at three different PrEP clinics in three regions of the U.S. (Northeast, South, Midwest). Participants were eligible if they took PrEP and had been retained in care for a minimum of 6 months. Interviews explored social, structural, clinic-level and behavioral factors that influencing PrEP persistence.Results: Through thematic analysis we identified the following factors as promoting PrEP persistence: (1) navigation to reduce out-of-pocket costs of PrEP (structural), (2) social norms that support PrEP use (social), (3) access to LGBTQ + affirming medical providers (clinical), (4) medication as part of a daily routine (behavioral), and (5) facilitation of sexual health agency (belief).Discussion: In this sample, persistence in PrEP care was associated with structural and social supports as well as a high level of perceived internal control over protecting their health by taking PrEP. Patients might benefit from increased access, LGBTQ + affirming medical providers, and communications that emphasize PrEP can promote sexual health. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: This evidence-based guideline intends to support patients, clinicians, and others regarding interventions and processes to support patient adherence to oral anticancer medications (OAMs). METHODOLOGIC APPROACH: A panel of healthcare professionals and patient representatives developed a clinical practice guideline to support patients taking OAMs. GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) methodology and criteria for trustworthy guidelines were followed. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. A quantitative or narrative synthesis of the evidence was completed. Certainty of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. FINDINGS: The panel agreed on recommendations and suggested an adherence risk assessment, education addressing adherence, ongoing assessment, proactive follow-up, coaching, and motivational interviewing in addition to usual care. The panel suggested the implementation of a structured OAM program. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: As cancer treatment shifts from clinic to home settings, interventions and programs to support patients on OAMs are needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Health insurers have increased the use of copay accumulator adjustment programs (CAAPs) to control costs; however, some states within the United States have banned the use of CAAPs to protect patients from rising out-of-pocket expenses., Objective: To assess the impact of state CAAP bans on patient liability, treatment adherence, and treatment persistence., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using administrative claims recorded in the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus database. Data were extracted for patients with fully insured commercial plans receiving autoimmune or multiple sclerosis drugs between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2021. Patient liability was defined as the difference in insurer allowed and paid amounts. Treatment adherence was measured as the proportion of days covered over a 1-year period, with "adherent" defined as a proportion of days covered greater than or equal to 80%. Treatment persistence was defined as time from treatment initiation to discontinuation (a period of 60 days without supply of treatment). The analysis compared differences in outcomes in states that implemented a CAAP ban during the study period (Arizona, Georgia, Illinois, Virginia, West Virginia) with states that did not, for before and after the date of ban., Results: States that implemented a CAAP ban had relative reductions in patient liability after the first 2 months, which ranged from 41% to 63%, with monthly savings ranging from $128 to $520. Patients in states with a CAAP ban had 14% greater odds of being adherent to their treatment after policy implementation than patients in states without a CAAP ban and a 13% reduction in risk of discontinuing., Conclusions: The implementation of state legislation to restrict the use of CAAPs in state-regulated plans was associated with reductions in patient liability and improvements in treatment adherence and persistence for the 5 states that were early implementers of a CAAP ban. These results may offer insights for states that have recently implemented a CAAP ban, as well as for those considering enacting similar legislation.

Objectives: We explore patient-reported behaviors and activities within 30-days post-stroke hospitalization and their role in reducing death or readmissions within 90-days post-stroke., Methods: We constructed the adequate transitions of care (ATOC) composite score, measuring patient-reported participation in eligible behaviors and activities (diet modification, weekly exercise, follow-up medical appointment attendance, medication adherence, therapy use, and toxic habit cessation) within 30 days post-stroke hospital discharge. We analyzed ATOC scores in ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhage stroke patients discharged from the hospital to home or rehabilitation facilities and enrolled in the NIH-funded Transitions of Care Stroke Disparities Study (TCSD-S). We utilized Cox regression analysis, with the progressive adjustment for sociodemographic variables, social determinants of health, and stroke risk factors, to determine the associations between ATOC score within 30-days and death or readmission within 90-days post-stroke., Results: In our sample of 1239 stroke patients (mean age 64 +/- 14, 58 % male, 22 % Hispanic, 22 % Black, 52 % White, 76 % discharged home), 13 % experienced a readmission or death within 90 days (3 deaths, 160 readmissions, 3 readmissions with subsequent death). Seventy percent of participants accomplished a ≥75 % ATOC score. A 25 % increase in ATOC was associated with a respective 20 % (95 % CI 3-33 %) reduced risk of death or readmission within 90-days., Conclusion: ATOC represents modifiable behaviors and activities within 30-days post-stroke that are associated with reduced risk of death or readmission within 90-days post-stroke. The ATOC score should be validated in other populations, but it can serve as a tool for improving transitions of stroke care initiatives and interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Karlon Johnson Jr reports financial support was provided by Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Foundation. Jose Romano, MD reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Carolina Gutierrez, PhD reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Gillian Gordon Perue, MD reports financial support was provided by Florida Department of Health. Jose Romano, MD reports financial support was provided by Florida Department of Health. Hannah Gardener, ScD reports financial support was provided by Florida Department of Health. Carolina Gutierrez, PhD reports financial support was provided by Florida Department of Health. Tatjana Rundek, MD, PhD reports financial support was provided by National Institutes of Health. Tatjana Rundek, MD, PhD reports financial support was provided by Florida Department of Health. Tatjana Rundek, MD, PhD reports financial support was provided by National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Vibegron is a selective β 3 -adrenergic receptor agonist that was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in December 2020 for the treatment of overactive bladder in adults. This retrospective study assessed US pharmacy claims data to evaluate the real-world adherence and persistence of vibegron compared with mirabegron and with anticholinergics., Materials and Methods: This analysis used the Optum Research Database to identify adults with ≥1 pharmacy claim for vibegron, mirabegron, or an anticholinergic from April 1, 2021, to August 31, 2022. Patients had ≥ 90 days of continuous commercial or Medicare medical and pharmacy coverage preindex and ≥ 60 days of continuous pharmacy coverage postindex. Two independent propensity-score models matched patients treated with (1) vibegron versus mirabegron and (2) vibegron versus anticholinergics on key variables such as demographics and clinical characteristics, index copay, days' supply, and time of entry into analysis (index quarter). Adherence was measured by proportion of days covered (PDC) from index to the end of follow-up and was defined as PDC ≥ 80%. Persistence was defined as days to discontinuation of index medication (first 30-day gap) or end of follow-up., Results: The matched vibegron and mirabegron cohorts included 4921 and 9842 patients, respectively, and the matched vibegron and anticholinergic cohorts included 4676 and 9352 patients, respectively. Patients receiving vibegron had greater mean PDC versus patients receiving mirabegron (0.67 vs. 0.64, respectively; p < 0.001) or anticholinergics (0.67 vs. 0.58; p < 0.001). A greater percentage of patients receiving vibegron were adherent versus those receiving mirabegron (49.0% vs. 45.1%, respectively; p < 0.001) or anticholinergics (49.1% vs. 38.5%; p < 0.001). Persistence was longer with vibegron compared with both mirabegron (median [95% CI], 171 [159-182] vs. 128 [122-137] days, respectively; p < 0.001) and anticholinergics (172 [159-183] vs. 91 [91] days; p < 0.001)., Conclusion: In this retrospective analysis of pharmacy claims data, patients receiving vibegron exhibited significantly higher adherence and demonstrated longer persistence in comparison to matched patient cohorts receiving either mirabegron or anticholinergics., (© 2024 The Authors. Neurourology and Urodynamics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Self-care for adults with hypertension includes adherence to lifestyle behaviors and medication. For unpaid caregivers with hypertension, the burden of family caregiving may adversely impact self-care. We examined the association between caregiver strain and hypertension self-care among caregivers with hypertension., Methods and Results: We included participants of the REGARDS (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke) study who identified as caregivers and had hypertension. Caregiver strain, assessed by self-report, was categorized as "none/some" or "high." Hypertension self-care was assessed individually across 5 domains (Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension [DASH] diet, physical activity, alcohol use, cigarette smoking, and medication adherence) and a composite self-care score summing performance across them. The association between caregiver strain and hypertension self-care was examined with multivariable linear regression. Among the 2128 caregivers with hypertension, 18.1% reported high caregiver strain. Caregivers with high strain versus those with none/some were less adherent to the DASH diet (50.8% versus 38.9%, P <0.002), physically inactive (44.4% versus 36.2%, P <0.009), current smokers (19.7% versus 13.9%, P <0.004), and had lower overall self-care scores (6.6 [SD 1.7] versus 7.0 [SD 1.7], P <0.001). In an age-adjusted model, high caregiver strain was associated with worse hypertension self-care (β=-0.37 [95% CI, -0.61 to -0.13]); this remained significant but was reduced in magnitude after adjustment for sociodemographics (β=-0.35 [-0.59 to -0.11]), comorbidities (β=-0.34 [-0.57 to -0.10]), caregiving intensity (β=-0.34 [-0.59 to 0.10]), and psychological factors (β=-0.26 [-0.51 to 0.00])., Conclusions: High caregiver strain was associated with worse hypertension self-care overall and across individual domains. Increased awareness of caregiver strain and its potential impact on hypertension self-care is warranted.

Background: The appointment-based model (ABM) is a pharmacy service to improve medication-related health outcomes. ABM involves medication synchronization and medication review, plus other services such as medication reconciliation, medication therapy management, vaccine administration, and multimedication packaging. ABM can improve medication adherence, but the economic impact is unknown., Objective: To assess the effect of a national pharmacy chain's ABM program for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries on total cost of care (TCOC)., Methods: This study analyzed administrative claims data from April 7, 2017, through February 29, 2020, for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D using a propensity score-matched cohort design. The national pharmacy chain provided a list of ABM participants. Eligibility criteria for the ABM and control (non-ABM) groups included age 65 years or older on the index date (initial participation, ABM; random fill date, control) and continuous enrollment from at least 6 months pre-index (baseline) date through at least 6 months post-index (follow-up) date. Medical inflation-adjusted (2020) TCOC was calculated as the sum of all health care spending from Medicare Advantage beneficiaries with Part D plan and patient paid amounts, standardized to per patient per month (PPPM), during the follow-up period. Secondary outcomes included medication adherence calculated across prevalent maintenance therapeutic classes using proportion of days covered (PDC)., Results: Each group contained 5,225 patients with balanced characteristics after matching: 64% female, 73% White, mean age 75 years, mean Quan-Charlson comorbidity index score 0.9, and hypertension and dyslipidemia, each >65%. Median baseline all-cause PPPM health care costs in the ABM and control groups, respectively, were $517 and $548 ($221 and $234 medical, $135 and $164 pharmacy). Baseline PDC of at least 80% was 83% in the ABM group and, similarly, 84% in the control group. The mean (SD) follow-up was 604 (155) days for the ABM group and 598 (151) days for the control group. During the follow-up period, the median PPPM TCOC for the ABM group was $656 and was $723 for the control group ( P = 0.011). Median pharmacy costs were also significantly less in the ABM group ($161 vs $193, P < 0.001), whereas median medical costs were $328 in the ABM group and $358 among controls ( P = 0.254). More patients in the ABM group were adherent during follow-up, with 84% achieving PDC of at least 80% vs 82% among controls ( P = 0.009)., Conclusions: The ABM program was associated with significantly lower follow-up median total costs (medical and pharmacy), driven primarily by pharmacy costs. More patients were adherent in the ABM program. Payers and pharmacies can use this evidence to assess ABM programs for their members.

Competing Interests: None.

Background: Telehealth has emerged as an effective tool for managing common chronic conditions such as hypertension, especially during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the impact of state telehealth payment and coverage parity laws on hypertension medication adherence remains uncertain., Methods: Data from the 2016 to 2021 Merative MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database were used to construct the study cohort, which included nonpregnant individuals aged 25 to 64 years with hypertension. We coded telehealth parity laws related to hypertension management in all 50 US states and the District of Columbia, distinguishing between payment and coverage parity laws. The primary outcomes were measures of antihypertension medication adherence: the average medication possession ratio; medication adherence (medication possession ratio ≥80%); and average number of days of drug supply. We used a generalized difference-in-differences design to examine the impact of these laws., Results: Among 353 220 individuals (mean [SD] age, 49.5 (7.1) years; female, 45.55%), states with payment parity laws were significantly linked to increased average medication possession ratio by 0.43 percentage point (95% CI, 0.07-0.79), and an increase of 0.46 percentage point (95% CI, 0.06-0.92) in the probability of medication adherence. Payment parity laws also led to an average increase of 2.14 days (95% CI, 0.11-4.17) in prescription supply, after controlling for state-fixed effects, year-fixed effects, individual sociodemographic characteristics and state time-varying covariates including unemployment rates, gross domestic product per capita, and poverty rates. In contrast, coverage parity laws were associated with a 2.13-day increase (95% CI, 0.19-4.07) in days of prescription supply but did not significantly increase the average medication possession ratio or probability of medication adherence., Conclusions: State telehealth payment parity laws were significantly associated with greater medication adherence, whereas coverage parity laws were not. With the increasing adoption of telehealth parity laws across states, these findings may support policymakers in understanding potential implications on management of hypertension., Competing Interests: None.

Introduction/aims: Sodium phenylbutyrate-taurursodiol (PB-TURSO) was recently approved for treating amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Third-party payors' coverage policies are evolving, and adverse events are just being fully assessed. The goals of this study were to evaluate patients' experiences in obtaining and continuing PB-TURSO and assess adverse events and medication adherence., Methods: Medical records of 109 ALS patients who were considered PB-TURSO candidates by the treating physician at a tertiary ALS clinic from October 2022 to May 2023 were reviewed. Data was recorded for demographics, clinical, and insurance information. A survey was e-mailed to patients asking about out-of-pocket expenses for PB-TURSO, financial assistance, medication start and (if applicable) stop dates, and reasons for discontinuation., Results: Insurance information was available for 91 patients [57 males (62%); mean age 64.8 years (range 25.7-88)]. Of 79 who applied for insurance approval, 71 (90%) were approved; however, 19 required 1-3 appeals. Among 73 patients with available data about medication status, 54 started PB-TURSO and 19 did not, most commonly due to personal choice or out-of-pocket expenses. About 44% of patients (24/54) stopped taking PB-TURSO, primarily due to adverse events. Monthly out-of-pocket expenses varied from $0 to $3500 and 36 patients qualified for financial assistance. Administrative and nursing staff devoted 7.2 hours/week to the insurance authorization process., Discussion: Most patients received insurance approval for PB-TURSO, but one-fourth required appeals. Some out-of-pocket costs were very high. Investment of staff time was substantial. These findings have implications for insurance coverage of, and adherence to, future ALS treatments., (© 2024 The Author(s). Muscle & Nerve published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Medicare supplement insurance, or Medigap, covers 21% of Medicare beneficiaries. Despite offsetting some out-of-pocket (OOP) expenses, remaining OOP costs may pose a barrier to medication adherence. This study aims to evaluate how OOP costs and insurance plan types influence medication adherence among beneficiaries covered by Medicare supplement plans., Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of the Merative MarketScan Medicare Supplement Database (2017-2019) in Medigap enrollees (≥65 years) with hypertension. The proportion of days covered (PDC) was a continuous measure of medication adherence and was also dichotomized (PDC ≥0.8) to quantify adequate adherence. Beta-binomial and logistic regression models were used to estimate associations between these outcomes and insurance plan type and log-transformed OOP costs, adjusting for patient characteristics., Results: Among 27,407 patients with hypertension, the average PDC was 0.68 ± 0.31; 47.5% achieved adequate adherence. A mean $1 higher in 30-day OOP costs were associated with a 0.06 (95% confidence intervals [CIs]: -0.09 to -0.03) lower probability of adequate adherence, or a 5% (95% CI: 4%-7%) decrease in PDC. Compared with comprehensive plan enrollees, the odds of adequate adherence were lower among those with point-of-service plans (odds ratio [OR]: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.62-0.77), but higher among those with preferred provider organization (PPO) plans (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 1.01-1.15). Moreover, the association between OOP costs and PDC was significantly greater for PPO enrollees., Conclusions: While Medicare supplement insurance alleviates some OOP costs, different insurance plans and remaining OOP costs influence medication adherence. Reducing patient cost-sharing may improve medication adherence., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of American Journal of Hypertension, Ltd. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Neighborhood contextual factors are associated with liver transplant outcomes. We analyzed associations between neighborhood-level socioeconomic status and healthcare utilization for pediatric liver transplant recipients., Methods: We merged the Pediatric Health Information System and Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients databases and included liver transplant recipients ≤21 years hospitalized between January 2004 and May 2022. Outcomes were annual inpatient bed-days, risk of hospitalizations, and risk of liver biopsies. The primary exposure was zip code-based neighborhood income at transplant. We applied causal inference for variable selection in multivariable analysis. We modeled annual inpatient bed-days with mixed-effect zero-inflated Poisson regression, and rates of hospitalization and liver biopsy with a Cox-type proportional rate model., Results: We included 1006 participants from 29 institutions. Children from low-income neighborhoods were more likely to be publicly insured (67% vs. 46%), Black (20% vs. 12%), Hispanic (30% vs. 17%), and have higher model for end-stage liver disease/pediatric end-stage liver disease model scores at transplant (17 vs. 13) than the remaining cohort. We found no differences in inpatient bed-days or rates of hospitalization across neighborhood groups. In univariable analysis, low-income neighborhoods were associated with increased rates of liver biopsy (rate ratio [RR]: 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.34, p = 0.03). These findings persisted after adjusting for insurance, race, and ethnicity (RR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.23-2.83, p < 0.01)., Conclusions: Children from low-income neighborhoods undergo more liver biopsies than other children. These procedures are invasive and potentially preventable. In addition to improving outcomes, interventions to mitigate health inequities among liver transplant recipients may reduce resource utilization., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

A qualitative systematic review was conducted to evaluate pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) interventions, describe characteristics of best practices for increasing PrEP use and persistence, and explore research gaps based on current PrEP interventions. We searched CDC's Prevention Research Synthesis (PRS) Project's cumulative HIV database (includes CINAHL, EMBASE, Global Health, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, and Sociological Abstracts) to identify PrEP intervention studies conducted in the U.S., published between 2000 and 2022 (last searched January 2023). Eligibility criteria include studies that evaluated PrEP interventions for persons testing negative for HIV infection, or for healthcare providers who prescribed PrEP; included comparisons between groups or pre/post; and reported at least one relevant PrEP outcome. Each eligible intervention was evaluated on the quality of study design, implementation, analysis, and strength of evidence (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42021256460). Of the 26 eligible interventions, the majority were focused on men who have sex with men (n = 18) and reported PrEP adherence outcomes (n = 12). Nine interventions met the criteria for Best Practices (i.e., evidence-based interventions, evidence-informed interventions). Five were digital health interventions while two implemented individual counseling, one offered motivational interviewing, and one provided integrated medical care with a PrEP peer navigator. Longer intervention periods may provide more time for intervention exposure to facilitate behavioral change, and engaging the community when developing, designing and implementing interventions may be key for effectiveness. For digital health interventions, two-way messaging may help participants feel supported. Research gaps included a lack of Best Practices for several populations (e.g., Black persons, Hispanic/Latino persons, persons who inject drugs, and women of color) and evidence for various intervention strategies (e.g., interventions for promoting provider's PrEP prescription behavior, peer support). These findings call for more collaborative work with communities to develop interventions that work and implement and disseminate Best Practices for increasing PrEP use and persistence in communities., (© 2024. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.)

Implementation of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) to prevent HIV transmission is suboptimal in the United States. To date, the literature has focused on identifying determinants of PrEP use, with a lesser focus on developing and testing change methods to improve PrEP implementation. Moreover, the change methods available for improving the uptake and sustained use of PrEP have not been systematically categorized. To summarize the state of the literature, we conducted a systematic review of the implementation strategies used to improve PrEP implementation among delivery systems and providers, as well as the adjunctive interventions used to improve the uptake and persistent adherence to PrEP among patients. Between November 2020 and January 2021, we searched Ovid MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science for peer reviewed articles. We identified 44 change methods (18 implementation strategies and 26 adjunctive interventions) across a variety of clinical and community-based service settings. We coded implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions in accordance with established taxonomies and reporting guidelines. Most studies focused on improving patient adherence to PrEP and most conducted pilot trials. Just over one-third of included studies demonstrated a positive effect on outcomes. In order to end the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic in the U.S., future, large scale HIV prevention research is needed that develops and evaluates implementation strategies and adjunctive interventions for target populations disproportionately affected by HIV., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

One effective preventative measure to reduce the number of new HIV infections is through the uptake of daily oral HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP). Although previous clinical trials have proven the effectiveness of on-demand PrEP uptake, daily PrEP uptake is the most popular prevention method among PrEP users and is still recommended by most healthcare professionals and organizations. Informed by the integrative model of behavioral prediction, the current study examined the socio-behavioral factors associated with PrEP non-adherence. The present study conducted a cross-sectional survey of 210 gay male daily PrEP users living in California and New York. The results showed more than two-thirds of the sample indicated that they had skipped taking PrEP within the last 30 days, averaging around four to five missed doses. General attitudes toward desirable and undesirable outcomes, perceived behavioral control, and social-level barriers were associated with daily PrEP uptake non-adherence. The findings highlight providers' role in PrEP adherence and the importance of habit-forming, which can be enhanced by cost-effective strategies and technological innovations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The prevention effectiveness of oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is highly dependent on medication adherence but no validated longer term PrEP adherence measures are readily available for use by primary care clinicians caring for diverse populations. We compared two self-report measures (number of doses missed in past 7 days and day-by-day past week pill taking) to results of tenofovir concentrations in dried blood spot (DBS) samples at quarterly visits over the first 12 months of PrEP use. 1420 men and women in five US community health centers enrolled in a medication adherence substudy. For 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, the respective percentages of persons with self-report vs DBS levels consistent having taken all 7 doses in the week prior were 71% (51%), 70% (47%), 71% (46%) and 69% (44%). Conversely, the percentage of participants reporting taking 0–1 doses in the week prior by self-report vs DBS drug levels at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months consistent with this level of nonadherence of 6% (9%), 5% (10%), 8% (9%), and 9% (15%). The estimated risk of low adherence (estimated 0–1 doses in the week prior) was higher for participants of Black (RR 1.60, CI 1.09–2.34) or "Other" race (RR 1.62, CI 0.99–2.65) compared with participants of White race; being a transgender female (RR 2.31, CI 1.33–4.02) compared to men who have sex with men; or enrollment at a study site with less experience in the provision of PrEP. The estimated risk of low adherence by DBS was lower for participants with a higher number of sex partners in the past 3 months and those having a bachelor's degree or higher. More work is needed to provide clinicians with measures to assess medication adherence in diverse US populations being prescribed PrEP to support its effective use in reducing HIV acquisition in individuals and at the community level. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We examine the experiences with and perceptions of the effect of reading clinical outpatient visit notes on patients with multiple chronic conditions at three healthcare organizations with significant experience sharing clinical notes with patients. Methods: A cross‐sectional survey was conducted via patient portals at three diverse healthcare organizations in the United States: Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (Boston, MA), UW Medical Center (Seattle, WA), and Geisinger Health System (Danville, PA). Participants were aged 65 and older patient portal users who read at least one clinical note over the 12 months before the survey. We examined the effect of note reading on patient engagement and managing medications. Results: The majority of respondents had read two or more clinical notes in the 12 months before the survey. Patients with more than two chronic conditions were more likely than those with fewer or none to report that reading their notes helped them remember their care plan, take their medications as prescribed, and understand and feel more in control of their medications. Very few patients reported feeling worried or confused about their health or medications due to reading their notes. Conclusions: Older patients with chronic conditions are particularly vulnerable to misremembering and mismanaging their care and medication plans. Findings from this study suggest that these patients and their care partners could receive important benefits from accessing their notes. Healthcare organizations should work to maximize patient's engagement with their health information both through the patient portal and through other methods to ensure that patients and the healthcare systems reap the full benefit of the increased transparency of medical records. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of AIDS & Behavior is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

The disparity in outcomes of breast cancer for Black compared with White women in the U.S. is well known and persistent over time, with the largest disparities appearing among women with hormone receptor‐positive (HR+) cancers. The racial gap in breast cancer survival first emerged in the 1980s, a time of significantmen treatment advances in early‐stage breast cancer, including the introduction of adjuvant endocrine therapy. Since that time, the gap has continued to widen despite steady advances in treatment and survival of breast cancer overall. Although advanced stage at presentation and unfavorable biology undoubtedly contribute to racial differences in survival of HR+ breast, treatment disparities are increasingly acknowledged to play a key role as well. The recent recognition of racial differences in endocrine therapy use may be a key explanatory factor in the persistent racial gap in mortality of HR+ disease, and may be a key focus of intervention to improve breast cancer outcomes for Black women. Implications for Practice: Black women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer experience the greatest racial disparity in survival among all breast cancer subtypes. This survival gap appears consistently across studies and is not entirely explained by differences in presenting stage, tumor biology as assessed by genomic risk scores, or receipt of chemotherapy. Recent research highlights lower adherence to endocrine therapy (ET) for Black women. Health systems and individual providers should focus on improving communication about the importance of ET use, sharing decisions around ET, providing appropriate support for side effects and other ET‐related concerns, and equitably delivering survivorship care, including ET adherence assessment. The disparity in outcomes of breast cancer for Black compared to White women in the United States is well‐known. This article examines the factors contributing to these persistent disparities, including biological and access‐related determinants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High cholesterol is a preventable risk factor for heart disease. This study examines which aspects of patient-provider communication are associated with patient report of increased adherence to cholesterol management advice in a diverse, low-income patient population accessing the health care safety net, using the 2014 Health Center Patient Survey. Patient-provider communication measures included patient report of: how often a provider listened carefully, gave easy-to-understand information, knew important information about the patient's medical history, showed respect, and spent enough time with the patient. Outcome measures were patient report of following provider advice to eat fewer high fat or high cholesterol foods, manage weight, increase physical activity, or take prescribed medicine. In adjusted analyses, when patients perceived their provider always knew their medical history, patients were more likely to report taking prescribed medication (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.6, 6.6). Knowledge of medical history (aOR: 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4, 5.8), spending enough time (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.2, 4.4), and providing easily understandable information (aOR: 2.2, 95% CI: 1.0, 4.7) were significantly associated with report of following physical activity advice. Knowledge of medical history (aOR: 2.3, 95% CI: 1.0, 5.2) and providing easily understandable information (aOR: 3.3, 95% CI: 1.4, 7.9) were significantly associated with report of following weight management advice. This study indicates different components of patient-provider communication influence patient adherence to lifestyle modification advice and medication prescription. These results suggest a tailored approach to optimize the impact of patient-provider communication on cholesterol management advice adherence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adherence to adalimumab on all-cause work loss, healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and direct medical and indirect costs over 2 years using real-world data. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study using a large, United States administrative claims database. Adult patients treated with adalimumab were grouped into adherent and non-adherent cohorts and followed for up to 2 years. Outcomes were compared between cohorts. Results: Over 2 years, adherent patients had $10,214 lower per patient medical and indirect costs compared to non-adherent patients, resulting from lower HRU, fewer days of absenteeism, and lower rates of work loss events. Conclusion: Patient and societal benefits of adherence to adalimumab are significant over 2 years. These findings highlight the importance of policies aimed at improving adherence to self-administrated medications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims and Objectives: To examine the feasibility of a culturally tailored education programme for Haitian immigrants diagnosed with hypertension. Background: Hypertension is a major public health problem, impacting more than 26% of the global population. The overall prevalence of hypertension is 45.4% in the United States with nearly 80,000 deaths due to hypertension in 2015. African Americans and other Black populations living in the U.S. are disproportionally affected by hypertension. Design: Pre‐test and post‐test feasibility study. Methods: A convenience sample of forty‐four participants who identified as Haitian immigrants was enrolled in this evidence‐based education programme. The intervention included culturally tailored education focused on improving knowledge, medication adherence and blood pressure. Outcomes were measured using the Hill‐Bone Medication Adherence Scale and Hypertension Knowledge Test. The SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines were used for reporting outcomes. Results: Of the participants that completed the study (N=42), the mean age was 61.95 (± 9.75) years and 59% were female. Baseline systolic and diastolic blood pressures were 143 (±18.15) and 85 (±7.23), respectively. Six weeks after the intervention, there was a significant decrease in mean systolic, 126 (±12.07) and diastolic 78.50 (± 7.23) blood pressures. An increase in medication adherence and hypertension knowledge was also noted at the six‐week follow‐up period. Conclusion: The feasibility of healthcare provider implementation of a culturally tailored intervention to manage hypertension has been demonstrated. However, future research is warranted to gain a more in‐depth understanding of how to approach hypertension management among Haitians and other Black immigrant communities. Relevance to clinical practice: Advanced practice nurses are uniquely qualified to implement evidence‐based programmes that improve patient knowledge and adherence to hypertension management. Through tailoring and adopting an evidence‐based methods for educating patients about medication adherence and adequate blood pressure management, there is a potential to see improvements in patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Medication restricting behaviours are common among persons with diabetes increasing risk for poor health outcomes. Persons with diabetes are more likely to experience food insecurity than persons without diabetes., Aim: This study aimed to assess the relationship between food insecurity and medication restricting behaviour among persons with diabetes in the United States., Methods: Data from the 2019 National Health Interview Survey (NHIS) data conducted in the United States was used for this analysis. Medication restricting behaviour was assessed by questions asking whether four restricting behaviours were present (skipped medication, took less medication, delayed filling a prescription and/or took less medication due to cost). Food insecurity status was obtained through a 10-item scale and participants were categorized as either food secure, low food security, or very low food security. Poisson regression evaluated the relationship between medication restricting behaviour and food insecurity controlling for confounders., Results: Participants with very low food security had a significantly higher mean number of medication restricting behaviours than participants who were food secure (adjusted mean ratio (AMR) = 4.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) = (3.09, 5.21)). Similarly, participants with low food security had a significantly higher mean ratio than participants who were food secure (AMR = 3.76; 95% CI = (2.86. 4.94)., Conclusion: Persons with diabetes who have low or very low food security are at an increased risk for engaging in medication restricting behaviours., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Real-world data have suggested inconsistent adherence to oral anticoagulation for thromboembolic event (TE) prevention in patients with Non valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF), yet it remains unclear if event risk is elevated during gaps of non-adherence., Objective: To compare difference in outcomes between direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and warfarin based on adherence to the therapy in patients with NVAF., Methods: Using the MarketScan claims data, patients receiving prescription of warfarin or a DOAC for NVAF from January 2015 to June 2016 were included. Outcomes included hospitalization for TE (ischemic stroke or systemic embolism), hemorrhagic stroke, stroke of any kind, and major bleeding. Event rates were reported for warfarin and DOACs at a higher-adherence proportion of days covered (PDC > 80%) and lower-adherence (PDC 40-80%)., Results: The cohort included 83,168 patients prescribed warfarin (51% [n = 42,639]) or DOAC (49% [n = 40,529]). Lower adherence occurred in 36% (n = 15,330) of patients prescribed warfarin and 26% (n = 10,956) prescribed DOAC. As compared to higher-adherence warfarin after multivariable adjustment, the risk of TE was highest in lower-adherence DOAC (HR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.33), and lowest in higher-adherence DOAC (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.88-0.99). There was a significantly higher risk of hemorrhagic stroke and stroke of any kind in the lower-adherence groups. Major bleeding was more common with lower-adherence DOAC (HR, 1.43, 95% CI, 1.35-1.52) and lower-adherence warfarin (HR, 1.32, 95% CI, 1.26-1.39)., Conclusions: In this large real-world study, low adherence DOAC was associated with higher risk of TE events as compared to high and low adherence warfarin., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Objectives: To collect and document the numerous barriers that people living with hepatitis B (PLHB) encounter when trying to access their hepatitis B virus (HBV) medications., Design: Researchers collected qualitative data through 24 online interviews. The semistructured interview questions focused on the impact that HBV has on different aspects of daily life (physical, emotional and social), personal experiences managing their infection, HBV treatment experiences and interactions with healthcare providers., Setting: All interviews occurred over Zoom., Participants: The participant cohort consisted of 12 males and 12 females. 63% of all participants represented communities of colour (37% white, 17% black/African/African American and 46% Asian/Asian American). Most of the participants were on antiviral treatment at the time of the study (62%). Participants were PLHB (self-reported), ≥18 years old, living in the USA or Canada and spoke English., Results: Participants reported several barriers to accessing medicine among PLHB including financial barriers, health insurance and pharmacy preauthorisation process and other intangible barriers like lack of access to reliable patient-friendly information and stigma. The identified barriers to accessing HBV medication impacted patients' continuity of care., Conclusions: Access to medicine is essential to improving health outcomes. PLHB experience significant barriers to accessing HBV antivirals at different levels. Patient-related, physician-related and healthcare system barriers were identified as themes contributing to antiviral access challenges. More research is needed to identify strategies to improve access to HBV medications., Competing Interests: Competing interests: CC serves on patient/community advisory boards for Gilead Sciences and GlaxoSmithKline. Hepatitis B Foundation receives programme and research grants from Gilead Sciences, VBI Vaccines, the US Food and Drug Administration and GlaxoSmithKline. CF has consulted and advised for Gilead and GlaxoSmithKline. BZ has advised for Gilead Sciences. YI has consulted for Roche. MJ and SJ have nothing to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: The 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline was a paradigm shift in lipid management and identified the four statin-benefit groups. Many have studied the guideline's potential impact, but few have investigated its potential long-term impact on MACE. Furthermore, most studies also ignored the confounding effect from the earlier release of generic atorvastatin in Dec 2011., Methods: To evaluate the potential (long-term) impact of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release in Nov 2013 in the U.S., we investigated the association of the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline with the trend changes in 5-Year MACE survival and three other statin-related outcomes (statin use, optimal statin use, and statin adherence) while controlling for generic atorvastatin availability using interrupted time series analysis, called the Chow's test. Specifically, we conducted a retrospective study using U.S. nationwide de-identified claims and electronic health records from Optum Labs Database Warehouse (OLDW) to follow the trends of 5-Year MACE survival and statin-related outcomes among four statin-benefit groups that were identified in the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline. Then, Chow's test was used to discern trend changes between generic atorvastatin availability and guideline potential impact., Results: 197,021 patients were included (ASCVD: 19,060; High-LDL: 33,907; Diabetes: 138,159; High-ASCVD-Risk: 5,895). After the guideline release, the long-term trend (slope) of 5-Year MACE Survival for the Diabetes group improved significantly (P = 0.002). Optimal statin use for the ASCVD group also showed immediate improvement (intercept) and long-term positive changes (slope) after the release (P < 0.001). Statin uses did not have significant trend changes and statin adherence remained unchanged in all statin-benefit groups. Although no other statistically significant trend changes were found, overall positive trend change or no changes were observed after the 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline release., Conclusions: The 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline release is associated with trend improvements in the long-term MACE Survival for Diabetes group and optimal statin use for ASCVD group. These significant associations might indicate a potential positive long-term impact of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline on better health outcomes for primary prevention groups and an immediate potential impact on statin prescribing behaviors in higher-at-risk groups. However, further investigation is required to confirm the causal effect of the 2013 ACA/AHA Guideline., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Buprenorphine and other medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) are recommended as standard of care in the treatment of OUD and are associated with positive health and addiction-related outcomes. Despite benefits, discontinuation is common, with half of patients discontinuing in the first year of treatment. Addressing OUD is a major clinical priority, yet little is known about the causes of medication discontinuation from the patient perspective., Methods: From March 2021 to April 2022, we conducted qualitative interviews with patients who had discontinued buprenorphine for the treatment of OUD within the past 12 months. Eligible participants were selected from 2 Veterans Health Administration Health Care Systems in Oregon. Coding and analysis were guided by conventional qualitative content analysis., Results: Twenty participants completed an interview; 90% were White and 90% were male, and the mean age was 54.2 years. Before discontinuation, participants had received buprenorphine for 8.3 months on average (range, 1-40 months); 80% had received buprenorphine for less than 12 months. Qualitative analysis identified the following themes relating to discontinuation: health system barriers (eg, logistical hurdles, rules and policy violations), medication effects (adverse effects; attributed adverse effects, lack of efficacy in treating chronic pain) and desire for opioid use. Patient description of decisions to discontinue buprenorphine could be multicausal, reflecting provider or system-level barriers in interaction with patient complexity or medication ambivalence., Conclusions: Study results identify several actionable ways OUD treatment could be modified to enhance patient retention., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Written work prepared by employees of the Federal Government as part of their official duties is, under the U.S. Copyright Act, a “work of the United States Government” for which copyright protection under Title 17 of the United States Code is not available. As such, copyright does not extend to the contributions of employees of the Federal Government.)

Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are recommended for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) given their improved safety profile. Suboptimal adherence to DOACs remains a significant concern among individuals with AF. However, the extent of adherence to DOACs following a cardiovascular or bleeding event has not been fully evaluated., Objective: To evaluate the pattern of adherence trajectories of DOACs after a cardiovascular or bleeding event and to investigate the sociodemographic and clinical predictors associated with each adherence trajectory by using claims-based data., Methods: This retrospective study was conducted among patients with AF prescribed with DOACs (dabigatran/apixaban/rivaroxaban) between July 2016 and December 2017 and who were continuously enrolled in the Texas-based Medicare Advantage Plan. Patients who experienced a cardiovascular or bleeding event while using the DOACs were further included in the analysis. The sample was limited to patients who experienced a clinical event such as a cardiovascular or bleeding event while using the DOACs. The clinical events considered in this study were cardiovascular (stroke, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, systemic embolism) and bleeding events. To assess adherence patterns, each patient with a DOAC prescription was followed up for a year after experiencing a clinical event. The monthly adherence to DOACs after these events was evaluated using the proportion of days covered (PDC). A group-based trajectory model incorporated the monthly PDC to classify groups of patients based on their distinct patterns of adherence. Predictors associated with each trajectory were assessed using a multinomial logistic regression model, with the adherent trajectory serving as the reference group in the outcome variable., Results: Among the 694 patients with AF who experienced clinical events after the initiation of DOACs, 3 distinct adherence trajectories were identified: intermediate nonadherent (30.50%), adherent (37.7%), and low adherent (31.8%); the mean PDC was 0.47 for the intermediate nonadherent trajectory, 0.93 for the adherent trajectory, and 0.01 for low adherent trajectory. The low-income subsidy was significantly associated with lower adherence trajectories (odds ratio [OR] = 4.81; 95% CI = 3.07-7.51) and with intermediate nonadherent trajectories (OR = 1.57; 95% CI = 1.06-2.34). Also, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use was significantly associated with lower adherence trajectories (OR = 5.10; 95% CI = 1.95-13.36) and intermediate nonadherent trajectories (OR = 3.17; 95% CI = 1.26-7.93). Other predictors significantly associated with both nonadherent trajectories are type of DOACs (OR = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.35-0.79), presence of coronary artery disease (OR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.01-3.55), and having 2 or more clinical events (OR = 1.65; 95% CI = 1.09-2.50)., Conclusions: Predictors identified provide valuable insights into the suboptimal adherence of DOACs among Medicare Advantage Plan enrollees with AF, which can guide the development of targeted interventions to enhance adherence in this high-risk patient population.

Prescription drug cost-sharing is a barrier to medication adherence, particularly for low-income and minority populations. In this systematic review, we examined the impact of prescription drug cost-sharing and policies to reduce cost-sharing on racial/ethnic and income disparities in medication utilization. We screened 2,145 titles and abstracts and identified 19 peer-reviewed papers that examined the interaction between cost-sharing and racial/ethnic and income disparities in medication adherence or utilization. We found weak but inconsistent evidence that lower cost-sharing is associated with reduced disparities in adherence and utilization, but studies consistently found that significant disparities remained even after adjusting for differences in cost-sharing across individuals. Study designs varied in their ability to measure the causal effect of policy or cost-sharing changes on disparities, and a wide range of policies were examined across studies. Further research is needed to identify the types of policies that are best suited to reduce disparities in medication adherence., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and type 2 diabetes (T2D) are 3 of the most common chronic conditions, but related medication adherence rates are far below 80%. Consequences of poor adherence include high health care utilization/costs and increased mortality. There is accumulating evidence in support of the benefits of affording pharmacists the opportunity to practice at the full scope of their licensure by engaging in patients' clinical care., Objective: To examine the impact of a large national pharmacy chain's pharmacist-led interventions to improve medication adherence among older adults with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, or T2D. A secondary objective was to estimate the potential cost savings associated with improved adherence., Methods: Participants were Medicare patients aged 18 years or older who had 2 or more prescription fills in at least 1 of the 3 therapeutic classes. The primary outcome, optimal adherence, was defined as proportion of days covered (PDC) of 80% or higher. A difference-in-differences (DID) design with a generalized linear model analytical approach was applied to examine differences between intervention participants and controls. The study period spanned from 2020 to 2022., Results: Intervention participants (n = 317,613, age 70.1 years, female sex 57.0%) had lower baseline optimal adherence than controls (n = 943,389, age 73.3, female sex 56.1%) for diabetes (76.9% vs 79.8%), hypertension (79.0% vs 83.0%), and cholesterol (78.6% vs 82.1%). The DID results showed that between 2020 and 2022, optimal adherence had significant absolute increases for intervention participants (diabetes: +4.0%, hypertension: +6.3%, cholesterol: +6.1%) vs controls who declined in adherence (diabetes: -1.6%, hypertension: -0.4%, cholesterol: -1.4%). All DID models were significant at P < 0.0001. Total cost of care was projected based on improvements in adherence. Based on PDC improvements for the test population, we estimate that the pharmacist consultations were associated with annual total health care cost savings of $10,329,284 ($109 per capita), $31,640,660 ($122 per capita), and $21,589,875 ($75 per capita) for test population patients with diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia, respectively., Conclusions: The study found that the pharmacist-led interventions were significantly associated with increased optimal adherence over 2 years. These findings demonstrate the potential of pharmacist-led interventions to improve medication adherence among older adults with chronic conditions. Strategies to expand pharmacist-provided care must be further examined.

Adherence to antihypertensives is crucial for control of blood pressure. This study analyzed factors and interventions that could affect adherence to antihypertensives in the US. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase were searched on January 21, 2022 and December 25, 2023 for studies on the adherence to antihypertensives in the US. Nineteen studies and 23 545 747 patients were included in the analysis, which showed that adherence to antihypertensives was the highest among Whites (OR: 1.47, 95% CI 1.34-1.61 compared to African Americans). Employment status and sex were associated with insignificant differences in adherence rates. In contrast, marital status yielded a significant difference where unmarried patients demonstrated low adherence rates compared to married ones (OR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.67-0.95). On analysis of comorbidities, diabetic patients reported lower adherence to antihypertensives (OR: 0.95, 95% CI 0.92-0.97); furthermore, patients who did not have Alzheimer showed higher adherence rates. Different BMIs did not significantly affect the adherence rates. Patients without insurance reported significantly lower adherence rates than insured patients (OR: 3.93, 95% CI 3.43-4.51). Polypill users had higher adherence rates compared with the free-dose combination (OR: 1.21, 95% CI 1.2-1.21), while telepharmacy did not prove to be as effective. Lower adherence rates were seen among African Americans, uninsured, or younger patients. Accordingly, interventions such as fixed-dose combinations should be targeted at susceptible groups. Obesity and overweight did not affect the adherence to antihypertensives., (© 2024 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Hypertension published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Medication persistence in type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a critical factor for preventing adverse clinical events. We assessed persistence among newly treated patients with T2D and documented the impact of persistence on clinical outcomes and costs., Study Design: Retrospective study of Optum Clinformatics Data Mart commercial and Medicare Advantage enrollees from 2007 to 2020., Methods: We identified adult patients who initiated antidiabetic treatments. Patients were required to have at least 1 treatment-free year prior to their first T2D prescription. Persistence was measured as the duration of continuous therapy until a 60-day gap in drug availability appeared in any antidiabetic therapy. Factors associated with duration were documented, focusing on the initial class(es) of T2D drugs. The impact of treatment duration on the risk of hospitalization and on total health care costs was also examined., Results: A total of 673,265 patients were included, with a median follow-up of 7 years. Only 22% of patients maintained continuous treatment, of whom 10% added a second medication. A 1-month increase in duration was associated with reduced risk of hospitalization due to stroke by 0.54% (95% CI, 0.46%-0.60%), acute myocardial infarction by 0.51% (95% CI, 0.44%-0.57%), and all-cause hospitalization by 0.36% (95% CI, 0.34%-0.37%). A 1-month increase in duration was associated with a year-to-year decrease in medical costs of $51 (95% CI, -$54 to -$48) and an increase in year-to-year drug costs of $14 (95% CI, $13-$14)., Conclusions: Our findings show low persistence among patients with T2D and emphasize the importance of medication persistence, which is associated with cost savings and lower risk of hospitalizations.

Objective: The objective of this study was to determine the proportion of new medication prescriptions observed in electronic health records (EHR) that represent true incident medication use, accounting for undocumented previous prescriptions (prevalent medication use) and failure to initiate treatment (primary nonadherence) with linked administrative claims data as the reference standard., Methods: Using single-specialty rheumatology EHR data from more than 700 community practices in the United States linked to administrative claims data, we identified first (index) EHR prescriptions and assessed the positive predictive value (PPV) of different EHR-derived new user definitions to identify true incident use (no prior claims). We then assessed how often index EHR prescriptions that met a definition of new use resulted in primary nonadherence (no subsequent claims)., Results: Overall, 12,405 index EHR prescriptions were identified with PPVs of 0.59 to 0.67 for true incident use. PPVs increased to 0.76 to 0.85 by excluding medications listed during the EHR medication reconciliation process and further increased to 0.87 to 0.93 by requiring ≥12 elapsed months since the first rheumatology office visit. Primary nonadherence at three months was observed in 33% to 38% overall and varied substantially by medication class, ranging from 15% to 23% for conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) to 54% to 64% for targeted synthetic DMARDs., Conclusion: New DMARD use was accurately distinguished from prevalent use with EHR prescriptions and simple new user definitions that include current medications collected during medication reconciliation. Primary nonadherence was frequent and varied by DMARD class. This has important implications for epidemiologic studies using EHR data and for optimal delivery of clinical care., (© 2023 American College of Rheumatology.)

Purpose: The purpose of this research was to conceptualize and develop a tool for identifying persons who are, or are likely to be, non-adherent to medications prescribed by their healthcare provider(s) by identifying concerns that patients have regarding their treatments. Patients and Methods: The target populations were persons diagnosed with atrial fibrillation or osteoarthritis, who were prescribed anticoagulants or over-the-counter or prescription pain medications, respectively. In this two-stage, multi-year, qualitative research study, relevant concepts were explored, confirmed and refined. The focus was on non-adherence due to active (thus potentially modifiable) patient decisions to forego taking medications as prescribed. Results: The most common concerns among participants with atrial fibrillation were medication-related side effects and fear of bleeding. Participants with osteoarthritis were most concerned about short-term stomach problems and long-term kidney and liver side effects. The Concerns Influencing Medication Adherence (CIMA) instrument was developed based on these concerns and those identified in the literature. It is comprised of 16 items: a core set of 11 items potentially applicable to multiple disease states, 3 items specific to atrial fibrillation, and 2 items unique to osteoarthritis. The instrument is intended to be completed electronically, and publicly available for use in direct patient care in the United States or in population health management. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first instrument focused on medication adherence that includes documented details of patient input as recommended by the United States Food and Drug Administration guidance. Patient input is considered a key component of content validity. In this research, for example, the concerns that patients have regarding their treatments can be expected to have affected past medication adherence and can potentially impact future adherence. Although applicability outside atrial fibrillation or osteoarthritis was not assessed, the general items may be useful in assessing adherence in other chronic diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most common causes of chronic pain and a leading cause of disability in the US. The objective of this study was to examine the clinical and economic burden of OA by pain severity. Patients and Methods: We used nationally representative survey data. Adults ≥ 18 years with self-reported physician-diagnosed OA and experiencing OA pain were included in the study. OA pain severity was measured using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Visual Analog Scale (SF-MPQ-VAS). Data were collected for demographics, clinical characteristics, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), productivity, OA treatment, adherence to pain medication, and healthcare resource utilization. Univariate analysis was performed to examine differences between respondents with moderate-to-severe OA pain vs those with mild OA pain. Results: Higher proportions of respondents with moderate-to-severe OA pain (n=3798) compared with mild OA pain (n=2038) were female (69.4% vs 57.3%), < 65 years of age (54.8% vs 43.4%), and not employed (70.6% vs 64.5%). Respondents with moderate-to-severe OA pain experienced OA pain daily (80.8% vs 48.8%), were obese (53.0% vs 40.5%), had more comorbidities (sleep disturbance, insomnia, depression, and anxiety), and reported significantly poorer health status and HRQoL, and greater productivity and activity impairment (all P< 0.05). Moderate-to-severe OA pain respondents were prescribed significantly more pain medications than mild OA pain respondents (41.0% vs 17.0%) and had higher adherence (75.9% vs 64.1%) yet were less satisfied with their pain medications (all P< 0.001). Outpatient and emergency room visits, and hospitalizations in the 6 months prior to the survey were significantly higher in moderate-to-severe OA pain respondents vs those with mild OA pain (all P< 0.05). Conclusion: Patient and clinical burden was significantly greater in moderate-to-severe OA pain respondents vs mild OA pain respondents and may inform decision-making for appropriate resource allocation and effective management strategies that target specific subgroups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Successful navigation of the HIV care continuum is necessary to maintain viral suppression. We explored gender-stratified correlates of being virally unsuppressed in the Prevention for Positives (P4P) component of HPTN 065. The outcome of interest was unsuppressed viral load (> 40 copies/mL) among individuals already living with HIV. Correlates included medication adherence factors, social support and stigma. Logistic regression models were stratified by gender (N = 673). Men-specific correlates of being virally unsuppressed included opposite-sex partners, older age and HIV disclosure stigma. Women-specific correlates included time since diagnosis, and personal-level barriers to medication adherence. When more individuals knew about their HIV status, women had over twice the likelihood of being virally unsuppressed; no such association was seen among men. Additionally, higher levels of social support were not associated with viral suppression among women. Interventions should consider gender-specific approaches to engaging social support in de-stigmatization of HIV and promotion of medication adherence and subsequent viral suppression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Uncontrolled hypertension is a significant risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. In the United States, many patients remain uncontrolled, in part, due to poor medication adherence. Efforts to improve hypertension control include not only attending to medical management of the disease but also the social determinants of health, which impact medication adherence, and ultimately blood pressure control.Purpose: To determine which social determinants - health care access or community and social stressors - explain medication adherence.Methods: In this cross-sectional analysis, we used baseline data (N=1820, collected August 2017 to October 2019) from a pragmatic trial, which compares the effectiveness of a multi-level intervention including collaborative care and a stepped approach with enhanced standard of care for improving blood pressure. We used logistic regression analyses to examine the association between patient experiences of care and community and social stressors with medication adherence.Results: The participants represented a diverse sample: mean age of 60 years; 59% female; 57.3% Black, 9.6% Hispanic, and 33.2% White. All participants had a blood pressure reading ≥140/90 mm Hg (mean blood pressure - 152/85 mm Hg). Half of the participants reported some level of non-adherence to medication. Regression analysis showed that, compared with Whites, Blacks (AOR .47; 95% CIs: .37-.60, P<.001) and Hispanics (AOR .48; 95% CIs: .32- .73, P<.001) were less likely to report medication adherence. Also part-time workers (AOR .57; 95% CIs: .38-.86, P<.05), and those who reported greater perceived stress (AOR .94; 95% CIs: .91 - .98, P<.001) and everyday discrimination (AOR .73; 95% CIs: .59 - .89; P<.001) had lower odds of medication adherence. Among Blacks, greater perceived stress (AOR .93; 95% CIs: .88-.98, P<.001) and everyday discrimination (AOR .63; 95% CIs: .49 - .82, P<.005) were negatively associated with medication adherence. Among Hispanics, greater report of everyday discrimination (AOR .36; 95% CIs: .14 - .89, P<.005) was associated with lower odds of medication adherence. Among Whites, the negative effect of perceived stress on medication adherence was attenuated by emotional support.Conclusions: Using the social determinants of health framework, we identified associations between stress, everyday discrimination and medication adherence among non-Hispanic Blacks and Hispanics that were independent of health status and other social determinants. Programs to enhance self-management for African American and Hispanic patients with uncontrolled blood pressure should include a specific focus on addressing social stressors. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cost-related medication nonadherence (CRN) is associated with poor prognosis among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), a population that requires long-term treatment for secondary prevention. In this study, we aimed to estimate the prevalence and sociodemographic characteristics of CRN in individuals with COPD in the US., Methods: In a nationally representative survey of US adults in the National Health Interview Survey (2013-2020), we identified individuals aged ≥18 years with a self-reported history of COPD. Cross-sectional study., Results: Of the 15,928 surveyed individuals, a weighted 18.56% (2.39 million) reported experiencing CRN, including 12.50% (1.61 million) missing doses, 13.30% (1.72 million) taking lower than prescribed doses, and 15.74% (2.03 million) delaying filling prescriptions to save costs. Factors including age < 65 years, female sex, low family income, lack of health insurance, and multimorbidity were associated with CRN., Conclusions: In the US, one in six adults with COPD reported CRN. The influencing factors of CRN are multifaceted and necessitating more rigorous research. Targeted interventions based on the identified influencing factors in this study are recommended to enhance medication adherence among COPD patients., (© 2024. The Author(s).)