Search

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest Collin Costello, MD, has grant support from the Melanoma Research Alliance to support melanoma educational programs and research support from DeepX Health for melanoma imaging technology. Both were paid to the institution. Allan Halpern, MD, is an advisor to Canfield Scientific Inc and Scibase Inc.

The primary cause of the increase in melanoma incidence in the United States has been suggested to be overdiagnosis. We used Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program data from 1975 to 2017 to examine epidemiologic trends of melanoma incidence and mortality and better characterize overdiagnosis in white Americans. Over the 43-year period, incidence and mortality showed discordant temporal changes across population subgroups; trends most suggestive of overdiagnosis alone were present in females aged 55-74. Other groups showed mixed changes suggestive of overdiagnosis plus changes in underlying disease risk (decreasing risk in younger individuals and increasing risk in older males). Cohort effects were identified for male and female mortality and male incidence but were not as apparent for female incidence, suggesting that period effects have had a greater influence on changes in incidence over time in females. Encouraging trends included long-term declines in mortality in younger individuals and recent stabilization of invasive incidence in individuals aged 15-44 years and males aged 45-54 years. Melanoma in situ incidence, however, has continued to increase throughout the population. Overdiagnosis appears to be relatively greater in American females and for melanoma in situ., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Dermoscopy is a noninvasive, in vivo imaging technique that allows for the visualization of subsurface skin structures. In recent years, several education interventions have incorporated dermoscopy in the primary care setting to improve skin cancer detection. We aim to describe the perspectives, attitudes, and interest of primary care physicians (PCPs) regarding dermoscopy., Methods: PCPs associated with academic institutions completed an anonymous survey emailed to faculty and resident listservs. The survey consisted of 23 questions related to dermoscopy., Results: A total of 156 PCPs completed the questionnaire. Few PCPs reported having access to a dermatoscope (16%), using it regularly (9%), or having received training (15%). The most common reasons for not using a dermatoscope were the lack of access to the device (85%), followed by the lack of training (76%). However, the majority view dermoscopy as a valuable tool in primary care and are interested in receiving training (87%), particularly with a hands-on approach., Conclusion: Our sample of PCPs in the United States showed that although few use dermoscopy, most perceive it as a useful tool, particularly family medicine physicians. The main reported barriers preventing its use included the lack of training and poor access to dermatoscopes. The vast majority of PCPs in our sample want to be trained in dermoscopy, thereby providing an opportunity for educational initiatives that take into account the barriers and preferred learning strategies., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None., (© Copyright 2020 by the American Board of Family Medicine.)

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common malignancy diagnosed in the USA and its incidence continues to increase. While BCC is still most prevalent in the older segments of the population, it is becoming ever more frequent in younger individuals. The costs of treatment and morbidity associated with BCCs place a heavy public health and economic burden on patients, their families and the American healthcare system and underscore the importance of efficient management and prevention efforts directed toward this malignancy. In this article, we address economic aspects of BCC using evidence from large-scale epidemiological studies. This information may help clinicians in developing better and more cost-effective methods for dealing with the most common cancer in America and in the world.

Background: Advances in treatment have increased childhood cancer 5-year survival rates to greater than 80%. However, children previously treated with radiation are at significantly increased risk of developing subsequent neoplasms, the most common of which are skin cancers. The National Cancer Institute and Children's Oncology Group have issued recommendations for survivors treated with radiation to perform monthly skin self-examinations and receive a physician skin examination at least annually, as early detection has demonstrated markedly improved outcomes in the diagnosis and treatment of skin cancers. The goal of the present study is to increase rates of skin self-examinations and clinical skin examinations among adult survivors of childhood cancer treated with radiation., Methods/design: This randomized controlled trial uses a 3-group comparative effectiveness design comparing: (1) Patient Activation and Education (PAE) including text messaging, print and web-based tutorials over 12 months; (2) PAE plus physician activation (PAE + MD) adding physician activation/educational materials about survivors' increased skin cancer risk and conducting full-body skin exams; and (3) PAE plus physician activation, plus teledermoscopy (PAE + MD + TD) adding participant receipt of a dermatoscope intended to empower them to photograph suspect moles or lesions for review by the study dermatologist., Discussion: The current study addresses barriers to screening in this population by providing educational and motivational information for both survivors and physicians regarding the value of periodic skin examinations. It also utilizes innovative mobile health technology to encourage and motivate (that is activate) survivors to conduct skin self-examinations, request physician exams, and obtain treatment when worrisome lesions are found. Finally, as a comparative effectiveness trial, this study isolates the effects of adding specific components to the patient activation intervention to test the most effective intervention for enhancing skin examination vigilance among this high-risk group., Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02046811 ; Registration date: 22 January 2014.

Background: Melanoma incidence and mortality is a growing concern. Better recognition and management of skin cancer by primary care providers (PCPs) could help, but studies suggest they would benefit from additional education. Effective educational programs are needed., Methods: We developed and conducted a voluntary before-and-after evaluation of a 1- to 2-hour interactive, web-based course in skin cancer detection for practicing, board-certified PCPs (http://www.skinsight.com/info/for_professionals/dermatology-education-resources). Voluntary participants' ability to diagnose and manage skin cancer was assessed using pretests, immediate tests, and 6-month posttests. The effect on actual practice patterns was assessed using participants' patient panels: referrals or visits to dermatology and skin biopsies during the 6 months after the course were compared with those during the same period before the course., Results: The mean age of the 54 participants was 50.5 years (standard deviation, 11.1); 54% were women and 52% were Asian. The mean score for appropriate diagnosis and management increased from 36.1% to 46.7% (odds ratio, 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-1.9), with greatest improvement in benign lesions, from 32.1% to 46.3% (odds ratio, 1.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.6-2.4). Dermatology referrals for suspicious lesions or new visits by participants' patients decreased at both sites after the course (from 630 to 607 and from 726 to 266, respectively)., Conclusions: This course improved skills in practicing PCPs. Improvement was greatest in the diagnosis and appropriate management of benign lesions and dermatology utilization decreased.

Objective: To assess current practices and recommendations of US physicians regarding depth of excision for melanomas of varying histologic thicknesses., Design: A 2-page, 13-question survey of depth of excision practices for the treatment of melanoma was developed and distributed., Setting: Both private and academic settings., Participants: A total of 1184 US physicians (1000 dermatologists and 184 melanoma specialists) were sent the survey. The 184 melanoma specialists included dermatologists, oncologists, and surgeons working in pigmented lesion clinics., Main Outcome Measures: Depth of excision practices reported for melanomas of varying histologic thicknesses and comparison of treating physician groups. Results were tabulated, and descriptive frequencies were used to describe demographics and survey responses., Results: The final study analysis included 498 completed surveys. The overall response rate was 45% (498 of 1097 [1184 total respondents - 87 ineligibles]). The response rate for the specialists was 63% (115 of 183 [184 total respondents - 1 ineligible]), and for nonspecialist dermatologists it was 43% (383 of 892 [1000 total respondents - 108 ineligibles]). Specialists were more likely to practice in an urban setting than were nonspecialist dermatologists (78% vs 46%) (P < .001). Fifty-eight percent of nonspecialist dermatologists reported more than 400 patient visits per month compared with only 16% of specialists (P < .001). While specialists reported fewer patient visits per month, 51% reported diagnosing over 20 invasive melanomas in the previous year compared with 11% of nonspecialist dermatologists. There was no significant difference in excision depth reported among the specialties for melanoma in situ (P = .15). For invasive melanoma, significant differences were observed among treating groups, with the greatest incongruence reported for thin invasive melanoma (<0.50 mm, P = .02; 0.50-0.75 mm, P < .001; and 0.76-1.00 mm, P < .001). Specialist nondermatologists consistently reported excising more deeply than specialist dermatologists and nonspecialist dermatologists. More specialist nondermatologists report excising to the fascia for thin invasive melanoma than do both specialist and nonspecialist dermatologists. For thicker melanomas (>1.00 mm), differences in excision depths among treating physician groups decreased: most physicians in each group reported excising to the fascia., Conclusions: There is considerable variation among physician groups with regard to depth of excision practices for the treatment of melanoma. Given the current lack of clinical data available, studies assessing depth of excision and patient outcomes are needed to better define our surgical management of melanoma.

Background: Total body photography (TBP) and dermatoscopy are imaging techniques used to treat patients with pigmented lesions., Objective: We sought to describe use, training, logistics, and beliefs about these tools among residency programs and to assess changes during a 10-year period., Methods: Surveys were sent to all directors (n = 111) and chief residents (n = 109) of US dermatology training programs., Results: A total of 83 (74.8%) attendings answered the questionnaire. In all, 59 (71.1%) reported using TBP, an 11.9% increase (P = .2484) over the past decade. Reasons for using TBP included: reduces patient anxiety (81.4%), helps detect early melanoma (78.0%), and leads to fewer biopsies (66.1%). Logistical (79.2%) and financial (45.8%) constraints were reasons for not using TBP. Seventy respondents (84.3%) reported using dermatoscopy, a 40.0% increase (P = .0001) over the 10-year period. Reasons for dermatoscopy use were consistent over time: helps find melanoma in curable stage (75.7%), reduces patient anxiety (61.4%), and leads to fewer biopsies (57.1%). The most common reason for not using dermatoscopy remained lack of training (38.5%). A total of 92 (84.4%) residents completed their survey, of which 41 (44.6%) and 81 (88.0%) reported using TBP and dermatoscopy, respectively. In all, 62 (67.4%) and 79 (85.9%) respondents would prefer additional training in TBP and dermatoscopy, respectively., Limitations: Results may not be applicable to the general dermatology community., Conclusions: Use of dermatoscopy among residency programs has increased significantly during the last decade. A more modest increase in the use of TBP was observed. Barriers to diffusion of these technologies into practice persist, including insufficient logistics and training., (Copyright 2010 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess current practices of US dermatologists regarding the diagnosis, treatment, and management of melanoma in situ (MIS)., Design: Survey., Participants: A total of 1200 dermatologists randomly selected from the American Board of Medical Specialists Directory of Board Certified Medical Specialists., Main Outcome Measures: Results based on 597 questionnaires returned., Results: The overall response rate was 63% (597 of 945 eligible participants). To aid in clinical assessment, respondents reported using a magnifying lens (57.4%) and dermoscopy (17.4%). Most dermatologists preferred excisional and saucerization biopsies as the method of choice for sampling. A large percentage of physicians (78.9%) preferentially used dermatopathologists for the evaluation of the majority of pigmented lesions. Although most respondents would not unquestioningly accept a benign pathology diagnosis when there was a clinical suspicion of MIS, 16.1% would accept a pathologist's diagnosis without further action. There was no consensus on the appropriate surgical margins or depth of excision for MIS. Of the respondents who characterized MIS as premalignant and malignant, 63.2% and 46.4%, respectively, did not know what percentage of MISs would progress to metastatic disease if left untreated., Conclusions: Considerable variability exists in the clinical concept and management of MIS. Dermoscopy is underutilized. The true nature of the evolution of MIS is unknown. Surgical margins and depth of excision need to be standardized to help dermatologists manage disease. Further research in the specific area of MIS is warranted to develop clear guidelines in the management and prevention of further disease.

Dermoscopy is a non-invasive technique that can be utilized for the clinical diagnosis of pigmented lesions. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization and beliefs about the usefulness of dermoscopy in the evaluation of pigmented lesions by physicians in dermatology residency programmes, and to determine the extent of dermoscopy training received by residents in these programmes. Questionnaires were sent to the directors of all the accredited dermatology residency programmes in the United States (n = 105). A follow-up postcard questionnaire was sent to the chief resident of all the responding programmes. Eighty-three physicians responded to the questionnaire (79%). Fifty-one per cent of the respondents (n = 42) reported utilizing dermoscopy. Reported reasons for using dermoscopy by respondents included the fact that it helps detect melanoma early (74%), leads to fewer biopsies (74%) and reduces patient anxiety (64%). Lack of training (51%) and lack of usefulness (42%) were amongst the reported reasons for not utilizing dermoscopy. Sixty-seven per cent of respondents reported an increase of approximately 50% in the use of dermoscopy over the past 5 years, and 45% anticipated an increase in use over the next 5 years. Thirty-eight per cent of chief residents from the responding programmes reported receiving training in dermoscopy during residency. In conclusion, half of the dermatology residency programmes currently use dermoscopy in the evaluation of pigmented lesions. The main reason for not using dermoscopy was a lack of training. Respondents anticipated a future increase in the use of dermoscopy.

Background: There is no consensus concerning management of Spitz nevi., Objective: This study was carried out to ascertain how dermatologists manage Spitz nevi., Methods: A questionnaire was sent to 997 fellows of the American Academy of Dermatology, 284 pediatric dermatologists, and 27 directors of pigmented-lesion clinics. The results are based on the 381 questionnaires returned., Results: The vast majority of responding dermatologists (93%) recommend biopsies of suspected Spitz nevi. Of this group, 43% recommend total biopsies and 55% recommend partial biopsies; 2% would recommend either total or partial biopsies, depending on the clinical situation. Sixty-nine percent of physicians would completely excise a lesion that was histologically diagnosed as an incompletely removed Spitz nevus. Seventy percent of general dermatologists and 80% of pediatric dermatologists would recommend excision with a 1- to 2-mm margin of normal-appearing skin around a Spitz nevus. Nine percent of general dermatologists would recommend margins of 4 mm or more; however, all pediatric dermatologists surveyed would recommend margins less than 4 mm. Physicians were less likely to monitor patients whose Spitz nevi were completely removed. Three fourths (74%) of respondents believe Spitz nevi are entirely benign, 4% believe they are precursors to melanoma, and 22% are not sure. Seven percent of general dermatologists and 4% of pediatric dermatologists have seen metastatic melanomas arise at sites of lesions initially diagnosed histologically as Spitz nevi; 40% of pigmented-lesion clinic directors have seen such lesions., Conclusions: We believe that the lack of consensus, both in our survey and in the medical literature, reflects to some extent the lack of certainty in the histologic differentiation of Spitz nevi from melanomas and that concern about melanoma influences management. At the pigmented-lesion clinic of the New York University Skin and Cancer Unit, because of this concern about melanoma, it is usually recommended that Spitz nevi be completely excised.

Medical photography is often used in dermatology to aid in the clinical surveillance of patients with pigmented lesions. This study aimed to assess the utilization, logistics, rationale and beliefs about the usefulness of baseline photography in patients with pigmented lesions by physicians in dermatology residency programmes, and to compare current utilization to that reported in the last decade. Questionnaires were mailed to directors of all accredited dermatology residency programmes in the United States (n = 105). Eighty-three physicians responded to the questionnaire (79%). Utilization of total body and individual lesion photography was reported by 63% and 75% of the respondents, respectively; 16% of the respondents did not use any method of photography. Reasons for using photography included the following beliefs: that it helps detect early melanoma, it results in fewer biopsies, and it reduces patient anxiety. Financial and logistical constraints were reasons why some programmes were not utilizing photography. Thus baseline photography is currently used in a majority of academic dermatology programmes as an aid in the early detection of melanoma.

The incidence and mortality rates of melanoma have risen for many decades in the United States. Increased exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is generally considered to be responsible. Sunburns, a measure of excess sun exposure, have been identified as a risk factor for the development of melanoma. Because sunburns are primarily due to UVB (280-320 nm) radiation, UVB has been implicated as a potential contributing factor to the pathogenesis of melanoma. The adverse role of UVA (320-400 nm) in this regard is less well studied, and currently there is a great deal of controversy regarding the relationship between UVA exposure and the development of melanoma. This article reviews evidence in the English-language literature that surrounds the controversy concerning a possible role for UVA in the origin of melanoma. Our search found that UVA causes DNA damage via photosensitized reactions that result in the production of oxygen radical species. UVA can induce mutations in various cultured cell lines. Furthermore, in two animal models, the hybrid Xiphophorus fish and the opossum (Mondelphis domestica), melanomas and melanoma precursors can be induced with UVA. UVA radiation has been reported to produce immunosuppression in laboratory animals and in humans. Some epidemiologic studies have reported an increase in melanomas in users of sunbeds and sunscreens and in patients exposed to psoralen and UVA (PUVA) therapy. There is basic scientific evidence of the harmful effects of UVA on DNA, cells and animals. Collectively, these data suggest a potential role for UVA in the pathogenesis of melanoma. To date evidence from epidemiologic studies and clinical observations are inconclusive but seem to be consistent with this hypothesis. Additional research on the possible role of UVA in the pathogenesis of melanoma is required.

Laboratory tests and imaging studies are often ordered for asymptomatic patients with malignant melanomas (MMs) in an effort to detect subclinical metastatic disease. However, their sensitivity and specificity for detecting cryptic metastases are not well established. A review of the literature on laboratory tests and imaging studies for MM metastases was undertaken to address the usefulness of such investigations in asymptomatic patients with MM in AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer system of classification) stages I, II, and III. A review of the pertinent literature since 1966 was conducted through MEDLINE, Medica, and Cancerlit. Laboratory tests and imaging studies revealed occult MM metastases in only a small number of the thousands of reported patients with putative AJCC stage I, II, and III MM. However, for those diagnosed with limited metastases, surgical removal with or without immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy can lead to long-term remissions in some patients. For patients with asymptomatic AJCC stage I or II disease, chest roentgenograms (CXR) and blood lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels may be obtained at low cost and prove to be of benefit if metastases are identified. For patients with AJCC stage III disease, computed tomographic (CT) scans of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis (especially when the primary cutaneous site of the melanoma is below the waist) may be considered for detecting metastatic MM. Other tests, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of the brain, may be ordered based on symptoms or physical findings. In the future, technologically improved techniques and newer methods may prove cost-effective for detecting treatable asymptomatic MM metastases. Furthermore, improvement in treatments will also influence the indications for the search for occult MM metastases. At this time there is a need for an international consensus conference on laboratory tests and imaging studies for occult melanoma metastases.

Background: During the past few decades there has been increasing interest and training in dermatologic surgery., Objective: Our purpose was to determine to what extent members of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) are involved in the surgical management of patients with malignant melanomas (MMs), comparing 1982 with 1992., Methods: Members of the AAD practicing in the United States (N = 7412) were sent a questionnaire that surveyed their role in the definitive treatment of patients with MMs and the surgical margins of normal-appearing skin that they used or recommended for melanomas of various thicknesses., Results: Sixty-four percent of the respondents stated that they performed the definitive surgery for in situ melanoma in 1992, a 14% increase from 1982. Although a significantly greater percentage of dermatologists were performing the definitive surgery for invasive melanoma in 1992 (28%) compared with 1982 (14%), the majority continued to refer their patients to surgical colleagues for definitive treatment. There has been a narrowing of surgical margins recommended or used for melanomas of all thicknesses. In addition, regional differences of the role of the dermatologist in surgical management of patients with MM were observed., Conclusion: An increasing proportion of dermatologists are involved in the surgical management of patients with MMs. Most dermatologists appear to be in accord with the guidelines for surgical margins currently recommended in the literature.

Background: The incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) has rapidly increased during the past five decades. Relatively little information is available on whether the role of the dermatologist has increased concomitantly in the surgical management of this cancer., Objective: Our purpose was to learn how members of the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD) treat patients with lesions highly suspected as being MM and how the management of these patients may have changed over the past decade. This, the first of a two-part series, concerns biopsies., Methods: The data for the study were collected by means of a questionnaire that was sent to all members of the AAD practicing in the United States (N = 7412)., Results: A total of 2991 valid questionnaires were returned, a response rate of 40%. The majority of respondents (89% in 1982; 90% in 1992) stated that they performed the biopsies of pigmented lesions suspected of being MMs. Excisional biopsy was the preferred technique (58% in 1982; 68% in 1992). The type of biopsy and who performed the initial biopsy of a suspected MM were associated with the following factors: (1) the number of years in practice, (2) the type of practice, and (3) whether the dermatologist subsequently performed the definitive surgery for the MM. Regional variations in biopsy practices were also noted., Conclusion: Most AAD dermatologists who responded to the questionnaire perform the biopsies of lesions highly suspected of being MM. During the last decade an increasing proportion of dermatologists are performing excisional biopsies rather than other types of biopsies for such lesions.

Background: The incidence of malignant melanoma (MM) in the United States (US) must be known to accurately evaluate the costs that MM imposes on the health care system and society in general. Furthermore, knowledge of the incidence is needed to determine the benefit of MM prevention programs., Objective: To obtain an estimate of the incidence of MM in the US., Methods: The data for this study were collected by means of a questionnaire that was sent to all members of the American Academy of Dermatology practicing in the US (N = 7412)., Results: Based on the mean number of MMs seen annually per dermatologist in each state and the number of dermatologists per state, the number of new in situ and invasive MMs in the US in 1992 was calculated to be 80,000. This translates to an incidence of 32 MMs per 100,000 persons., Conclusions: Our estimate of 80,000 new MMs diagnosed in 1992 in the US suggests that MM places much greater burdens on the US health care system and society than that based on current published estimates.

Background: This study was designed to determine the risk of developing malignant melanoma (MM) in patients with a history of basal cell and/or squamous cell skin cancer (BCC/SCC) and to determine whether surveillance efforts can be directed toward these patients for the detection of early MMs., Methods: The study cohort was followed by annual total cutaneous examination (TCE). Controls consisted of individuals from the United States population matched for age, sex, and length of follow-up. The anatomic locations of the study cohorts' newly diagnosed MMs were plotted on an anatomic chart. The setting was a private dermatology practice. Two hundred, ninety consecutive white patients with a history of BCC/SCC but with no personal or family history of MM were followed by annual TCEs. The main outcome measures were the relative risk of developing MM and their prognosis., Results: Ten of the 290 patients developed an MM within an average of 109 months of follow-up (range, 3-17 years). All MMs were less than 0.70 mm in Breslow thickness and 80% occurred on usually clothed cutaneous sites. The expected number of MMs in the control population was 0.59 (P = 0.006), resulting in a relative risk of 17., Conclusion: Patients with BCC/SCC skin cancer are at substantial increased risk for developing MM. Regular and life-long surveillance TCE is an inexpensive and effective method for detecting curable MMs in such patients.