Search

Editorial. Focuses on the use of stethoscope in the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases in the United States. Historical background of auscultation; Development phonocardiography; Minimal use of cardial auscultation in the country.

Diseases of heads of state can affect national policy. Yet, cases of cover-up are numerous and involve not only dictatorships but also open and democratic societies. No system of full disclosure is currently in place to ensure that the public has access to all the information needed to establish whether a candidate to the presidency or an elected leader can discharge the powers and duties of the office. Hence, this essay reviews how the illnesses of democratically elected heads of state have changed history; addresses how to ensure greater transparency, so that leaders will not only be unable to conceal incapacitating disabilities, but also be removed from office once impaired; and lastly discusses how illness does not necessarily imply incapacitation, even though separating the two might often be difficult. These are issues of great relevance to national politics and medical ethics. They are particularly important as the 2020 presidential election is underway, and four out of the five leading candidates are well into their 70s.

In view of many changes taking place in today's health care marketplace, the theme of empathy in health provider-patient relations needs to be revisited. It has been proposed that patients benefit when all members of the health care team provide empathic care. Despite the role of empathy in patient outcomes, empirical research on empathy among health professionals is scarce partly because of a lack of a psychometrically sound tool to measure it. In this study, we briefly describe the development and validation of the Jefferson Scale of Physician Empathy (JSPE), an instrument that was specifically developed to measure empathy among health professionals (20 Likert-type items). The purpose of this study was to compare nurses and physicians on their responses to the JSPE. Study participants were 56 female registered nurses and 42 female physicians in the Internal Medicine postgraduate medical education program at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital. The reliability coefficients (Chronbach's coefficient alpha) were 0.87 for the nurses and 0.89 for physicians. Results of t test showed no significant difference between nurses and physicians on total scores of the JSPE; however, multivariate analyses of variance indicated statistically significant differences between the two groups on 5 of 20 items of the JSPE. Findings suggest that the JSPE is a reliable research tool that can be used to assess empathy among health professionals including nurses.

Objective: To survey the teaching time and importance given to cardiopulmonary auscultation during internal medicine (IM) and family practice (FP) residencies, and to compare current practices to those of the early 1990s., Design: A nationwide mail survey of IM and FP program directors (PDs)., Setting: All Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-accredited IM and FP residencies., Participants: A total of 538 of 939 PDs (57.5%)., Measurements and Main Results: In contrast to the early 1990s, when there had been no significant difference in teaching practices between IM and FP programs, more IM than FP residencies taught cardiopulmonary auscultation in 1999 (cardiac auscultation: IM residencies, 48%; FP residencies, 29.2% [p < 0.001]; pulmonary auscultation: IM residencies, 23.7%; FP residencies, 12.2% [p < 0.001]). Across the decade there also had been a significant increase in the percentage of IM programs offering structured education in chest auscultation (cardiac auscultation increase, 27.1 to 48% [p < 0.001]; pulmonary auscultation increase, 14.1 to 23.7% [p < 0.02]), but no significant changes for FP residencies. IM PDs gave more clinical importance to auscultation and expressed a greater desire for expanded teaching than did their counterparts in FP programs., Conclusions: This study indicates a significant gain over the last decade in the percentage of IM residencies offering structured teaching of cardiopulmonary auscultation. This same gain did not occur for FP programs. Whether these differences in attitudes and teaching practices will translate into improved auscultatory proficiency of IM trainees will need to be determined.

Structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation is greatly underrepresented during internal medicine (IM) or family practice (FP) training. It is not known, however, whether this underrepresentation applies to the other major field of primary care, pediatrics. To answer this question, we surveyed all accredited U.S. residencies in pediatrics by mailing a 1-page questionnaire to 174 pediatrics program directors, and by comparing results to those previously gathered from internal medicine and family practice residencies. Pediatrics directors' response rate was 62%. More pediatrics than family practice residencies offered structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation (21.5% vs. 9.7%, P < 0.004). When compared to internal medicine programs, this difference showed a trend toward significance (21.5% for pediatrics and 14.1%, for internal medicine, P = 0.08). Teaching modalities included: lectures (91.2%); audiotapes (13%); seminars (8.3%); and miscellaneous (21.7%). University-affiliated residencies taught auscultation significantly more frequently than nonuniversity-affiliated programs (25.4% vs.10.5%, P = 0.07). Pediatrics directors gave great importance to pulmonary auscultation, and wished for more time devoted to its teaching (5.52 +/- 0.84 and 5.01 +/- 1.07, respectively, on a 1-6 scale, with 6 indicating the highest value). They also attributed great clinical importance to 13 commonly encountered pulmonary auscultatory events (all rated, on average, between 4-5.8 on a 1-6 scale, with 6 indicating highest importance). In summary, training programs in pediatrics offered significantly more structured teaching of pulmonary auscultation than IM or FP residencies. Whether this difference in teaching may have a beneficial impact on the auscultatory proficiency of pediatric residents, as compared to internal medicine and family practice trainees, needs to be determined., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Context: Medical educators have had a growing sense that proficiency in physical diagnostic skills is waning, but few data have examined the question critically., Objective, Design, and Setting: To compare the cardiac auscultatory proficiency of medical students and physicians in training. A multicenter cross-sectional assessment of students and house staff. A total of 8 internal medicine and 23 family practice programs of the mid-Atlantic area., Participants: A total of 453 physicians in training and 88 medical students., Interventions: All participants listened to 12 cardiac events directly recorded from patients, which they identified by completing a multiple-choice questionnaire., Main Outcome Measures: scores were expressed as the percentage of participants, for year and type of training, who correctly identified each event. Cumulative scores were expressed as the total number of events correctly recognized. An adjusted score was calculated whenever participants selected not only the correct finding but also findings that are acoustically similar and yet absent., Results: Trainees' cumulative scores ranged between 0 and 7 for both internal medicine and family practice residents (median, 2.5 and 2.0, respectively). Internal medicine residents had the highest cumulative adjusted scores for the 6 extra sounds and for all 12 cardiac events tested (P=.01 and .02, respectively). On average, internal medicine and family practice residents recognized 20% of all cardiac events; the number of correct identifications improved little with year of training and was not significantly higher than the number identified by medical students., Conclusions: Both internal medicine and family practice trainees had a disturbingly low identification rate for 12 important and commonly encountered cardiac events. This study suggests a need to improve the teaching and assessment of cardiac auscultation during generalists' training, particularly with the advent of managed care and its search for more cost-effective uses of technology.

Objectives: To assess the time and importance given to cardiac auscultation during internal medicine and cardiology training and to evaluate the auscultatory proficiency of medical students and physicians-in-training., Study Design: A nationwide survey of internal medicine and cardiology program directors and a multicenter cross-sectional assessment of students' and housestaff's auscultatory proficiency., Setting: All accredited U.S. internal medicine and cardiology programs and nine university-affiliated internal medicine and cardiology programs., Participants: Four hundred ninety-eight (75.6%) of all 659 directors surveyed; 203 physicians-in-training and 49 third-year medical students., Interventions: Directors completed a 23-item questionnaire, and students and trainees were tested on 12 prerecorded cardiac events., Main Outcome Measures: The teaching and proficiency of cardiac auscultation at all levels of training., Results: Directors attributed great importance to cardiac auscultation and thought that more time should be spent teaching it. However, only 27.1% of internal medicine and 37.1% of cardiology programs offered any structured teaching of auscultation (P = 0.02). Programs without teaching were more likely to be large, university affiliated, and located in the northeast. The trainees' accuracy ranged from 0 to 56.2% for cardiology fellows (median, 21.9%) and from 2% to 36.8% for medical residents (median, 19.3%). Residents improved little with year of training and were never better than third-year medical students., Conclusions: A low emphasis on cardiac auscultation appears to have affected the proficiency of medical trainees. Our study raises concern about the future of this time-honored art and, possibly, other bedside diagnostic skills.