Search

Farmers' investment in more efficient irrigation systems represents a primary adaptation strategy when confronting climate change. However, the regional benefits of these investments and their influence on the conflicting demands among different water dependent stakeholders for intensely irrigated regions remains an open question. Using the Pacific Northwest of the United States as an illustrative region of focus, we show that higher irrigation efficiency has diverse effects across stakeholders that are contingent on many local climatic, institutional and infrastructural factors such as the availability of water storage, the location of hydropower generators, and water rights. These complexities limit simple abstractions of irrigation efficiency as broader policy challenge and are central to its inclusion within the class of "wicked problems". Additionally, we argue that the widely used rebound effect concept, which implicitly discourages irrigation efficiency supporting policies, should not be assumed to fully capture the nuances of the complex suite of regional impacts that emerge from irrigation efficiency investments. Consequently, the evaluation of irrigation efficiency investments requires a broader framing across a diversity of perspectives. policies and actions that are pluralistic, context-specific, and closely engage various groups of stakeholders in the policymaking process. • Climate change impacts on supply and demand will interact with IE effects. • Higher IE improves the overall performance of agricultural systems during droughts. • IE can generate complex and path-dependent implications for various stakeholders. • Efficiency policymakers should consider region-specific institutional contexts. • The Rebound Effect concept can oversimplify IE impacts and lead to biased policies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Land surface models such as the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5) seek to enhance understanding of terrestrial hydrology and aid in the evaluation of anthropogenic and climate change impacts. However, the effects of parametric uncertainty on CLM5 hydrologic predictions across regions, timescales, and flow regimes have yet to be explored in detail. The common use of the default hydrologic model parameters in CLM5 risks generating streamflow predictions that may lead to incorrect inferences for important dynamics and/or extremes. In this study, we benchmark CLM5 streamflow predictions relative to the commonly employed default hydrologic parameters for 464 headwater basins over the conterminous United States (CONUS). We evaluate baseline CLM5 default parameter performance relative to a large (1,307) Latin Hypercube Sampling‐based diagnostic comparison of streamflow prediction skill using over 20 error measures. We provide a global sensitivity analysis that clarifies the significant spatial variations in parametric controls for CLM5 streamflow predictions across regions, temporal scales, and error metrics of interest. The baseline CLM5 shows relatively moderate to poor streamflow prediction skill in several CONUS regions, especially the arid Southwest and Central U.S. Hydrologic parameter uncertainty strongly affects CLM5 streamflow predictions, but its impacts vary in complex ways across U.S. regions, timescales, and flow regimes. Overall, CLM5's surface runoff and soil water parameters have the largest effects on simulated high flows, while canopy water and evaporation parameters have the most significant effects on the water balance. Plain Language Summary: Large‐scale land surface computer models, such as the Community Land Model version 5 (CLM5), play a central role in projecting future changes in water resources and hydrological extreme events such as floods and droughts. These models require representations of land surface processes and properties that vary significantly across space. Consequently, these representations require a large suite of input parameters to distinguish different soils, vegetation, land‐cover, and other features of the landscape that shape flood and drought dynamics. Given the large number of these input parameters required by CLM5 and limits in the information needed to specify them, we hypothesize that they strongly increase uncertainty in our ability to predict floods or droughts. In this study, we develop and apply a diagnostic approach to better understand how CLM5 input parameter uncertainty influences water predictions and the relative importance of different input parameters across the continental United States. We argue and illustrate that addressing model input parameter uncertainty is crucial as the results of uncertainty characterization may have important implications for decision making. This study provides region‐specific insights into CLM5 model input parameter uncertainty and dominant processes for a variety of hydrologic application contexts. Key Points: Community Land Model Version 5 (CLM5) streamflow predictions use default parameters are vulnerable to poor performance especially in the arid Southwest and Central U.SThe effects of CLM5 hydrologic parameter uncertainty are significantly higher for drought versus flood predictions in humid regionsThe dominant hydrologic parameters in CLM5 vary significantly across regions, diagnostic error metrics, and temporal scales [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]