Search

Background Talazoparib is a poly (adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor approved for the treatment of adult patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA -mutated (g BRCA m), HER2-negative, locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (LA/mBC), with approval based on the EMBRACA trial. To date, there are no published data on talazoparib use in the real-world United States (USA) setting. Patients and Methods Characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes of real-world US patients with g BRCA m HER2-negative LA/mBC treated with talazoparib monotherapy were collected via retrospective chart review and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Among 84 eligible patients, 35.7% had hormone receptor-positive tumors and 64.3% had triple-negative LA/mBC (TNBC). At talazoparib initiation, 29.8% had ECOG PS of ≥2 and 19.0% had brain metastasis. Mutations in g BRCA1 or 2 were detected among 64.3% and 35.7% of patients, respectively. Talazoparib was given as 1st-line therapy in 14.3% of patients, 2nd-line in 40.5%, and 3rd- or 4th-line in 45.2%. Median time to talazoparib treatment failure was 8.5 months (95% CI, 8.0-9.7), median progression-free survival was 8.7 months (95% CI, 8.0-9.9), the median time from initiation to chemotherapy was 12.2 months (95% CI, 10.5-20.1), and the overall response rate was 63.1%. No differences in clinical outcomes were observed between patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative LA/mBC and patients with TNBC by using unadjusted statistical comparisons. Brain metastasis and ECOG PS ≥2 at talazoparib initiation were associated with treatment failure and progression or mortality. Conclusion Overall, talazoparib clinical outcomes in this real-world population are consistent with findings from EMBRACA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors have recently been shown to be effective for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2—negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC) who have a germline mutation in their breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2mut). This study evaluated differences in patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and BRCA1/2mut testing within the United States (US), European Union 4 (EU4; France, Germany, Italy, and Spain), and Israel in a real-world patient population with HER2− ABC. In the US, EU4, and Israel, 73%, 42%, and 99% of patients were tested for BRCA1/2mut, respectively. In the US and the EU4, patients who were not tested versus tested for BRCA1/2mut were more likely to have hormone receptor–positive (HR+)/HER2− ABC than triple-negative breast cancer, less likely to have a known family history of BRCA1/2-related cancer and were older. Efforts should be made to improve BRCA1/2 testing rates in the US and Europe. Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors are approved to treat patients harboring a germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 mutation (BRCA1/2mut) with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2—negative (HER2−) advanced breast cancer (ABC). This study evaluated differences in patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and BRCA1/2mut testing within the United States (US), European Union 4 (EU4; France, Germany, Italy, and Spain), and Israel in a real-world population of patients with HER2− ABC. Oncologists provided chart data from eligible patients from October 2019 through March 2020. In the US, EU4, and Israel, 73%, 42%, and 99% of patients were tested for BRCA1/2mut, respectively. In the US and the EU4, patients who were not tested versus tested for BRCA1/2mut were more likely to have hormone receptor—positive (HR+)/HER2− ABC (US, 94% vs. 74%, p < 0.001; EU4, 96% vs. 78%, p < 0.001), less likely to have a known family history of BRCA1/2-related cancer (US, 6% vs. 19%, p = 0.002; EU4, 10% vs. 28%, p < 0.001), and were older (US, 68.9 vs. 62.5 years, p < 0.001; EU4, 66.7 vs. 58.0 years, p < 0.001). Among tested patients, genetic counseling was received by 45%, 53%, and 98% with triple-negative breast cancer, and 36%, 36%, and 98% with HR+/HER2− ABC in the US, EU4, and Israel, respectively. Efforts should be made to improve BRCA1/2 testing rates in the US and Europe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Talazoparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved in the US for HER2-negative germline BRCA1/2-mutated (gBRCA1/2mut) locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer. Approval was based on results from the Phase 3 EMBRACA trial comparing efficacy and safety of talazoparib (1 mg/day) to physician's choice of therapy ([PCT]; capecitabine, eribulin, gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) in patients with HER2-negative gBRCA1/2mut locally advanced/ metastatic breast cancer. Objectives: The purpose of this analysis was to describe efficacy and safety outcomes of talazoparib vs PCT in US patients included in the pivotal EMBRACA study. Methods: Clinical findings from US patients enrolled in EMBRACA were analyzed. Patient characteristics, progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety/adverse events (AEs) were among the parameters assessed. Results: Of 431 randomized patients, 156 patients (36%) were from the US (talazoparib: 99 patients; PCT: 57 patients). Patient characteristics were balanced, although a higher percentage in the talazoparib arm had more poor prognostic features (e.g. triple-negative breast cancer, disease-free interval <12 months, and more disease sites). A total of 53 patients (53.5%) had hormone receptor (HR)+ breast cancer in the talazoparib arm and 37 patients (64.9%) had HR+ breast cancer in the PCT arm. Talazoparib improved PFS (median 9.0 [95% confi- dence interval (CI), 7.0-12.9] months) vs PCT (median 5.8 [95% CI, 4.2-6.7] months); hazard ratio (HR [95% CI]), 0.5 (0.3-0.7). ORR occurred in 51 patients (63.0%) receiving talazoparib and 11 patients (24.4%) receiving PCT. CBR was 68.7% (95% CI, 58.6-77.6) for talazoparib and 33.3% (95% CI, 21.4-47.1) for PCT; odds ratio (95% CI), 4.7 (2.2-10.6). Median duration of response was 5.0 months and 3.1 months for talazoparib and PCT, respectively. The most common AEs in the talazoparib arm included anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, fatigue, nausea, alopecia, and headache; hematologic grade 3/4 AEs occurred more often than nonhematologic AEs. Six out of 99 (6.1%) patients in the talazoparib arm and 6/43 (14.0%) patients in the PCT arm discontinued treatment. Conclusions: In US patients with HER2-negative gBRCA1/2mut locally advanced/metastatic breast cancer, talazoparib demonstrated significant improvements in outcomes vs PCT with a manageable safety profile. Note: © 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting. All rights reserved. Clinical trial identification: NCT01945775 Funding: This study was sponsored by Medivation, which was acquired by Pfizer in September 2016. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Genetic mutations in breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (BRCA1/2) confer a high risk for developing breast cancer; however, at least 50% of women with BRCA1/2 mutations go undiagnosed. This study evaluated differences in patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and BRCA1/2 mutation testing in the USA, European Union (EU4), and Israel in a real-world population of patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Methods: This study was a retrospective analysis of data from the Adelphi Real World ABC Disease Specific Programme in the USA, EU4, and Israel. Medical oncologists completed a patient record form, which included detailed questions on demographics, clinical assessments and outcomes, and treatment history. Eligible patients were at least 18 years of age and receiving therapy for stage IIIb-IV ABC., Results: Among the 2527 study patients, 407 were from the USA, 1926 were from the EU4, and 194 were from Israel; 86% had hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- ABC and 14% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Israeli patients had a higher rate of family history of BRCA-related cancer (69%) compared with patients in the EU4 (18%; p < 0.0001) and USA (18%; p < 0.0001). Among patients with HR+/HER2- ABC, the BRCA1/2 testing rate was 99% in Israel, 37% in the EU4, and 68% in the USA (p < 0.0001 vs Israel and the EU4). The age of tested patients was significantly younger in Israel (56 years) compared with the EU4 (59 years; p = 0.016 vs Israel) and USA (64 years; p < 0.0001 vs Israel and the EU4). Among patients with TNBC, the BRCA1/2 testing rate was 100% in Israel, 78% in the EU4 (p < 0.0001 vs Israel), and 93% in the USA (p < 0.002 vs the EU4). Among tested patients, genetic counseling rates were also higher in Israel (98%) compared with the EU4 (40%; p < 0.0001) and USA (38%; p < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Testing and genetic counseling rates for BRCA1/2 mutations were very high in Israel, potentially due to the high rate of family history of BRCA-related cancer in this population and higher general awareness of genetic testing. In the EU4 and USA, overall rates of testing for BRCA1/2 mutations and genetic counseling were significantly lower compared with Israel. Given the high risk of breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and the efficacy of new therapies in treating ABC with a BRCA1/2 mutation, efforts should be made to improve BRCA1/2 testing rates in Europe and the USA., (© 2022. Pfizer Inc.)

Background: In clinical trials, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) versus chemotherapy resulted in significantly improved progression-free survival, manageable adverse event profiles, and favorable patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) and germline BRCA1/2 mutations (gBRCA1/2mut). The objective of this study was to evaluate PROs and physician satisfaction with treatment in patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC receiving PARPi or physician's choice of chemotherapy in a multi-country, real-world setting., Methods: This retrospective analysis used data from the Adelphi Real World ABC Disease Specific Programmes in the United States, European Union, and Israel. PROs were assessed at a single timepoint using the EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Level (EQ-5D-5L) scale, Cancer Therapy Satisfaction Questionnaire (CTSQ), and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the breast cancer-specific module (QLQ-BR23). Baseline PROs were not assessed. Physician satisfaction with treatment scores was dichotomized to a 0/1 variable (0 = very dissatisfied/dissatisfied/moderately satisfied; 1 = satisfied/very satisfied). Scores were compared using inverse-probability-weighted regression adjustment, controlling for multiple confounding factors., Results: The study included 96 patients (PARPi, n = 38; platinum/non-platinum-based chemotherapy, n = 58). Patients receiving PARPi versus chemotherapy reported significantly better scores on the EQ-5D-5L Health Utility Index. On the EORTC QLQ-C30 functional scales, patients receiving PARPi reported significantly better scores (mean ± SE) for physical functioning (80.0 ± 2.4 vs 71.9 ± 3.4; p < 0.05) and social functioning (82.0 ± 6.2 vs 63.6 ± 3.7; p < 0.05) and, on the symptom scales, reported significantly better scores for constipation (1.9 ± 1.8 vs 18.7 ± 3.2; p < 0.001), breast symptoms (0.4 ± 3.9 vs 13.3 ± 2.6; p < 0.01), arm symptoms (2.6 ± 1.3 vs 11.4 ± 2.4; p = 0.001), and systemic therapy side effects (13.5 ± 1.8 vs 29.4 ± 2.3; p < 0.001). In contrast, patients receiving chemotherapy scored significantly better on the nausea/vomiting scale (18.3 ± 2.8 vs 34.5 ± 5.1; p < 0.01). Patients receiving PARPi reported numerically better satisfaction scores on the CTSQ scales. Physicians were more likely to be satisfied/very satisfied with PARPi versus chemotherapy (95.4% ± 7.3% vs 40.8% ± 6.2%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: The PRO findings in this real-world population of patients with gBRCA1/2mut HER2- ABC complement those from the pivotal clinical trials, providing further support for treatment with PARPi in these patients., (© 2022. Pfizer Inc.)

Background: Current guidelines for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2‒negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC) are informed by tumor characteristics and include platinum- and non-platinum-based chemotherapy, chemotherapy plus immunotherapy, endocrine monotherapy, or endocrine therapy plus a targeted therapy. In addition, poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) have recently demonstrated improved clinical and patient-reported outcomes and manageable toxicity profiles compared with chemotherapy in patients with germline breast cancer susceptibility gene 1 or 2 (gBRCA1/2)‒mutated HER2- ABC in clinical trials and are now approved to treat this patient population. This study provides complementary real-world data regarding treatment patterns, adverse events, and physician-reported treatment satisfaction in this population., Methods: This retrospective analysis using the Adelphi Real World ABC Disease Specific Programme in the United States, European Union, and Israel included patients aged ≥18 years receiving therapy for stage IIIb or IV gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2- ABC. Oncologists completed a patient record form detailing patient demographics, clinical assessments, and treatment history and a survey regarding their use of and satisfaction with treatments., Results: Among the 543 patients, mean age was 55 years, 25% were premenopausal, 70% had hormone receptor‒positive (HR+) ABC, and 30% had triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). PARPi were used in 5%, 11%, and 12% of first-line, second-line, and third-line therapies, respectively, for patients with HR+ ABC; for TNBC, percentages were 18%, 44%, and 36%. Across treatment lines, neutropenia, anemia, and nausea occurred in 16%, 24%, and 32% of patients receiving PARPi, respectively; 22%, 38%, and 33% of patients receiving platinum chemotherapy; and 20%, 20%, and 33% of patients receiving non-platinum-based chemotherapy. Physician satisfaction was highest with PARPi and with chemotherapy plus immunotherapy., Conclusions: Findings in this real-world population complement clinical trial observations and provide further support for treatment of patients with PARPi in gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2- ABC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest RM contracted research funding from Genentech and acted as consultant for Agendia, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Biotheranostics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Immunomedics, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma, Sanofi, and SeaGen. AN and BA are employees of and own stock in Pfizer Inc. KL, AR, and LM are employees of Adelphi Real World. MPL received honoraria for lectures, consulting, or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Exact Sciences, Gilead, Grünenthal, Medac, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar, Pierre Fabre, and Roche and travel and accommodations expenses from Pfizer and Roche., (Copyright © 2022 The Pfizer, The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)