Purpose: To investigate differences between women and men in the repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments (RRDs) in the United States., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: Setting: A large insurance claims database., Participants: Subjects with an incident RRD between 2007 and 2015., Data: Demographic data, comorbid ocular conditions associated with RRD, systemic comorbidities, and surgical intervention (pneumatic retinopexy [PR], pars plana vitrectomy [PPV], laser barricade, or scleral buckle [SB]) were collected., Main Outcome Measures: Odds of receipt of surgical intervention for incident RRD, time to repair, type of intervention, and the rate of reoperation by sex., Results: The study period included 133 million eligible records with 61,071 cases of incident RRD among which 43% (n = 26,289) were women. The primary outcome model had 23,933 confirmed RRD cases with a 93% retinal detachment repair rate. Women had 34% reduced odds of receipt of surgical repair of an RRD (odds ratio [OR] 0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59, 0.73; P < .001) after adjusting for confounders. This effect persisted in all sensitivity models. Among patients who received repair, women were more often delayed (0.17 days, P = .04). Women were more likely to undergo primary laser barricade (relative risk ratio [RRR] 1.68, P < .001), primary SB (RRR 1.15, P < .001), and PR (RRR 1.07, P < .04) than men. The odds of reoperation were lower in women (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85, 0.96; P = .002) after adjustment., Conclusions: Insured women are less likely than insured men to receive surgical intervention for an RRD. Based on the results of this study, if the odds of repair were equal between women and men in the United States, then 781 more women would receive surgery each year, or 7,029 more during the study period. Women are more likely to have the repair performed with scleral buckle, laser barricade, and pneumatic retinopexy. The reason for these sex differences in RRD repair remains unknown and requires further investigation., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)