Search

Importance: To date, the risk of developing second primary cancers (SPCs) after the first primary melanoma has not been studied in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs)., Objective: To assess differences in the risk of SPCs in patients with primary melanoma before (2005-2010) and after (2011-2016) the introduction and approval of ICIs., Design, Setting, and Participants: Population-based cohort study using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from January 2005 to December 2016 of patients diagnosed with metastatic melanoma. Data were analyzed from January 4 to June 30, 2020., Exposures: Receipt of immunotherapy or other anticancer agents., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the development of second primary cancers in patients with melanoma. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated for the development of SPCs before and after the introduction of ICIs., Results: Among 5016 patients with diagnosed metastatic melanoma, 2888 (58%) were younger than 65 years at the time of diagnosis, and 3441 (69%) were male. From 2005 to 2010, SIRs were 3.24 (95% CI, 0.08-18.04) for small intestine cancer, 1.93 (95% CI, 1.14-3.05) for lung and bronchus cancer, 2.77 (95% CI, 1.02-6.03) for kidney cancer, and 7.29 (95% CI, 2.93-15.02) for myeloma. From 2011 to 2016, SIRs were 9.23 (95% CI, 1.12-33.35) for small intestine cancer, 1.54 (95% CI, 0.71-2.93) for lung and bronchus cancer, 2.66 (95% CI, 0.73-6.82) for kidney cancer, and 5.90 (95% CI, 1.61-15.10) for myeloma. The overall risk of developing SPCs in individuals who survived the first primary melanoma was 65% higher (SIR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.35-2.00) in the pre-ICIs period and 98% higher (SIR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.57-2.45) in the post-ICIs period than the overall cancer incidence rate in the general population., Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, an increase in the overall risk of second primary cancers after melanoma after the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors was observed. The pattern of SPCs has been altered in the era of systemic therapy. Close monitoring and screening for SPCs may be warranted in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Purpose: Recent studies have revealed that breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT) led to better survival than mastectomy in some populations. We compared the efficacy of BCS+RT and mastectomy using the National Cancer Database (NCDB, USA)., Results: A total of 160,880 patients with a median follow-up of 43.4 months were included. The respective 8-year OS values were 86.5%, 72.3% and 70.4% in the BCS+RT, mastectomy alone and mastectomy+RT group, respectively (P < 0.001). After exclusion of patients with comorbidities, mastectomy (alone or with RT) remained associated with a lower OS in N0 and N1 patients. However, the OS of mastectomy+RT was equivalent to BCS+RT in N2-3 patients. Among patients aged 50 or younger, the OS benefit of BCS+RT over mastectomy alone was statistically significant (HR1.42, 95% CI 1.16-1.74), but not clinically significant (<5%) in N0 patients, whereas in N2-3 patients, the OS of BCS+RT was equivalent to mastectomy+RT (85.2% vs. 84.8%). The results of the propensity analysis were similar., Methods: Non-metastatic breast cancers in the NCDB from 2004-2011 were identified.The Kaplan-Meier method, Coxregression and propensity score analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) among patients with BCS+RT, mastectomy alone and mastectomy+RT., Conclusions: BCS+RT resulted in improved OS compared with mastectomy ± RT in N0 and N1 patients. In N2-3 patients, BCS+RT has an OS similar to mastectomy+RT when patients with comorbidities were excluded. Among patients aged 50 or younger, the OS of BCS+RT is equivalent to mastectomy ± RT.

Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) characterized by late diagnosis and poor outcomes represents the commonest malignancy of biliary tract. Understanding metachronous cancer associations may achieve earlier detection. We aimed to evaluate the risk of subsequent CCAs among common cancer survivors. The National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-2010) was reviewed for patients with 1 of the 25 primary cancers. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated as an approximation of relative risk for subsequent CCAs after primary malignancy. Data were stratified by age at primary cancer diagnosis, latency period, and application of radiation. A total of 1487 patients developed subsequent CCAs. For patients diagnosed with primary cancers between the ages 20 and 39 years, the risk was increased among colon (SIR 14.65), gallbladder (129.29), and uterus (7.29) cancer survivors. At ages of 40 to 59 years, oral cavity and pharynx (1.89), stomach (3.24), colon (1.76), gallbladder (11.78), and lung cancers (1.75) were associated with increased risk. We found persistently elevated SIRs after colon and gallbladder cancer between ages 60 and 79 years. The SIR remained significant among gallbladder cancer survivors diagnosed after 80 years. Gallbladder cancer showed elevated risk at all of the latency periods except first 6 to 11 months. Increased risk of lung cancer (1.66) was detected after 120 months. However, radiation therapy did not contribute to increased risk. This population-based study suggests that several initial cancers are associated with elevated risk of CCA. The increased risk may be due to shared genetic or environmental etiological factors between these malignancies. Lower threshold for CCA surveillance may be warranted in high-risk patients.