Search

Background: Racial and ethnic disparities have been extensively reported across surgical specialties, highlighting existing healthcare inequities. Nevertheless, evidence is lacking regarding their influence on postoperative outcomes after head and neck reconstruction. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of race and ethnicity on postoperative complications in head and neck microvascular reconstruction., Methods: The ACS-NSQIP database was used to identify patients who underwent head and neck microvascular reconstruction between 2012 and 2022. Baseline characteristics were compared based on race (White, non-White) and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic). Group differences were assessed using t tests and Fisher Exact tests. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to evaluate postoperative complications between the groups. A Cochran-Armitage test was conducted to evaluate the significance of trends over time., Results: A total of 11,373 patients met inclusion criteria. Among them, 9,082 participants reported race, and 9,428 reported ethnicity. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that Hispanic patients were more likely to experience 30-day readmission (OR 6.7; 95% CI, 1.17-38.4; P=0.032) and had an average total length of stay of 5.25 days longer (95% CI, 0.84-9.65; P=0.020) compared with non-Hispanic patients. Additional subgroup analyses revealed higher rates of all readmissions among non-White patients, particularly those indicated by malignancy (OR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.1-1.4; P=0.002). No significant differences were found in mortality, reoperation rates, and operative times between racial and ethnic groups., Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that ethnicity may be a significant risk factor for readmission in head and neck microvascular reconstruction. However, future studies are needed to further clarify the impact of race and ethnicity on longer postoperative outcomes, particularly in head and neck cancer minorities., Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 by Mutaz B. Habal, MD.)

Background: Traumatic hand and wrist amputations are rare but debilitating injuries. Surgical replantation of the hand provides a unique alternative to revision surgery but requires appropriate access to necessary medical resources. This study aims to understand the national practice of replantation of traumatic hand amputation and to determine whether disparities exist in accessing surgical treatment., Methods: International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision codes for replantation and revision amputation surgeries were used to gather data from the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. Summary statistics were calculated on demographic, hospital, and outcome variables, with subanalysis performed for effect on replantation and revision rates., Results: Seventy-two patients were identified. The average patient was 35 years old with a strong male predominance (90%). The racial distribution of the cohort roughly mirrored the demographic proportions of race in the US population. Fifteen (21%) patients underwent replantation. This rate was similar between sexes, races, and income brackets. Hand replantation was primarily performed at large bed size (87%), private not-for-profit (73%), and urban teaching hospitals (94%). The most common insurance status for these patients was private, followed by Medicaid, Medicare, and self-pay. Forty-seven patients underwent revision amputation (65%) with no association between demographic characteristics. The patients remained hospitalized for significantly longer periods ( P = .0188) and paid significantly more ( P = .0014) if replanted. The patients were most frequently discharged home (65%), followed by skilled nursing facilities (18%)., Conclusion: This study describes the current state of hand amputation management and finds no evidence of sociodemographic factors influencing the surgical care provided., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Introduction: Research in gender-affirming chest surgery has primarily compared cisgender versus transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) people, without specifically addressing nonbinary people. This study will assess surgical complications between cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary adults undergoing breast reductions., Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases from 2015 to 2021 were used to identify TGD patients who underwent breast reduction (Current Procedural Terminology code: 19318) and cisgender patients who underwent this procedure for cosmesis or cancer prophylaxis. Analysis of variance tests, chi-squared tests, unpaired t-tests, and regression models compared complications among cisgender, transgender, and nonbinary patients., Results: A total of 1222 patients met the inclusion criteria: 380 (31.1%) were cisgender, 769 (62.9%) were transgender, and 73 (6.0%) were nonbinary. The proportion of TGD patients grew significantly relative to cisgender patients over the study period (P < 0.001). The overall all-cause complication rate was 3.4%, with 4.2% of cisgender, 1.4% of nonbinary, and 3.1% of transgender patients experiencing surgical complications. After adjusting for confounding variables, no statistically significant difference was observed in all-cause complication rates between the cohorts. In the sample, 19 transgender patients (2.5%) underwent reoperation. Transgender patients had a lower likelihood of wound complications (odds ratio: 0.172; 95% confidence interval: 0.035-0.849; P = 0.031) compared to cisgender patients and nonbinary patients. None of the patients experienced a severe systemic complication., Conclusions: The findings emphasize the growing demand and safety of gender-affirming breast reductions. They underscore the importance of continued research and tailored approaches to delivering care to nonbinary and transgender patients, addressing their diverse needs and improving access to gender-affirming surgeries., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-specific mortality in Hispanic women in the United States. Given the complexity of treatment options, disparities in access to quality care, and increased rates of inadequate or marginal health literacy within this population, these patients face significant barriers to informed decision-making. We aimed to assess the health literacy of Spanish breast cancer surgery websites., Methods: A web search using "cirugía de cancer de mama or seno" was performed to identify the top 20 websites in Spanish, divided on the basis of affiliation with academic centers or private institutions and by international/US region. Validated metrics were used to assess readability, understandability, actionability, and cultural sensitivity using Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook in Spanish, Patient Education and Materials Assessment for Understandability and Actionability, and Cultural Sensitivity and Assessment Tool, respectively., Results: Online materials in Spanish had a mean reading grade level of 10.9 (Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook in Spanish) for academic centers and 10.4 for private institutions. The average understandability score was significantly greater for academic centers at 77% compared with private institutions at 67% (P = .019). Actionability scores were low for both centers at 26% and 37%, respectively. The mean Cultural Sensitivity and Assessment Tool scores were 2.3 and 2.2, respectively., Conclusion: Current Spanish resources for breast cancer surgery are unfitting not only from a readability standpoint but also in their quality and cultural sensitivity. As the Latino population in the United States increases and online resources become more accessible, we must ensure that these resources cater to their target audience, bridging the health care access gap and empowering patients in decision-making., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is characterized by cardiometabolic abnormalities such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, or dyslipidemia. This study aims to evaluate the association of MetS on the postoperative outcomes of ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair using component separation., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify patients who underwent ventral, umbilical, and epigastric hernia repair with component separation between 2015 and 2021. MetS status was defined as patients receiving medical treatment for diabetes mellitus and hypertension, with a body mass index greater than 30 kg/m 2 . Propensity matching was performed to generate two balanced cohorts with and without MetS. T-tests and Fisher's Exact tests assessed group differences. Logistic regression models evaluated complications between the groups., Results: After propensity score matching, 3930 patients were included in the analysis, with 1965 in each group (MetS versus non-MetS). Significant differences were observed in the severity and clinical presentation of hernias between the groups. The MetS cohort had higher rates of incarcerated hernia (39.1% versus 33.2%; P < 0.001), and recurrent ventral hernia (42.7% versus 36.5%; P < 0.001) compared to the non-MetS cohort. The MetS group demonstrated significantly increased rates of renal insufficiency (P = 0.026), unplanned intubation (P = 0.003), cardiac arrest (P = 0.005), and reoperation rates (P = 0.002) than the non-MetS cohort. Logistic regression models demonstrated higher likelihood of postoperative complications in the MetS group, including mild systemic complications (OR 1.25; 95%CI 1.030-1.518; P = 0.024), severe systemic complications (OR 1.63; 95%CI 1.248-2.120; P < 0.001), and reoperation (OR 1.47; 95%CI 1.158-1.866; P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the rates of 30-d wound complications between groups., Conclusions: The presence of metabolic derangement appears to be associated with adverse postoperative medical outcomes and increased reoperation rates after hernia repair with component separation. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing preoperative comorbidities as surgeons counsel patients with MetS., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Gluteal augmentation with autologous fat grafting, colloquially referred to as Brazilian butt lift (BBL), is an increasingly common procedure with a highly reported complication profile., Objectives: In this study we aimed to analyze the prevalence and characteristics of complications that accompanied these surgeries at ambulatory surgery facilities., Methods: Adults patients who experienced fat grafting complications from 2019 to 2021 were identified in QUAD A, formerly known as the American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities (AAAASF, Highland Park, IL, USA), database. Patients and complications were analyzed based on sociodemographic, surgery-, and facility-specific variables with descriptive statistics and logistic regression., Results: Overall, 436 fat grafting procedures with complications were reported to QUAD A, with an overall complication rate of 0.94%. Of these complications, 164 (37.6%) were confirmed to be from gluteal augmentation procedures. Notably, the number of gluteal augmentation with fat grafting complications decreased from the year 2019 (48) to 2020 (36), then nearly doubled from 2020 to 2021 (69). The majority of patients were female (96.7%), with a mean age of 42.0 years and a mean BMI of 28.3 kg/m2. Wound infection was the most commonly documented complication (22.3%). Of the patients who experienced complications, 35.9% presented to a hospital for their complications and 12.6% required reoperation. Four deaths were described. There was no association between sociodemographic or surgical variables and increased odds of readmission or reoperation (P > .05), except for increasing surgeon number and reoperation (P = .02)., Conclusions: Gluteal augmentation accounts for a large proportion of complications from fat grafting procedures. Increased reporting requirements may aid in future determination of incidences of complications and improve patient safety., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Aesthetic Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Introduction: On most online platforms, just about anyone can disseminate plastic surgery (PS) content regardless of their educational or professional background. This study examines the general public's perceptions of the accuracy of online PS content and the factors that contribute to the discernment of credible information., Methods: The Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdsourcing platform was used to survey adults in the United States. The survey assessed respondent demographics, health literacy (HL), and perceptions of online PS content accuracy. T-tests, Chi-square tests, and post hoc analyses with Bonferroni corrections assessed differences between HL groups. Multivariate linear regressions assessed associations between sociodemographic variables and perceptions of online content., Results: In total, 428 (92.0%) of 465 complete responses were analyzed. The median age of respondents was 32 y (interquartile range: 29-40). Online sources were predominantly perceived to have a high degree of accuracy, with mean scores of various platforms ranging from 3.8 to 4.5 (1 = not accurate at all; 5 = extremely accurate). The low HL group perceived social media sites and review sites to be more accurate than the high HL respondents, particularly for Reddit (P = 0.004), Pinterest (P = 0.040), and Snapchat (P = 0.002)., Conclusions: There is a concerning relationship between low HL and the perceptions of the accuracy of online PS sources. This study underscores the need for education campaigns, the development of trustworthy online resources, and initiatives to improve HL. By fostering a more informed public, individuals seeking PS can make better informed decisions., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Recent CMS billing changes have raised concerns about insurance coverage for deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction. This study compared the costs and utilization of transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM), DIEP, and latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps in breast reconstruction., Method: The study utilized the National Inpatient Sample database to identify female patients who underwent DIEP, TRAM, and LD flap procedures from 2016 to 2019. Key data such as patient demographics, length of stay, complications, and costs (adjusted to 2021 USD) were analyzed, focusing on differences across the flap types., Results: A total of 17,770 weighted patient encounters were identified, with the median age being 51. The majority underwent DIEP flaps (73.5%), followed by TRAM (14.2%) and LD (12.1%) flaps. The findings revealed that DIEP and TRAM flaps had a similar length of stay (LOS), while LD flaps typically had a shorter LOS. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio were also comparable between DIEP and TRAM flaps, whereas LD flaps were significantly less expensive. Factors such as income quartile, primary payer of hospitalization, and geographic region significantly influenced flap choice., Conclusion: The study's results appear to contradict the prevailing notion that TRAM flaps are more cost-effective than DIEP flaps. The total hospital charges to costs using cost-to-charge ratio and hospital stays associated with TRAM and DIEP flaps were found to be similar. These findings suggest that changes in the insurance landscape, which may limit the use of DIEP flaps, could undermine patient autonomy while not necessarily reducing healthcare costs. Such policy shifts could favor less costly options like the LD flap, potentially altering the landscape of microvascular breast reconstruction., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: The recent proposed alterations to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services regulations, although subsequently reversed on August 21, 2023, have engendered persistent concerns regarding the impact of insurance policies on breast reconstruction procedures coverage. This study aimed to identify factors that would influence women's preferences regarding autologous breast reconstruction to better understand the possible consequences of these coverage changes., Methods: A survey of adult women in the United States was conducted via Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess patient preferences for breast reconstruction options, specifically deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) and transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap surgery. The Cochrane-Armitage test evaluated trends in flap preferences concerning incremental out-of-pocket payment increases., Results: Of 500 total responses, 485 were completed and correctly answered a verification question to ensure adequate attention to the survey, with respondents having a median (interquartile range) age of 26 (25-39) years. When presented with the advantages and disadvantages of DIEP versus TRAM flaps, 78% of respondents preferred DIEP; however, as DIEP's out-of-pocket price incrementally rose, more respondents favored the cheaper TRAM option, with $3804 being the "indifference point" where preferences for both procedures converged (P < 0.001). Notably, respondents with a personal history of breast reconstruction showed a higher preference for DIEP, even at a $10,000 out-of-pocket cost (P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Out-of-pocket cost can significantly influence women's choices for breast reconstruction. These findings encourage a reevaluation of emergent insurance practices that could potentially increase out-of-pocket costs associated with DIEP flaps, to prevent cost from decreasing equitable patient access to most current reconstructive options., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

In 1993, the National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act mandated increasing minority and women enrollment in clinical trials (CTs). This study aimed to investigate trends in race and ethnicity enrollment and reporting in US plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) CT., Methods: A comprehensive systematic review was performed. All CTs in PRS from 2012 to 2022 were included. To assess racial and ethnic representation within CTs, a random-effects meta-analysis of proportion was conducted to pool the prevalence of the binomial data., Results: A total of 3609 studies were initially identified in the search strategy, with 154 later classified as CTs in PRS. Only 36 met the eligibility criteria for reporting race and ethnicity and were included in the analysis. A total of 7281 participants were included: 446 (6.1%) males and 6835 (93.9%) females. From CTs that correctly reported race, the pooled prevalence of races were as follows: Whites 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 73-82%), Black or African Americans 8% (95% CI 5-11%), Asians 1% (95% CI <1-2%), American Indians <1% (95% CI <1-<1%), and Pacific Islanders <1% (95% CI <1-<1%). From the studies that reported ethnicity correctly, the pooled prevalence of Hispanics was 7% (95% CI 5-9%), and Non-Hispanics was 12% (<1-38%)., Conclusions: Disparities in minority representation were present among PRS CTs. This suggests clear limitations in generalizing PRS CT results to the population. Efforts to decrease the gap in minority enrollment and accurately report race and ethnicity are needed in all fields, including plastic surgery., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have evolved to validated questionnaires assessing health-related quality of life. This systematic review evaluates the utilization of PROs in United States plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) clinical trials (CTs)., Methods: A medical librarian conducted a search strategy for PRS CTs from 2012 to 2022. CTs were identified and assessed for PRO utilization. Summary statistics were performed, and Fisher's exact test was used for subgroup analysis., Results: Of the 3609 studies initially identified, 154 were PRS CTs. Approximately half (80 studies) employed PROs, encompassing 13,190 participants, 95% (12,229) of whom were female. Among the CTs, 37 (48%) were in the field of reconstruction, while 25 (32%) were cosmetic. Pain (35%) and patient satisfaction (24%) were the most common primary outcomes. Validated PROs were the main outcome in 61% of these trials, with the visual analog scale (19%) and BREAST-Q (15%) as the top instruments. Funding was primarily private (34%) or not reported (49%). No significant trend in validated PRO usage was observed over the examined decade., Conclusions: The use of PROs is relevant for healthcare delivery and improvement as they provide insight into the efficacy of treatments from a patient-centered viewpoint. PROs are reported in just over half of PRS CTs, and within those CTs, the use of validated questionnaires is inconsistent. Therefore, emerging CTs should strive to incorporate PRO measures and utilize the existing validated tools to assess novel interventions and ensure that the data reported is objective., (Copyright © 2024 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients consider many factors when selecting a plastic surgeon. Previous studies have demonstrated the importance of board certification and reputation in this decision. Despite this, there is a paucity of knowledge on the role that cost of procedure, social media, and surgeon training have on the decision-making process., Methods: The authors' study used a population-based survey administered by Amazon Mechanical Turk. Adults 18 years and older and residing in the United States were asked to rank the importance of 36 factors from 0 (least important) to 10 (most important) when selecting a plastic surgeon., Results: A total of 369 responses were analyzed. The mean age of respondents was 36.9 years (SD, 10.9 years), and 174 participants (47.2%) were female. Of those surveyed, 216 (55.0%) had previously undergone plastic surgery, and all respondents were considering plastic surgery either at the time of survey or in the future. The most common first step for respondents in identifying a plastic surgeon was a web-based search (32.2%). The top three most important factors in selecting a plastic surgeon were surgeon's experience with the desired procedure (7.48), surgeon's board certification (7.38), and surgeon's years in practice (7.36). The three least important factors were the surgeon's race (5.43), number of social media posts (5.62), and television appearances (5.64)., Conclusions: The authors' survey provides insight into the role that different elements play in the decision of selecting a plastic surgeon in the United States. Understanding how patients select a plastic surgeon can help surgeons optimize these elements in their practices., (Copyright © 2023 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Weight loss following bariatric surgery often results in excess skin, which has led to a population of patients seeking body contouring surgery (BCS). This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of patients who underwent BCS following bariatric surgery using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database and to assess the demographic and socioeconomic variables of this cohort., Methods: NIS database was queried from 2016 to 2019 using ICD-10 codes to identify patients that underwent bariatric surgery procedures. Patients who subsequently underwent BCS were compared to those who did not. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receipt of BCS., Results: A total of 263,481 patients that underwent bariatric surgery were identified. Of those, 1777 (0.76%) patients underwent subsequent inpatient BCS. Being female was associated with greater odds of undergoing body contouring (OR 1.28 95% CI 1.13-1.46, p = 0.0001). Patients who underwent BCS were more likely to have their procedure performed in large and government-controlled hospitals than bariatric surgery-only patients (55% vs. 50%, p < 0.0001, and 11% vs. 9.4%, respectively). Higher-income did not impose higher odds of receiving BCS compared to lowest income quartile (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.86-1.16, p = 0.99066). Lastly, compared to Medicare holders, self-payers (OR 3.5, 95% CI 2.83-4.30, p < 0.0001) or private insurance (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.40, p = 0.001) had greater odds of undergoing BCS., Conclusions: There is a gap in access to BCS procedures, with cost and insurance coverage being the principal barriers. Developing policies that allow for holistic evaluation of patients is crucial to improve access to these procedures., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Background:  Microsurgery is a foundational plastic surgery principle. However, public unawareness of microsurgery and its associated rigorous training in the United States may contribute to current misconceptions and undervaluing of plastic and reconstructive surgeons. This study aims to characterize public knowledge of microsurgery., Methods:  A cross-sectional survey was conducted from August to September 2021 using Amazon Mechanical Turk to assess baseline public knowledge of microsurgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed to evaluate the association between baseline knowledge and demographic characteristics. Significance was set to a p  < 0.05., Results:  A total of 516 responses were analyzed. The mean age was 36.7 years (standard deviation, 16.04 years; white, 84%; non-Hispanic, 70%). Of those surveyed, 52% agreed that general surgeons perform microsurgery, while only 28% agreed that plastic and reconstructive surgeons perform microsurgery. When asked if head and neck reconstruction, breast reconstruction, and finger replantation required microsurgery, only 28, 41, and 41% of respondents agreed, respectively. When controlled for sociodemographic factors, Hispanics had significantly more odds to mistake that head and neck reconstruction did not require microsurgery (odds ratio [OR] 95% CI 0.49; 0.30-0.80; p  = 0.004) and less odds to consider plastic and reconstructive surgeons for reconstruction (OR 0.51; 95% CI 0.32-0.84; p  = 0.008). Females had 1.63 more odds of considering plastic and reconstructive surgeons for reconstruction (95% CI 1.09-2.43; p  = 0.017). Low-educated participants had significantly more odds to consider general surgeons as those who performed reconstructive microsurgery (OR 8.70; 95% CI 1.09-69.40; p  = 0.041)., Conclusion:  Misconceptions of microsurgery as a foundational principle of plastic surgery persist and correlate with undervaluing the specialty. Knowledge differs by ethnicity, level of education, and gender. Therefore, patient counseling should use culturally appropriate elements to demystify microsurgery, build value, and better inform risks and benefits., Competing Interests: None declared., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

This study aimed to investigate the impact of performing neurotization during breast reconstruction on total operating time and post-operative morbidity. The 2015 through 2019 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases were utilized to identify patients who underwent breast reconstruction with and without neurotization. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics and outcomes were examined for each group. Thirty-day complication and readmission rates were compared using univariable and multivariable logistic regressions. Of 73,507 patients identified who underwent breast reconstruction, 240 had reconstruction with neurotization. Autologous reconstruction was more prevalent for patients with neurotization (90.8% vs. 18.5%, p <.001). Average operating time was longer when neurotization was performed during both autologous (527.1 ± 152.4 vs. 414.8 ± 186.3, p <.001) and alloplastic-only reconstruction (310.9 ± 115.9 vs. 173.0 ± 94.3, p <.001). The likelihood total operating time exceeded 521 min (two standard deviations above average) increased when neurotization was performed (OR 2.464, CI 1.864-3.255, p <.001). Thirty-day complications occurred in 13.8% of patients with neurotization and 6.8% without ( p <.001). Similarly, 30-day readmission rates were higher for patients with neurotization (7.5% vs. 4.2%, p <.001). However, when adjusted for comorbidities and operative characteristics, neurotization did not significantly impact 30-day complication rates (OR 0.802, CI 0.548-1.174, p =.256) or 30-day readmission rates (OR 1.352, CI 0.822-2.223, p =.077). Although neurotization during breast reconstruction increases operating time, comorbidities and procedural characteristics play a greater role in post-operative outcomes than neurotization alone.

Background: Medical chaperones often play an important role during physical examinations, providing patient comfort and serving as medicolegal witness. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare practices regarding chaperone use by plastic surgery attendings and trainees., Methods: A voluntary survey was distributed to members of the American Council of Academic Plastic Surgeons. The survey included a standardized set of questions regarding physician demographics, nature of practice training, and current practices pertaining to chaperone use. Data were analyzed in a descriptive fashion. Ordinal logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of chaperone use., Results: We received 167 responses, of which 107 (64.1%) were attendings and 60 (35.9%) were trainees. In total, 78.3% of the respondents were male and 21.7% were female. Routine use of chaperones was reported at 58.6%. Compared with plastic surgery trainees, attending surgeons were 12.8 times more likely to use a chaperone during sensitive examinations (P < 0.001). In addition, male respondents were 6.43 times more likely than their female counterparts to involve a chaperone during sensitive examinations (P < 0.001). Forty-eight percent of the trainees acknowledged receiving education regarding chaperone use, and this cohort was 7 times more likely to use a chaperone when compared with trainees who had not received chaperone instruction (P < 0.001)., Conclusions: This study highlights the wide variability of chaperone use among plastic surgery attendings and trainees. Integration and standardization of chaperone education within plastic surgery training may be an effective technique to promote this practice and lead to improved patient-provider clinical experiences., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest and sources of funding: none declared., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: The basis of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty goes back to the late 19th and the early 20th centuries. In that era, pioneers such as Drs. Goodale, Lothrop, and Cottle were prominent surgeons who reported on this technique. Currently, there has been a renewed interest of this technique that stems from the nasal anatomy and an interest in less destructive techniques. In this review, we discuss examples of the contributions of those surgeons, which represent some of the earliest experiences in this field., Methods: We reviewed several journals from the late 19th and early 20th centuries as detailed in the references section. We collected the related publications on closed reduction techniques performed by Drs. Goodale, Lothrop, and Cottle., Results: The publications on closed reduction techniques by Drs. Goodale, Lothrop, and Cottle described similar thought processes and techniques comparable to current dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques. The thought processes of these 3 renowned rhinoplasty surgeons appear to be very much relevant today., Conclusions: Although there has been recent resurgence in dorsal preservation rhinoplasty techniques due to anatomical and functional aspects of the nose, the basis of dorsal preservation rhinoplasty goes far back to more than 100 years ago.

Background: In response to the cancellation of away rotations and the shift to virtual interviews due to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, residency programs have pursued other methods of sharing program details, most notably with the use of social media. This study aimed to evaluate the extent of social media utilization in the setting of the COVID-19 pandemic by plastic surgery residency programs., Methods: Instagram, Twitter, and Facebook accounts of plastic surgery programs, program directors, and chiefs were identified. Number of followers, total posts, and posts since March 1, 2020, were extracted. Account content was categorized as informational, social, operative, research, self-promotional, guest lecture, education, or other. Spearman's coefficient was used to determine correlations among account data. Differences among regions and program pathways were evaluated using the Kruskal-Wallis test., Results: Since March 1, 2020, 17 Instagram, five Twitter, and three Facebook accounts have been created. Instagram was most widely used and followed (1720 posts, 1235.7 ± 735.9 followers) compared with Twitter (722 tweets, 325.6 ± 451.0 followers) and Facebook (430 posts, 338.3 ± 363.3 followers). Although the majority of content was informational (45.1 percent), Instagram contained more social content (21 percent), Twitter contained more research (21 percent), and Facebook contained more self-promotional content (25 percent). Integrated-only programs on average posted more on Instagram (21.5 ± 15.1 posts) than did independent-only programs (9.4 ± 8.5 posts), and post volume moderately correlated with number of followers. There were no statistically significant differences among regional means., Conclusion: Plastic surgery residency programs have incorporated social media into their recruitment strategies and will likely continue to increase and diversify their posts to effectively engage with future applicants., Competing Interests: Disclosure:The authors have no financial interests to disclose. No conflicts of interest are associated with this publication. No funding was received for this article., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: Complex pelvic reconstruction is challenging for plastic and reconstructive surgeons following surgical resection of the lower gastrointestinal or genitourinary tract. Complication rates and hospital costs are variable and may be linked to the hospital case volume of pelvic reconstructions performed. A comprehensive examination of these factors has yet to be performed., Methods: Data were retrieved for patients undergoing pedicled flap reconstruction after pelvic resections in the American National Inpatient Sample database between 2010 and 2014. Patients were then separated into three groups based on hospital case volume for pelvic reconstruction. Multivariate logistic regression and gamma regression with log-link function were used to analyze associations between hospital case volume, surgical outcomes, and cost., Results: In total, 2,942 patients underwent pelvic flap reconstruction with surgical complications occurring in 1,466 patients (49.8%). Total median cost was $38,469.40. Pelvic reconstructions performed at high-volume hospitals were significantly associated with fewer surgical complications (low: 51.4%, medium: 52.8%, high: 34.8%; p < 0.001) and increased costs (low: $35,645.14, medium: $38,714.92, high: $44,967.29; p < 0.001). After regression adjustment, high hospital volume was the strongest independently associated factor for decreased surgical complications (Exp[β], 0.454; 95% Confidence Interval, 0.346-0.596; p < 0.001) and increased hospital cost (Exp[β], 1.351; 95% Confidence Interval, 1.285-1.421; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Patients undergoing pelvic flap reconstruction after oncologic resections experience high complication rates. High case volume hospitals were independently associated with significantly fewer surgical complications but increased hospital costs. Reconstructive surgeons may approach these challenging patients with greater awareness of these associations to improve outcomes and address cost drivers., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors have no commercial associations, financial interests, or conflicts of interest to disclose. None of the authors have a financial interest in any of the products, drugs, or devices mentioned in this article. No funding was received for this work., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Summary: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, and the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery commissioned the multidisciplinary Rhinoplasty Performance Measure Development Work Group to identify and draft quality measures for the care of patients undergoing both functional and aesthetic rhinoplasty. One outcome measure and three process measures were identified. The outcome looked at patient satisfaction with rhinoplasty procedures. The process measures look at motivations and expectations of the procedure, airway assessment, and nonnarcotic shared decision-making strategies for pain management. All measures in this report were approved by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Quality and Performance Measures Work Group and Executive Committee, and the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, The Rhinoplasty Society, and the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons. The Work Group recommends the use of these measures for quality initiatives, Continuing Medical Education, Maintenance of Certification, Qualified Clinical Data Registry reporting, and national quality reporting programs., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Background: The United States (US) is in the mid of an opioid epidemic propagated, in part, by prescription opioids. With excess overprescribing documented in a variety of surgical procedures, several societies have recommended opioid-prescribing guidelines. Considering the scope and postoperative pain associated with aesthetic plastic surgery procedures, earnest evaluation into opioid-prescribing practices for breast augmentation was conducted., Methods: Members of the American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery were electronically surveyed on their opioid-prescribing patterns. The survey was distributed to 1709 plastic surgeons. Descriptive statistics were collated into percentages, deviations, and morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), when appropriate., Results: Two hundred twenty-nine American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery members (13.4%) provided responses. A total of 91.2% of respondents prescribe opioids to patients undergoing breast augmentation. The most commonly prescribed agents included oxycodone/acetaminophen (Percocet, 47.0%) and hydrocodone/acetaminophen (Vicodin, 38.3%). On average, 165.3 ± 81.7 MMEs were dispensed (range, 25.0-600.0 MMEs; number tablets, 5-60). Prescribers felt that a lack of phone-in prescribing (52.4%) and the ease of preemptively prescribing opioids (52.4%) propagate opioid overprescribing. A total of 61.3% of respondents reported that they are or may be in favor of developing plastic surgery societal guidelines related to opioid prescribing. These respondents indicated support for guidelines on opioid-sparing pain management strategies (74.2%) and guidelines identifying the type (54.7%), duration of use (69.5%), and number of opioid tablets (61.7%) necessary for procedures., Conclusions: Considerable variability exists among prescribing patterns after breast augmentation. Societal guidelines aimed at providers and patients may serve a future role in opioid prescribing.

Background: Non-board-certified plastic surgeons performing cosmetic procedures and advertising as plastic surgeons may have an adverse effect on a patient's understanding of their practitioner's medical training and patient safety. The authors aim to assess (1) the impact of city size and locations and (2) the impact of health care transparency acts on the ratio of board-certified and non-American Board of Plastic Surgeons physicians., Methods: The authors performed a systematic Google search for the term "plastic surgeon [city name]" to simulate a patient search of online providers. Comparisons of board certification status between the top hits for each city were made. Data gathered included city population, regional location, practice setting, and states with the passage of truth-in-advertising laws., Results: One thousand six hundred seventy-seven unique practitioners were extracted. Of these, 1289 practitioners (76.9 percent) were American Board of Plastic Surgery-certified plastic surgeons. When comparing states with truth-in-advertising laws and states without such laws, the authors found no significant differences in board-certification rates among "plastic surgery" practitioners (88.9 percent versus 92.0 percent; p = 0.170). There was a significant difference between board-certified "plastic surgeons" versus out-of-scope practitioners on Google search between large, medium, and small cities (100 percent versus 92.9 percent versus 86.5; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Non-board-certified providers tend to localize to smaller cities. Truth-in-advertising laws have not yet had an impact on the way a number of non-American Board of Plastic Surgery-certified practitioners market themselves. There may be room to expand the scope of truth-in-advertising laws to the online world and to smaller cities., (Copyright © 2020 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.)

Health care reform continues to be a topic of debate among lawmakers, politicians, physicians, and citizens of the United States. In recent years, proposed changes to the health care industry have grown in both granularity and popularity, with the possibility of adapting a single-payer health insurance system reaching an all-time high. The implications of such a policy are far-reaching and can be challenging to conceptualize, especially in isolation. The purpose of this article is to review some of the anticipated changes under this new system, specifically as they pertain to the field of plastic surgery.

Clinical research remains at the forefront of academic practice and evidence-based medicine. Unfortunately, history has shown that human subjects are vulnerable to experimentation without regard for their own dignity and informed decision-making. Subsequently, it is vital for research institutes to uphold safeguards and ethical conscientiousness toward human subjects. The establishment of federal regulations and the development of institutional review boards have set guidance on these processes. On January 21, 2019, final revisions to the Federal Policy for the Protection of Human Subjects (the "Common Rule") went into effect. The purpose of this article is to review changes to the Common Rule and discuss their impact on plastic surgery research.

Introduction: Currently, there is limited literature on reconstructive trends for inpatient head and neck skin cancer. Rather, studies have focused primarily on patients treated on an outpatient basis. To gain a better understanding of the effect that reconstructive correction of complex skin cancer defects has on the healthcare system, we examined the existing incidence and reconstructive trends of head and neck melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in the inpatient setting., Method: We performed the analysis of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database (NIS) for the years 2012-2014 of the United States (US). Adults diagnosed with melanoma skin cancer or NMSC of the head and neck region were included. Patient characteristics, reconstructive modality, surgical specifics, and outcomes were retrieved. Trends with time for reconstruction techniques were analyzed., Results: In total, 41,185 patients with a diagnosis of skin malignancy were identified, of whom 5,480 (13.3%) underwent reconstruction. Most patients were white (90.0%), male (71.6%), and had a diagnosis of NMSC (79.2%). An increase in flap reconstruction (p < 0.001) was observed. After population adjustment, the highest incidence of skin malignancy was found in the Northeast., Conclusion: There has been a trending increase in inpatient NMSC and melanoma skin cancer of the head and neck region, correlating to an increase in the reconstructive procedures performed, and greater cost burden. Resources may be allocated toward early identification and treatment for skin cancer to help control the current rise in complex skin cancer cases necessitating inpatient admission., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Background: The United States is currently in the midst of an opioid epidemic precipitated, in part, by the excessive outpatient supply of opioid pain medications. Accordingly, this epidemic has necessitated evaluation of practice and prescription patterns among surgical specialties. The purpose of this study was to quantify opioid-related adverse events in ambulatory plastic surgery., Methods: A retrospective review of 43,074 patient profiles captured from 2001 to 2018 within an American Association for Accreditation of Ambulatory Surgery Facilities quality improvement database was conducted. Free-text search terms related to opioids and overdose were used to identify opioid-related adverse events. Extracted profiles included information submitted by accredited ambulatory surgery facilities and their respective surgeons. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify opioid-related adverse events., Results: Among our cohort, 28 plastic surgery patients were identified as having an opioid-related adverse event. Overall, there were three fatal and 12 nonfatal opioid-related overdoses, nine perioperative opioid-related adverse events, and four cases of opioid-related hypersensitivities or complications secondary to opioid tolerance. Of the nonfatal cases evaluated in the hospital (n = 17), 16 patients required admission, with an average 3.3 ± 1.7 days' hospital length of stay., Conclusions: Opioid-related adverse events are notable occurrences in ambulatory plastic surgery. Several adverse events may have been prevented had different diligent medication prescription practices been performed. Currently, there is more advocacy supporting sparing opioid medications when possible through multimodal anesthetic techniques, education of patients on the risks and harms of opioid use and misuse, and the development of societal guidance regarding ambulatory surgery prescription practices.

Background: Colorectal cancer is one of the most common and fatal malignancies in the United States. When localized to the distal gastrointestinal tract, surgical therapy includes abdominoperineal resection (APR) or pelvic exenteration (PEX). Subsequent ablative defects are considerable, impart concerning morbidity, and often necessitate autologous reconstruction. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes after reconstruction of APR and PEX defects., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2017) was queried for patients undergoing APR for lower gastrointestinal malignancies with concurrent autologous reconstructions. Cases of disseminated cancer were excluded. Postoperative adverse event profiles, including rates of wound and systemic complications, were evaluated. Multivariate regression analysis controlling for age, sex, body mass index, and operative time was performed to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs)., Results: A total of 1309 patients were identified as undergoing APR/PEX with concomitant reconstruction. The majority (96.9%) of reconstructions consisted of muscle, myocutaneous, fasciocutaneous, or omental pedicled flaps. Of the cohort, 45.7% experienced at least 1 all-cause complication within 30-days of the procedure. Having a limited or moderate frailty (frailty index of "1" or "2") was identified as a predictor of all-cause complications [OR, 1.556; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.187-2.040, P = 0.001; and OR, 1.741; 95% CI, 1.193-2.541, P = 0.004, respectively], whereas smoking was a predictor of wound complications (OR, 1.462; 95% CI, 1.070-1.996, P = 0.017) and steroid use was a predictor of mild systemic complications (OR, 2.006; 95% CI, 1.058-3.805, P = 0.033)., Conclusion: Anorectal cancer resection often necessitates reconstruction secondary to postexenteration perineal defects. The incidence of postoperative complications is relatively high, and several risk factors are identified to help refine patient optimization.

Background: Studies based on large-volume databases have made significant contributions to research on breast cancer surgery. To date, no comparison between large-volume databases has been made internationally. This is the first proof-of-concept study exploring the feasibility of combining two existing operational databases of The Netherlands and the United States, focusing on breast cancer care and immediate breast reconstruction specifically.313/291 METHODS:: The National Breast Cancer Organization The Netherlands Breast Cancer Audit (NBCA) (2011 to 2015) and the U.S. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2010 to 2013) were compared on structure and content. Data variables were grouped into general, treatment-specific, cancer-specific, and follow-up variables and were matched. As proof-of-concept, mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction rates in patients diagnosed with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ were analyzed., Results: The NBCA included 115 variables and SEER included 112. The NBCA included significantly more treatment-specific variables (n = 46 versus 6), whereas the SEER database included more cancer-specific variables (n = 74 versus 26). In patients diagnosed with breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ, immediate breast reconstruction was performed in 19.3 percent and 24.0 percent of the breast cancer cohort and 44.0 percent and 35.3 percent of the ductal carcinoma in situ cohort in the NBCA and SEER, respectively. Immediate breast reconstruction rates increased significantly over time in both data sets., Conclusions: This study provides a first overview of available registry data on breast cancer care in The Netherlands and the United States, and revealed limited data on treatment in the United States. Comparison of treatment patterns of immediate breast reconstruction showed interesting differences. The authors advocate the urgency for an international database with alignment of (treatment) variables to improve quality of breast cancer care for patients across the globe.

Background: The aim of this study was to assess readability of articles shared on Twitter and analyze differences between them to determine whether messages and written posts are at reading levels comprehended by the general public., Methods: Top-rated #PlasticSurgery tweets (per Twitter algorithm) in January of 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Text from tweeted links to full, open-access, and society/institutional patient information articles were extracted. Readability was analyzed using the following established tests: Coleman-Liau, Flesch-Kincaid, FORCAST Readability Formula, Fry Graph, Gunning Fog Index, New Dale-Chall Formula, New Fog Count, Raygor Readability Estimate, and Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Readability Formula. Ease-of-reading was analyzed using the Flesch Reading Ease Index., Results: Of 234 unique articles, there were 101 full journal (43 percent), 65 open-access journal (28 percent), and 68 patient information (29 percent) articles. When compared using the Simple Measure of Gobbledygook Readability Formula, full and open-access journal articles attained similar mean reading levels of 17.7 and 17.5, respectively (p = 0.475). In contrast, patient information articles had a significantly lower mean readability level of 13.9 (p < 0.001). Plastic surgeons posted 128 articles (55 percent) and non-plastic surgeon individuals posted 106 articles (45 percent). Mean readability levels between the two were 16.2 and 16.9, respectively (p < 0.001). All tweeted articles were above the sixth-grade recommended reading level., Conclusions: Readability of #PlasticSurgery articles may not be appropriate for many American adults. Consideration should be given to improving readability of articles targeted toward the general public to optimize delivery of social media messages.

Background: Integrative medicine (IM) centers are becoming more established nationwide and provide an expansive range of therapeutic services. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among plastic surgery patients, we sought to define referrals rates to IM centers by plastic surgeons to investigate (1) the role of IM in the continuous care process of plastic surgery patients and (2) whether IM centers are being effectively utilized., Methods: Institutions with plastic surgery residency programs were identified using the American Medical Association's Fellowship and Residency Electronic Interactive Database Access System in January 2017. Data on the presence of a named IM center, director/administrator contact information, and types of therapeutic services offered were extracted. The total number of IM services at these centers was summed and tabulated for preliminary analyses. A survey questionnaire was sent to the center to ascertain referral patterns in February 2017., Results: Of 96 institutions with plastic and reconstructive surgery residency programs in North America, 49 (51%) provide IM services, and 24 (25%) have affiliated named IM centers of which we attained a survey response from 13 (54.5%). Of these centers, 10 (76.9%) evaluate more than 50 patients per week. Patient referrals to these centers were primarily from the department of medicine (73.8%) as opposed to surgery (13.1%) (P < 0.0001). An average of 0.77% of surgical referrals, or 0.077% of all referrals, arose from plastic and reconstructive surgery., Conclusions: Plastic surgeons appear to infrequently refer patients to IM centers. Given the high prevalence of IM usage among our patient population, IM centers are an underutilized adjunct in the care of our patients. Further study into specific IM services that may benefit our patients would be helpful in increasing IM utilization in our field.

Background: Spanish-speaking Hispanics living in the United States utilize the internet as a primary means to obtain health information. Accurate, accessible information is important for English speakers; however, it could have even greater utility for Spanish speakers who have lower health literacy levels. The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare online English and Spanish carpal tunnel surgery materials provided by using a multimetric approach., Materials and Methods: A web search using the English term "carpal tunnel surgery" was performed. The first 10 institutional/organizational websites that provided carpal tunnel surgery information in English and Spanish were included. All relevant online materials were evaluated using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), Cultural Sensitivity Assessment Tool (CSAT), and Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook, Spanish (SOL) to assess understandability and actionability, cultural sensitivity, and readability, respectively., Results: There were no statistically significant differences in understandability or actionability scores between Spanish and English materials. Average cultural sensitivity scores for Spanish materials were significantly lower than English materials (P = 0.015). The average reading grade level of online English materials was greater than that for Spanish materials (P = 0.011). Both mean values were above the recommended sixth-grade reading level., Conclusions: Online patient-directed information regarding carpal tunnel surgery exceeded the recommended reading grade level for both English and Spanish-speaking populations. Most Spanish materials were often direct translations and were not contoured to the elevated literacy needs of this demographic. Institutions must caution their authors to tailor their web material in a way that is sensitive to their target population to optimize understanding., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Breast cancer is a leading cause of death in US Hispanic females. This demographic is more likely to present with later-stage disease and require more extensive surgical treatment, including axillary lymph node dissection, which increases risk of lymphedema. The Spanish-speaking Hispanic population has a lower health literacy level and requires materials contoured to their unique needs. The aim of this study was to evaluate online Spanish lymphedema resources., Methods: A web search using the Spanish term "linfedema" was performed, and the top 10 websites were identified. Each was analyzed using validated metrics to assess readability, understandability, actionability, and cultural sensitivity using the SOL (Simplified Measure of Gobbledygook, Spanish), Patient Education and Materials Assessment for Understandability and Actionability (Patient Education and Assessment Tool), and Cultural Sensitivity and Assessment Tool (CSAT), respectively. Online materials were assessed by 2 independent evaluators, and interrater reliability was determined., Results: Online lymphedema material in Spanish had a mean reading grade level of 9.8 (SOL). Average understandability and actionability scores were low at 52% and 36%, respectively. The mean CSAT was 2.27, below the recommended value of 2.5. Cohen κ for interrater reliability was greater than 0.81 for the Patient Education and Assessment Tool and CSAT, suggesting excellent agreement between raters., Conclusions: Available online Spanish lymphedema resources are written at an elevated reading level and are inappropriate for a population with lower health literacy levels. As patients continue to use the internet as their primary source for health information, health care entities must improve the quality of provided Spanish resources in order to optimize patient comprehension.

Given the rising popularity in body-contouring procedures (BCPs) in the United States, it is important to assess the currently unknown association between resident involvement and postoperative complications. As such, the aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of resident involvement on outcomes in BCPs using a large national database., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was performed (2006-2012) to identify patients undergoing BCPs, using relevant Current Procedural Terminology codes. Outcome measures included postoperative complications, hospital length of stay, and operation time.Multivariate regression models were used to assess the impact of resident involvement and resident experience on outcomes., Results: A total of 9638 cases were identified, of which 3311 involved resident participation.Resident involvement was associated with significantly higher rates of complications (7.8% vs 4.4%; P = 0.003) and longer operation times (180.7 vs 171.9 minutes; P = 0.005). For each year increase of resident postgraduate year, there was a significant decrease in odds of complications (odds ratio, 0.906; P = 0.013) and operative time (-2.7 minutes; P = 0.001)., Conclusions: Resident involvement in BCPs was associated with an increased rate of overall complications in a large, national database. However, the clinical significance of these outcomes may be debated. Increased postgraduate year experience as a surgical resident was inversely associated with overall complications. Guided resident autonomy and earlier exposure to BCPs could lead to an optimization of clinical outcomes and resident education.

Objective: Although resident involvement in surgical procedures is critical for training, it may be associated with increased morbidity, particularly early in the academic year-a concept dubbed the "July effect." Assessments of such phenomena within the field of plastic surgery have been both limited and inconclusive. We sought to investigate the impact of resident participation and academic quarter on outcomes for autologous breast reconstruction., Methods: All autologous breast reconstruction cases after mastectomy were gathered from the 2005-2012 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to investigate the association between resident involvement and the first academic quarter (Q1 = July-September) with 30-day morbidity (odds ratios [ORs] with 95% confidence intervals). Medical and surgical complications, median operation time, and length of stay (LOS) were also compared., Results: Overall, 2527 cases were identified. Cases with residents (n = 1467) were not associated with increased 30-day morbidity (OR, 1.20; 0.95-1.52) when compared with those without (n = 1060), although complications including transfusion (OR, 2.08; 1.39-3.13) and return to the operating room (OR, 1.46; 1.11-1.93) were more frequently observed in resident cases. Operation time and LOS were greater in cases with resident involvement.In cases with residents, there was decreased morbidity in Q1 (n = 343) when compared with later quarters (n = 1124; OR, 0.67; 0.48-0.92). Specifically, transfusion (OR, 0.52; 0.29-0.95), return to operating room (OR, 0.64; 0.41-0.98), and surgical site infection (OR, 0.37; 0.18-0.75) occurred less often during Q1. No differences in median operation time or LOS were observed within this subgroup., Conclusions: Our study reveals that resident involvement in autologous breast reconstruction is not associated with increased morbidity and offers no evidence for a July effect. Notably, our results suggest that resident cases performed earlier in the academic year, when surgical attendings may offer more surveillance and oversight, is associated with decreased morbidity.

Background: Evidence of racial disparities in the receipt of postmastectomy breast reconstruction is well documented. The objective of this study was to describe trends in racial disparities overall and by reconstructive technique., Methods: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent mastectomy and/or breast reconstruction from 2005 to 2014. Patient demographics were recorded, and cases were grouped by reconstructive status and technique. Trends were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage test and the index of disparity., Results: Over the study period, 92,960 postmastectomy patients were identified (77,049 white women, 10,396 black women, 4939 Asian women, and 576 Native American women), of whom 46,931 underwent reconstruction. Of these, 7692 women underwent autologous reconstructions (3913 free flaps and 3696 pedicled flaps). From 2005 to 2014, receipt of breast reconstruction by postmastectomy patients rose from 33.2% to 60.0%, receipt of autologous reconstruction by patients who underwent breast reconstruction fell from 30.4% to 15.9%, and receipt of free-flap reconstruction by patients who underwent autologous reconstruction rose from 15.0% to 70.8%. These trends were significant in all racial subgroups (P < .001), except for Native Americans (P = .269). The index of disparity decreased from 51.4% to 22.6% for overall receipt of breast reconstruction, decreased from 10.7% to 7.0% for tissue expander and implant-based reconstruction, increased from 18.0% to 27.3% for autologous reconstruction, and decreased from 66.7% to 4.3% for free-flap reconstruction., Conclusions: The use of postmastectomy breast reconstruction is steadily rising in the United States. Racial disparities persist, but progress has been made. Further efforts are needed to reduce racial disparities. Cancer 2018;124:2774-2784. © 2018 American Cancer Society., (© 2018 American Cancer Society.)

Advanced manufacturing techniques such as 3-dimensional (3D) printing, while mature in other industries, are starting to become more commonplace in clinical care. Clinicians are producing physical objects based on patient clinical data for use in planning care and educating patients, all of which should be managed like any other healthcare system data, except it exists in the "real" world. There are currently no provisions in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) either in its original 1996 form or in more recent updates that address the nature of physical representations of clinical data. We submit that if we define the source data as protected health information (PHI), then the objects 3D printed from that data need to be treated as both (PHI), and if used clinically, part of the clinical record, and propose some basic guidelines for quality and privacy like all documentation until regulatory frameworks can catch up to this technology. Many of the mechanisms designed in the paper and film chart era will work well with 3D printed patient data., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Previous studies revealed that patients preferred plastic surgeons over cosmetic surgeons for surgical procedures, but few knew that any physician with a medical degree was legally qualified to perform cosmetic surgery. Results also indicated that a primary consideration for patients in selecting a surgeon was board certification. Although patient preferences concerning aesthetic surgery have previously been surveyed, no study examined a consumer's ability delineate between specialties based on Web sites. The purpose of this study was to investigate the responses of medical students to questions regarding a cosmetic and plastic surgeon's board certification., Methods: A total of 4 cosmetic and 5 plastic surgeon Web sites were selected, in a single large city, from a Google search for the following procedures: liposuction, breast augmentation, blepharoplasty, rhytidectomy, and abdominoplasty. Screenshots of the Google search link, the page after clicking on the link, and the about the doctor page were collected to simulate an actual patient search experience. Four randomized surveys were created using screenshots and scenarios through Survey Monkey. Surveys were distributed and collected anonymously. Data analysis was accomplished using a chi-square test of independence (P < 0.05)., Results: A total of 474 medical students responded, and the difference between cosmetic and plastic surgeon variables was significant (P < 0.001). Upon comparison of different procedures, the cosmetic and plastic groups were found to be statistically different (P < 0.05), with some exceptions. On average, when presented with a plastic surgeon, 95.3% thought this was a board-certified plastic surgeon. When presented with a cosmetic surgeon, 54.3% also thought this was a board-certified plastic surgeon. The decline in responses regarding board certification, for the first and second cosmetic surgeons presented, was found to be statistically different (P < 0.0001)., Conclusions: Over 50% of medical students had difficulty distinguishing between a cosmetic and plastic surgeon based on Web site advertisements; therefore, patients may have a more difficult experience. Results of this study prove the need for a universal definition, and patient education, relating to board certifications.

Background: Scholastic productivity has previously been shown to be positively associated with National Institute of Health (NIH) grants and industry funding. This study examines whether society, industry, or federal funding contributes toward academic productivity as measured by scholastic output of academic plastic surgeons., Methods: Institution Web sites were used to acquire academic attributes of full-time academic plastic surgeons. The Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payment database, NIH reporter, the Plastic Surgery Foundation (PSF), and American Association of Plastic Surgeons (AAPS) Web sites were accessed for funding and endowment details. Bibliometric data of each surgeon were then collected via Scopus to ascertain strengths of association with each source. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify significant contributors to high scholastic output., Results: We identified 935 academic plastic surgeons with 94 (10.1%), 24 (2.6%), 724 (77.4%), and 62 (6.6%) receiving funding from PSF, AAPS, industry, and NIH, respectively. There were positive correlations in receiving NIH, PSF, and/or AAPS funding (P < 0.001), whereas industry funding was found to negatively associate with PSF (r = -0.75, P = 0.022) grants. The NIH R award was consistently found to be the most predictive of academic output across bibliometrics, followed by the AAPS academic scholarship award. Conventional measures of academic seniority remained predictive across all measures used., Conclusions: Our study demonstrates for the first time interactions between industry, federal, and association funding. The NIH R award was the strongest determinant of high scholastic productivity. Recognition through AAPS academic scholarships seemed to associate with subsequent success in NIH funding.

Background: Indocyanine green angiography has gained popularity in breast reconstruction for its ability to assess mastectomy skin and tissue flap viability. The authors aim to analyze trends and outcomes associated with indocyanine green angiography use in breast reconstruction., Methods: Using 2012 to 2014 data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project National Inpatient Sample, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the authors identified breast reconstructions performed with or without indocyanine green angiography use. Trends over time were assessed using the Cochran-Armitage test. Outcomes were assessed using logistic regression and generalized linear modeling., Results: Over the study period, 110,320 patients underwent breast reconstruction: 107,005 (97.0 percent) without and 3315 (3.0 percent) with indocyanine green angiography use. Usage increased over time: 750 patients (1.9 percent) in 2012, increasing to 1275 patients (3.7 percent) in 2013 (p < 0.001). Smokers (p = 0.018), hypertensive patients (p = 0.046), obese patients (p < 0.001), and those with a higher comorbidity index (p < 0.001) were more likely to undergo indocyanine green angiography. Autologous reconstruction was more frequently combined with its use compared with tissue expander reconstruction (4.5 percent versus 2.1 percent; p < 0.001). There was a significant increase in the odds of débridement associated with its use (OR, 1.404; p < 0.001; 95 percent CI, 1.201 to 1.640)., Conclusions: Indocyanine green angiography use in breast reconstruction has increased in recent years and is associated with higher débridement rates. These rates may indicate changing trends for clinicians when deciding whether to débride tissue during breast reconstruction., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Background: Centralization of specialist services, including cleft service delivery, is occurring worldwide with the aim of improving the outcomes. This study examines the relationship between hospital surgical volume in cleft palate repair and outcomes., Methods: A retrospective analysis of the Kids' Inpatient Database was undertaken. Children 3 years or younger undergoing cleft palate repair in 2012 were identified. Hospital volume was categorized by cases per year as low volume (LV; 0-14), intermediate volume (IV; 15-46), or high volume (HV; 47-99); differences in complications, hospital costs, and length of stay (LOS) were determined by hospital volume., Results: Data for 2389 children were retrieved: 24.9% (n = 595) were LV, 50.1% (n = 1196) were IV, and 25.0% (n = 596) were HV. High-volume centers were more frequently located in the West (71.9%) compared with LV (19.9%) or IV (24.5%) centers (P < 0.001 for hospital region). Median household income was more commonly highest quartile in HV centers compared with IV or LV centers (32.3% vs 21.7% vs 18.1%, P < 0.001). There was no difference in complications between different volume centers (P = 0.74). Compared with HV centers, there was a significant decrease in mean costs for LV centers ($9682 vs $,378, P < 0.001) but no significant difference in cost for IV centers ($9260 vs $9682, P = 0.103). Both IV and LV centers had a significantly greater LOS when compared with HV centers (1.97 vs 2.10 vs 1.74, P < 0.001)., Conclusions: Despite improvement in LOS in HV centers, we did not find a reduction in cost in HV centers. Further research is needed with analysis of outpatient, long-term outcomes to ensure widespread cost-efficiency.

Introduction: Rhytidectomy is one of the most commonly performed cosmetic procedures by plastic surgeons. Increasing attention to the development of a high-value, low-cost healthcare system is a priority in the USA. This study aims to analyze specific patient and hospital factors affecting the cost of this procedure., Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of self-pay patients over the age of 18 who underwent rhytidectomy using the Healthcare Utilization Cost Project National Inpatient Sample database between 2013 and 2014. Mean marginal cost increases patient characteristics, and outcomes were studied. Generalized linear modeling with gamma regression and a log-link function were performed along with estimated marginal means to provide cost estimates., Results: A total of 1890 self-pay patients underwent rhytidectomy. Median cost was $11,767 with an interquartile range of $8907 [$6976-$15,883]. The largest marginal cost increases were associated with postoperative hematoma ($12,651; CI $8181-$17,120), West coast region ($7539; 95% CI $6412-$8666), and combined rhinoplasty ($7824; 95% CI $3808-$11,840). The two risk factors associated with the generation of highest marginal inpatient costs were smoking ($4147; 95% CI $2804-$5490) and diabetes mellitus ($5622; 95% CI $3233-8011). High-volume hospitals had a decreased cost of - $1331 (95% CI - $2032 to - $631)., Conclusion: Cost variation for inpatient rhytidectomy procedures is dependent on preoperative risk factors (diabetes and smoking), postoperative complications (hematoma), and regional trends (West region). Rhytidectomy surgery is highly centralized and increasing hospital volume significantly decreases costs. Clinicians and hospitals can use this information to discuss the drivers of cost in patients undergoing rhytidectomy., Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Background: Research derived from large-volume databases plays an increasing role in the development of clinical guidelines and health policy. In breast cancer research, the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases are widely used. This study aims to compare the trends in immediate breast reconstruction and identify the drawbacks and benefits of each database., Methods: Patients with invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ were identified from each database (2005-2012). Trends of immediate breast reconstruction over time were evaluated. Patient demographics and comorbidities were compared. Subgroup analysis of immediate breast reconstruction use per race was conducted., Results: Within the three databases, 1.2 million patients were studied. Immediate breast reconstruction in invasive breast cancer patients increased significantly over time in all databases. A similar significant upward trend was seen in ductal carcinoma in situ patients. Significant differences in immediate breast reconstruction rates were seen among races; and the disparity differed among the three databases. Rates of comorbidities were similar among the three databases., Conclusions: There has been a significant increase in immediate breast reconstruction; however, the extent of the reporting of overall immediate breast reconstruction rates and of racial disparities differs significantly among databases. The Nationwide Inpatient Sample and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program report similar findings, with the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database reporting results significantly lower in several categories. These findings suggest that use of the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database may not be universally generalizable to the entire U.S.

Background: Social media use is growing inexorably, and there is public appetite for evidence-based information. Little is known about engagement by plastic surgeons with social media. The aim of this study was to examine posting about plastic surgery on Twitter, to best inform how board-certified plastic surgeons could use the hashtag #PlasticSurgery as a tool to educate patients and the public., Methods: A prospective analysis of 2880 "tweets" containing the words "plastic surgery" was performed. The following were assessed: identity of author, use of the hashtag #PlasticSurgery, subject matter, whether link to study was provided, and whether posts by surgeons were self-promotional or educational., Results: Social media posting about plastic surgery is dominated by the public, accounting for 70.6 percent of posts versus only 6.0 percent by plastic surgeons. Only 5.4 percent of all tweets contained the hashtag #PlasticSurgery, although almost half of those that did were by plastic surgeons. Of these, 61.3 percent of posts by plastic surgeons were about aesthetic surgery; additional posts were about basic science, patient safety, and reconstruction (13.9, 4.0, and 2.3 percent, respectively). Eighteen scientific articles were referenced, with a link to the Journal site posted in two tweets. Of posts by plastic surgeons, 37.0 percent were self-promotional., Conclusions: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons and its Journal have recognized that social media may be used to educate and engage. Board-certified plastic surgeons have a great opportunity to promote evidence-based plastic practice by means of #PlasticSurgery in the interests of supporting patients and the profession.

Background: The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Next Accreditation System milestones were implemented for plastic surgery programs in July of 2014. Forward progress through the milestones is an indicator of trainee-appropriate development, whereas regression or stalling may indicate the need for concentrated, targeted training., Methods: Online software at www.surveymonkey.com was used to create a survey about the program's approaches to milestones and was distributed to program directors and administrators of 96 Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-approved plastic surgery programs., Results: The authors had a 63.5 percent response rate (61 of 96 plastic surgery programs). Most programs report some level of readiness, only 22 percent feel completely prepared for the Next Accreditation System milestones, and only 23 percent are completely satisfied with their planned approach for compliance. Seventy-five percent of programs claim to be using some form of electronic tracking system. Programs plan to use multiple tools to capture and report milestone data. Most programs (44.4 percent) plan to administer evaluations at the end of each rotation. Over 70 percent of respondents believe that the milestones approach would improve the quality of resident training. However, programs were less than confident that their current compliance systems would live up to their full potential., Conclusions: The Next Accreditation System has been implemented nationwide for plastic surgery training programs. Milestone-based resident training is a new paradigm for residency training evaluation; programs are in the process of making this transition to find ways to make milestone data meaningful for faculty and residents.

Background: Patients increasingly rely on Internet resources for medical information. Well-informed patients are more likely to be active participants in their health care, contributing to higher satisfaction and better overall outcomes. Access to online patient material, however, can be limited by inadequate functional health literacy. The National Institutes of Health and the American Medical Association recommend that educational content be written at a sixth-grade reading level. This study aims to assess the readability of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery., Methods: A Web search for "breast implant surgery" was performed using the largest public search engine. After sponsored results were excluded, the 12 most accessed sites were identified. Patient-directed information from all relevant articles immediately linked from the main site was downloaded and formatted into plain text. The readability of 110 articles was evaluated using 10 established analyses, both overall and by Web site., Results: The overall average readability of the 12 most popular Internet resources for breast augmentation was at a thirteenth-grade reading level (Coleman-Liau, 13.4; Flesch-Kincaid, 12.7; FORCAST, 11.3; Fry, 13; New Dale-Chall, 12.9; New Gunning Fog, 13.8; Raygor Estimate, 15; and Simple Mesaure of Gobbledygook Formula, 14.3). The Flesch Reading Ease index was 41, which falls into a "difficult" reading category. No individual article or Web site was at the recommended sixth-grade level., Conclusions: Online resources for breast augmentation are above recommended reading levels. This may potentially serve as a barrier to patients seeking this type of surgery. Plastic surgeons should be aware of potential gaps in understanding and direct patients toward more appropriate resources.

Background: Facial fractures are commonly encountered scenarios for surgeons in the emergency room. The aim of this study was to assess epidemiology and complication rates of facial fractures and the impact of surgical specialty on facial fracture repair using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database., Methods: The authors performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the 2005 to 2011 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients undergoing facial fracture repair. Demographic data, postoperative complications, comparison between single and multiple facial fractures, and surgical specialty were accessed. Chi-square tests or Fisher's exact test were used for comparing categorical variables and t tests for continuous variables., Results: A total of 1170 patients were analyzed. The mean age was 38.7 ± 17.0, and the male-to-female ratio was 3.72:1. The most prevalent facial fracture was mandibular fracture in the single-fracture group and zygomatic fracture in the multiple-fracture group. Mandibular fractures were more prevalent in males and orbital fractures in females. Wound complication, morbidity, and mortality rates were 1.8, 1.3, and 0.1 percent, respectively. Multiple facial fractures and orbital fractures were more frequently treated by plastic surgeons among all surgeons., Conclusions: Epidemiologic analysis of facial fractures identifies the most affected patient populations and the characteristics of their fractures. Comparison of complication rates and surgical specialty may permit broad insight into how patients are currently managed., Clinical Question/level of Evidence: Therapeutic, III.

Objective: To estimate the effect of prescription drug insurance on health, as measured by self-reported poor health status, functional disability, and hospitalization among the elderly., Data: Analyses are based on a nationally representative sample of noninstitutionalized elderly (≥65 years of age) from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) for years 1992-2000., Study Design: Estimates are obtained using multivariable regression models that control for observed characteristics and unmeasured person-specific effects (i.e., fixed effects)., Principal Findings: In general, prescription drug insurance was not associated with significant changes in self-reported health, functional disability, and hospitalization. The lone exception was for prescription drug coverage obtained through a Medicare HMO. In this case, prescription drug insurance decreased functional disability slightly. Among those elderly with chronic illness and older (71 years or more) elderly, prescription drug insurance was associated with slightly improved functional disability., Conclusions: Findings suggest that prescription drug coverage had little effect on health or hospitalization for the general population of elderly, but may have some health benefits for chronically ill or older elderly., (© Health Research and Educational Trust.)

Background: The shortage of organ donors for kidney transplants has made the expansion of the kidney donor pool a clinically significant issue. Previous studies suggest that kidneys from donors with a history of intravenous (IV) drug, cigarette, and/or alcohol use are considered to be a risky choice. However, these kidneys could potentially be used and expand the kidney supply pool if no evidence shows their association with adverse transplant outcomes., Methods: This study analyzed the United Network for Organ Sharing dataset from 1994 to 1999 using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox modeling. The effects on transplant outcome (graft and recipient survival) were examined with respect to the donors' IV drug use, cigarette smoking, and alcohol dependency. Covariates including the recipient variables, the donor variables, and the transplant procedure variables were included in the Cox models., Results: The results show that the donors' history of cigarette smoking is a statistically significant risk factor for both graft survival (hazard ratio=1.05, P<0.05) and recipient survival (1.06, P<0.05), whereas neither IV drug use nor alcohol dependency had significant adverse impact on graft or recipient survival., Conclusions: Assuming that adequate testing for potential infections is performed, there is no evidence to support avoiding the kidneys from donors with IV drug use or alcohol dependency in transplantation. Utilizing these kidneys would clearly expand the potential pool of donor organs.

Objectives: The Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Nursing Home Version (NPI-NH) was used to study the impact of rivastigmine (Exelon; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ), on occupational disruptiveness (OD), a proxy measure for professional caregiver burden., Methods: The study was a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm trial with NH residents prescribed rivastigmine (up to 6 mg bid) for Alzheimer's disease (AD) treatment. The NPI-NH was completed by NH staff caregivers at time of initiation of treatment with rivastigmine (T1), at treatment weeks 10 to 14 (T2), at treatment weeks 24 to 28 (T3), and at treatment weeks 50 to 54 (T4)., Results: Observations ranged from 173 at baseline to 73 at week 52. All but one patient had either moderate or severe dementia. Total OD score means were 4.7 +/- 6.1, 3.9 +/- 5.0, 4.19 +/- 5.6, and 2.79 +/- 2.8 at baseline, and weeks 12, 26, and 52 (T1-T4), respectively, with significant difference found between T1 and T4. Except for euphoria and disinhibition at T3 and T4, all correlations between OD scores and the domain scores of the NPI, were significant. Rivastigmine dose was an independent variable that affected OD change., Conclusion: Treatment with rivastigmine was associated with a reduction in the self-reported professional caregiver burden, as assessed by the NPI-NH OD scale.