Search

Background: Labor dystocia has been identified as a contributor to the rising cesarean delivery rate in the United States. Allowing more time for vaginal delivery, while being cognizant of maternal and neonatal outcomes, has been identified as a possible strategy to lower cesarean delivery rates., Objective: This study aimed to characterize the relationship between the duration of active phase and second-stage labor and maternal and neonatal morbidity., Study Design: We present a secondary analysis of the Consortium on Safe Labor project. From labors of 66,940 nonanomalous nulliparous term singleton vertex gestations, we excluded labors for which active phase (≥6 cm dilation) or second stage durations could not be calculated and from sites that did not report determinants of morbidity. For each duration of active phase or second stage labor (grouped in 1-hour increments), the adjusted maternal and neonatal composite morbidity was estimated by and compared with the morbidity associated with a duration <1 hour total and a duration of 1 hour shorter., Results: After exclusions, 48,144 deliveries remained. In adjusted models, compared with labor durations <1 hour total, maternal composite morbidity was significantly higher across active phase and second stage durations (both P<.001); neonatal composite morbidity was higher across the second stage (P<.001), but not active phase (P=.07) duration. These relationships appear linear with no apparent inflection point, and morbidity increases more rapidly. When compared with labor durations 1 hour shorter, significant differences persisted in maternal and neonatal composite morbidity in second stage labor only through 4 and 3 hours, respectively., Conclusion: Maternal and neonatal composite morbidity is greater with longer durations of active and second stage labor; however, no clear cutoff point was determined to suggest truncation of either stage of labor for reasons of morbidity. In addition, incrementally higher morbidities that were noted vs duration <1 hour total were obscured when comparison was made with labors 1 hour shorter, which suggests that focusing on short differences in duration of labor may mask important underlying trends., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The objective of the study was to examine differences in labor patterns in a modern cohort compared with the 1960s in the United States. Study Design: Data from pregnancies at term, in spontaneous labor, with cephalic, singleton fetuses were compared between the Collaborative Perinatal Project (CPP, n = 39,491 delivering 1959-1966) and the Consortium on Safe Labor (CSL; n = 98,359 delivering 2002-2008). Results: Compared with the CPP, women in the CSL were older (26.8 ± 6.0 vs 24.1 ± 6.0 years), heavier (body mass index 29.9 ± 5.0 vs 26.3 ± 4.1 kg/m2), had higher epidural (55% vs 4%) and oxytocin use (31% vs 12%), and cesarean delivery (12% vs 3%). First stage of labor in the CSL was longer by a median of 2.6 hours in nulliparas and 2.0 hours in multiparas, even after adjusting for maternal and pregnancy characteristics, suggesting that the prolonged labor is mostly due to changes in practice patterns. Conclusion: Labor is longer in the modern obstetrical cohort. The benefit of extensive interventions needs further evaluation. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]