Search

Introduction: Compared with hemiarthroplasty (HA), reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) may provide greater cost and health-related benefits for patients with complex three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures. This study set out to compare RTSA versus HA for the incremental cost per incremental improvement in quality adjusted life years (QALYs) for a hypothetical cohort of patients with proximal humerus fractures., Methods: Parameters and characteristics for a hypothetical cohort of elderly patients with proximal humerus fractures were collected through the literature. A cohort-level Markov decision model was constructed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios representing the difference in cost divided by the difference in QALYs were calculated, and scenario, one-way, and probabilistic analysis were conducted., Results: RTSA was associated with lower cost and greater effectiveness compared with HA. The predicted cost difference corresponded to a saving of $99,626 per 100 individuals treated, and the predicted difference in QALY was 16.8 per 100 individuals treated. Results were sensitive to the discount rate, the health-related quality of life assigned to health states, and the cost of the surgical procedures. In probabilistic analysis, 77.1% of iterations were cost-effective at a threshold willingness-to-pay for a QALY of $100,000 US dollars., Discussion: Findings suggest that RTSA may be a cost-effective alternative to HA for treating elderly patients requiring surgery for proximal humerus fractures., Data Availability: The model and corresponding code are available on request to the corresponding author., Level of Evidence Using the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Guidance: Level III., (Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.)

Little is known about the epidemiology of orthopaedic conditions among the uninsured. This is a descriptive study of 107 patients presenting with 140 orthopaedic conditions for care at the student-run free clinic, the Shade Tree Clinic. Patients were 50.0 (± 13.0) years old with a BMI of 32.9 (± 8.60). About half were female (58.9%), of Spanish origin/Hispanic or Latino descent (50.9%), immigrants (48.3%), and non-English speaking (44.9%). Most presented with chronic (75.5%) conditions of the knee (24.3%), hand (16.4%) and spine (13.6%). While knee osteoarthritis was the most common diagnosis made (18.7%), there were 38 (35.5%) unique diagnoses with only a single occurrence. Most conditions were initially treated nonoperatively (82.9%). There was an average of 1.92 (± 1.44) visits per condition, and 74.0% of conditions had reported improvement or resolution. Though further study is needed, providing free comprehensive patient-centered orthopaedic care to uninsured individuals in a low-cost setting may prove cost-effective. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 29(2):112-116, 2020).

Objectives: To provide students at our own institution with more accurate and granular data regarding the costs associated with applying for residency., Methods: We created an electronic survey with >28 different fields delineating the costs associated with applying for residency. Demographic data, costs broken down by type of expenditure, and how these costs were financed were measured. Each year, graduating students at our institution took the survey in 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 before The Match. We then created a dynamic, user-friendly, and interactive Web-based application to display these data numerically and graphically for students to use while planning and preparing for The Match., Results: There was a response rate of 48.9% (194/397). Overall, students completed an away rotation at a median of 1.0 (interquartile range [IQR] 0-2.0) programs and spent $1000 (IQR $292-$1606) per away rotation. They applied to a median of 30.0 (IQR 20.0-47.8) categorical programs and attended 12.0 (IQR 10.0-16.0) interviews. The cost per interview was $282 (IQR $192-$407). The total expenditures for preparing for residency were $4992 (IQR $3034-$8,274). These numbers varied significantly by intended specialty. Differences were noted between our data and those from both a regional and recent national cohort., Conclusions: The costs associated with applying for residency are relatively unknown and can be significant for some. Institutionally led efforts may allow students to more appropriately plan and budget for The Match. Other institutions may benefit from a similar program.